[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Artest to Knicks according to ESPN1050 via RealGM
Author Thread
COSSUCKS
Posts: 20984
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/15/2007
Member: #1569

8/3/2007  6:36 PM
FIRST PLACE!
AUTOADVERT
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
8/3/2007  7:01 PM
At least Ron can continue his community work with the kids.

I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

8/3/2007  8:08 PM
Posted by nixluva:

I LOVE Balkman and would love to see him stay, but I mean we can't keep everyone and also take on Artest. If he's part of the deal then so be it. We still would have Chandler and Nichols, so I don't think we'd be in bad shape at all.

To be honest we all know that Artest is a guy that will eventually do something to create headlines, but if he does what he is capable of on the court it makes this team better. We know the drill. He's a talented guy with problems or else we wouldn't even have a chance to get him. Isiah believes he can handle these kinds of guys and for the most part, aside from Steph's cooky comments, we haven't had any issues with these guys.


But wait we'd be giving up youth and possible near future youth when you said the plan appears that we're trying to inject youth into this franchise.

Oh wait that's right no one does the FLIP-FLOP dance better than you.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

8/3/2007  8:24 PM
Ron artest is currently playing streetball in nyc. He was in the dyckman all-star game. I wasn't there but from what I heard he looked in good shape. He was kinda trying stuff out. He still was playing hard.

Anyway, knicks need a guy that still does **** like that. Mason used to play streetball every year. Its good to see.

Little Nate showed up to west 4th to play pick up last year I believe. Nate and craw played for Seattle in the rucker nationwide tourney.

Stuff like that is cool.

Anyway, the knicks need artest. He should fit in smooth and make the knicks bloody ****in awesome.

Boston? Ok artest is checking pierce. That's a battle that artest will win every time cuz pierce can't keep his head in the game if artest is bodying him up. Piece has a temper and he will lose it even if his team needs him. He has shown that many times in post season play.

Artest is an extra scorer. He moves the ball and can score all over the court.

If this deal goes down for real? The knicks will play "match maker" everynight cuz someone is gonna have a major miss match for real.

This trade kinda is a must.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
PhilinLA
Posts: 24941
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/12/2004
Member: #696
8/3/2007  8:55 PM
I'm hearing Malik, Nate and Balk, and I don't like it.
http://amonthhoffundays.blogspot.com/ We got a ringer.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38590
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
8/3/2007  9:10 PM
Posted by PhilinLA:

I'm hearing Malik, Nate and Balk, and I don't like it.

If Balk is included, I will be extremely upset.

An Artest and K. Thomas for Nate, JJ2, F. Jones, D. Dickau

Sac gets Nate and (clears throat) JJ2 plus 2 expiring contracts for a lunatic they want to get rid off and a long bad contract. Why are we doing this again?
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

8/3/2007  9:12 PM
Posted by PhilinLA:

I'm hearing Malik, Nate and Balk, and I don't like it.

Ditto plus pick(s)
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

8/3/2007  9:13 PM
Posted by PhilinLA:

I'm hearing Malik, Nate and Balk, and I don't like it.

We certainly aint getting Artest for JJ2, JJ1 and the rest of our redundant garbage that aint good enough for us but some people feel it should be good for Sac to accept for one of the best 2 way players (if not the craziest) in the game.

I said it before, Id rather wiat until next summer to sign Artest. But to play devils advocate, Chandler's presence can make Balk expendable. Both seem to be good defenders, Chandler showed a knack to block shots from the wing similar to Balk, is perhaps more athletic and is certainly stronger than Balk. Of course he doesn't have Balks motor, however. Also, how many minutes is Balk going to get with Artest here? And lastly, if this move pushes us to the top 4 of the east, should we not pull the trigger because we everyone loves Balk?

I'm torn aswell. I see the potential and balance that Artest can bring to this team, but Balk is a unique player. Personally, Id wait until next year and sign Artest.

[Edited by - bigbeast on 03-08-2007 9:14 PM]
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
PhilinLA
Posts: 24941
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/12/2004
Member: #696
8/3/2007  9:23 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by PhilinLA:

I'm hearing Malik, Nate and Balk, and I don't like it.

Ditto plus pick(s)

you're hearing plus pick(s)? I wasn't. We're trading for damaged goods for pete's sake!
http://amonthhoffundays.blogspot.com/ We got a ringer.
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27835
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
8/3/2007  9:24 PM
Posted by Panos:

Are we seriously saying that Sac is going to take Nate + filler for Artest?
That's the best they can do? Come on...

Especially when they gave up Peja for him?
You know I gonna spin wit it
Bobby
Posts: 22094
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/18/2003
Member: #408
USA
8/3/2007  9:26 PM
http://weblogs.newsday.com/sports/basketball/knicks/blog/2007/08/artest_rumor_a_false_alarm.html

[Edited by - Bobby on 08-03-2007 9:33 PM]

[Edited by - Bobby on 08-03-2007 9:40 PM]
"Like they always say, New York is the Mecca of basketball,"I read that in Michael Jordan books my whole life and I played here in the Big East tournament, so it's always fun to play in the Mecca of basketball."---Rip Hamilton
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27835
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
8/3/2007  9:40 PM
Posted by DarkKnicks:
Posted by TrueBlue:

Some guy who broke the Randolph trade on RealGM said


Nate, Balkman, Rose, and picks or Jones are on the table


That's a pretty typical terrible I SAY UGH deal. Basiclly trading 3 first round picks and essentially an expiring for a SHORT FUSE. Not to mention Artest could walk after next yr.
WOW! I would be sad to lose Balkman, but I think that trade is good enough for me.
Rose sucks and regardless of his summer league (which means nothing me) I dont think Nate has any role in our team. Losing Balkman is the bad part of the trade, but is better losing Balkman than losing Lee, and we must Sacramento anything valuable in order to make the trade work. I wish they accept Malik, Nate and a pick, but I dont think Sac would do it.

I gotta say, I like Balk more than Lee... maybe I am the odd one out, but Lee has been injured every season, he rebounds at the top of the league and shows a lot of energy. Balk does all of the same, but has more energetic defense... and he has an extra year on his rookie contract. Trouble is that we have a glut of SFs if it were Artest, Qrich, Balkman, Chandler, Nichols and JJ2. As such, Lee is safe.

I think that getting them to take Malik off our hands is worth something. I'd like the pick to be protected.

Also, their is only so many minutes to be had.

Marbury 35/Collins 13/Dickau
Qrich 28/Craw 23
Artest 35/Chandler 8/Nichols 5
Randolph 32/Lee 16
Curry 30/ Morris 18/

IR
James
JJ2
Jones
You know I gonna spin wit it
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
8/3/2007  9:42 PM
2 full days with the nephew and neice so i threw them in front of the tv with a lord of the rings dvd and i can finally sit down for a minute...

this deal makes 100% sense and i agree with it if it's made. i've advocated going all in for a while now.

but i also want to clarify that i view this move the following way:

desperate times...desperate gm...desperate move...

if the deal ends up being nate + balkman + picks...well that falls in line with every other isiah trade.

i'd love to see how it's spun...but more intrigued with how it will play out. it seems isiah felt getting zach made them a lock for the playoffs...but after the kg deal, he may have gotten a little worried. one thing that kind of seems to be going on is dolan may be requiring a playoff birth from isiah this season and isiah is making moves accordingly.

martin - this IS a starphuck b/c artest can potentially destroy your team.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
8/3/2007  9:45 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by nixluva:

I LOVE Balkman and would love to see him stay, but I mean we can't keep everyone and also take on Artest. If he's part of the deal then so be it. We still would have Chandler and Nichols, so I don't think we'd be in bad shape at all.

To be honest we all know that Artest is a guy that will eventually do something to create headlines, but if he does what he is capable of on the court it makes this team better. We know the drill. He's a talented guy with problems or else we wouldn't even have a chance to get him. Isiah believes he can handle these kinds of guys and for the most part, aside from Steph's cooky comments, we haven't had any issues with these guys.

But wait we'd be giving up youth and possible near future youth when you said the plan appears that we're trying to inject youth into this franchise.

Oh wait that's right no one does the FLIP-FLOP dance better than you.
Yo man get it right! How can I be flip flopping, when it's not my plan to begin with. It would be Isiah that you'd have to accuse of flip flopping, not me. You're acting like a child, with all these accusations and attempts to show me somehow being hypocritical. Grow up!

You obviously have never paid any attention to what i've written, since i've made it clear many times what my stance on youth is. The idea isn't to just get young, it's to WIN. If you can use some of your youth to get a player that will give you a chance to win, and he's not over the hill, then you do it. You really don't have a point here at all.

You make it sound like we would somehow have given up all of our youth with any deal for Artest. Artest isn't old and we still would have plenty of youth. We'd have a nice balance of vets and young players, which is what you would want.

You really need to stop trying to make me look bad, it's pathetic.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
8/3/2007  10:47 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by nixluva:

I LOVE Balkman and would love to see him stay, but I mean we can't keep everyone and also take on Artest. If he's part of the deal then so be it. We still would have Chandler and Nichols, so I don't think we'd be in bad shape at all.

To be honest we all know that Artest is a guy that will eventually do something to create headlines, but if he does what he is capable of on the court it makes this team better. We know the drill. He's a talented guy with problems or else we wouldn't even have a chance to get him. Isiah believes he can handle these kinds of guys and for the most part, aside from Steph's cooky comments, we haven't had any issues with these guys.

But wait we'd be giving up youth and possible near future youth when you said the plan appears that we're trying to inject youth into this franchise.

Oh wait that's right no one does the FLIP-FLOP dance better than you.
Yo man get it right! How can I be flip flopping, when it's not my plan to begin with. It would be Isiah that you'd have to accuse of flip flopping, not me. You're acting like a child, with all these accusations and attempts to show me somehow being hypocritical. Grow up!

You obviously have never paid any attention to what i've written, since i've made it clear many times what my stance on youth is. The idea isn't to just get young, it's to WIN. If you can use some of your youth to get a player that will give you a chance to win, and he's not over the hill, then you do it. You really don't have a point here at all.

You make it sound like we would somehow have given up all of our youth with any deal for Artest. Artest isn't old and we still would have plenty of youth. We'd have a nice balance of vets and young players, which is what you would want.

You really need to stop trying to make me look bad, it's pathetic.

Nix I am just wondering.
If Isiah will go (suppouse) are you going to root for the next team he will GM/coach of you will stay with the Knicks?


"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
8/3/2007  10:55 PM
its worthless to criticize the trade before we find out what is traded. until that happens, the trade simply can't be assessed.

if its balkman, robinson, rose, and picks, i think its a panic move.

if its any combination of jeffries, dickau, fred jones, and nate, then i think its a great move.

does anyone else think that isiah HASNT made a move yet b/c he's waiting for sept. 1 to come so he can include the expiring contracts of dickau or jones?

also, if its a 2-for or 3-for-1 deal, it has to be looked at as ron artest + demetris nichols for ____________ (FILL IN THE BLANK) b/c nichols is taking the roster spot of he who gets dealt.

if, in the end, its artest and nichols for the expiring contracts of jones and dickau, nate robinson, and a first rounder, its an awesome deal and i cant see how thats criticized. to get that much talent back and be able to play nichols for essentialy nate and a first rounder is too much to turn away.
#Knickstaps
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
8/3/2007  11:10 PM
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by nixluva:

I LOVE Balkman and would love to see him stay, but I mean we can't keep everyone and also take on Artest. If he's part of the deal then so be it. We still would have Chandler and Nichols, so I don't think we'd be in bad shape at all.

To be honest we all know that Artest is a guy that will eventually do something to create headlines, but if he does what he is capable of on the court it makes this team better. We know the drill. He's a talented guy with problems or else we wouldn't even have a chance to get him. Isiah believes he can handle these kinds of guys and for the most part, aside from Steph's cooky comments, we haven't had any issues with these guys.

But wait we'd be giving up youth and possible near future youth when you said the plan appears that we're trying to inject youth into this franchise.

Oh wait that's right no one does the FLIP-FLOP dance better than you.
Yo man get it right! How can I be flip flopping, when it's not my plan to begin with. It would be Isiah that you'd have to accuse of flip flopping, not me. You're acting like a child, with all these accusations and attempts to show me somehow being hypocritical. Grow up!

You obviously have never paid any attention to what i've written, since i've made it clear many times what my stance on youth is. The idea isn't to just get young, it's to WIN. If you can use some of your youth to get a player that will give you a chance to win, and he's not over the hill, then you do it. You really don't have a point here at all.

You make it sound like we would somehow have given up all of our youth with any deal for Artest. Artest isn't old and we still would have plenty of youth. We'd have a nice balance of vets and young players, which is what you would want.

You really need to stop trying to make me look bad, it's pathetic.

Nix I am just wondering.
If Isiah will go (suppouse) are you going to root for the next team he will GM/coach of you will stay with the Knicks?

Is this even a serious question? Why would you think after all these years that i'd suddenly have more allegiance to an individual over the team? What is it about me that has so many coming after me personally? Let's just stick to the subject of the thread please.

If you think Artest would help this team to get closer to a title then it makes sense to give up a couple of young players for him. Some are trying to weigh the risk of Artest not working out and then losing him. Then we would've lost 2 young players for nothing. That's a valid concern. Perhaps Isiah feels it's a risk worth taking.

Let's not kid ourselves. We have youth coming up behind the guys like Nate and Balkman. I love Balkman, but if Isiah is high on Chandler and Nichols, there's really no need to be so concerned about giving up Nate and Balkman. Balkman is one of my favorite players, but I realize that trades like this are part of the game. If we get to the ECF's I won't be crying over the loss of Balkman.

We already have Playing time issues as it is. You know that we're gonna have to consolidate this roster at some point. I'm not asking for Nate and Balkman to leave, but if they are part of the deal, we aren't gonna be hurting for young talent.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
8/3/2007  11:22 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by nixluva:

I LOVE Balkman and would love to see him stay, but I mean we can't keep everyone and also take on Artest. If he's part of the deal then so be it. We still would have Chandler and Nichols, so I don't think we'd be in bad shape at all.

To be honest we all know that Artest is a guy that will eventually do something to create headlines, but if he does what he is capable of on the court it makes this team better. We know the drill. He's a talented guy with problems or else we wouldn't even have a chance to get him. Isiah believes he can handle these kinds of guys and for the most part, aside from Steph's cooky comments, we haven't had any issues with these guys.

But wait we'd be giving up youth and possible near future youth when you said the plan appears that we're trying to inject youth into this franchise.

Oh wait that's right no one does the FLIP-FLOP dance better than you.
Yo man get it right! How can I be flip flopping, when it's not my plan to begin with. It would be Isiah that you'd have to accuse of flip flopping, not me. You're acting like a child, with all these accusations and attempts to show me somehow being hypocritical. Grow up!

You obviously have never paid any attention to what i've written, since i've made it clear many times what my stance on youth is. The idea isn't to just get young, it's to WIN. If you can use some of your youth to get a player that will give you a chance to win, and he's not over the hill, then you do it. You really don't have a point here at all.

You make it sound like we would somehow have given up all of our youth with any deal for Artest. Artest isn't old and we still would have plenty of youth. We'd have a nice balance of vets and young players, which is what you would want.

You really need to stop trying to make me look bad, it's pathetic.

Nix I am just wondering.
If Isiah will go (suppouse) are you going to root for the next team he will GM/coach of you will stay with the Knicks?

Is this even a serious question? Why would you think after all these years that i'd suddenly have more allegiance to an individual over the team? What is it about me that has so many coming after me personally? Let's just stick to the subject of the thread please.

If you think Artest would help this team to get closer to a title then it makes sense to give up a couple of young players for him. Some are trying to weigh the risk of Artest not working out and then losing him. Then we would've lost 2 young players for nothing. That's a valid concern. Perhaps Isiah feels it's a risk worth taking.

Let's not kid ourselves. We have youth coming up behind the guys like Nate and Balkman. I love Balkman, but if Isiah is high on Chandler and Nichols, there's really no need to be so concerned about giving up Nate and Balkman. Balkman is one of my favorite players, but I realize that trades like this are part of the game. If we get to the ECF's I won't be crying over the loss of Balkman.

We already have Playing time issues as it is. You know that we're gonna have to consolidate this roster at some point. I'm not asking for Nate and Balkman to leave, but if they are part of the deal, we aren't gonna be hurting for young talent.

Sorry if I was offensive but you always have backing up IT no matter what he does.
He brings some player - you like it, he trade him - you also like it. He goes for youth - you are saying its way to go, he trades youth for vets - it’s the way to go too.
He hired coach you like it, he fires him - you think it's good.
Let me rephrase my question:
When Knicks will have new coach/GM (suppose) do you plan to support whatever he will do regardless?





"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
8/3/2007  11:23 PM
And also do you mean "all this years" since 2004 when you joined the UK or before this?
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

8/3/2007  11:29 PM
Posted by arkrud:

And also do you mean "all this years" since 2004 when you joined the UK or before this?


Here's a better question for you....If Isiah doens't go anytime soon, will you ever root for the Knicks?
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
Artest to Knicks according to ESPN1050 via RealGM

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy