Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
sidsanders
Posts: 22541 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/17/2009 Member: #2426 |
![]() Markji wrote:TMS wrote:as a scout of draft prospects i have no problem w/bringing Isiah back as a consultant... just as long as he has no say on player trade acquisitions. if walsh is gonna be looking over his shoulder he is gonna bail. isnt the interaction with bird one of the reasons he split the pacers? dolan is really pushing the clips owner for most ginormous anus hat award. GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
|
scoshin
Posts: 20584 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/23/2004 Member: #568 |
![]() Isiah's an above average drafter. If we were to grade GM's solely on their draft picks, Isiah would probably get a B or B+. Getting Lee, a 20/10 all star at #30 was easily his best pick. Imagine how worse the Knicks would've been if we picked Chris Taft here instead, as a lot of us wanted. Ariza at #44 was a steal (but leave it to Isiah to trade him for Steve Francis). Chandler's a good pick for being a starter at #23, especially considering he wasn't really on anyone's radar. Some teams get nothing more than a bench role player or someone who is out of the league in 2 years that late in the draft. He gets a pass for picking Nate and Mardy in my eyes cause there hasn't really been anyone after them who outshined either (with the exception of Millsap).
However, taking Balkman over Rondo was a huge miss, especially from a former great PG like Isiah. Where was that eye for talent then? Moreover, I remember really wanting Granger instead of Frye in that 2005 draft, especially since back then our best SF was Tim Thomas. But of course, Isiah drafted by need instead of BPA, since we had zero frontcourt players after the KT/Nate trade. He also passed on Bynum who would've filled our need at the 5 much better than Charming Frye ever would have. |
sidsanders
Posts: 22541 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/17/2009 Member: #2426 |
![]() scoshin wrote:Isiah's an above average drafter. If we were to grade GM's solely on their draft picks, Isiah would probably get a B or B+. Getting Lee, a 20/10 all star at #30 was easily his best pick. Imagine how worse the Knicks would've been if we picked Chris Taft here instead, as a lot of us wanted. Ariza at #44 was a steal (but leave it to Isiah to trade him for Steve Francis). Chandler's a good pick for being a starter at #23, especially considering he wasn't really on anyone's radar. Some teams get nothing more than a bench role player or someone who is out of the league in 2 years that late in the draft. He gets a pass for picking Nate and Mardy in my eyes cause there hasn't really been anyone after them who outshined either (with the exception of Millsap). this team hardly came close to getting to %50, being worse wouldnt have gotten the clowns outta the FO fast either.. i agree with others who think the guys talent eval skills are avg when you see what he picked up early and late. finding some diamonds is nice, however i think many guys can claim that. hope stern says clobbers dolan for this. GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
|
misterearl
Posts: 38786 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/16/2004 Member: #799 USA |
![]() Hindsight Is Easy
Stephon Marbury was coveted and welcomed with open arms by fans, but did not work out for the same reasons Ron Artest would not work in New York, nice try. Matt Barnes, who no one heard of was signed as free agent by Thomas before he became fashionable Ime Udoka, who? He plays for he Spurs, right? Trevor Ariza, quality selection Nate Robinson, too much energy packed into a tiny body Channing Frye, three point specialist with new contract Wilson Chandler, poised to take the next step in his career, 6'8 240 is not that easy to be graceful David Lee, our Herschel Walker, thank you for the memories but I'm looking ahead to training camp once a knick always a knick
|
TMS
Posts: 60684 Alba Posts: 617 Joined: 5/11/2004 Member: #674 USA |
![]() islesfan wrote:Year Pick Player Who he could have drafted LMAO at Rudy Fernandez as a guy who Isiah could have drafted instead of Wilson Chandler... i already covered the Mardy pick in my previous post... yes, we lost out on Millsap but we already had David Lee, who's a much better player & would have made a Millsap pick worth a lot less because the guy wouldn't be getting minutes on the same team as Lee & Zach Randolph, let's be honest... & Jarret Jack, Jason Maxiell? another LOL... come on dude... did we really lose out on premier talent by passing up those guys? i already said i was in agreement on the Balkman & Frye picks. After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
|
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
![]() I am not sure why people are debating Isiah's accomplishments during his time in NY. Isiah was not good at his job even if he didn't have all of the other issues that came along with him. The last two years of sucking @ss are because of Isiah. Not having a first round pick this year was because of Isiah. Isiah chased talent regardless of contract, character, the current roster needs, team chemistry, or the impact on the team down the road. He was a disaster without ever discussing all of the controversy that surrounded him while in NY. To excuse all of his failures because he picked Lee, Nate, Chandler and Ariza during his five year tenure is ridiculous.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
TMS
Posts: 60684 Alba Posts: 617 Joined: 5/11/2004 Member: #674 USA |
![]() CrushAlot wrote:I am not sure why people are debating Isiah's accomplishments during his time in NY. Isiah was not good at his job even if he didn't have all of the other issues that came along with him. The last two years of sucking @ss are because of Isiah. Not having a first round pick this year was because of Isiah. Isiah chased talent regardless of contract, character, the current roster needs, team chemistry, or the impact on the team down the road. He was a disaster without ever discussing all of the controversy that surrounded him while in NY. To excuse all of his failures because he picked Lee, Nate, Chandler and Ariza during his five year tenure is ridiculous. we're not debating his accomplishments, we're debating his ability to spot young talent... his disastrous trades, off the court indiscretions & horrible FA signings are not up for debate... no one has excused his failures because he picked Lee, Nate, Chandler & Ariza. After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
|
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
![]() TMS wrote:He hits about 50% of the time in the draft and his ego impacted his success in this area also in my opinion. In my opinion the Balk pick was made to shock and show the world that Isiah was a draft expert. Also, I am quick to criticize the current coach and gm about only going for character guys in the draft but there is something to be said about considering character when taking on a player for a big contract. Isiah seemed to only be concerned with ability. He is flawed in many ways and his flaws far outweight any positives he has in evaluating talent. He is not a savant in this area. There are plenty of guys that can scout and identify talent that haven't been convicted of sexual harrassment, or attempted suicide, or embarassed and humiliated respected nba coaches, or destroyed the future of an nba team for many years, or are on tape being racially and gender insensitive, or used their position to be extremely vindictive and impact/destroy nba careers. I have posted in the past that this guy fits the profile of a sociopath. Since he left the Knicks he attempted to deny his pill overdose on his daughter. Minimally this guy is an incompetent narcissist, if not a true sociopath. There is nothing that he brings to the Knicks that negates all of the damage that he did to the franchise. Talking about him as a draft guru is ignoring all of the horrible things that he has done which should never be done. A lot of the damage Isiah did had nothing to do with basketball when he was with the Knicks.CrushAlot wrote:I am not sure why people are debating Isiah's accomplishments during his time in NY. Isiah was not good at his job even if he didn't have all of the other issues that came along with him. The last two years of sucking @ss are because of Isiah. Not having a first round pick this year was because of Isiah. Isiah chased talent regardless of contract, character, the current roster needs, team chemistry, or the impact on the team down the road. He was a disaster without ever discussing all of the controversy that surrounded him while in NY. To excuse all of his failures because he picked Lee, Nate, Chandler and Ariza during his five year tenure is ridiculous. I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
misterearl
Posts: 38786 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/16/2004 Member: #799 USA |
![]() NYT
No Need for Panic, Knicks Fans By HOWARD BECK Isiah Thomas is back, and it is hard to imagine a four-word statement that would inspire so much dread among Knicks fans — unless the words “Isiah Thomas” were substituted with “Stephon Marbury,” “Jerome James” or “Larry Brown.” When the Knicks announced Friday that Thomas was returning as a consultant, it sparked a predictable torrent of outrage and derision. To commentators, the hiring was comical. To Knicks fans, tragic. It is not entirely clear, however, just how much panic is warranted. Thomas’s new job is ambiguous and limited. According to the team’s statement, he will assist in scouting prospects and recruiting free agents. He will rank, at best, seventh in the basketball operations hierarchy, behind Donnie Walsh (the team president), Glen Grunwald (senior vice president), Misho Ostarcevic (director of player personnel), John Gabriel (director of pro scouting and free agency), Jamie Mathews (vice president) and Coach Mike D’Antoni. In effect, Thomas is merely resuming the role he had from April 2008 through April 2009, when Walsh — after replacing Thomas — made him an informal adviser. In that year, Thomas did some scouting and provided sporadic feedback to Walsh. Although he was removed as the president and coach, Thomas was never fired as an employee. He left the Knicks after accepting the coaching job at Florida International University in April 2009. Had he not taken that job, Thomas might have remained with the Knicks indefinitely —placing him in exactly the same position he is in now, as a part-time adviser with no authority. once a knick always a knick
|
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
![]() misterearl wrote:NYT The fact that this was made public is very concerning. It is hard not to react to what Isola is repoting. Isola talks specifically about Isiah and Dolan's relationship currently and some of their encounters. Based on Dolan's loyalty and demonstrated ignorance in regards to running the team, the entire situation is very concerning. I think it would be a mistake to not question and react to this move. I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
TMS
Posts: 60684 Alba Posts: 617 Joined: 5/11/2004 Member: #674 USA |
![]() CrushAlot wrote:TMS wrote:He hits about 50% of the time in the draft and his ego impacted his success in this area also in my opinion. In my opinion the Balk pick was made to shock and show the world that Isiah was a draft expert. Also, I am quick to criticize the current coach and gm about only going for character guys in the draft but there is something to be said about considering character when taking on a player for a big contract. Isiah seemed to only be concerned with ability. He is flawed in many ways and his flaws far outweight any positives he has in evaluating talent. He is not a savant in this area. There are plenty of guys that can scout and identify talent that haven't been convicted of sexual harrassment, or attempted suicide, or embarassed and humiliated respected nba coaches, or destroyed the future of an nba team for many years, or are on tape being racially and gender insensitive, or used their position to be extremely vindictive and impact/destroy nba careers. I have posted in the past that this guy fits the profile of a sociopath. Since he left the Knicks he attempted to deny his pill overdose on his daughter. Minimally this guy is an incompetent narcissist, if not a true sociopath. There is nothing that he brings to the Knicks that negates all of the damage that he did to the franchise. Talking about him as a draft guru is ignoring all of the horrible things that he has done which should never be done. A lot of the damage Isiah did had nothing to do with basketball when he was with the Knicks.CrushAlot wrote:I am not sure why people are debating Isiah's accomplishments during his time in NY. Isiah was not good at his job even if he didn't have all of the other issues that came along with him. The last two years of sucking @ss are because of Isiah. Not having a first round pick this year was because of Isiah. Isiah chased talent regardless of contract, character, the current roster needs, team chemistry, or the impact on the team down the road. He was a disaster without ever discussing all of the controversy that surrounded him while in NY. To excuse all of his failures because he picked Lee, Nate, Chandler and Ariza during his five year tenure is ridiculous. i don't agree that Isiah was only concerned about talent... he picked Channing Frye with his highest pick as our GM, a boyscout if there ever was one... he picked David Lee & Wilson Chandler, both kids with great character. of course he's flawed in many ways, who's arguing any different? what's the point in bringing up all the other stuff that's obvious in everyone's mind about his mistakes as our GM? no one wants to see this guy taking on any role on this franchise in a decision making role, but as a scout of talent i think he's got his uses... that's the only point being debated, at least by me. After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
![]() The Jordan Hill trade with the flip of the pick and no protection does sound like IT.
RIP Crushalot😞
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
![]() BRIGGS wrote:The Jordan Hill trade with the flip of the pick and no protection does sound like IT. if not for that trade we wouldn't have been able to A) sign Amare or B) trade DLee for the GSW package. you get to pick ONE of the above not both if we don't make that jordan hill trade. we wouldn't have had the cap room to do both without that trade. not to mention it allowed us to add Felton. knicks fans who still complain about that trade... ¿ △ ?
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
![]() crzymdups wrote:BRIGGS wrote:The Jordan Hill trade with the flip of the pick and no protection does sound like IT. we gave up way too much. giving up Hill and two possible lottery picks just to get rid of Jefferies? and you are wrong about the cap space--in fact no even close Just to show you--AFTER we signed Amare and did the S+T--we signed Felton 8mm Mosgov 3.2mm Mason JR and we still have 1.2mm in cap--we had almost 14mm in cap space AFTER the Randolph Lee and Amare deals.
RIP Crushalot😞
|
Nalod
Posts: 71203 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
![]() Dolan loves "the second chance" thing and Isiah slithers in and knowsnhowntonwork it.
isiah has lost his cred in this town. This is all so wrong on so many levels it's not funny. I was starting to think Dolan was starting to get things right the last few years. I hope isiah does not get the gig. |
Markji
Posts: 22753 Alba Posts: -4 Joined: 9/14/2007 Member: #1673 USA |
![]() BRIGGS wrote:crzymdups wrote:BRIGGS wrote:The Jordan Hill trade with the flip of the pick and no protection does sound like IT. Briggs, you are so correct in thinking the Jeffries/Hill trade was an Isiah/Dolan move. I am surprised no one else has picked up on this aspect of the trade. Donnie is way too conservative to have given up so much. Donnie wanted to get rid of Jeffries earlier (even a year earlier) and, IMO, was stopped by his boss under the influence of Isiah who has Dolan's ear. The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense.
Tom Clancy - author
|
GustavBahler
Posts: 42841 Alba Posts: 15 Joined: 7/12/2010 Member: #3186 |
![]() These recent developments aren't good news if they are true. I was under the impression
that Dolan was throwing Isiah a bone but it looks like he is going to put Thomas back in charge of everything unless Stern stops him. If this is true it just shows what contempt Dolan has for the fans. Reminds me of that Seinfeld episode where George drags a Yankees championship trophy around |
smackeddog
Posts: 38390 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() Good article from Tmmy Beer at hoopsworld:
http://www.hoopsworld.com/Story.asp?story_id=17029#ixzz0vzzi8U6Z |
smackeddog
Posts: 38390 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() Markji wrote: To be fair, I think this was Donnie's move alone, though he was very reluctant to do it he felt he had to as without it we had no shot at Lebron (ha- if only we'd known then, what we know now). You can tell it's a Walsh move because we got back T-Mac and Sergio in addition to clearing the cap space- if you look at DW moves he usually fulfills multiple needs at the same time with each of his moves- maybe he thought getting those 2 players made the deal more attractive as we were desperate for a PG at the time. If you remember his account of the trade was the Rockets asked for what they got, but he initially refused, the next day he woke up and read that they were trading T-Mac to the Kings, and he thought it was all over. Then I guess he had to make a last minute decision- get in on the deal there and then or possibly lose the chance to get T-Mac and lose JJ contract. I suppose where you could say maybe Dolan had something to do with it, was when describing him, Walsh said that he was "fine so long as you tell him the plan and then stick to it" (or something like that)- maybe when DW balked at the proposal, Dolan asked him what he was doing and that he was jepordizing the Lebron plan, but I don't know whether thats true. I must admitt I find it hard to believe, after seeing other teams deals this off season, that no team would have been willing to take Jeffries contract if it meant getting EITHER Jordan Hill OR 1 future draft pick OR the chance to swap picks- I don't get why it cost us all 3- his contract wasn't that high and he's a reasonable defensive bench player with a good attitude- I could understand if it was Curry we got rid- it's just odd. I was against the trade at the time, but in the midst of the offseason I changed my mind, simply because the POTENTIAL to sign 2 max contracts made us a slightly more attractive destination to FA. Also it allowed us to sign Felton- otherwise we wouldn't of had a PG this season. We lost Jordan Hill, who I don't think is going to be anything other than what he was tagged to be - Chris Wilcox (speaking of which, where is Chris Wilcox now?), and the Rockets are already shopping him. Also we didn't give up 2 picks- we gave up 1 pick, and the rights to SWAP picks- thats not the same thing. Still I don't like still not having control of our picks after all these years. |