[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Isiah is officially coming back as a consultant
Author Thread
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/7/2010  8:39 PM

I can't believe he even wants to come back. It got pretty ugly before he was let go.

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
AUTOADVERT
sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

8/7/2010  8:40 PM
Markji wrote:
TMS wrote:as a scout of draft prospects i have no problem w/bringing Isiah back as a consultant... just as long as he has no say on player trade acquisitions.

Looks like we have a "Problem."

New article by Isola

Thomas was brought on as consultant only after Walsh refused Dolan's request two weeks ago to name the former Detroit Pistons star (Thomas) general manager, an NBA source said.

Dolan, Thomas and Walsh reached a compromise after Walsh vehemently objected to having Thomas part of the day-to-day operations of the club.

Dolan was adamant about rehiring Thomas. It appears the compromise will simply delay Thomas' full-time return to the club, quite possibly as Walsh's successor.
http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/basketball/knicks/2010/08/06/2010-08-06_isiah_thomas_officially_returns_to_new_york_knicks_two_years_after_scandalmarred.html?r=sports/basketball/knicks&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+nydnrss/sports/basketball/knicks+(Sports/Basketball/Knicks)

if walsh is gonna be looking over his shoulder he is gonna bail. isnt the interaction with bird one of the reasons he split the pacers? dolan is really pushing the clips owner for most ginormous anus hat award.

GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
scoshin
Posts: 20584
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #568
8/7/2010  8:50 PM
Isiah's an above average drafter. If we were to grade GM's solely on their draft picks, Isiah would probably get a B or B+. Getting Lee, a 20/10 all star at #30 was easily his best pick. Imagine how worse the Knicks would've been if we picked Chris Taft here instead, as a lot of us wanted. Ariza at #44 was a steal (but leave it to Isiah to trade him for Steve Francis). Chandler's a good pick for being a starter at #23, especially considering he wasn't really on anyone's radar. Some teams get nothing more than a bench role player or someone who is out of the league in 2 years that late in the draft. He gets a pass for picking Nate and Mardy in my eyes cause there hasn't really been anyone after them who outshined either (with the exception of Millsap).

However, taking Balkman over Rondo was a huge miss, especially from a former great PG like Isiah. Where was that eye for talent then? Moreover, I remember really wanting Granger instead of Frye in that 2005 draft, especially since back then our best SF was Tim Thomas. But of course, Isiah drafted by need instead of BPA, since we had zero frontcourt players after the KT/Nate trade. He also passed on Bynum who would've filled our need at the 5 much better than Charming Frye ever would have.

sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

8/7/2010  8:57 PM
scoshin wrote:Isiah's an above average drafter. If we were to grade GM's solely on their draft picks, Isiah would probably get a B or B+. Getting Lee, a 20/10 all star at #30 was easily his best pick. Imagine how worse the Knicks would've been if we picked Chris Taft here instead, as a lot of us wanted. Ariza at #44 was a steal (but leave it to Isiah to trade him for Steve Francis). Chandler's a good pick for being a starter at #23, especially considering he wasn't really on anyone's radar. Some teams get nothing more than a bench role player or someone who is out of the league in 2 years that late in the draft. He gets a pass for picking Nate and Mardy in my eyes cause there hasn't really been anyone after them who outshined either (with the exception of Millsap).

However, taking Balkman over Rondo was a huge miss, especially from a former great PG like Isiah. Where was that eye for talent then? Moreover, I remember really wanting Granger instead of Frye in that 2005 draft, especially since back then our best SF was Tim Thomas. But of course, Isiah drafted by need instead of BPA, since we had zero frontcourt players after the KT/Nate trade. He also passed on Bynum who would've filled our need at the 5 much better than Charming Frye ever would have.

this team hardly came close to getting to %50, being worse wouldnt have gotten the clowns outta the FO fast either.. i agree with others who think the guys talent eval skills are avg when you see what he picked up early and late. finding some diamonds is nice, however i think many guys can claim that. hope stern says clobbers dolan for this.

GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
8/7/2010  9:42 PM
Hindsight Is Easy

Stephon Marbury was coveted and welcomed with open arms by fans, but did not work out for the same reasons Ron Artest would not work in New York, nice try.

Matt Barnes, who no one heard of was signed as free agent by Thomas before he became fashionable

Ime Udoka, who? He plays for he Spurs, right?

Trevor Ariza, quality selection

Nate Robinson, too much energy packed into a tiny body

Channing Frye, three point specialist with new contract

Wilson Chandler, poised to take the next step in his career, 6'8 240 is not that easy to be graceful

David Lee, our Herschel Walker, thank you for the memories but I'm looking ahead to training camp

once a knick always a knick
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/7/2010  9:45 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/7/2010  9:46 PM
islesfan wrote:Year Pick Player Who he could have drafted
2007 23rd Wilson Chandler Rudy Fernandez (24th), Aaron Brooks (26th), Carl Landry (31st)
2006 20th Renaldo Balkman Rajon Rondo (21st), Daniel Gibson (42nd), Paul Millsap (47th)
2006 29th Mardy Collins Gibson, Millsap
2005 8th Channing Frye Andrew Bynum (10th), Danny Granger (17th)
2005 21st Nate Robinson (from Phoenix) Jarrett Jack (22nd), Jason Maxiell (26th)
2005 30th David Lee N/A – great pick
2004 43rd Trevor Ariza N/A – great pick

LMAO at Rudy Fernandez as a guy who Isiah could have drafted instead of Wilson Chandler... i already covered the Mardy pick in my previous post... yes, we lost out on Millsap but we already had David Lee, who's a much better player & would have made a Millsap pick worth a lot less because the guy wouldn't be getting minutes on the same team as Lee & Zach Randolph, let's be honest... & Jarret Jack, Jason Maxiell? another LOL... come on dude... did we really lose out on premier talent by passing up those guys?

i already said i was in agreement on the Balkman & Frye picks.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/7/2010  10:32 PM
I am not sure why people are debating Isiah's accomplishments during his time in NY. Isiah was not good at his job even if he didn't have all of the other issues that came along with him. The last two years of sucking @ss are because of Isiah. Not having a first round pick this year was because of Isiah. Isiah chased talent regardless of contract, character, the current roster needs, team chemistry, or the impact on the team down the road. He was a disaster without ever discussing all of the controversy that surrounded him while in NY. To excuse all of his failures because he picked Lee, Nate, Chandler and Ariza during his five year tenure is ridiculous.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/7/2010  11:01 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/7/2010  11:02 PM
CrushAlot wrote:I am not sure why people are debating Isiah's accomplishments during his time in NY. Isiah was not good at his job even if he didn't have all of the other issues that came along with him. The last two years of sucking @ss are because of Isiah. Not having a first round pick this year was because of Isiah. Isiah chased talent regardless of contract, character, the current roster needs, team chemistry, or the impact on the team down the road. He was a disaster without ever discussing all of the controversy that surrounded him while in NY. To excuse all of his failures because he picked Lee, Nate, Chandler and Ariza during his five year tenure is ridiculous.

we're not debating his accomplishments, we're debating his ability to spot young talent... his disastrous trades, off the court indiscretions & horrible FA signings are not up for debate... no one has excused his failures because he picked Lee, Nate, Chandler & Ariza.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/8/2010  12:53 AM
TMS wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:I am not sure why people are debating Isiah's accomplishments during his time in NY. Isiah was not good at his job even if he didn't have all of the other issues that came along with him. The last two years of sucking @ss are because of Isiah. Not having a first round pick this year was because of Isiah. Isiah chased talent regardless of contract, character, the current roster needs, team chemistry, or the impact on the team down the road. He was a disaster without ever discussing all of the controversy that surrounded him while in NY. To excuse all of his failures because he picked Lee, Nate, Chandler and Ariza during his five year tenure is ridiculous.

we're not debating his accomplishments, we're debating his ability to spot young talent... his disastrous trades, off the court indiscretions & horrible FA signings are not up for debate... no one has excused his failures because he picked Lee, Nate, Chandler & Ariza.

