Posted by bitty41:
If this is profiling on my part to not assume that this guy isn't burglar then I'm guilty as charged.
But, again, somehow the cop would have been doing a better job had he assumed that the only reason someone might be in a home unauthorized is to burgle? He would have been a good police officer if he was like "oh, dudes got a cane. It’s all good?" What if the guy in the house was a tall strapping black man? Would it have been OK then to ask for the guy’s ID, or would that have been profiling?
It’s profiling when a black man gets pulled over for driving a Mercedes. We know this kind of **** happens. It isn't profiling when a cop asks a person who is in a home where there was a reported break-in for their ID. That’s doing his job. It’s interesting that this is the way most in this conversation see it, with the biggest critique I am hearing of the cop is that he didn't walk away. Fine. But that doesn't
necessarily have anything to do with race, now, does it?
So people are all excited that this ******* of a cop is disgraced, and the Cambridge police got called idiots by the President, but they don't seem bothered that it would be pretty damn unlikely that this story ever came to light had the good doctor been a white man or not famous, when neither would have made the cop more or less of an ******* and the President, in that case, wouldn't have given a ****.
All I'm saying is...as a nation we need to aspire toward racial transcendence. We have a long way to go. But we aren't going to get there if all of the onus for transcendence is put on only one side. You dig?
Its like a groupie website, or bitter ex-wives club. -Sebstar