[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks are most aggressive Collin Sexton suitor according to Shams
Author Thread
Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239

7/14/2021  2:05 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/14/2021  2:06 PM
TheGame wrote:
Knixkik wrote:One underrated advantage to trading for Sexton now is you can hold off on an extension and basically have this summer and next summer (with his cap hold) to improve the team prior to an extension. You basically get a major piece without sacrificing significant cap space right away. I am of the opinion that with Mitch, randle, and eventually Barrett extensions coming, cap space will need to be used over the next 2 summers or it will be gone regardless.

You make a good point but is Sexton really that much better than Rose. If we can resign Rose for $13-$14 million, then you have IQ, we can move up in the draft for a PG, and we have Luca who is a 24 year old in prime with a few years of professional experience. You do that and you still have Obi to use in a future trade. If Sexton was a better defender, then maybe but you make this trade then you are locking yourself into paying Sexton the max or close to the max at some point and I don’t know that he is ever going to be that guy.

Derrick Rose is a soon to be 33 year old with a history of injuries who needs to operate on a minutes restriction. That alone puts Sexton ahead of Rose.
AUTOADVERT
martin
Posts: 76105
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/14/2021  2:11 PM
TPercy wrote:
martin wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Not sure where people think we're getting young players who can shoot, drive, pass, defend at a high level, score but are unselfish, aren't undersized, fit perfectly with the rest of our players, have no injury issues and will sign for a good contract and will also either be unrestricted free agents so you don't have to give up any assets, or can be traded for without giving up major assets. Oh and can also be found in the next 2 offseason before we lose our cap space. Good luck!

One more offseason: Brunson and LaVine. Took me all of 2 seconds to come up with that list.


Brunson is undersized and is nowhere near as good as Sexton while being 2+ yrs older. Lavine is a good shout but Bulls are going to try and max extend him this off season no?

IDK, what are we comparing? High usage rates or running a team and playing defense while making others around you better? Brunson is young by all standards unless you want to fiddle between the difference of having a 22 year old versus 24 going on 25 year old on your team, that's a wash for me.

Maybe there is some untapped version of a PG in Sexton but can you survive having a high usage PG that plays with Randle and RJ? I want to compliment and enhance them not disrupt what they do

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Nalod
Posts: 71102
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/14/2021  2:12 PM
TheGame wrote:
Knixkik wrote:One underrated advantage to trading for Sexton now is you can hold off on an extension and basically have this summer and next summer (with his cap hold) to improve the team prior to an extension. You basically get a major piece without sacrificing significant cap space right away. I am of the opinion that with Mitch, randle, and eventually Barrett extensions coming, cap space will need to be used over the next 2 summers or it will be gone regardless.

You make a good point but is Sexton really that much better than Rose. If we can resign Rose for $13-$14 million, then you have IQ, we can move up in the draft for a PG, and we have Luca who is a 24 year old in prime with a few years of professional experience. You do that and you still have Obi to use in a future trade. If Sexton was a better defender, then maybe but you make this trade then you are locking yourself into paying Sexton the max or close to the max at some point and I don’t know that he is ever going to be that guy.

Luca is 25 and might not even make the team. His contract is very team friendly. Its a tryout.
IQ objectively is not super fast, not great defender, and is not that guy yet. He is young and could be. But not certain.
YOu might be right. If Luca and IQ are killing it they are trade fodder for value. Or go a year or two and Sexton could be as well. I like your take and I’m good with it. The energy Obi bought to the court vs. Hawks could be a preview of things to come. If randle can keep his trade value up I’m ok moving him in two years. Lots of ways to develop a team. Have to cut bait from time to time as well.

VDesai
Posts: 42615
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
7/14/2021  2:31 PM
martin wrote:
TPercy wrote:
martin wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Not sure where people think we're getting young players who can shoot, drive, pass, defend at a high level, score but are unselfish, aren't undersized, fit perfectly with the rest of our players, have no injury issues and will sign for a good contract and will also either be unrestricted free agents so you don't have to give up any assets, or can be traded for without giving up major assets. Oh and can also be found in the next 2 offseason before we lose our cap space. Good luck!

One more offseason: Brunson and LaVine. Took me all of 2 seconds to come up with that list.


Brunson is undersized and is nowhere near as good as Sexton while being 2+ yrs older. Lavine is a good shout but Bulls are going to try and max extend him this off season no?

IDK, what are we comparing? High usage rates or running a team and playing defense while making others around you better? Brunson is young by all standards unless you want to fiddle between the difference of having a 22 year old versus 24 going on 25 year old on your team, that's a wash for me.

Maybe there is some untapped version of a PG in Sexton but can you survive having a high usage PG that plays with Randle and RJ? I want to compliment and enhance them not disrupt what they do

This is where I'm hesitating too. Unquestionably a good scorer and a good price, but there's pressure to find the long term fit here and not make a mistake with the assets we have.

martin
Posts: 76105
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
7/14/2021  2:55 PM
For my money I'm still on the 1 year [inflated] deal for a guy like TJ McConnell.

And for those of you that want to only focus on this 3 point shooting numbers please also highlight his rim and mid-range numbers that come from relentlessly attaching a defense while talking about his pesky defense via steals and how he barely ever turns the ball over. Dude has an eFG% of 57% last year while not being a dunker.

For me TJ is like the PG passing version of Rose without any 3pt shooting ability.

Dude barely ever shoots from beyond 16 feet but these are really good numbers


2P 0-3 3-10 10-16 16-3P 3P
.586 .654 .545 .554 .524 .313
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748

7/14/2021  3:00 PM
martin wrote:
TPercy wrote:
martin wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Not sure where people think we're getting young players who can shoot, drive, pass, defend at a high level, score but are unselfish, aren't undersized, fit perfectly with the rest of our players, have no injury issues and will sign for a good contract and will also either be unrestricted free agents so you don't have to give up any assets, or can be traded for without giving up major assets. Oh and can also be found in the next 2 offseason before we lose our cap space. Good luck!

One more offseason: Brunson and LaVine. Took me all of 2 seconds to come up with that list.


Brunson is undersized and is nowhere near as good as Sexton while being 2+ yrs older. Lavine is a good shout but Bulls are going to try and max extend him this off season no?

IDK, what are we comparing? High usage rates or running a team and playing defense while making others around you better? Brunson is young by all standards unless you want to fiddle between the difference of having a 22 year old versus 24 going on 25 year old on your team, that's a wash for me.

Maybe there is some untapped version of a PG in Sexton but can you survive having a high usage PG that plays with Randle and RJ? I want to compliment and enhance them not disrupt what they do

You most definitely can. In fact I thought a guard 1st option is what we've been missing and Sexton is the mold of what we need. We'd probably need another passing guard to complement him but Sexton can get to the rim well, has a very good floater game and is improving at getting to his 3 ball off the dribble. Brunson is a good option but has he shown us hes capable of being a full time PG yet? He's not proven yet. Mind you his AST to USG ratio isn't particularly impressive. Sexton's isn't great, but he knows that and has improved on that part of his game since he's been in the league much like Lavine has.

We need passers but we also need scorers as well. You get him, you slide RJ down to the 3 and put him at the 2 and still try and get a pass first PG. Just putting him in in place of Bullock is a big upgrade.

The Future is Bright!
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
7/14/2021  3:08 PM
All you need to know

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- Collin Sexton is polarizing.

On one hand, Sexton, who won’t turn 23 until January, is one of the league’s premier young scorers.

This past season, a year after being named a Rising Star, he averaged career-bests in points (24.3) and field goal percentage (47.5) while nudging his way into the All-Star conversation. Sexton also made promising strides as a secondary playmaker, averaging 4.4 assists and boosting that to 6.1 during Darius Garland’s late-season injury absence.


Despite silly chatter to the contrary, players with Sexton’s three-level scoring package aren’t easy to find. A list of guys 22 or younger to average more than 24 points while also boasting a true shooting percentage of at least 57 percent shows just 20 names throughout NBA history, including Devin Booker, Kevin Durant, Michael Jordan, Luka Doncic, Trae Young, Zion Williamson, and a cluster of other future Hall-of-Famers and past or current All-Stars. Pretty good company there.

Sexton’s unique burst allows him to blow by defenders and explode to the rim. His improved 3-point shot keeps the defense honest, no longer able to go under screens like early in his career.

The third-year guard is also a relentless worker and feisty competitor. Head coach J.B. Bickerstaff and other teammates have repeatedly called him a “great kid” -- even if Sexton’s playing style can be frustrating at times.


During his rookie season, teammates chirped about whether he knew how to play, wondered why he was getting so many minutes and scoffed at the top-to-bottom organizational support. He’s had four different head coaches and 52 teammates. He’s changed positions to better accommodate Garland, learning to become an away-from-the-ball threat. Been unfairly criticized for things out of his control. Played with crummy teammates and dreadful court spacing. And, yet, through it all Sexton’s not only persevered but he’s progressed as a player, identified his flaws and corrected them each season -- as the No. 1 scoring option with defenses focused on him.


A lesser guy would have broken. He’s the kind of player -- and person -- that’s worth betting on.

On the other hand, Sexton is an outlier.

He’s not a point guard. The Cavaliers front office made that admission a few years ago, using the fifth pick in 2019 on Garland, who members of the organization believe has blossomed into the most promising of the young core and is extension-eligible in 2022. Sexton, an undersized shooting guard, has clear defensive limitations that are even more exposed when paired in the backcourt with Garland -- the two of them together limiting the team’s ceiling. At 6-foot-1 and 190 pounds, Sexton lacks the size, strength and length to bother wings. Even though effort isn’t an issue, he still doesn’t have a great grasp on how to properly navigate screens, leading to breakdowns at the point of attack that often cause the remaining defenders to scramble.


If there are areas to nitpick on offense, it starts with his shot profile. Even the Cavs have stayed in his ear about taking less mid-range jumpers and more 3-pointers. According to Cleaning the Glass, he is in the bottom six percent of guards in 3-point rate. There’s also been plenty of judgment about his tunnel vision, over-dribbling, pick-and-roll reads and passing. His advanced numbers -- PER (Player Efficiency Rating), VORP (Value Over Replacement Player), BPM (Box Plus-Minus), Win Shares -- are unappealing, leading to plenty of questions about whether Sexton makes teams better. His release could be quicker. His handle could tighten. People around the league believe he would best fit on a stable, contending team. His game has been called “ugly.” He probably shouldn’t be the focal point of an offense.


All of that, combined with impending contract extension talks that are unlikely to align in value, has led to Sexton being “very available” this offseason. At this point, it seems to be more than the usual due diligence and market value exploration.

After years of assembling assets and building through the draft, the Cavs are almost at the point where it’s time to place a tangible, monetary value on Sexton, which could limit financial flexibility into the future. This is when mistakes threaten to cripple progress, cost jobs and have a lasting impact. Giving him a rookie-scale max that could reach $168 million over five years is dangerous. Wouldn’t it be easier to let someone else make that decision?

The Cavs still like Sexton and believe in him. Sources say they’ve put a hefty price tag on him, which could make a deal challenging, and The Athletic identified the New York Knicks as the “most aggressive” trade suitor on Tuesday. The New York Post confirmed Sexton as a player on the Knicks’ radar, even saying he would’ve been their draft pick three years ago had Cleveland not nabbed him one slot earlier.


Cleveland and New York have discussed possibilities, sources say, and it’s an obvious potential trade destination. The Knicks are one of many teams monitoring the situation.

A surprising playoff party crasher this past season, the Knicks ranked 22nd in offensive efficiency during the regular season -- and those struggles became their undoing in the postseason, ranking second-last among 16 qualifiers. Sexton would give them a needed shot-creator, someone to take pressure off Most Improved Player Julius Randle, especially with guards Elfrid Payton, Derrick Rose, Frank Ntilikina and Alec Burks headed for free agency.

Sexton is a client of CAA, the agency that Knicks president Leon Rose ran until last season, and is also well-known by former Cavaliers executive Brock Aller, who was in Cleveland when decision-makers fell in love with Sexton following an eye-popping pre-draft workout.


But what kind of package could New York assemble?

The Cavs were smitten with RJ Barrett ahead of the 2019 draft. They even tried trading up a few spots, sources say. Barrett is reportedly not viewed as untouchable, considered a potential trade centerpiece if the Knicks go star hunting. Coming off a strong sophomore season in which the 21-year-old averaged 17.6 points, 5.8 rebounds, and 3.8 assists while hitting 40.1% from 3-point range and started all 72 games, it’s hard to see the Knicks parting with him for Sexton -- and then agreeing to give Sexton a massive contract.


Power forward Obi Toppin, a player Cleveland considered at No. 5 before choosing Isaac Okoro in the draft last November, doesn’t make much sense for a team that already has more than $40 million invested in Larry Nance Jr. and Kevin Love and could be adding Evan Mobley with the third pick in a few weeks. The Knicks do have a pair of 2021 first-rounders (Nos. 19 and 21), but those are sweeteners as opposed to headliners of a deal. So, who else? Reclamation project Knox? Even packaging all three together would give the Cavs essentially a trio of backups for Sexton.

Think about it more and the Knicks don’t make for the ideal trade partner. Unless Barrett is involved, sending Sexton to New York would be Cleveland making a lateral move -- or perhaps taking a step backward.

In a vacuum, other potential landing spots -- Miami, New Orleans, Indiana and the Los Angeles Lakers -- have pitfalls as well. It’s not easy to find teams that need a player with Sexton’s skill set, have the trade assets and would be willing to pay him. Unless, of course, the Sexton deal grows into a bigger blockbuster, stacking him with any combination of Love’s bulky salary, a future draft pick, Taurean Prince’s expiring contract or highly coveted Larry Nance Jr. The Cavs, of course, would prefer to shed Love in a Sexton swap.

https://www.cleveland.com/cavs/2021/07/collin-sexton-trade-a-possibility-for-the-cleveland-cavaliers-its-complicated.html
ES
smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
7/14/2021  4:41 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/14/2021  5:15 PM
martin wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Not sure where people think we're getting young players who can shoot, drive, pass, defend at a high level, score but are unselfish, aren't undersized, fit perfectly with the rest of our players, have no injury issues and will sign for a good contract and will also either be unrestricted free agents so you don't have to give up any assets, or can be traded for without giving up major assets. Oh and can also be found in the next 2 offseason before we lose our cap space. Good luck!

One more offseason: Brunson and LaVine. Took me all of 2 seconds to come up with that list.

You’re missing the point- both of those players come with question marks- is LaVine a good enough defender? Is he a winning player? Will he make it to unrestricted free agency? (Guess we’ll find out soon). Is Brunson a starting calibre player? How much will you have to pay for him? There are no perfect, obtainable players or there, yet people keep advocating we hold out until they are- at some point you need to take a risk.

I’m keen on LaVine, but we need to see if he signs an extension with the bulls, plus he has the same question marks as Sexton. If he doesn’t want to stay with the Bulls, likely we’d have to do a mid season trade with the Bulls likely for a similar package as we are looking at for Sexton AND he has a max salary straight away- at least with Sexton you get a year or two before that has to happen, so you can still add to the team.

technomaster
Posts: 23347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
7/14/2021  5:25 PM
Knixkik wrote:One underrated advantage to trading for Sexton now is you can hold off on an extension and basically have this summer and next summer (with his cap hold) to improve the team prior to an extension. You basically get a major piece without sacrificing significant cap space right away. I am of the opinion that with Mitch, randle, and eventually Barrett extensions coming, cap space will need to be used over the next 2 summers or it will be gone regardless.

I agree with this.
There are so many good reasons to trade for Sexton.
He's young, he's already proven the makings of a player that could create his own shot and score some points when plays are broken - he's opportunistic and thinks he can take his man 1-on-1. And he's still on a rookie contract. The only guard (or player) on the Knicks that can give the Knicks the things that Sexton does is Rose.

What he's not:
Definitely not a polished floor general, at this phase of his career. He won't necessarily make his teammates better, certainly not the way a polished general might (CP3 or Lowry). But I don't know of any young up-and-coming PGs really do that.
There are those that doubt he's really a PG and say he's small for a SG. Everyone wants a redo of the Ntilikina draft and wishes we picked Donovan Mitchell, who is also 6'1" and isn't exactly a PG or SG. Yet we all think he's awesome.


So with all that said, he has value given that he's already a 20ppg type scorer. Given his cap-friendly contract, I'd assume Cleveland would probably want to use this trade to dump Olympian Kevin Love's contract - they could use that money to sign Jarrett "the Fro" Allen to a long term deal.

I can see a base trade of Obi/a couple of 1st rounders for Sexton/Love. Love hasn't been healthy for a few years now and he ruined my fantasy team last season, but if we can install him as a 3pt shooter and limit his minutes to keep his calves/achilles in order, he could still be a valuable perimeter shooting big man, something we didn't have last season. We can also rationalize veteran/championship experience.
Sexton would definitely make the Knicks better, though he'd need to continue to improve his defense a bit to really raise us to championship level.


I see Dame or CP3 as a whole nother stratosphere of acquisition, but those guys would need to really want to force their way to the Knicks.

“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
7/14/2021  5:25 PM
smackeddog wrote:
martin wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Not sure where people think we're getting young players who can shoot, drive, pass, defend at a high level, score but are unselfish, aren't undersized, fit perfectly with the rest of our players, have no injury issues and will sign for a good contract and will also either be unrestricted free agents so you don't have to give up any assets, or can be traded for without giving up major assets. Oh and can also be found in the next 2 offseason before we lose our cap space. Good luck!

One more offseason: Brunson and LaVine. Took me all of 2 seconds to come up with that list.

You’re missing the point- both of those players come with question marks- is LaVine a good enough defender? Is he a winning player? Will he make it to unrestricted free agency? (Guess we’ll find out soon). Is Brunson a starting calibre player? How much will you have to pay for him? There are no perfect, obtainable players or there, yet people keep advocating we hold out until they are- at some point you need to take a risk.

I’m keen on LaVine, but we need to see if he signs an extension with the bulls, plus he has the same question marks as Sexton. If he doesn’t want to stay with the Bulls, likely we’d have to do a mid season trade with the Bulls likely for a similar package as we are looking at for Sexton AND he has a max salary straight away- at least with Sexton you get a year or two before that has to happen, so you can still add to the team.

that is a HUGE part of the appear. Getting Sexton and still having a big chunk of cap space to work with.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
xblvdels3
Posts: 20736
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/31/2020
Member: #8868

7/14/2021  5:46 PM
smackeddog wrote:Not sure where people think we're getting young players who can shoot, drive, pass, defend at a high level, score but are unselfish, aren't undersized, fit perfectly with the rest of our players, have no injury issues and will sign for a good contract and will also either be unrestricted free agents so you don't have to give up any assets, or can be traded for without giving up major assets. Oh and can also be found in the next 2 offseason before we lose our cap space. Good luck!

Good post

Knixkik
Posts: 35423
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
7/14/2021  6:17 PM
martin wrote:
TPercy wrote:
martin wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Not sure where people think we're getting young players who can shoot, drive, pass, defend at a high level, score but are unselfish, aren't undersized, fit perfectly with the rest of our players, have no injury issues and will sign for a good contract and will also either be unrestricted free agents so you don't have to give up any assets, or can be traded for without giving up major assets. Oh and can also be found in the next 2 offseason before we lose our cap space. Good luck!

One more offseason: Brunson and LaVine. Took me all of 2 seconds to come up with that list.


Brunson is undersized and is nowhere near as good as Sexton while being 2+ yrs older. Lavine is a good shout but Bulls are going to try and max extend him this off season no?

IDK, what are we comparing? High usage rates or running a team and playing defense while making others around you better? Brunson is young by all standards unless you want to fiddle between the difference of having a 22 year old versus 24 going on 25 year old on your team, that's a wash for me.

Maybe there is some untapped version of a PG in Sexton but can you survive having a high usage PG that plays with Randle and RJ? I want to compliment and enhance them not disrupt what they do

I agree that Brunson would be great.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39803
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

7/14/2021  9:27 PM
There're also clips breaking down his shot creation and defense.



Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/14/2021  10:08 PM
What I remember about sexton against us was he was a smallish player who got engulfed by our size
RIP Crushalot😞
TripleThreat
Posts: 23106
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/24/2012
Member: #3997

7/14/2021  10:19 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/14/2021  10:23 PM
smackeddog wrote:Not sure where people think we're getting young players who can shoot, drive, pass, defend at a high level, score but are unselfish, aren't undersized, fit perfectly with the rest of our players, have no injury issues and will sign for a good contract and will also either be unrestricted free agents so you don't have to give up any assets, or can be traded for without giving up major assets. Oh and can also be found in the next 2 offseason before we lose our cap space. Good luck!

You try to find those type of players in the draft. The system rewards teams who focus on the draft and draft well.

The salary system also functionally accommodates two max players on the roster at any given time. The question is do you want Sexton to be one of them? Because the natural pathway will be RJ Barrett and Sexton then as the teams two core players moving forward. That's not going to win the Knicks a championship. Which is fine as long as people understand that's the path the team will take if they move in that direction. Not every franchise has a championship as a goal. Some team owners are OK with a product that generates profit and keeps their fans mostly happy.

A draftee will come in and if he works out, he gives you many of his prime years. He is naturally implied to be on a good contract if he breaks out, since his production rate will be exponential to the cost control of the Rookie Scale Exception. The natural pathway to his cost certainty means you will garner his full Bird Rights without being forced into a trade to do it or lock up your cap space for three years with an expensive street free agent. You don't have to give up any major assets in most cases as draft picks are a renewable resource each year.

There is literally no problem you can't fix on any NBA team in any situation, no matter how dire, if you simply keep drafting well. It's the only team building dynamic where that statement is ever true.

Nearly all NBA teams now have fully staffed analytics departments filled with actual quality evaluators. That wasn't always true in the past. Sextons value will sink around the league if he gets to free agency. Sure, there will be some GMs desperate to save their jobs who might try to push for him, but the analytics department is the Stop sign for nearly every franchise now. If you go to Memphis, the owner and GM might talk about lots of things, but both have to look at Rich Cho and ask if the money is going to work or not. Leon Rose has to do the same thing with Brock Aller.

When a player like Sexton passes some of the eye test but not the deep dive analytics test, what that usually means is regression for such a player is like falling off a cliff. Tim Duncan and Steph Curry are types to decline in controlled stages. If Sexton loses a step ( to be fair, he's very explosive), he's in big trouble. In the middle of a five year max, that's a tough pill to swallow. The idea that there will be waves of teams begging to pick up Sexton for the max/heavy offer sheet is probably not the reality of the situation. Low BBIQ players do not magically turn into average or high BBIQ players. They just don't. It doesn't work that way. Some pundits will project Sexton is going to make another leap, but that's not very likely. Size and smarts are functional speed bumps that don't move very often.

Could the Knicks manage three max deals at once? Yes, the system allows it. But it's very difficult to maneuver and often it saps you of functional depth. Sweeping changes, over time, to the sign and trade, mid level exception, rookie scale, rules for defenders, how the league handles it's refs and devaluation of the big man position has created a salary bottleneck at the wing position. That ripples any team that wants to contend eventually into the repeater tax zone. The Knicks are a cash rich team, but when you lose cap flexibility ( as three maxes naturally implies), you are crushed eventually by the league salary structure in place.

The longer the Knicks wait, the cheaper the cost to acquire Sexton becomes.

TripleThreat
Posts: 23106
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/24/2012
Member: #3997

7/14/2021  10:28 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/14/2021  10:30 PM
TPercy wrote:If the cost is that Obi Knox and a pick then this shouldn't even be a question. I was prepared to give up 2 firsts, a 2nd, a pick swap, and Love's contract. We need efficient scoring bad and this guy solves it while having so much room to improve as a 22 year old. Grab him, grab lonzo and bet on Lonzo(23), Sexton(22), RJ(21), Randle(26), and *Mitch(23)* as your core going forward while still being net positive in picks. Once their training is complete 2-3 years from now we could be looking at a championship team or at the very least a team that will always push playoffs.


The path you want to take is impulsive. Understandable as the Knicks have suffered a long time, but still impulsive.

Arnold Rothstein is right. Sometimes you have to have periods of doing nothing. Then you strike. Now is not the time to strike on Sexton.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39803
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

7/14/2021  11:13 PM
BRIGGS wrote:What I remember about sexton against us was he was a smallish player who got engulfed by our size

He had to take on shooting guards because Garland couldn't. By all accounts his ball IQ on the defensive side is low too.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
gradyandrew
Posts: 22403
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/19/2021
Member: #8959

7/15/2021  1:27 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/15/2021  1:45 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:What I remember about sexton against us was he was a smallish player who got engulfed by our size

He had to take on shooting guards because Garland couldn't. By all accounts his ball IQ on the defensive side is low too.

I watched the second half and double overtimes of his 42 point game against Brooklyn to get a feel for his game. Lots to like.

Defense Strong shoulders and long arms and hands make him a pesky defender. He gets his hand on the ball a lot for steals and deflections. Cavs we're a poor defensive team so the players didn't rotate much. There wasn't much to see about his help defense, But He was able to keep his Man in front of him. He played spurts on each of the big 3 and was able to hold his own. He has a very wide stance when on the ball and is quick, small, and strong enough to get through screens. His body type is thick enough that he players taller than his height, with some legit Jrue Holiday- level potential.

Offense The thing that sticks out is he hunts efficiency. He will always turn up a good shot for a better one. Looking at his gamelogs you can see big swings in 3's, non 3 FGs, and FTs. He will get the best shot He can. He is a Derrick Rose type- He prefers drives to get space for a mid range jumper. He is not as good a shooter as Rose and has a somewhat unorthodox form. It's a solid jump shot and one he is confident taking from a lot of different spots.
He's an opportunistic 3 pt shooter and will turn one up for a better shot. He shoots better from a dribble. Catch and shoot as well as hitting 3s off the dribble on the break will be the next skills he needs to work on.

Playmaking No ability to manipulate the defense with his dribble to create better shots for his team. He is willing to dish on drives but lacks the perception to make more than the easiest pass, perhaps this is enough for a top ten offense with Mitchell Robinson back. When not involved in the play will often stop moving. He needs the ball to be effective but hasn't figured out what to do if he doesn't shoot.


Fit If Randle, RJ, and Rose are the core, Sexton seems like a good fit. He has a broadly similar game to Rose making play calling and defensive schemes easier. As a starter He immediately has a role- get the ball in transition and put immediate pressure on the defense. If no quick shot give it up to Randle.

With Sextons body type, He could develop a steady pick and roll routine with Randle and Mitch in the dunkers spot. He's strong enough to pick Randles guy and then get open. Randle/ Barrett PnRs don't work because their body type is close enough.

Final Thoughts Many of those 42 points we're scored in the second overtime period when he caught on fire from 3 point land. Before then, he had been reluctant to shoot them. Much earlier it was apparent that he has an offensive ceiling higher than anyone on the team. I was on the fence before but now I feel like this could be a really, really solid Move. We will not find a player like this drafting in the second half.

Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239

7/15/2021  7:40 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/15/2021  10:16 AM
technomaster wrote:I can see a base trade of Obi/a couple of 1st rounders for Sexton/Love. Love hasn't been healthy for a few years now and he ruined my fantasy team last season, but if we can install him as a 3pt shooter and limit his minutes to keep his calves/achilles in order, he could still be a valuable perimeter shooting big man, something we didn't have last season. We can also rationalize veteran/championship experience.
If we have to take on Love's contract then the package we ship to Cleveland needs to be reduced. Love would be a cap liability and is still owed $60M+. I wouldn't be mad at having to add Love to the roster BUT only if it means we get to keep or acquire more assets in the deal. Boston had to give up a mid first round pick to move Kemba.
MS
Posts: 27059
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
7/15/2021  8:15 AM
PG - Sexton
SG - Barrett
SF - Lonzo (3D with ability to create)
PF - Randle
C - Mitch

PG - Rose
SG - Quickly
SF - Draft pick
PF - Gibson

It’s an interesting team. Lonzo shoots it identical to Bullock from three and rebounds and passes better and can still handle the ball. It actually would be helpful to have four guys that can all shoot and put the ball on the floor.

You’re going all in on Sexton and Barrett improving. His contract demands are scary. But you’re going to need a lot of fire power to bring at the Nets.

Knicks are most aggressive Collin Sexton suitor according to Shams

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy