FistOfOakley wrote:Bippity10 wrote:
I keep backing things up with actual evidence and you keep saying things like I think we would have won because I think he is a good rebounder. Doesn't your argument have to be stronger then that.
if you cannot see the evidence then you are just not understanding my point or you don't fully understand the numbers. something as simple as the difference between a differential and a rate and how it's reflective of an individual or team's ability is pretty simple. quoting records of guys who play 10mpg and their playing status is pretty weak.
anyway, you either see it or you don't. when AR gets back on the court regularly and mozgov is glued to the bench then we'll see.
I haven't argued with you anything about rebond differential and a rate so I'm not quite sure what you are talking about. Are you combining convdrsations? You've said that we would have won the minnesota game, ended some other games early because of his rebounding. Completely ignoring his 27% shooting, turnovers and poor shot selection and how that may have affected the game
I don't have a dog in the fight. I don't care who plays out of randolph or mozgov. So if randolph wins the minutes and I'm all for it. If mozgov then beats randolph out then I'm all for thatbas well. Whoever earns the spot in the coaches eyes should get it. Right now they both suck and I will defend neither of them. I'm actually hoping we are able to sign/trade for someone that actually produces while we are waiting for them to develop. Randolph has not earned his minutes, the team has not missed him but when he is ready you are right, he will help us
For me the sad thing is that ar is the better talent. The fact that he has left the door open is an embarrassment