Great Play! LEE!

that's all we have here.

it's almost like more than half the battle is having a personality.

orangeblobman wrote:I don't know what your agenda is in this argument, but I can't go on because you are viewing it one-dimensionally. You are a logical one-trick-pony in this case, Friend TMS. I so sorry. But come on, comparing Nate to MDA?

Also, you are assuming that Nate yucking it up was the sole reason he was benched. It was an aggregate of his antics over 2 seasons.

i don't have an agenda... it's simple... practice what you preach or don't preach it at all... i like MDA as our coach but there are things he does that to me strikes of disingenuousness & he double talks alot about certain things... all the BS about developing our youth & he never plays our young guys... all the BS about him not wanting to play Nate because he doesn't want to mess with the "winning formula" & it not being personal but he plays Marcus freakin' Landry over him off the bench when we're short handed? when has Marcus Landry ever contributed to a Knicks win in his time here?

i'm not assuming anything about Nate's yucking it up... didn't i just get done saying i agreed w/him being disciplined about his other antics? try to read what i write & not put your own definitions into it.

Great play Parker

Wow

TMS wrote:

orangeblobman wrote:I don't know what your agenda is in this argument, but I can't go on because you are viewing it one-dimensionally. You are a logical one-trick-pony in this case, Friend TMS. I so sorry. But come on, comparing Nate to MDA?

Also, you are assuming that Nate yucking it up was the sole reason he was benched. It was an aggregate of his antics over 2 seasons.

i don't have an agenda... it's simple... practice what you preach or don't preach it at all... i like MDA as our coach but there are things he does that to me strikes of disingenuousness & he double talks alot about certain things... all the BS about developing our youth & he never plays our young guys... all the BS about him not wanting to play Nate because he doesn't want to mess with the "winning formula" & it not being personal but he plays Marcus freakin' Landry over him off the bench when we're short handed? when has Marcus Landry ever contributed to a Knicks win in his time here?

i'm not assuming anything about Nate's yucking it up... didn't i just get done saying i agreed w/him being disciplined about his other antics? try to read what i write & not put your own definitions into it.

it's just that you hit me with so many things at once. it's not as black and white as you make it seem, as far as practicing what you preach. there is a lot of gray area there, man. it's really not disingenuous at all.

how much of this 'double talk' is politics, how much of it must be said? nate doesn't have half the responsibility mda has with this team, so it's always easier to get on mda because of his share of responsiblity, there is simple a lot more to find fault with. you talk of double standards in another thread-- this is one case where one is clearly required.

subzero0 wrote:...and Tony Parker drives straight to the hoop. Behold the defensive Juggernaut that is Jared Jeffries!!!

Well I'm sure it takes a lot out of you when you realize that just LOOKING at a Spurs player can be called a foul. How can you guard a man you are not watching?