4th Qtr 2:42
NYK 107 MEM 113

Cosmic wrote:
You think players would welcome a new teammate by acting like they didn't want him if he was as good as you make him out to be? Upset they traded for him? And when did Jackson's opinion and his 10 coaching rings not matter? When does the head coach of the team's opinion on not wanting to make changes, not wanting to take on Nate for House, not matter?

You'd think we just traded Michael Jordan and Tim Duncan in their primes by some of the posts on this forum over Nate and Jordan Hill getting dumped.

Cosmic, you are simply reading what you want to. A team with the 3rd best record in the East is not going to say they were terrible because they weren't. You'll just have to accept that not everybody shares your derision for Nate Robinson.

oohah

4th Qtr 1:00
NYK 107 MEM 116

93BUICK wrote:This game is more depressing than the I know more people in Boston than you do argument.
Must leave house. Must go to party.

Just give me the address and I'm there!

oohah

Childs2Dudley wrote:

oohah wrote:

Childs2Dudley wrote:
When Robinson takes over a game, we usually win. Show me proof. Empty posts are just as bad as Mr. Lee's empty stats.

And before you tell me you wont look, then don't make these posts before backing up your claims.

Nate rarely "took over" games because most of the time he was out of control and/or acting like a clown and unable to focus.

I see you just became a Knicks fan this season...welcome!

Last season he had about 10-12 games where he took over and simply won the game.

I'm not going to research for you. If you watched the games you would know that already. You're obviously a 12 year old new jack. Stop being lazy.

So, you said that Robinson's impact was to make the Knicks losers when he played a lot...but you don't agree about Lee? Stop running and answer young man!

oohah

I'm not King1. I don't like David Lee.

As for everything else, I'm not going to go back and forth with someone more immature than a 12 year old that you call me. All I asked was for you to provide proof. You just repeated the claims you said and then insinuated that I don't watch games because I wanted written proof. Nice job. Go try and bait someone else into these childish games. I'm not here for that. Enjoy the game, buddy'ol pal and when you decide to back up your posts and have a discussion like a normal person then I'll gladly talk to you,

Childs, oohah is not talking out of his ass on this one... Nate had a string of games last year when guys on this forum were calling him the team MVP & people were actually debating whether to hold onto him or D Lee after their contracts expired... he was playing great basketball for a pretty decent stretch... to say he can't impact games is just not true... when he's got it going there isn't a more electrifying player in the NBA that i've seen... dude can literally take the game over all by himself... not many players can do this... yes, his achilles heel is the stupid shenanigans & his lack of focus during games, but there's no doubting his talent & ability... he just has not been able to harness his energy on a nightly basis, & i doubt he ever will... what u get from Nate is doctor Jekyll & Mr. Hyde... that's who he is, an enigma as Clyde would put it... but he can be a very important cog to a team's success if used properly & surrounded by guys who will provide leadership for him to follow... i think BOS is the perfect situation for him.

Well... I never wanted to get rid of the guy but... you know the plan and all.

Final  
NYK 109 MEM 120