[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The Official 2005 NO THANKS CLUB
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 7 of 10 « First‹ Previous 5  6  7  8  9 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
7/3/2007  9:47 AM
I don't want to say it's easy being a gm, but if every fan can put together a list of cancer players to stay away from, and players that aren't worth the risk.

Curry
Zach
Jalen Rose
Steve Francis
Jerome James
Tim Thomas
Mo Taylor

Would be on just about every list, it is downwright scary the lack of vision this man possessess
AUTOADVERT
knicksbabyyeah
Posts: 21472
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 8/19/2001
Member: #100
Netherlands
7/4/2007  10:41 AM
Don't forget Greg Ostertag's "comeback", just say NO!!!
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
7/4/2007  10:51 AM
We're lucky we got Curry at the price paid.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/4/2007  11:07 AM
Yeah, I thought we should have given up at least four lottery picks for our 2 way stud center

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 07-04-2007 11:08 AM]
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
7/4/2007  11:09 AM
The only problem with what was given up is the risk that they would have had to have given up Oden. That was dumb.

That aside, it turned out well.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/4/2007  12:44 PM
I disagree with your assumption but do you not think that if we had a well-run organization with our draft pick, we would have let Marbury sit and let the kids play more and probably would have had around the 5th or 6th slot and had a very good chance at Oden or Durant?
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/5/2007  1:47 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:

if we had a well-run organization

i wonder what that feels like.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569
7/5/2007  2:10 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:

I disagree with your assumption but do you not think that if we had a well-run organization with our draft pick, we would have let Marbury sit and let the kids play more and probably would have had around the 5th or 6th slot and had a very good chance at Oden or Durant?

Whats a very good shot at Oden or Durrant? Like Boston had? Or like Memphis had?

How well did those very good shots work out?
Bobby
Posts: 22094
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/18/2003
Member: #408
USA
7/5/2007  2:33 AM
dj....your 2005 no thanks list has exposed your true identity. you now join a select group of true knick fans aka the anti-knicks.

please continue to enlighten us....you are, of course, in control of the horizontal and the vertical
"Like they always say, New York is the Mecca of basketball,"I read that in Michael Jordan books my whole life and I played here in the Big East tournament, so it's always fun to play in the Mecca of basketball."---Rip Hamilton
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/5/2007  8:01 AM
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by Bonn1997:

I disagree with your assumption but do you not think that if we had a well-run organization with our draft pick, we would have let Marbury sit and let the kids play more and probably would have had around the 5th or 6th slot and had a very good chance at Oden or Durant?

Whats a very good shot at Oden or Durrant? Like Boston had? Or like Memphis had?

How well did those very good shots work out?
See bold. We wouldn't have been bad enough to end up where Boston or Memphis was.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/5/2007  8:15 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by Bonn1997:

I disagree with your assumption but do you not think that if we had a well-run organization with our draft pick, we would have let Marbury sit and let the kids play more and probably would have had around the 5th or 6th slot and had a very good chance at Oden or Durant?

Whats a very good shot at Oden or Durrant? Like Boston had? Or like Memphis had?

How well did those very good shots work out?
See bold. We wouldn't have been bad enough to end up where Boston or Memphis was.

Oh, I meant 5th or 6th slot in the draft lottery. Maybe you didn't know what I meant by that. Otherwise, I can't understand your post.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 07-05-2007 08:15 AM]
Panos
Posts: 30549
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
7/5/2007  9:39 AM
DJ - please update your list with non-Knick players so that we know who will be on the team in 2 years. Thanks...
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/5/2007  9:59 AM
Posted by Panos:

DJ - please update your list with non-Knick players so that we know who will be on the team in 2 years. Thanks...

i'm going to have to make a list of guys like "kobe, ok4, dwight, lebron, melo, and durant" - that way, at least 3 of them will be knicks.
Panos
Posts: 30549
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
7/5/2007  9:59 AM
SWEET!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/5/2007  10:07 AM
if we do an updated list, can we add Rashard Lewis to the list? there's no way he's worth that max contract he's going to sign w/ORL... guess that means he's got a good shot of ending up here next season
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569
7/5/2007  11:53 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by Bonn1997:

I disagree with your assumption but do you not think that if we had a well-run organization with our draft pick, we would have let Marbury sit and let the kids play more and probably would have had around the 5th or 6th slot and had a very good chance at Oden or Durant?

Whats a very good shot at Oden or Durrant? Like Boston had? Or like Memphis had?

How well did those very good shots work out?
See bold. We wouldn't have been bad enough to end up where Boston or Memphis was.

Oh, I meant 5th or 6th slot in the draft lottery. Maybe you didn't know what I meant by that. Otherwise, I can't understand your post.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 07-05-2007 08:15 AM]

So we would have targeted the 5th or 6th slot in order to get Oden/Durant. Not tried for the 1st or second slot? Sure that sounds reasonable.

So lets take out flukes in this years draft slotting which cant be counted on and look at what happened with the 5th and 6th picks

Boston trades the 5th pick for a 32 year old highly paid Ray Allen
Milwaukee takes a skinny far from ready YI who doesnt even want to play for them.

How is that better than a 24 year old center that led the NBA in points in the paint?

[Edited by - COSSUCKS on 07-05-2007 11:54 AM]
Panos
Posts: 30549
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
7/5/2007  11:58 AM
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by Bonn1997:

I disagree with your assumption but do you not think that if we had a well-run organization with our draft pick, we would have let Marbury sit and let the kids play more and probably would have had around the 5th or 6th slot and had a very good chance at Oden or Durant?

Whats a very good shot at Oden or Durrant? Like Boston had? Or like Memphis had?

How well did those very good shots work out?
See bold. We wouldn't have been bad enough to end up where Boston or Memphis was.

Oh, I meant 5th or 6th slot in the draft lottery. Maybe you didn't know what I meant by that. Otherwise, I can't understand your post.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 07-05-2007 08:15 AM]

So we would have targeted the 5th or 6th slot in order to get Oden/Durant. Not tried for the 1st or second slot? Sure that sounds reasonable.

So lets take out flukes in this years draft slotting which cant be counted on and look at what happened with the 5th and 6th picks

Boston trades the 5th pick for a 32 year old highly paid Ray Allen
Milwaukee takes a skinny far from ready YI who doesnt even want to play for them.

How is that better than a 24 year old center that led the NBA in points in the paint?

[Edited by - COSSUCKS on 07-05-2007 11:54 AM]


It is not infrequent that the top pick goes to a team that is not the worst in the league.
Check the numbers.


[Edited by - panos on 05-07-2007 1:00 PM]
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/5/2007  12:24 PM
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by Bonn1997:

I disagree with your assumption but do you not think that if we had a well-run organization with our draft pick, we would have let Marbury sit and let the kids play more and probably would have had around the 5th or 6th slot and had a very good chance at Oden or Durant?

Whats a very good shot at Oden or Durrant? Like Boston had? Or like Memphis had?

How well did those very good shots work out?
See bold. We wouldn't have been bad enough to end up where Boston or Memphis was.

Oh, I meant 5th or 6th slot in the draft lottery. Maybe you didn't know what I meant by that. Otherwise, I can't understand your post.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 07-05-2007 08:15 AM]

So we would have targeted the 5th or 6th slot in order to get Oden/Durant. Not tried for the 1st or second slot? Sure that sounds reasonable.

So lets take out flukes in this years draft slotting which cant be counted on and look at what happened with the 5th and 6th picks

Boston trades the 5th pick for a 32 year old highly paid Ray Allen
Milwaukee takes a skinny far from ready YI who doesnt even want to play for them.

How is that better than a 24 year old center that led the NBA in points in the paint?

[Edited by - COSSUCKS on 07-05-2007 11:54 AM]

Targeted the 5th or 6th slot? No, don't be silly.
Had a very good shot of landing the 5th or 6th shot? Yes.
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569
7/5/2007  1:39 PM
Posted by Panos:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by Bonn1997:

I disagree with your assumption but do you not think that if we had a well-run organization with our draft pick, we would have let Marbury sit and let the kids play more and probably would have had around the 5th or 6th slot and had a very good chance at Oden or Durant?

Whats a very good shot at Oden or Durrant? Like Boston had? Or like Memphis had?

How well did those very good shots work out?
See bold. We wouldn't have been bad enough to end up where Boston or Memphis was.

Oh, I meant 5th or 6th slot in the draft lottery. Maybe you didn't know what I meant by that. Otherwise, I can't understand your post.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 07-05-2007 08:15 AM]

So we would have targeted the 5th or 6th slot in order to get Oden/Durant. Not tried for the 1st or second slot? Sure that sounds reasonable.

So lets take out flukes in this years draft slotting which cant be counted on and look at what happened with the 5th and 6th picks

Boston trades the 5th pick for a 32 year old highly paid Ray Allen
Milwaukee takes a skinny far from ready YI who doesnt even want to play for them.

How is that better than a 24 year old center that led the NBA in points in the paint?

[Edited by - COSSUCKS on 07-05-2007 11:54 AM]


It is not infrequent that the top pick goes to a team that is not the worst in the league.
Check the numbers.


[Edited by - panos on 05-07-2007 1:00 PM]

You are right. The problem is the odds are about 75 to 1 unless you get to have every single slot in the draft that isnt #1 or #2
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569
7/5/2007  1:40 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by COSSUCKS:
Posted by Bonn1997:

I disagree with your assumption but do you not think that if we had a well-run organization with our draft pick, we would have let Marbury sit and let the kids play more and probably would have had around the 5th or 6th slot and had a very good chance at Oden or Durant?

Whats a very good shot at Oden or Durrant? Like Boston had? Or like Memphis had?

How well did those very good shots work out?
See bold. We wouldn't have been bad enough to end up where Boston or Memphis was.

Oh, I meant 5th or 6th slot in the draft lottery. Maybe you didn't know what I meant by that. Otherwise, I can't understand your post.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 07-05-2007 08:15 AM]

So we would have targeted the 5th or 6th slot in order to get Oden/Durant. Not tried for the 1st or second slot? Sure that sounds reasonable.

So lets take out flukes in this years draft slotting which cant be counted on and look at what happened with the 5th and 6th picks

Boston trades the 5th pick for a 32 year old highly paid Ray Allen
Milwaukee takes a skinny far from ready YI who doesnt even want to play for them.

How is that better than a 24 year old center that led the NBA in points in the paint?

[Edited by - COSSUCKS on 07-05-2007 11:54 AM]

Targeted the 5th or 6th slot? No, don't be silly.
Had a very good shot of landing the 5th or 6th shot? Yes.

OK we have the 6th slot and odds are we draft #6.
Now what? There is no player at #6 that is more dominant than a 24 year old Curry
Page 7 of 10 « First‹ Previous 5  6  7  8  9 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
The Official 2005 NO THANKS CLUB
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy