Knicks1969 wrote:bigbasketballs wrote:Since you are doing the criticism, why don't you suggest the rotation. 'EVERYONE should play more and more consistently' is easier said than done.
Show us how it's done.
Jose-15, Afflalo-23, Carmelo-28, KP-20, Lopez-20
Grant-20, Galloway-25, Williams-20, Lance-15, KO-20
As the 11th man:
When energy is needed play Lou.
If low post scoring is lacking play Seraphin.
We do not need to play 13 or 14 players per game; specifically, if the goal is to build a rapport or cohesion within our players. Use the 11 men rotation for 5 games, and make the appropriate changes based on the result.
Please feel free to make adjustments as you all see fit. My goals are to have a well balanced rotation and to compete/win games
Here's your issues.
For one, you don't pay for 31 year old alpha dog $21m to play 28 mins a night. That's not at all realistic or likely wise.
Second of all, you left 33 minutes on the table, which means you just arbitrarily threw out numbers that sounded right to you, but have no quantitative or qualitative value. They're just numbers you made up and didn't even seem to check.
The Knicks have a new roster with frankly considerable question marks as to who deserves PT and how much, not to mention what's the best combination of players.
Consistent minutes is a theory, and it might be a sound one for some rosters, but no theory is one-sized fits all.
The Knicks are about to play their 12th game with again, almost an entirely turned over roster and players have delivered some widely uneven performances, as both their newness to one another and their history as players suggest is not surprising.
I don't see what the fire is.
But making up numbers out of thin air and suggesting the Knicks will play better if Fisher just stuck to the numbers you made up out of thin air is … what it is.
