| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
need to let players who you are really high on go at some point. There are so many reasons that things don't work out from mental health to weight to strength to politics ... life is about opportunities, some don't get em, some just don't make the best of them, some get screwed. Luck is a big part of it too. Don't know how doug collins lives with himself
so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
Finestrg
Posts: 27296 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/1/2006 Member: #1069 |
mreinman wrote:need to let players who you are really high on go at some point. There are so many reasons that things don't work out from mental health to weight to strength to politics ... life is about opportunities, some don't get em, some just don't make the best of them, some get screwed. Luck is a big part of it too. Don't know how doug collins lives with himself When I look at Cole and think about what he did in college, what he did here for us, what he's capable of doing compared to Robin Lopez and how much he makes compared to Robin Lopez (a huge part of it -- we're talking money that could've been spent elsewhere this past offseason or deferred 'til next offseason), I like him better than Robin Lopez. Nothing against Lopez--he's a worker--I just feel he's limited ability-wise and vastly overpaid. |
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:need to let players who you are really high on go at some point. There are so many reasons that things don't work out from mental health to weight to strength to politics ... life is about opportunities, some don't get em, some just don't make the best of them, some get screwed. Luck is a big part of it too. Don't know how doug collins lives with himself Lopez did it at a high level for a really good team. Cole did nothing other than have good spurts. Not sure how you can be so absolute about this without him having proven anything. Robin Lopez plays really good defense, sets excellent screens, scores very efficiently, is a team guy, qb's the defense. You seem like you are not willing to be open minded about changing your stance on him. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
Finestrg
Posts: 27296 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/1/2006 Member: #1069 |
mreinman wrote:Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:need to let players who you are really high on go at some point. There are so many reasons that things don't work out from mental health to weight to strength to politics ... life is about opportunities, some don't get em, some just don't make the best of them, some get screwed. Luck is a big part of it too. Don't know how doug collins lives with himself I don't dislike RoLo and don't discount what you're saying (maybe "scores very efficiently" is a little overstated though, no? And I notice you left out rebounding--he's not a great rebounder at all in my estimation). I just don't like him at the price we got him for AT ALL. Managing a salary cap is crucial in the NBA. I hope I'm wrong about him and that salary of his turns out to be fitting and deserving, not something we'll wind up regretting. I mean even with the cap set to expand, we still won't have room for a max offer, even if we stretched Calderon.. |
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:need to let players who you are really high on go at some point. There are so many reasons that things don't work out from mental health to weight to strength to politics ... life is about opportunities, some don't get em, some just don't make the best of them, some get screwed. Luck is a big part of it too. Don't know how doug collins lives with himself 8.5 boards per 36 is not a bad rebounder. 4 offensive boards per 36 is excellent. I do think the lopez does allow his teammates to get boards. He gets a lot of attention under there. I actually thought that they paid too much for him (and I really like him) but that is with me not understanding the cap well enough. Interesting but I heard an announcer say today that Paul Milsap is much better for a team like Atlanta than Aldridge and I absolutely agree. Its much more than just about compiling stats, its floor impact and we don't have all the data that they have. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
I fail to see how what we paid RoLo is so outside the value for a proven starting C from a playoff team! RoLo was paid fairly compared to comparable C's. It's a JOKE IMO to look at Cole and RoLo and not understand why RoLo got paid and Cole was let go. RoLo isn't sexy or a star but he has shown he can be depended on to give a team a presence inside. This team was in need of an anchor.
RoLo is a more well rounded player. Just watching RoLo you can tell his BB IQ is higher than Cole's. |
|
babyKnicks
Posts: 22486 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/31/2006 Member: #1191 USA |
I'm afraid finestrg has gone mad We should let him fade out gracefully as the posts are getting stranger and stranger. Harking back to college videos to show better than rolo is an obvious cry for help.
Posting 5 paragraph mantras devoid of facts. Even more so. Crying he's seen more than anybody else and seen things we can't imagine. More concerning. He may be shooting up a mall or school campus any second. Step away from the keyboard. Hug yourself and breath. I usually have him ignored, but it's not fool proof when he gets into it with posters I like. A shame. He may have been a sane person one day. Before Cole. Let's go Knicks. That's amare
|
|
blkexec
Posts: 28451 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 9/3/2004 Member: #748 |
On the surface, I can see why people have a hard time with Rolo, especially when you have players like Cole making much less. But it's like any major corporation when they hire employees. They rather hire someone they trust and don't have to micro-manage.....VS.....Cole who might have equal talent, but may not be trusted in pressure situations. I don't think Cole is ready for a starting role on a team with a weak foundation. Maybe if we had a loaded team of allstars at other positions.
But Rolo is that anchor man on the court and off the court, that you can trust. You pay a little extra for those NBA pro guys, that knows their role.....Plus he also showed interest in being here and has family ties to the area, while having patients to see if Monroe was going to take the offer.... Then on top of that, the cap is going up. I see both sides, but I also see Phils thinking when adding Rolo. It really takes a deep basketball mind to understand this logic. On the surface, Rolo is not the guy you pickup in a pickup game at the park, but he can be a championship piece on an NBA team, over a long season.....just with his leadership and locker room presences alone. Just wanted to add my two cents..... Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland.
The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
|
|
Finestrg
Posts: 27296 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/1/2006 Member: #1069 |
babyKnicks wrote:I'm afraid finestrg has gone mad We should let him fade out gracefully as the posts are getting stranger and stranger. Harking back to college videos to show better than rolo is an obvious cry for help. You have nothing to worry about. I won't be spending time around here anymore. |
|
blkexec
Posts: 28451 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 9/3/2004 Member: #748 |
nixluva wrote:I fail to see how what we paid RoLo is so outside the value for a proven starting C from a playoff team! RoLo was paid fairly compared to comparable C's. It's a JOKE IMO to look at Cole and RoLo and not understand why RoLo got paid and Cole was let go. RoLo isn't sexy or a star but he has shown he can be depended on to give a team a presence inside. This team was in need of an anchor. Rolo is needed for rookie coaches. He can be that extension of a coach on the court. This is what I liked about Kidd and all those vets we had like Rasheed and camby. Sometimes it doesn't always workout as planned. But Jose Calderon is another example. you saw last game he stepped up when the media was criticizing him.....he didn't hide and just fall to the negativity. That's a learning lesson for our young guards. Also how he spoke about winning and it's all about the team. That's the leadership Phil needs from these vets. And that's why they are playing a major role right now. Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland.
The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
|
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:need to let players who you are really high on go at some point. There are so many reasons that things don't work out from mental health to weight to strength to politics ... life is about opportunities, some don't get em, some just don't make the best of them, some get screwed. Luck is a big part of it too. Don't know how doug collins lives with himself The only way his contract is bad is that we don't have a team option for the 4th year. As mentioned earlier...we have complete control of him for the rest of his prime years, so Phil has some flexibility based on how things play out...especially KPs progress as a potential center. Not sure who is available at the 5 position next year, but salaries will be inflated when the cap explodes, and what we gave Lopez should look like a pretty good deal. Lopez is not a great player in any specific category, but he does a number of things you want from a big man, and is willing to mix it up down low. You also get a guy who seems to be a good teammate with some leadership ability, and he seems very much at ease with the NY media. I see Lopez as a bridge to the day when KP takes over at the center position. KP will be 24 when Lopez' contract ends. If he matures physically the way I anticipate he will, KP will take over at the 5. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
WaltLongmire wrote:Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:need to let players who you are really high on go at some point. There are so many reasons that things don't work out from mental health to weight to strength to politics ... life is about opportunities, some don't get em, some just don't make the best of them, some get screwed. Luck is a big part of it too. Don't know how doug collins lives with himself You so sure that KP should ever be a 5? Just because of his height? Why can't he just be a taller version of Durant/Dirk/KG? so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
Nalod
Posts: 72120 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
fine,
The thing some miss about NBA players is to extrapolate minutes played as if the performance can continue. By that, think of a game where a guy is doing well and then gets taken out. We win, its all good. If not, "WHY THE PHUCK DID WE TAKE HIM OUT!!!!!!". IM being general here but more times than not the player will get tired and gets sloppy. NBA guys that can go 35 min a game at a high level is max type player and more rare than we think. Cole cannot sustain starter minutes. to take any stats and go "Per 38" is a nice measure but not really applicable. The guy is a 8-10min player MAX. Rolo is less polished that cole but the kid can go 30 min a nite and finish a game. He has proven to be a durable generic type player who has triangle skills. I think KP is off to a good start because RoPez does his job. His rebounding numbers are uneven but from what I have seen he is doing the job. Cavs went to finals largely in part because of Mozgov being a good rim defender and moves well. Ropez can be a starting center for a contending team, but its not on him to be one of the better players on such a team. The intangibles Ropez brings allows KP to do his thing. Monroe is a better offensive weapon but it would be better for him to have a strong 4 next to him that can bang. KP is not that guy. |
|
blkexec
Posts: 28451 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 9/3/2004 Member: #748 |
mreinman wrote:WaltLongmire wrote:Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:need to let players who you are really high on go at some point. There are so many reasons that things don't work out from mental health to weight to strength to politics ... life is about opportunities, some don't get em, some just don't make the best of them, some get screwed. Luck is a big part of it too. Don't know how doug collins lives with himself Right now it looks like KP is a lock at PF or Center. Just like KD can and will always be able to play 2 or 3 positions. I think KP is in the special category of being more than capable of playing multiple positions for the rest of his career. That makes it easier to build around him. Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland.
The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
|
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
blkexec wrote:mreinman wrote:WaltLongmire wrote:Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:need to let players who you are really high on go at some point. There are so many reasons that things don't work out from mental health to weight to strength to politics ... life is about opportunities, some don't get em, some just don't make the best of them, some get screwed. Luck is a big part of it too. Don't know how doug collins lives with himself I guess it all depends on matchups just like Green plays center at times in GS. Who really cares the whole 4 or 5 thing is much less relevant. I don't want him giving away 50 pounds to a big oaf center but on the other hand, that big oaf has no chance at guarding KP so not really an issue. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
mreinman wrote:WaltLongmire wrote:Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:Finestrg wrote:mreinman wrote:need to let players who you are really high on go at some point. There are so many reasons that things don't work out from mental health to weight to strength to politics ... life is about opportunities, some don't get em, some just don't make the best of them, some get screwed. Luck is a big part of it too. Don't know how doug collins lives with himself Not sure of anything, actually. I do think that his greatest impact might be as a defensive player, and he can do more of what he does best at the center position, IMO. Heck...if he is a franchise talent, I don't care where he ends up playing, to be honest. Would still like to see him get some time at the 5, though. My gut feeling is that Phil sees him there at some point, but I'm not even sure that he cares about these designations anyway. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
I think Robin Lopez is a much better fit for this team in terms of building a culture and an identity.
KP and Melo and Afflalo can bring the offense. Lopez has actually been solid bringing offense when needed - I think he'll improve as the season goes on. Monroe just doesn't ever seem to impact the game that much. His defense is non-existent. If you think KP commits a lot of fouls now, he'd be committing even more trying to cover for Monroe. And it's been pointed out that Robin Lopez creates great opportunities for his teammates to get rebounds with his boxing out. Could be an unheralded reason why KP is at 8rpg - way higher than he's ever averaged in his pro career in similar minutes. KP's rebounding rate has doubled in the NBA from his Spanish league stats. I think Robin Lopez is a partial reason why. I'm fine with Lopez over Monroe ¿ △ ?
|
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
crzymdups wrote:I think Robin Lopez is a much better fit for this team in terms of building a culture and an identity. excellent point so here is what phil is thinking ....
|