StarksEwing1 wrote:

Clean wrote:

Clean wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:I wish woodson would let melo rest in another blowout. If we are gonna make a playoff run we need melo's minutes to go down

I would start the rest from 4 min mark of 3rd depending on score. The Knicks are known to blow big leads.

As I say that Cavs go on a 7 to 0 run.

they are also doing too much iso

yellowboy90 wrote:

Dagger wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:Bad stretch.

Wish they would feature THJ more let him get into a flow.

It looks like JR freezes him out. Maybe it's just cause I dislike JR but I see it sometimes

I think you are reaching just a bit.

Probably just my annoyance with JR coloring my perception

StarksEwing1 wrote:

nixluva wrote:I'm happy the team is playing well you people need to relax. We've been playing BUM TEAMS and none of this means Bargs being out is the reason guys are hitting shots last 4 games. Before this some were saying Tyson was the problem when we won while he was out. Come on!

I respect that you are a bigtime Bargs fan and i have nothing against the guy. But most fans agree taht he really wasnt needed especially for 3 picks

You keep saying I'm a big time Bargs fan which you think is cute but when have you ever read me say anything about Bargs before (the trade)? I just like to counter opinions with a balanced response showing the truth as opposed to perceptions. Bargs was not the reason this team was losing. Bargs being out isn't the reason we're winning. The trade for a 28 yr old 7'er wasn't a bad move. Bargs seems like he's more of a C now and he's played best for us at that position. Tyson went down and we won with Bargs at C.

nixluva wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

nixluva wrote:I'm happy the team is playing well you people need to relax. We've been playing BUM TEAMS and none of this means Bargs being out is the reason guys are hitting shots last 4 games. Before this some were saying Tyson was the problem when we won while he was out. Come on!

I respect that you are a bigtime Bargs fan and i have nothing against the guy. But most fans agree taht he really wasnt needed especially for 3 picks

You keep saying I'm a big time Bargs fan which you think is cute but when have you ever read me say anything about Bargs before (the trade)? I just like to counter opinions with a balanced response showing the truth as opposed to perceptions. Bargs was not the reason this team was losing. Bargs being out isn't the reason we're winning. The trade for a 28 yr old 7'er wasn't a bad move. Bargs seems like he's more of a C now and he's played best for us at that position. Tyson went down and we won with Bargs at C.

yellowboy90 wrote:If Bargs was shooting the 3 like he did earlier in his career than yes he would work but its about the cross matches that really hurt teams.

CrushAlot wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

nixluva wrote:I'm happy the team is playing well you people need to relax. We've been playing BUM TEAMS and none of this means Bargs being out is the reason guys are hitting shots last 4 games. Before this some were saying Tyson was the problem when we won while he was out. Come on!

I respect that you are a bigtime Bargs fan and i have nothing against the guy. But most fans agree taht he really wasnt needed especially for 3 picks

I think the Knicks need to play with one big. I think bargs or Tyson fit well. Also a bit tired of hearing about picks in the bargs trade. One compromised first rounder was moved. The 2nd rounder the Knicks got from OKC for brewer will be one of the last picks in the draft. Grunwald got a starter and cap space.

It's a shame that Grunwald lost his job. He actually provided a lot of options for Woodson, but I think Woody made the mistake of just not recognizing soon enough that he should give up his experiment and go back to what the team did best last year. Adding Bargs just gave the team more depth and options. Knicks went 6-1 with Bargs at C and then went on the losing streak when Tyson came back. No one wants to talk about that tho. It's all Bargs fault, rather than Woodson for continuing to force Tyson and Bargs together.

nixluva wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

StarksEwing1 wrote:

nixluva wrote:I'm happy the team is playing well you people need to relax. We've been playing BUM TEAMS and none of this means Bargs being out is the reason guys are hitting shots last 4 games. Before this some were saying Tyson was the problem when we won while he was out. Come on!

I respect that you are a bigtime Bargs fan and i have nothing against the guy. But most fans agree taht he really wasnt needed especially for 3 picks

I think the Knicks need to play with one big. I think bargs or Tyson fit well. Also a bit tired of hearing about picks in the bargs trade. One compromised first rounder was moved. The 2nd rounder the Knicks got from OKC for brewer will be one of the last picks in the draft. Grunwald got a starter and cap space.

It's a shame that Grunwald lost his job. He actually provided a lot of options for Woodson, but I think Woody made the mistake of just not recognizing soon enough that he should give up his experiment and go back to what the team did best last year. Adding Bargs just gave the team more depth and options. Knicks went 6-1 with Bargs at C and then went on the losing streak when Tyson came back. No one wants to talk about that tho. It's all Bargs fault, rather than Woodson for continuing to force Tyson and Bargs together.

Agree. Also they should have been 7-0 if jr didn't mess up. Tyson was horrible on his return and immediately began his finger pointing. Also I agree about grunwald.

yellowboy90 wrote:If Bargs was shooting the 3 like he did earlier in his career then yes he would work but its about the cross matches that really hurt teams.

Just before the injury, Bargs was rounding out his game at the center position. He had about three blocks, was hitting his mid-range jumper consistently, and was driving to the rim with impunity. He does not initiate the offense, it must be done with the help of a PG. When Felton ignores him, he less productive. If we get good PG play, he responds.