He hits about 50% of the time in the draft and his ego impacted his success in this area also in my opinion. In my opinion the Balk pick was made to shock and show the world that Isiah was a draft expert. Also, I am quick to criticize the current coach and gm about only going for character guys in the draft but there is something to be said about considering character when taking on a player for a big contract. Isiah seemed to only be concerned with ability. He is flawed in many ways and his flaws far outweight any positives he has in evaluating talent. He is not a savant in this area. There are plenty of guys that can scout and identify talent that haven't been convicted of sexual harrassment, or attempted suicide, or embarassed and humiliated respected nba coaches, or destroyed the future of an nba team for many years, or are on tape being racially and gender insensitive, or used their position to be extremely vindictive and impact/destroy nba careers. I have posted in the past that this guy fits the profile of a sociopath. Since he left the Knicks he attempted to deny his pill overdose on his daughter. Minimally this guy is an incompetent narcissist, if not a true sociopath. There is nothing that he brings to the Knicks that negates all of the damage that he did to the franchise. Talking about him as a draft guru is ignoring all of the horrible things that he has done which should never be done. A lot of the damage Isiah did had nothing to do with basketball when he was with the Knicks.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
8/8/2010  1:19 AM
NYT

No Need for Panic, Knicks Fans

By HOWARD BECK

Isiah Thomas is back, and it is hard to imagine a four-word statement that would inspire so much dread among Knicks fans — unless the words “Isiah Thomas” were substituted with “Stephon Marbury,” “Jerome James” or “Larry Brown.”

When the Knicks announced Friday that Thomas was returning as a consultant, it sparked a predictable torrent of outrage and derision. To commentators, the hiring was comical. To Knicks fans, tragic. It is not entirely clear, however, just how much panic is warranted.

Thomas’s new job is ambiguous and limited. According to the team’s statement, he will assist in scouting prospects and recruiting free agents. He will rank, at best, seventh in the basketball operations hierarchy, behind Donnie Walsh (the team president), Glen Grunwald (senior vice president), Misho Ostarcevic (director of player personnel), John Gabriel (director of pro scouting and free agency), Jamie Mathews (vice president) and Coach Mike D’Antoni.

In effect, Thomas is merely resuming the role he had from April 2008 through April 2009, when Walsh — after replacing Thomas — made him an informal adviser. In that year, Thomas did some scouting and provided sporadic feedback to Walsh.

Although he was removed as the president and coach, Thomas was never fired as an employee. He left the Knicks after accepting the coaching job at Florida International University in April 2009. Had he not taken that job, Thomas might have remained with the Knicks indefinitely —placing him in exactly the same position he is in now, as a part-time adviser with no authority.

once a knick always a knick
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/8/2010  1:29 AM
misterearl wrote:NYT

No Need for Panic, Knicks Fans

By HOWARD BECK

Isiah Thomas is back, and it is hard to imagine a four-word statement that would inspire so much dread among Knicks fans — unless the words “Isiah Thomas” were substituted with “Stephon Marbury,” “Jerome James” or “Larry Brown.”

When the Knicks announced Friday that Thomas was returning as a consultant, it sparked a predictable torrent of outrage and derision. To commentators, the hiring was comical. To Knicks fans, tragic. It is not entirely clear, however, just how much panic is warranted.

Thomas’s new job is ambiguous and limited. According to the team’s statement, he will assist in scouting prospects and recruiting free agents. He will rank, at best, seventh in the basketball operations hierarchy, behind Donnie Walsh (the team president), Glen Grunwald (senior vice president), Misho Ostarcevic (director of player personnel), John Gabriel (director of pro scouting and free agency), Jamie Mathews (vice president) and Coach Mike D’Antoni.

In effect, Thomas is merely resuming the role he had from April 2008 through April 2009, when Walsh — after replacing Thomas — made him an informal adviser. In that year, Thomas did some scouting and provided sporadic feedback to Walsh.

Although he was removed as the president and coach, Thomas was never fired as an employee. He left the Knicks after accepting the coaching job at Florida International University in April 2009. Had he not taken that job, Thomas might have remained with the Knicks indefinitely —placing him in exactly the same position he is in now, as a part-time adviser with no authority.


The fact that this was made public is very concerning. It is hard not to react to what Isola is repoting. Isola talks specifically about Isiah and Dolan's relationship currently and some of their encounters. Based on Dolan's loyalty and demonstrated ignorance in regards to running the team, the entire situation is very concerning. I think it would be a mistake to not question and react to this move.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/8/2010  1:45 AM    LAST EDITED: 8/8/2010  1:46 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
TMS wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:I am not sure why people are debating Isiah's accomplishments during his time in NY. Isiah was not good at his job even if he didn't have all of the other issues that came along with him. The last two years of sucking @ss are because of Isiah. Not having a first round pick this year was because of Isiah. Isiah chased talent regardless of contract, character, the current roster needs, team chemistry, or the impact on the team down the road. He was a disaster without ever discussing all of the controversy that surrounded him while in NY. To excuse all of his failures because he picked Lee, Nate, Chandler and Ariza during his five year tenure is ridiculous.

we're not debating his accomplishments, we're debating his ability to spot young talent... his disastrous trades, off the court indiscretions & horrible FA signings are not up for debate... no one has excused his failures because he picked Lee, Nate, Chandler & Ariza.

He hits about 50% of the time in the draft and his ego impacted his success in this area also in my opinion. In my opinion the Balk pick was made to shock and show the world that Isiah was a draft expert. Also, I am quick to criticize the current coach and gm about only going for character guys in the draft but there is something to be said about considering character when taking on a player for a big contract. Isiah seemed to only be concerned with ability. He is flawed in many ways and his flaws far outweight any positives he has in evaluating talent. He is not a savant in this area. There are plenty of guys that can scout and identify talent that haven't been convicted of sexual harrassment, or attempted suicide, or embarassed and humiliated respected nba coaches, or destroyed the future of an nba team for many years, or are on tape being racially and gender insensitive, or used their position to be extremely vindictive and impact/destroy nba careers. I have posted in the past that this guy fits the profile of a sociopath. Since he left the Knicks he attempted to deny his pill overdose on his daughter. Minimally this guy is an incompetent narcissist, if not a true sociopath. There is nothing that he brings to the Knicks that negates all of the damage that he did to the franchise. Talking about him as a draft guru is ignoring all of the horrible things that he has done which should never be done. A lot of the damage Isiah did had nothing to do with basketball when he was with the Knicks.

i don't agree that Isiah was only concerned about talent... he picked Channing Frye with his highest pick as our GM, a boyscout if there ever was one... he picked David Lee & Wilson Chandler, both kids with great character.

of course he's flawed in many ways, who's arguing any different? what's the point in bringing up all the other stuff that's obvious in everyone's mind about his mistakes as our GM? no one wants to see this guy taking on any role on this franchise in a decision making role, but as a scout of talent i think he's got his uses... that's the only point being debated, at least by me.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/8/2010  2:43 AM
The Jordan Hill trade with the flip of the pick and no protection does sound like IT.
RIP Crushalot😞
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/8/2010  2:48 AM
BRIGGS wrote:The Jordan Hill trade with the flip of the pick and no protection does sound like IT.

if not for that trade we wouldn't have been able to A) sign Amare or B) trade DLee for the GSW package. you get to pick ONE of the above not both if we don't make that jordan hill trade. we wouldn't have had the cap room to do both without that trade. not to mention it allowed us to add Felton.

knicks fans who still complain about that trade...

¿ △ ?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/8/2010  2:56 AM
crzymdups wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:The Jordan Hill trade with the flip of the pick and no protection does sound like IT.

if not for that trade we wouldn't have been able to A) sign Amare or B) trade DLee for the GSW package. you get to pick ONE of the above not both if we don't make that jordan hill trade. we wouldn't have had the cap room to do both without that trade. not to mention it allowed us to add Felton.

knicks fans who still complain about that trade...

we gave up way too much. giving up Hill and two possible lottery picks just to get rid of Jefferies?

and you are wrong about the cap space--in fact no even close

Just to show you--AFTER we signed Amare and did the S+T--we signed Felton 8mm Mosgov 3.2mm Mason JR and we still have 1.2mm in cap--we had almost 14mm in cap space AFTER the Randolph Lee and Amare deals.


so if Felton Mosgov and Mason Jr is > then Hill and two number 1 picks????? not to mention all of them were signed as stop gaps.

RIP Crushalot😞
Nalod
Posts: 71203
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/8/2010  7:57 AM
Dolan loves "the second chance" thing and Isiah slithers in and knowsnhowntonwork it.

isiah has lost his cred in this town. This is all so wrong on so many levels it's not funny.

I was starting to think Dolan was starting to get things right the last few years.

I hope isiah does not get the gig.

Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
8/8/2010  8:13 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:The Jordan Hill trade with the flip of the pick and no protection does sound like IT.

if not for that trade we wouldn't have been able to A) sign Amare or B) trade DLee for the GSW package. you get to pick ONE of the above not both if we don't make that jordan hill trade. we wouldn't have had the cap room to do both without that trade. not to mention it allowed us to add Felton.

knicks fans who still complain about that trade...

we gave up way too much. giving up Hill and two possible lottery picks just to get rid of Jefferies?

and you are wrong about the cap space--in fact no even close

Just to show you--AFTER we signed Amare and did the S+T--we signed Felton 8mm Mosgov 3.2mm Mason JR and we still have 1.2mm in cap--we had almost 14mm in cap space AFTER the Randolph Lee and Amare deals.


so if Felton Mosgov and Mason Jr is > then Hill and two number 1 picks????? not to mention all of them were signed as stop gaps.


Briggs, you are so correct in thinking the Jeffries/Hill trade was an Isiah/Dolan move. I am surprised no one else has picked up on this aspect of the trade. Donnie is way too conservative to have given up so much. Donnie wanted to get rid of Jeffries earlier (even a year earlier) and, IMO, was stopped by his boss under the influence of Isiah who has Dolan's ear.
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
GustavBahler
Posts: 42841
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

8/8/2010  9:11 AM
These recent developments aren't good news if they are true. I was under the impression
that Dolan was throwing Isiah a bone but it looks like he is going to put Thomas
back in charge of everything unless Stern stops him. If this is true it just shows what
contempt Dolan has for the fans.

Reminds me of that Seinfeld episode where George drags a Yankees championship trophy around
the parking lot in this car and wears Babe Ruth's old jersey to get fired but Steinbrenner
could care less, he even wants to reward him.

smackeddog
Posts: 38390
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
8/8/2010  11:20 AM
Good article from Tmmy Beer at hoopsworld:


"NEW YORK, Aug. 6, 2010 - Isiah Thomas has officially been re-hired and named a consultant to the New York Knicks, it was announced today…"

The above sentence reads like the lead-in to the punch line in to one of David Letterman's jokes during his monologue… Or the start to some fictitious column penned by Bill "Sports Guy" Simmons meant solely to poke fun at the fragile psyche of beleaguered Knick fans… Or a nightmare from which any New York basketball fan worth his salt would wake up from sweating and scared out of his mind, until he realized he had only been dreaming and could nod off back to sleep knowing it was only imagined delirium … Or maybe the first line in an article in "The Onion."

Only problem is, the Knicks really are re-hiring Isiah Thomas. It is a sad, depressing reality that Knicks fans are somehow, someway going to have to wrap their heads around.

In other breaking news, FEMA has re-hired Michael Brown and BP has re-hired CEO Tony Hayward. And the Atlanta Falcons are checking into Bobby Petrino's availability, and the Detroit Lions have asked Matt Millen if he is interested in taking another shot at running the team as a GM.

All kidding aside, yesterday's announcement that Knicks owner James Dolan is welcoming Isiah Thomas back into the fold is beyond rational comprehension. It is a slap in the face to all of the organization's loyal fans, especially those that have supported the Knicks through the debacle that has been the last decade.

I suppose it is debatable whether or not Isiah Thomas is in fact the worst executive in the history of all of professional sports, but he is certainly in the conversation. By any standard method of measurement, Isiah's four-plus years in New York were a complete and unmitigated disaster. The overall record, 133-231, including a 53-101 mark as head coach, is horrendous. (You could also tack on one more defeat if you count the loss Isiah and MSG suffered in the infamous sexual harassment lawsuit.) The trades were been dreadful. The free-agent signings were laughable. There is no need to get into specifics at this point, we are all well aware of the irreparable damage that was done.

As an aside, I always find it humorous when some try to defend Isiah and claim he is an incomparably skilled evaluator of talent. Yes, he had some very good picks (David Lee and Trevor Ariza, whom he would later trade for Steve Francis!), but let's not forget Isiah also drafted Renaldo Balkman one spot ahead of Rajon Rondo, when the Knicks desperately needed a point guard. In addition, he took Channing Frye ahead of Andrew Bynum and Danny Granger.

However, getting involved in a debate regarding Isiah's overall performance is a waste of time because no sane, sensible human being could ever believe Thomas is in any way qualified to be involved in the front office of any organization - be it a local McDonalds franchise, let alone a multi-million dollar sports team. Well, no person other than James Dolan, that is. And since Dolan is the owner of the New York Knicks, and apparently has some morbid fascination with the train wreck that is Isiah Thomas, New Yorkers are despondently shaking their heads in disbelief this morning.

Now, some might argue that, on the surface, the announcement that Isiah Thomas has been hired as a "consultant" doesn't seem as if it should set off the alarm bells it has in NYC. However, there are some very disturbing causes for concern.

First, there was absolutely no reason for the Knicks to make this public. Sports franchises, as many other high-profile, multi-tiered organizations frequently add periphery employees, such as consultants or advisors. This is common practice. The vast majority of the time no public pronouncements are made. It is alarming that Dolan choose to made an grand proclamation and issue a statement that read" "Isiah Thomas brings unique experience as a Hall of Fame player, coach, executive and owner, and we believe having him as part of our organization will be extremely beneficial to the team's success." It appears Dolan is doing his best to try and assist Thomas' attempts to re-ingratiate himself within NBA circles, and eventually angle for another GM job.

The other distressing factor is Donnie Walsh's advanced age and deteriorating health. When Walsh was hired as team president, all parties understood that this wouldn't be a 20-year marriage due to the fact that Walsh is nearing the end of his career as a basketball executive. Although Donnie hasn't tabbed a general manager to take over when he retires, it was assumed former Knick Allan Houston was being groomed for a significant role within the organization. Moreover, there are number of qualified GM's out of work and on the open market. Kevin Pritchard, Mark Warkentien, and Rod Thorn, just to name a few. All three of these individuals would represent significant additions to the Knicks front office. But are we to read between the lines of Dolan's latest bonehead decision and wonder if he views Isiah as Walsh's ultimate successor? Furthermore, if you were Thorn or Pritchard and had to choose your future place of employment, would you feel comfortable working alongside Isiah, knowing he was likely gunning for you job behind the scenes? (Check out Isiah's comment ESPN yesterday: "I've always said that if there's a GM position that should ever open that I would be interested in going back to the NBA as a GM for the right spot and the right opportunity.")

Or, as a potential GM candidate, would you feel confident working for an employer that doesn't have the common sense to realize that Thomas is a plague that should be avoided at all costs. Failing to properly review his resume and hiring him the first time was bad enough; but allowing yourself to be sucked back into that vortex… c'mon.

Fool me once, shame on you. Destroy my franchise and turn my team into a league-wide laughingstock and I still hire Isiah back again, shame on me…

The worst part about this recent news was that it finally appeared the Knicks were begging to turn the corner. Despite missing out on the LeBron Lottery, Donnie and the Knicks had a very successful offseason, with Amar'e Stoudemire being the first big piece to the puzzle. (And please don't even intimate that Isiah was responsible for recruiting Amar'e to NYC. Amar'e himself has said that he would have stayed in Phoenix had the Suns has offered him the same contract. The Knicks gave Stoudemire $100 bucks, that's why he chose the Knicks, not because of Isiah's charming smile or quick wit.)

Then Walsh made the terrific trade with Golden State, parlaying David Lee (who had one foot out the door was leaving anyway) into a future star in the extremely exciting Anthony Randolph, and two solid role players in Azubuike and Turiaf. Raymond Felton the key ingredient added, supplying Mike D'Antoni with the solid starting point guard he has ached for since leaving the Valley of the Sun.

This is a young team, with enticing upside and the potential for great growth. In addition, the organization had a clear leader and sound decision-maker in Donnie Walsh, who the unquestioned director, responsible for calling the shots.

For the first time in (seemingly) forever, there was a light at the end of the tunnel and future looked relatively promising.

Now, that bright future seems as if it could be in jeopardy...

The ominous dark cloud of Isiah Thomas' specter is hovering hauntingly close to Madison Square Garden. History tells us that dark, dreary days lay ahead if Thomas is able to snake his way back in Dolan's good graces to the point where he is put in charge of this franchise once more.

It took Donnie Walsh and company over two years to clean out the foul stench that had permeated every crevice of MSG. Virulent, vituperative weeds had overrun the Garden, which was teeming with dreariness and depression.

Two years of Walsh's arduous and excruciating efforts will all be for naught if he is replaced by Isiah Thomas.

Yes, it's a sad day for Knicks fans everywhere. The only question is whether or not worse ones will follow…


http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=17029#ixzz0vzzi8U6Z

smackeddog
Posts: 38390
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
8/8/2010  11:38 AM
Markji wrote:
Briggs, you are so correct in thinking the Jeffries/Hill trade was an Isiah/Dolan move. I am surprised no one else has picked up on this aspect of the trade. Donnie is way too conservative to have given up so much. Donnie wanted to get rid of Jeffries earlier (even a year earlier) and, IMO, was stopped by his boss under the influence of Isiah who has Dolan's ear.

To be fair, I think this was Donnie's move alone, though he was very reluctant to do it he felt he had to as without it we had no shot at Lebron (ha- if only we'd known then, what we know now). You can tell it's a Walsh move because we got back T-Mac and Sergio in addition to clearing the cap space- if you look at DW moves he usually fulfills multiple needs at the same time with each of his moves- maybe he thought getting those 2 players made the deal more attractive as we were desperate for a PG at the time.

If you remember his account of the trade was the Rockets asked for what they got, but he initially refused, the next day he woke up and read that they were trading T-Mac to the Kings, and he thought it was all over. Then I guess he had to make a last minute decision- get in on the deal there and then or possibly lose the chance to get T-Mac and lose JJ contract. I suppose where you could say maybe Dolan had something to do with it, was when describing him, Walsh said that he was "fine so long as you tell him the plan and then stick to it" (or something like that)- maybe when DW balked at the proposal, Dolan asked him what he was doing and that he was jepordizing the Lebron plan, but I don't know whether thats true.

I must admitt I find it hard to believe, after seeing other teams deals this off season, that no team would have been willing to take Jeffries contract if it meant getting EITHER Jordan Hill OR 1 future draft pick OR the chance to swap picks- I don't get why it cost us all 3- his contract wasn't that high and he's a reasonable defensive bench player with a good attitude- I could understand if it was Curry we got rid- it's just odd.

I was against the trade at the time, but in the midst of the offseason I changed my mind, simply because the POTENTIAL to sign 2 max contracts made us a slightly more attractive destination to FA. Also it allowed us to sign Felton- otherwise we wouldn't of had a PG this season. We lost Jordan Hill, who I don't think is going to be anything other than what he was tagged to be - Chris Wilcox (speaking of which, where is Chris Wilcox now?), and the Rockets are already shopping him. Also we didn't give up 2 picks- we gave up 1 pick, and the rights to SWAP picks- thats not the same thing. Still I don't like still not having control of our picks after all these years.

Isiah is officially coming back as a consultant

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy