[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Does Lakers lack of success so far put things into perspective.
Author Thread
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30155
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
12/3/2012  11:44 PM
3G4G wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
3G4G wrote:As has been stated it shows how important Nash was first and foremost always and forever but second no player no matter what team he plays for is absolved from not giving full effort something Melo admitted he didn't do when D'Antoni was the coach. For this reason among many others he's made it hard for me to support him as a player.

Dwight Howard very similar to Melo in that he derailed Orlando. I loved the fact Orlando kicked their butts yesterday. I'm hoping if Kyrie can get back on the mend soon the Cavs can be every bit the foe for the Heat.

I do not, will not, support players who do things on their terms that in any way sets back a team or becomes a detriment to a team's present and long-term success.

Sorry I have standards

Yet MDA is absolved for admittingly quitting on the Suns, then quitting on the Knicks.

Who absolved him from quitting on this team? He went to mgmt made a request to trade for Deron and it's obvious how things shook down from there. He wasn't extended, somewhat forced to hire a defensive assistant, at odds with star, star at odds with him, the writing was on the wall, he was lame duck, he took the safe route not good.

I said from jump we should have never hired D'Antoni nevertheless it doesn't absolve Melo.

You state who absolved him from quitting in the beggining then go on to paint the picture on how everyone else did him wrong with absolutely no criticism.

He went to mgmt for Deron because he needed a stud PG. Lin started to fall off and wasn't reliable enough and he was running out of time to make it happen for the playoffs. He was forced to hire a defensive assistant because he deosn't teach defense which is one of his flaws as a coach. Again rather then accepting that as a flaw its painted as him being wronged. He was at odds with the roster which spilled over to the star since it put both he and the star in a compromising position.

MDA gets treated like the innocent coach who was treated unfairly, while Melo gets painted as the evil coach killer who ran him out of town. Truth is the roster wasn't set up for MDA to run his style of play so he needed to adapt until he got the pieces in place to do so.

It went for last season Melo as the sole reason to why MDA's offense didn't run smooth last season due to him being an out of shape, selfish, coach killer to Kobe, Gasol, Howard needing Steve Nash to make the offense work.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
AUTOADVERT
FoeDiddy
Posts: 22619
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2008
Member: #2350

12/4/2012  12:28 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:
3G4G wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
3G4G wrote:As has been stated it shows how important Nash was first and foremost always and forever but second no player no matter what team he plays for is absolved from not giving full effort something Melo admitted he didn't do when D'Antoni was the coach. For this reason among many others he's made it hard for me to support him as a player.

Dwight Howard very similar to Melo in that he derailed Orlando. I loved the fact Orlando kicked their butts yesterday. I'm hoping if Kyrie can get back on the mend soon the Cavs can be every bit the foe for the Heat.

I do not, will not, support players who do things on their terms that in any way sets back a team or becomes a detriment to a team's present and long-term success.

Sorry I have standards

Yet MDA is absolved for admittingly quitting on the Suns, then quitting on the Knicks.

Who absolved him from quitting on this team? He went to mgmt made a request to trade for Deron and it's obvious how things shook down from there. He wasn't extended, somewhat forced to hire a defensive assistant, at odds with star, star at odds with him, the writing was on the wall, he was lame duck, he took the safe route not good.

I said from jump we should have never hired D'Antoni nevertheless it doesn't absolve Melo.

You state who absolved him from quitting in the beggining then go on to paint the picture on how everyone else did him wrong with absolutely no criticism.

He went to mgmt for Deron because he needed a stud PG. Lin started to fall off and wasn't reliable enough and he was running out of time to make it happen for the playoffs. He was forced to hire a defensive assistant because he deosn't teach defense which is one of his flaws as a coach. Again rather then accepting that as a flaw its painted as him being wronged. He was at odds with the roster which spilled over to the star since it put both he and the star in a compromising position.

MDA gets treated like the innocent coach who was treated unfairly, while Melo gets painted as the evil coach killer who ran him out of town. Truth is the roster wasn't set up for MDA to run his style of play so he needed to adapt until he got the pieces in place to do so.

It went for last season Melo as the sole reason to why MDA's offense didn't run smooth last season due to him being an out of shape, selfish, coach killer to Kobe, Gasol, Howard needing Steve Nash to make the offense work.

A great coach adapt..did Riley complain when he got to New York and didnt have a All-World PG with a roster full of hall of famers. No he adapted and scrapped showtime and play'd rugged basketball that fit his roster. Saying Dantoni didn't have players for his system is ridiculous. He signed up and knew the roster he was getting and his goal should have been to get the most out of it. No coach out there is afraid of Dantoni out coaching them. He is a bum coach.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/4/2012  1:07 AM
FoeDiddy wrote:A great coach adapt..did Riley complain when he got to New York and didnt have a All-World PG with a roster full of hall of famers. No he adapted and scrapped showtime and play'd rugged basketball that fit his roster. Saying Dantoni didn't have players for his system is ridiculous. He signed up and knew the roster he was getting and his goal should have been to get the most out of it. No coach out there is afraid of Dantoni out coaching them. He is a bum coach.

Why compare MDA to Riley? Look there are only a few great coaches as we tend to refer to them in our recent history. PJax, Riley & Popavich have done the most winning, with the late Chuck Daly in there as well. Overall it's very difficult to win a title in the NBA and you MUST have elite talent to have a chance to do that. NO COACH WINS WITHOUT TALENT. Some are better with less talent and others are better with elite talent and egos.

As for your comments about MDA, I think you should at least accept that MANY NBA coaches had a really tough time dealing with D'Antoni teams when he was kicking their asses with the top offense in the league and 50+ wins a year. Most of the negatives people around here have for MDA come from his time in NY and we've all seen MANY coaches fail to have success here and yet have success in other places. There's more to the problems in NY than the coaches we've had.

It's highly doubtful that the Lakers would be having trouble right now if they had a healthy Nash and Blake and had started the year with MDA in training camp. I think this situation makes it far too easy to kick dirt on MDA's coaching as it was in NY. In time they'll figure things out in LA and then no one around here will have anything to say except to find someone else to give credit to rather than MDA.

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/4/2012  1:40 AM
sidsanders wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:Some people just hate without thinking..

Even with steve nash there still going to be a bunch of mis fits, those guys just don't compliment each other..I know it was preseaon, but going 0-8 and 1-4 to start a season with that much talent can only mean one thing, they lack chemistry big time..

MDA, has again been toss a below avg pg, and thats only half his promblem..look at gasol numbers, he's avg 12pts on 42% shooting on the season, that coming from a guy who's career avg is 18.5 on 51% shooting.

Did anybody bother to read WOODSONS Q&A with steve serby in sundays NY post..He mention that if the entire team is not on board 100%, it won't work, he also mention that he had the luxury of hand picking his aquistions over the summer, getting guys that fit, guys that are smart, guys bench guys that won't require a lot of minute but can be factors when the do play..Gasol is not on board at all, he's bitching and whinning and he is a key piece on that team..

Q: Have you noticed a change in commitment from a year ago to now?

A: Yes. And a lot of that is the players that we filled in this summer to be on our ball club. We brought in some veteran guys that, their clock is ticking, too. I forgot to mention Rasheed Wallace is on this team, he has a ring, too. A lot of those veteran guys — a few of ’em — haven’t had an opportunity to win a title. Like Marcus Camby ... Raymond Felton, [Carmelo Anthony], Amar’e [Stoudemire] ... they haven’t tasted an NBA title. So, we were able to assemble guys that we thought could come in here and help us, didn’t have to worry about playing big minutes, but be a positive piece to our puzzle. And I think that’s been the difference so far this early season is the fact that we have veteran guys that are hungry ... that really believe that this team, if we stay healthy and we stay together that we got a legitimate shot.
Charles Wenzelberg/New York Post
Mike Woodson

Q: How do you get a team to believe?

A: First you gotta trust one another, and that was a big theme when we started camp. The only way you’re gonna be a team — and it’s gotta be team and win. That’s all I think about —team, win. And how that happens, you gotta trust one another and you gotta be committed.

A coach will have very little success if he doesn't have the type of players that fit his system, it's a known fact..Why do some of you keep blaming MDA for coaching a roster he had nothing to do with and expecting him to adapt..Its ridiculous to think that..

The guy essentially won 2 gold medals with his system..

bold part -- wouldnt having the best players on earth have had something to do with that? i suspect they coulda won playing many diff offensive systems with that talent.

2004 olympic team was very talented

Allen Iverson
Stephon Marbury
Dwyane Wade
Carlos Boozer
Carmelo Anthony
LeBron James
Emeka Okafor
Shawn Marion
Amar'e Stoudemire
Tim Duncan
Lamar Odom
Richard Jefferson

but they had the worse chemistry ever and thats why they won the bronze

Talent is just half the puzzle

ES
sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

12/4/2012  1:54 AM
knicks1248 wrote:
sidsanders wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:Some people just hate without thinking..

Even with steve nash there still going to be a bunch of mis fits, those guys just don't compliment each other..I know it was preseaon, but going 0-8 and 1-4 to start a season with that much talent can only mean one thing, they lack chemistry big time..

MDA, has again been toss a below avg pg, and thats only half his promblem..look at gasol numbers, he's avg 12pts on 42% shooting on the season, that coming from a guy who's career avg is 18.5 on 51% shooting.

Did anybody bother to read WOODSONS Q&A with steve serby in sundays NY post..He mention that if the entire team is not on board 100%, it won't work, he also mention that he had the luxury of hand picking his aquistions over the summer, getting guys that fit, guys that are smart, guys bench guys that won't require a lot of minute but can be factors when the do play..Gasol is not on board at all, he's bitching and whinning and he is a key piece on that team..

Q: Have you noticed a change in commitment from a year ago to now?

A: Yes. And a lot of that is the players that we filled in this summer to be on our ball club. We brought in some veteran guys that, their clock is ticking, too. I forgot to mention Rasheed Wallace is on this team, he has a ring, too. A lot of those veteran guys — a few of ’em — haven’t had an opportunity to win a title. Like Marcus Camby ... Raymond Felton, [Carmelo Anthony], Amar’e [Stoudemire] ... they haven’t tasted an NBA title. So, we were able to assemble guys that we thought could come in here and help us, didn’t have to worry about playing big minutes, but be a positive piece to our puzzle. And I think that’s been the difference so far this early season is the fact that we have veteran guys that are hungry ... that really believe that this team, if we stay healthy and we stay together that we got a legitimate shot.
Charles Wenzelberg/New York Post
Mike Woodson

Q: How do you get a team to believe?

A: First you gotta trust one another, and that was a big theme when we started camp. The only way you’re gonna be a team — and it’s gotta be team and win. That’s all I think about —team, win. And how that happens, you gotta trust one another and you gotta be committed.

A coach will have very little success if he doesn't have the type of players that fit his system, it's a known fact..Why do some of you keep blaming MDA for coaching a roster he had nothing to do with and expecting him to adapt..Its ridiculous to think that..

The guy essentially won 2 gold medals with his system..

bold part -- wouldnt having the best players on earth have had something to do with that? i suspect they coulda won playing many diff offensive systems with that talent.

2004 olympic team was very talented

Allen Iverson
Stephon Marbury
Dwyane Wade
Carlos Boozer
Carmelo Anthony
LeBron James
Emeka Okafor
Shawn Marion
Amar'e Stoudemire
Tim Duncan
Lamar Odom
Richard Jefferson

but they had the worse chemistry ever and thats why they won the bronze

Talent is just half the puzzle

2004 saw a number of players choose to not play. the make up those teams was a primary focus of the recent teams and how they were built. cant prove it, i still suspect they would have crushed most teams playing many styles as they had built a team that can compete under international rules/style way better than the 2004 squad.

GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
Mray20
Posts: 20785
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2010
Member: #3138

12/4/2012  3:02 AM
sidsanders wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
sidsanders wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:Some people just hate without thinking..

Even with steve nash there still going to be a bunch of mis fits, those guys just don't compliment each other..I know it was preseaon, but going 0-8 and 1-4 to start a season with that much talent can only mean one thing, they lack chemistry big time..

MDA, has again been toss a below avg pg, and thats only half his promblem..look at gasol numbers, he's avg 12pts on 42% shooting on the season, that coming from a guy who's career avg is 18.5 on 51% shooting.

Did anybody bother to read WOODSONS Q&A with steve serby in sundays NY post..He mention that if the entire team is not on board 100%, it won't work, he also mention that he had the luxury of hand picking his aquistions over the summer, getting guys that fit, guys that are smart, guys bench guys that won't require a lot of minute but can be factors when the do play..Gasol is not on board at all, he's bitching and whinning and he is a key piece on that team..

Q: Have you noticed a change in commitment from a year ago to now?

A: Yes. And a lot of that is the players that we filled in this summer to be on our ball club. We brought in some veteran guys that, their clock is ticking, too. I forgot to mention Rasheed Wallace is on this team, he has a ring, too. A lot of those veteran guys — a few of ’em — haven’t had an opportunity to win a title. Like Marcus Camby ... Raymond Felton, [Carmelo Anthony], Amar’e [Stoudemire] ... they haven’t tasted an NBA title. So, we were able to assemble guys that we thought could come in here and help us, didn’t have to worry about playing big minutes, but be a positive piece to our puzzle. And I think that’s been the difference so far this early season is the fact that we have veteran guys that are hungry ... that really believe that this team, if we stay healthy and we stay together that we got a legitimate shot.
Charles Wenzelberg/New York Post
Mike Woodson

Q: How do you get a team to believe?

A: First you gotta trust one another, and that was a big theme when we started camp. The only way you’re gonna be a team — and it’s gotta be team and win. That’s all I think about —team, win. And how that happens, you gotta trust one another and you gotta be committed.

A coach will have very little success if he doesn't have the type of players that fit his system, it's a known fact..Why do some of you keep blaming MDA for coaching a roster he had nothing to do with and expecting him to adapt..Its ridiculous to think that..

The guy essentially won 2 gold medals with his system..

bold part -- wouldnt having the best players on earth have had something to do with that? i suspect they coulda won playing many diff offensive systems with that talent.

2004 olympic team was very talented

Allen Iverson
Stephon Marbury
Dwyane Wade
Carlos Boozer
Carmelo Anthony
LeBron James
Emeka Okafor
Shawn Marion
Amar'e Stoudemire
Tim Duncan
Lamar Odom
Richard Jefferson

but they had the worse chemistry ever and thats why they won the bronze

Talent is just half the puzzle

2004 saw a number of players choose to not play. the make up those teams was a primary focus of the recent teams and how they were built. cant prove it, i still suspect they would have crushed most teams playing many styles as they had built a team that can compete under international rules/style way better than the 2004 squad.

Wade Anthony and Lebron didn't really even play Larry Brown went with the vets and that team had no size.

No layups!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/4/2012  7:12 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/4/2012  7:12 AM
Bringing gold medals back to the USA? .700 seasons with Phoenix?
When MDA's teams win, it's because of the players. When they lose, it's because of the coach.
Nalod
Posts: 71261
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
12/4/2012  7:55 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:Bringing gold medals back to the USA? .700 seasons with Phoenix?
When MDA's teams win, it's because of the players. When they lose, it's because of the coach.

Blame is very important to many folks.

I blame them for great redundancy on the UK.

KnicksFE
Posts: 20634
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/13/2011
Member: #3561

12/4/2012  8:02 AM
nixluva wrote:
FoeDiddy wrote:A great coach adapt..did Riley complain when he got to New York and didnt have a All-World PG with a roster full of hall of famers. No he adapted and scrapped showtime and play'd rugged basketball that fit his roster. Saying Dantoni didn't have players for his system is ridiculous. He signed up and knew the roster he was getting and his goal should have been to get the most out of it. No coach out there is afraid of Dantoni out coaching them. He is a bum coach.

Why compare MDA to Riley? Look there are only a few great coaches as we tend to refer to them in our recent history. PJax, Riley & Popavich have done the most winning, with the late Chuck Daly in there as well. Overall it's very difficult to win a title in the NBA and you MUST have elite talent to have a chance to do that. NO COACH WINS WITHOUT TALENT. Some are better with less talent and others are better with elite talent and egos.

As for your comments about MDA, I think you should at least accept that MANY NBA coaches had a really tough time dealing with D'Antoni teams when he was kicking their asses with the top offense in the league and 50+ wins a year. Most of the negatives people around here have for MDA come from his time in NY and we've all seen MANY coaches fail to have success here and yet have success in other places. There's more to the problems in NY than the coaches we've had.

It's highly doubtful that the Lakers would be having trouble right now if they had a healthy Nash and Blake and had started the year with MDA in training camp. I think this situation makes it far too easy to kick dirt on MDA's coaching as it was in NY. In time they'll figure things out in LA and then no one around here will have anything to say except to find someone else to give credit to rather than MDA.

Agree, even the great Larry Legend couldn’t make it here in New York, after winning a championship in Detroit.

If the coach don’t have the support of his best player, is very hard to win in the NBA, since Melo is now in shape and with so many babysitters, I mean leaders around him, he is thriving under Mike Woodson.

yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

12/4/2012  8:04 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:Bringing gold medals back to the USA? .700 seasons with Phoenix?
When MDA's teams win, it's because of the players. When they lose, it's because of the coach.

Well at least he is one of the only assistant coaches who gets credit for bringing gold medals back.

All this talk right now is way to premature.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/4/2012  8:26 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/4/2012  8:28 AM
They all deserve credit. I agree that it's premature but MDA has the gold medals and the playoff wins to already merit respect.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30155
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
12/4/2012  8:38 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:Bringing gold medals back to the USA? .700 seasons with Phoenix?
When MDA's teams win, it's because of the players. When they lose, it's because of the coach.

I'm not looking to knock MDA but he was the offensive assistant for the team he wasn't the head coach. Coach K and Nate Mcmillian on the defensive side contributed just as much as MDA to the teams success, as did the players. Y its being stated like MDA is the reason why USA won gold is stretching out the accomplishment just a little bit.

This thread wasn't really made for MDA though it was made for the players as I have stated about 4 times and targeted in the OP.

But it is ironic that if a coach is put in a position that doesn't maximize his coaching ability then for some that is allowed to be used as an excuse. Yet if a player is put in a position that doesn't maximize his talent then for some of the same group of ppl they have no problem putting blame on the player.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
CashMoney
Posts: 23145
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/15/2011
Member: #3374
USA
12/4/2012  8:50 AM
It's difficult to win without a PG in this league and the Lakers are without Blake and Nash. The Lakers are a mess right now. Gasol is riding the pine in the 4th and having trouble adjusting to the MDA run, run, run offense. Then you have Kobe stating that Pao should put his big boy pants on. They're way over the cap and already have all roster spots filled.

I give him credit for coming here knowing that we were going to tank for 2 seasons to make a run at Lebron. Regardless of what happened between him and Melo he QUIT on us. I was a MDA fan when he came here but his inability to call time outs and make subs drove me to the other side of the fence. Even without Nash and Blake, the Lakers have enough talent to win games. Kobe, even at his age, is still one of the best players in the league and Howard is supposed to be a franchise player. MDA needs to make adjustments to right the ship but I'll go out on a limb and state that the Lakers will unload Pao to get some back court help sooner than later.

Blue & Orange 4 Life!
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/4/2012  9:02 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:Bringing gold medals back to the USA? .700 seasons with Phoenix?
When MDA's teams win, it's because of the players. When they lose, it's because of the coach.

I'm not looking to knock MDA but he was the offensive assistant for the team he wasn't the head coach. Coach K and Nate Mcmillian on the defensive side contributed just as much as MDA to the teams success, as did the players. Y its being stated like MDA is the reason why USA won gold is stretching out the accomplishment just a little bit.

This thread wasn't really made for MDA though it was made for the players as I have stated about 4 times and targeted in the OP.

But it is ironic that if a coach is put in a position that doesn't maximize his coaching ability then for some that is allowed to be used as an excuse. Yet if a player is put in a position that doesn't maximize his talent then for some of the same group of ppl they have no problem putting blame on the player.

I just think some folks take MDA's tenure in NY and use it justify his credentials..
The blame is on the players for the most part.

It's like MDA should take 12 guys off these boards put them through training camp, and have us playing .600 ball in the nba.

It's pretty simple, if the players ain't buying what the coach is selling, hows he suppose to be successful.

Whats also pretty obvious, If you have a below avg pg, your going to have a below avg record. You think if you put CHRIS DUHON on that olympic team instead of CP3 they'll have the same success..

ES
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
12/4/2012  9:03 AM
Mray20 wrote:
dk7th wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Right. As much as I hate Dantoni's coaching philosophy I think you have to wait to see what the team looks like with Nash and once Pau is traded for complimentary pieces before callig this a failure what 5 games in?

So its okay for Kobe, Howard, Gasol, to have to wait for Nash. But its Melo's fault for not being successful in the same system with Tony Douglas as his PG.

Didn't Dwight Howard lead a team to the finals practically by himself? Now he has to depend on Nash?

in the lakers case nash was brought here as part of a grand plan with specific players in mind.

knicks were not afforded that luxury with the carmelo trade.

this is another case of apples and oranges.

of course the lakers NEED nash.

and so the question remains: did the knicks truly need carmelo?


The Lakers need Nash? They have Kobe Bryant one of the best players in NBA history and Dwight Howard the best center in the NBA by far and former defensive player of the year, as well as Pau Gasol, but they're waiting on a 38 year old PG to save their team? Nash should push them over the top not be the end all be all , they should still be a top team even without him given the talent they have. BTW without Carmelo the Knicks would be a lottery team yes the Knicks need him especially with no Amare

you listing factual information reminds me of someone who just throws stuff onto a piece of canvas and then calls it art.

the crux of the offseason was to bring in howard and then nash as a tandem and become a pick and roll team. the reasoning behind it is clearly because bryant is getting older and may not be able to be the focal point offensively he once was. nash takes pressure off bryant and allows bryant to gradually ease into more of a catch and shoot player, preserving his legs and his body in general. with nash remaining a top facilitator in the game it takes the pressure off howard to be a low post threat, and allows him to be more of a finisher.

this is not to say that nash and gasol would thrive together, yet it seems clear that since gasol loves the free-throw line extended that gasol would also benefit from nash kickouts.

bottom line nash is the ultimate straw that stirs the drink and until he returns the lakers will flounder as they have. watch out when he returns.

perhaps what muddies the situation for you is the mike brown factor.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
12/4/2012  9:10 AM
Mray20 wrote:
dk7th wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Right. As much as I hate Dantoni's coaching philosophy I think you have to wait to see what the team looks like with Nash and once Pau is traded for complimentary pieces before callig this a failure what 5 games in?

So its okay for Kobe, Howard, Gasol, to have to wait for Nash. But its Melo's fault for not being successful in the same system with Tony Douglas as his PG.

Didn't Dwight Howard lead a team to the finals practically by himself? Now he has to depend on Nash?

in the lakers case nash was brought here as part of a grand plan with specific players in mind.

knicks were not afforded that luxury with the carmelo trade.

this is another case of apples and oranges.

of course the lakers NEED nash.

and so the question remains: did the knicks truly need carmelo?


The Lakers need Nash? They have Kobe Bryant one of the best players in NBA history and Dwight Howard the best center in the NBA by far and former defensive player of the year, as well as Pau Gasol, but they're waiting on a 38 year old PG to save their team? Nash should push them over the top not be the end all be all , they should still be a top team even without him given the talent they have. BTW without Carmelo the Knicks would be a lottery team yes the Knicks need him especially with no Amare

as to your BTW statement... not a fan of revisionist history which is what your doing here.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/4/2012  9:11 AM
I give him credit for coming here knowing that we were going to tank for 2 seasons to make a run at Lebron. Regardless of what happened between him and Melo he QUIT on us. I was a MDA fan when he came here but his inability to call time outs and make subs drove me to the other side of the fence. Even without Nash and Blake, the Lakers have enough talent to win games. Kobe, even at his age, is still one of the best players in the league and Howard is supposed to be a franchise player. MDA needs to make adjustments to right the ship but I'll go out on a limb and state that the Lakers will unload Pao to get some back court help sooner than later.

I agree with you about the quiting part, as far as the timeouts, phil called less timeouts then any coach I have ever seen..A team can go on a 15-2 run and he would let them play through it.

MDA really doesn't call plays to begin with, just play smart, share the ball and space the floor and if your not doing that, you end up on the bench..

ES
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/4/2012  9:36 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:Bringing gold medals back to the USA? .700 seasons with Phoenix?
When MDA's teams win, it's because of the players. When they lose, it's because of the coach.

I'm not looking to knock MDA but he was the offensive assistant for the team he wasn't the head coach. Coach K and Nate Mcmillian on the defensive side contributed just as much as MDA to the teams success, as did the players. Y its being stated like MDA is the reason why USA won gold is stretching out the accomplishment just a little bit.

This thread wasn't really made for MDA though it was made for the players as I have stated about 4 times and targeted in the OP.

But it is ironic that if a coach is put in a position that doesn't maximize his coaching ability then for some that is allowed to be used as an excuse. Yet if a player is put in a position that doesn't maximize his talent then for some of the same group of ppl they have no problem putting blame on the player.


The way I worded it gave too much credit to MDA but he deserves some credit for his work in the Olympics, no?
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

12/4/2012  10:04 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:Bringing gold medals back to the USA? .700 seasons with Phoenix?
When MDA's teams win, it's because of the players. When they lose, it's because of the coach.

I'm not looking to knock MDA but he was the offensive assistant for the team he wasn't the head coach. Coach K and Nate Mcmillian on the defensive side contributed just as much as MDA to the teams success, as did the players. Y its being stated like MDA is the reason why USA won gold is stretching out the accomplishment just a little bit.

This thread wasn't really made for MDA though it was made for the players as I have stated about 4 times and targeted in the OP.

But it is ironic that if a coach is put in a position that doesn't maximize his coaching ability then for some that is allowed to be used as an excuse. Yet if a player is put in a position that doesn't maximize his talent then for some of the same group of ppl they have no problem putting blame on the player.


The way I worded it gave too much credit to MDA but he deserves some credit for his work in the Olympics, no?

Can I credit Doug Collins?

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
12/4/2012  10:23 AM
knicks1248 wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:Bringing gold medals back to the USA? .700 seasons with Phoenix?
When MDA's teams win, it's because of the players. When they lose, it's because of the coach.

I'm not looking to knock MDA but he was the offensive assistant for the team he wasn't the head coach. Coach K and Nate Mcmillian on the defensive side contributed just as much as MDA to the teams success, as did the players. Y its being stated like MDA is the reason why USA won gold is stretching out the accomplishment just a little bit.

This thread wasn't really made for MDA though it was made for the players as I have stated about 4 times and targeted in the OP.

But it is ironic that if a coach is put in a position that doesn't maximize his coaching ability then for some that is allowed to be used as an excuse. Yet if a player is put in a position that doesn't maximize his talent then for some of the same group of ppl they have no problem putting blame on the player.

I just think some folks take MDA's tenure in NY and use it justify his credentials..
The blame is on the players for the most part.

It's like MDA should take 12 guys off these boards put them through training camp, and have us playing .600 ball in the nba.

It's pretty simple, if the players ain't buying what the coach is selling, hows he suppose to be successful.

Whats also pretty obvious, If you have a below avg pg, your going to have a below avg record. You think if you put CHRIS DUHON on that olympic team instead of CP3 they'll have the same success..

yea, MDA had his flaws, but he is a very good coach.. the same with brown, chaney, wilkins... I never sided with the players over the years, especially with this knick teams... one thing was always constant.. through all the coach's that came through here, dolan was the constant and salty, flawed star players, were the constant here in NY.. no matter what coach left, this team never got better.. or at least played up to the level of the salaries on the books..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Does Lakers lack of success so far put things into perspective.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy