sebstar wrote:To say that we are implying that Walsh and co are racists is trying to over dramatize things. MSG is a very corporate environment. Anybody that says that they are "color blind" or "race neutral" is a lie. So with the struggling Knicks being so closely tied to the likes of Isiah, Marbury, Curry, ext... it would be naive to think that there wouldnt be a certain stigma attached to that Knicks regmie. A stigma that it stands to reason Dolan and Co would want to change.
Race and being "urban" is an easy shorthand response and reasoning. Its life.
If you want to look at the D'Antoni hire, Gallo pick, and Hill pick ( I know he's black but they picked a "good" black instead of the right pick --- Jennings, who was easily marginalized as a head case because he was more "urban") as all coincidences, fine.
Point being is that it is P.R 101. The audience is primarily white, especially the ones buying tickets. Advertisers, sponsers, corporate types --- so its comforting to them to see the makeup of the team and managment more geared towards their sensibilities and hues. Even subconsiously. Especially when they feel like they gave a "black" a chance and he messed up.
This has happened again and again, over and over since integration and the civil rights bill. Not from an NBA standpoint, but life in general. I know some of ya'll dont see it, or its easy to overlook, but its reality.
in general, absolutely. in the specific case of the knick fan base, I don‘t think so.
what am i basing this on? attendance this year. i went to a dozen games at the garden this year. i've never seen the place so empty. and that's with the garden GIVING tickets away to try to fill the empty seats. how many times did brian msg come on this board trying to get people to buy $90 seats - FOR $20!! that's unprecedented as far as i know.
and this after walsh gave us d'antoni, gallo, darko, re-signed lee, hill, douglas (another “high-character” guy). according to your theory everyone should have JUMPED at the chance to see a more presentable team. but it’s not the case. so why's that? i'd maintain it's because they suck and play crappy b-ball. and that's the criteria people are using to determine whether they go see them or not.
you could put together a squad of jennings, artest. stephen jackson, jermaine, ellis, kg, whomever. they play hard-nosed winning ball and the place sells right the hell back out imo.