[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Bulls' future vs. Knicks


Author Poll
Bonn1997
Posts: 38654
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
Which team has a brighter future?
Bulls
Knicks
View Results


Author Thread
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
5/14/2007  12:58 PM
You haters are in what I like to call "the reality-based community." You believe that solutions emerge from a judicious study of discernible reality. That's not the way the NBA works. The Knicks are a playoff team now, and when they win the championship this year, they'll create their own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—they'll win another championship, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. The Knicks are champions . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what they do.

[Edited by - basketballjones on 05-14-2007 13:02]
https:// It's not so hard.
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/14/2007  1:10 PM
Posted by franco12:

If Isiah's plan is to build up the supporting cast & chips to get a Lebron or Wade in 2010, OK- I'd like that plan, though I don't think it is the plan.

It already is part of the plan unless he makes a trade for someone and adds some FA via the MLE that clogs up the cap. If he doesn't do those things he's still headed towards that eventuality. If he makes a trade for a JO, then he still can look towards 2009, since even with him they'll be under the cap at that time. Unless Isiah totally ignores what we already know that they're aware of, the Knicks will inevitably move towards cap space after the 2008/09 season.
Posted by franco12:

Chicago could land KG and instantly have a roster deep and strong enough to get to the finals.

And here is the other thing- I feel Paxson and the Bulls ownership have better vision of where they are trying to go.

Dolan has been hampered by his shortsightedness.

Isiah has gone through coaches- whereas Paxson has pretty much stuck with Skiles.

The Bulls could certainly make a trade for any one of the top bigman vets. I believe that if they do it will cost them one of their best young players. Teams want Deng. Chi already balked at the idea of trading him. So they'll have to make up their minds on whether to weaken themselves at one position in order to fix another. In our trade scenario we'd be likely asked for Lee in a trade for JO. If we did, we'd be stronger at PF still be strong at the positions. LA it seems may be ready to make a deal, even if it means giving up Bynum. They have to put a winning team around Kobe. So what does Chi do? it's not likely that a team will take picks and some other junk for a player like Pau or KG. As DJsunyc mentioned they can try to make a lesser deal and preserve their best players, but will that be enough to get them to the top?

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/14/2007  1:27 PM
Nixluva, when are you gonna answer my question about which teams (if any) in the league have less bright futures than the Knicks? You can't leave me hangin' like this!
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

5/14/2007  1:33 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by franco12:

If Isiah's plan is to build up the supporting cast & chips to get a Lebron or Wade in 2010, OK- I'd like that plan, though I don't think it is the plan.

It already is part of the plan unless he makes a trade for someone and adds some FA via the MLE that clogs up the cap. If he doesn't do those things he's still headed towards that eventuality. If he makes a trade for a JO, then he still can look towards 2009, since even with him they'll be under the cap at that time. Unless Isiah totally ignores what we already know that they're aware of, the Knicks will inevitably move towards cap space after the 2008/09 season.
Posted by franco12:

Chicago could land KG and instantly have a roster deep and strong enough to get to the finals.

And here is the other thing- I feel Paxson and the Bulls ownership have better vision of where they are trying to go.

Dolan has been hampered by his shortsightedness.

Isiah has gone through coaches- whereas Paxson has pretty much stuck with Skiles.

The Bulls could certainly make a trade for any one of the top bigman vets. I believe that if they do it will cost them one of their best young players. Teams want Deng. Chi already balked at the idea of trading him. So they'll have to make up their minds on whether to weaken themselves at one position in order to fix another. In our trade scenario we'd be likely asked for Lee in a trade for JO. If we did, we'd be stronger at PF still be strong at the positions. LA it seems may be ready to make a deal, even if it means giving up Bynum. They have to put a winning team around Kobe. So what does Chi do? it's not likely that a team will take picks and some other junk for a player like Pau or KG. As DJsunyc mentioned they can try to make a lesser deal and preserve their best players, but will that be enough to get them to the top?


The Knicks will have next to no cap space if they exercise options on Lee, Balk, Collins, Frye, and Nate. The only way they will if Curry opts out of his contract because we all know Q, Jamal, and Jerome will not. Including TO(Team Option's) and QO(Qualifying Offer) cap holds the Knicks will be in the $50+mil cap range. You have to figure in the next 2yrs ISAYUGH will at some point dish out another MLE deal. The minuscule room that might possibly have will not be near enough to offer Lebron, Wade, or Melo a Max deal and the only way we'd get those players is S&T NO F'N way that happens. You can't just be under the cap you have to be way under the cap to sign a big time FA of such caliber.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 05-14-2007 12:35 PM]
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/14/2007  1:49 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:

The Knicks will have next to no cap space if they exercise options on Lee, Balk, Collins, Frye, and Nate. The only way they will if Curry opts out of his contract because we all know Q, Jamal, and Jerome will not. Including TO(Team Option's) and QO(Qualifying Offer) cap holds the Knicks will be in the $50+mil cap range. You have to figure in the next 2yrs ISAYUGH will at some point dish out another MLE deal. The minuscule room that might possibly have will not be near enough to offer Lebron, Wade, or Melo a Max deal and the only way we'd get those players is S&T NO F'N way that happens. You can't just be under the cap you have to be way under the cap to sign a big time FA of such caliber.

The Knicks don't have to do anything!!! As of right now they have the 23rd pick and adding that players salary won't be enough to change their cap # negatively. They stand to be somewhere around 42mil at that time. You just want to try to paint the most negative picture as possible, but when we get close to that point, they can decide who they want to keep or not. I'm sure that if they feel they have a legit chance at landing a big time player that they'll do whatever they have to do to make room for it.



islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
5/14/2007  1:50 PM
It already is part of the plan unless he makes a trade for someone and adds some FA via the MLE that clogs up the cap. If he doesn't do those things he's still headed towards that eventuality. If he makes a trade for a JO, then he still can look towards 2009, since even with him they'll be under the cap at that time. Unless Isiah totally ignores what we already know that they're aware of, the Knicks will inevitably move towards cap space after the 2008/09 season.

So your whole argument is that the Knicks have a brighter future because they're going to sign LeBron, Wade or Melo to a max deal after the 2009 season???

And you think they can trade for a JO and not damage any type of core you think they've already established, while still being prepared to be under the cap in 2 years when JO is making $20M a season?

And the Bulls have no options available to them that will give them a brighter future than the Knicks and their fantasy free agent signing.

Why is anybody bothering with this guy? He's obviously just screwing with people.

Isiah's big plan when he got here in Dec 03, was to land a top free agent in the summer of 09. Brilliant.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
5/14/2007  1:52 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by TrueBlue:

The Knicks will have next to no cap space if they exercise options on Lee, Balk, Collins, Frye, and Nate. The only way they will if Curry opts out of his contract because we all know Q, Jamal, and Jerome will not. Including TO(Team Option's) and QO(Qualifying Offer) cap holds the Knicks will be in the $50+mil cap range. You have to figure in the next 2yrs ISAYUGH will at some point dish out another MLE deal. The minuscule room that might possibly have will not be near enough to offer Lebron, Wade, or Melo a Max deal and the only way we'd get those players is S&T NO F'N way that happens. You can't just be under the cap you have to be way under the cap to sign a big time FA of such caliber.

The Knicks don't have to do anything!!! As of right now they have the 23rd pick and adding that players salary won't be enough to change their cap # negatively. They stand to be somewhere around 42mil at that time. You just want to try to paint the most negative picture as possible, but when we get close to that point, they can decide who they want to keep or not. I'm sure that if they feel they have a legit chance at landing a big time player that they'll do whatever they have to do to make room for it.

If this pipedream of landing a big time player through free agency doesn't pan out, then what type of future do you see for the Knicks?
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
codeunknown
Posts: 22615
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 7/14/2004
Member: #704
5/14/2007  2:14 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by codeunknown:

Thats the most backwards logic I've ever seen. Cap space and picks are "desirable" but they're not "an indicator of success" because some some teams have failed to make good decisions? Look, the 9th pick is a clear advantage over the 23rd pick. Cap space gives you better options to attract better players and, thus, is a clear advantage over no cap space. And players who are good now with high ceilings are better than players who suck now but have high ceilings.

You're speaking in generalities and not being specific. They used cap space to sign Ben Wallace and that was a good short term move. However, simply having cap space and no real FA's to sign with that cap space renders the cap space useless. WHO is it that the Bulls are going to sign now that will improve their team? They need an inside presence and not just anybody. Someone who will force teams to double the post. As it is they're going to have to make a trade for what they need.

In order to land a bigtime talent they'll have to use one of their coveted young players too. As I pointed out, Deng is the guy that Memphis wanted in a trade for Pau. No one is just gonna give Chicago what it needs for nothing. Paxson took a chance and passed on the deal and now he's in a tougher position, cuz teams KNOW that the Bulls aren't good enough to advance without that key Big. Now they're gonna be harder to negotiate with. He's gonna have to give up something to get something.
Posted by codeunknown:

You talk about team development as if the Bulls have reached a certain threshold, where they are going to remain. Just waiting for the Knick to catch up. In a moment of clarity, you'd see that the Knick's have less picks, less cap space, and worse youth - its obvious that, if anything, the Knicks are the ones trapped at the threshold of mediocrity.

I do believe that the Bulls have a very limited range of improvement left with the current roster they have. Unless they make some moves that team isn't going to get that much better. They're roster isn't setup for getting much better. Kirk, Gordon and Deng aren't going to suddenly all score a lot more and dominate games from the perimeter. PJ and Ben are old. Tyrus is limited and IMO years away from being an offensive threat. I'm telling you that the Knicks will bridge that gap quickly if the Bulls aren't able to pull off a big trade for a bigman.

My goodness, Nixluva. You're telling me there are no FAs left for the Bulls to sign over the next 2 years? You're telling me that the Bulls players won't improve but the Knicks players suddenly will? You're telling me that the Bulls, with one of the youngest teams in the league, have the pressure to win now or else? And you're telling me that the only way for the Bulls to really improve is to get a superstar post player? And I'm the one speaking in generalities? Nixluva, you've got to be clinically delusional if you actually believe that. Your "position" seems desperate and even phony at times.

Look, I won't even address the garbage that there aren't any free agents. You look it up. And the crap about the Knicks players only getting better is just as farcical. Once again, the Bulls youth have better ball handling, better shooting, better defense, better athletes. There's every reason to think that they have more upside and will continue to outperform the Knicks. Its not even just Gordon, Hinrich and Deng - its Sefalosha and Ty Thomas, this years pick and next year's pick.

But, most of all, get rid of your rigid and, well, bizarre notion that the only way to win is with a post-up center. What the Bulls need is a bigger 4/5 that can shoot from outside - a floor spacer who can be a legitimate threat on the pick and roll. That alone significantly upgrades the offense and puts them on par with the Pistons.

Or they can start Sefalosha (I know, all he did was put the clamps on D-Wade) and trade Gordon and Nocioni for Gasol or O'Neal.

Or, with the 9th pick, they can take Spencer Hawes, a 6-11 center effective in the high post - that would spell trouble for obvious reasons.

Or, and here's the clincher, they can take POST-UP big man ROY HIBBERT at #9 and then sign Vince Carter and then laugh in your face.

Or they could take Julian Wright or Corey Brewer and trade Deng and Nocioni for Kevin Garnett. You get the picture.

There are multiple combinations and all of them bode well for the Bulls. Many of the teams above are championship contenders. The possibilities are endless when you're not Isiah.
Sh-t in the popcorn to go with sh-t on the court. Its a theme show like Medieval times.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

5/14/2007  2:19 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by BlueSeats:

This is great. Since finishing our 33 win season I've been educated that we're in a better position than the Bulls and the Mavs. At this rate I'll expect us to be better than the Spurs, Suns and Pistons as early as next week.


He's a TOOL nothing more. I love how during the yr we couldn't compare our season to Toronto's, GSW's,........ (PHX, Ind, and Dallas from a yr or 2 ago) in terms of new additions, youth, injuries, coaching, GM, suspensions, etc etc etc but now we can compare our future with the Bulls.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 05-14-2007 10:46 AM]


I like nixluva, he's very good at what he does. But it's not just him. 19 people - more than half of the poll responders - agree with him. And more than half thought the Knicks were better off than the 60+ win Mavs.

If 'luva is a tool, there's a whole "tool set" flying beneath the radar here.

What I don't get is if people think the knicks are so good, why are they not more outraged at all the under-performance. If we're better situated than 60+ and 49 win teams I'd think the expectations for us next season should be in the area of 55 wins and a trip to the conference finals. I don't expect such performance, but nor do I expect great disappointment from the under-the-radar crowd if/when we fall short. It's this amazing balance of great expectations and unlimited patience that I find so amazing. Most Knicks fans have been expecting an 8th seed or better performance every year of the past 3, but then exhibit so little upset when we fall short. In fact their upset manifests itself against fans who expect less of the team and are right.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/14/2007  2:22 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by BlueSeats:

This is great. Since finishing our 33 win season I've been educated that we're in a better position than the Bulls and the Mavs. At this rate I'll expect us to be better than the Spurs, Suns and Pistons as early as next week.


He's a TOOL nothing more. I love how during the yr we couldn't compare our season to Toronto's, GSW's,........ (PHX, Ind, and Dallas from a yr or 2 ago) in terms of new additions, youth, injuries, coaching, GM, suspensions, etc etc etc but now we can compare our future with the Bulls.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 05-14-2007 10:46 AM]


I like nixluva, he's very good at what he does. But it's not just him. 19 people - more than half of the poll responders - agree with him. And more than half thought the Knicks were better off than the 60+ win Mavs.

If 'luva is a tool, there's a whole "tool set" flying beneath the radar here.
It has to be one person (my bet is nixluva or misterearl) voting many times. You can tell from the replies that the two of them are alone in their stance. Next time I'll just ask people to reply saying they're answer so that one poster can't just create screen name and vote with them.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/14/2007  2:23 PM
Or let's make it simple: Who here voted for the Knicks?
Misterearl
Nixluva
Enyspree
babyknicks
holfresh

Please reply if you voted for the Knicks and I didn't count you.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 05-14-2007 2:23 PM]
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

5/14/2007  2:43 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by TrueBlue:

The Knicks will have next to no cap space if they exercise options on Lee, Balk, Collins, Frye, and Nate. The only way they will if Curry opts out of his contract because we all know Q, Jamal, and Jerome will not. Including TO(Team Option's) and QO(Qualifying Offer) cap holds the Knicks will be in the $50+mil cap range. You have to figure in the next 2yrs ISAYUGH will at some point dish out another MLE deal. The minuscule room that might possibly have will not be near enough to offer Lebron, Wade, or Melo a Max deal and the only way we'd get those players is S&T NO F'N way that happens. You can't just be under the cap you have to be way under the cap to sign a big time FA of such caliber.

The Knicks don't have to do anything!!! As of right now they have the 23rd pick and adding that players salary won't be enough to change their cap # negatively. They stand to be somewhere around 42mil at that time. You just want to try to paint the most negative picture as possible, but when we get close to that point, they can decide who they want to keep or not. I'm sure that if they feel they have a legit chance at landing a big time player that they'll do whatever they have to do to make room for it.



Dude do you live on earth on what? I just checked and those players won't even be elligible for FA until 2010/2011. You do realize Lebron, Melo, Wade will be making in the Option yr $16mil+, you also realize the Knicks would have no room to offer any player a new contract including their own FA from now till then? That means no extending Marbury for any kind of deal but remember he has just as much game in him as Hinrich will 2yrs from now(rolling eyes). They wouldn't be able to trade for K.G. or J.O. without significantly gutting the roster of the future salaries to do so. Even if these FA's were available during the 2009/10 yr there is no way they turn down that kind of cash to come here, take a paycut, or barely tread water because the roster had to be gutted to acquire them. The salary cap stands to be about $57mil ball parking projection. People aren't as INLUV with New York as you are. And seriously stop dummying up the Poll.



[Edited by - TrueBlue on 05-14-2007 1:52 PM]
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
Masterplan
Posts: 21571
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2002
Member: #362
5/14/2007  3:25 PM
^^^ BlueSeats, to be fair, the argument was that Knicks *fans* are better off than Mavs *fans* who have to put up with a 67 win team choking in the playoffs. i think it's bogus, but they weren't arguing that the actual Knicks team is even comparable to those guys.

the bulls have some great young players. guys like deng have taken even bigger strides this season than eddy. the bulls could trade 2 or 3 young studs for that all-star big man and have more draft picks ready to step into those shoes. whereas if the knicks are forced to trade lee or collins for a vet its practically back to square 1 for our youth movement since guys like frye and nate have disappointed this season. i like our guys and think some of them can be real good, but i think it's totally unreasonable to *expect* them to be outperforming the Bulls young guns at any point based solely on what we've seen. it's a possibility, but the probabilities have to be in chicago's favor at this point.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
5/14/2007  8:51 PM
I can't beleive this is still a debate. I'd like to ask a different kind of question here. Have we forgotten what quality is as a basketball team? If we have it, then how come it doesn't show up in our records? Quality means everything.
I'll never trust this' team again.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

5/14/2007  10:02 PM
Posted by Masterplan:

^^^ BlueSeats, to be fair, the argument was that Knicks *fans* are better off than Mavs *fans* who have to put up with a 67 win team choking in the playoffs. i think it's bogus, but they weren't arguing that the actual Knicks team is even comparable to those guys.


I guess everyone has their own way of looking at things. I just don't get why a fan would feel better about a team that won 23 and 33 wins vs one that went to the finals and then won 67 games. But, to each their own.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/14/2007  10:14 PM
Posted by 4949:

I can't beleive this is still a debate. I'd like to ask a different kind of question here. Have we forgotten what quality is as a basketball team? If we have it, then how come it doesn't show up in our records? Quality means everything.
It's all about the future. We're going to peak in 2042 whereas Chicago is headed all downward after 2029!
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
5/14/2007  10:21 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:

Better in 2yrs

Marbury or Hinrich=Hinrich
Jamal or Gordon=Gordon
Q or Deng=Deng
Lee or Nocioni=Wash.... maybe Lee edges him out
Curry or Wallace=I'll go ahead and say Chubby
Francis or FA=FA
Nate or ?=Nate
Jeffries or Sefolosha=Sef
Balk or Thomas=Wash
Frye or Draft pick=Unknown
Collins or Duhon=Wash
Morris or ?=Morris


I just don't see how any sane human being can think otherwise.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 05-14-2007 11:51 AM]

that has to be the most ridiculous thing I have seen posted on any board, anywhere in the last 7 years....

You bash nixluva, but you will go to any length to degrade the knicks, and no one is saying the knicks are great or even a good team at this point, but you seem like you have to bash the knicks to justify your unhappiness, and your helplessness regarding this team. I think it is ridiculous.. you are actually comparing francis to a FA the bulls might get? come on!!!

and then you end your post with this remark..


I
just don't see how any sane human being can think otherwise.

LOL.. so a person would be insane to think that marbury would be better at 32 than hinrich will be at 27, when marbury even with his declining health is clearly a better player now. put your hate aside, marbury is better and it is not close...

who know what these guys will be doing in 2 years. Did anyone think nash after he left dallas would be posting MVP seasons? Or that the mavs would make the finals without him?

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/14/2007  10:27 PM
Posted by tkf:
Posted by TrueBlue:

Better in 2yrs

Marbury or Hinrich=Hinrich
Jamal or Gordon=Gordon
Q or Deng=Deng
Lee or Nocioni=Wash.... maybe Lee edges him out
Curry or Wallace=I'll go ahead and say Chubby
Francis or FA=FA
Nate or ?=Nate
Jeffries or Sefolosha=Sef
Balk or Thomas=Wash
Frye or Draft pick=Unknown
Collins or Duhon=Wash
Morris or ?=Morris


I just don't see how any sane human being can think otherwise.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 05-14-2007 11:51 AM]

that has to be the most ridiculous thing I have seen posted on any board, anywhere in the last 7 years....

You bash nixluva, but you will go to any length to degrade the knicks, and no one is saying the knicks are great or even a good team at this point, but you seem like you have to bash the knicks to justify your unhappiness, and your helplessness regarding this team. I think it is ridiculous.. you are actually comparing francis to a FA the bulls might get? come on!!!
I actually thought he was being generous to the Knicks. I would have picked a draft pick over Frye, Nate, and Francis. Frye and Nate are inferior to the average player you'd get in a 1st rd pick. (That's why they weren't even close to making the rookie-sophomore game.) And Francis is awful.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
5/14/2007  10:31 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by Masterplan:

^^^ BlueSeats, to be fair, the argument was that Knicks *fans* are better off than Mavs *fans* who have to put up with a 67 win team choking in the playoffs. i think it's bogus, but they weren't arguing that the actual Knicks team is even comparable to those guys.


I guess everyone has their own way of looking at things. I just don't get why a fan would feel better about a team that won 23 and 33 wins vs one that went to the finals and then won 67 games. But, to each their own.

blue, I think that if the mavs were in NY, the forums would be going crazy with threads to trade the whole team, dirk sucks, blow up the team and start over, we will never be a championship team, we are the best 67 win team in history to be bumped in the first round, I mean these boards would be a mess!!!! So what I think is that some people including myself just don't see the mavs as a championship team, and although we are not even a playoff team, we do have a team with a good amount of players who still have their best years way ahead of them, and for that reason, there is some hope that this team can add a player here and there, hope our young guys reach their potential and maybe one day become a contender for the championship.You know it is the very reason why some people would rather have a lottery pick over a player like like elton brand, because with the unknown there is always that hope for greatness. While on the other hand, where does dallas go from here? they are a veteran team, not much young talent,over the cap and built around a player who can't deliver them a ring. I am not saying that we are a better team or in a better situation but I think most NY fans feel that in our current situations there is that glimmer of hope of reaching that championship level whereas dallas will soon be at a crossroad of remaining a good regular season team that can go but so far in the playoffs or a team that needs to take a few steps back and retool. Just a theory of mine...


[Edited by - tkf on 05-14-2007 10:37 PM]
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
5/14/2007  10:38 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by tkf:
Posted by TrueBlue:

Better in 2yrs

Marbury or Hinrich=Hinrich
Jamal or Gordon=Gordon
Q or Deng=Deng
Lee or Nocioni=Wash.... maybe Lee edges him out
Curry or Wallace=I'll go ahead and say Chubby
Francis or FA=FA
Nate or ?=Nate
Jeffries or Sefolosha=Sef
Balk or Thomas=Wash
Frye or Draft pick=Unknown
Collins or Duhon=Wash
Morris or ?=Morris


I just don't see how any sane human being can think otherwise.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 05-14-2007 11:51 AM]

that has to be the most ridiculous thing I have seen posted on any board, anywhere in the last 7 years....

You bash nixluva, but you will go to any length to degrade the knicks, and no one is saying the knicks are great or even a good team at this point, but you seem like you have to bash the knicks to justify your unhappiness, and your helplessness regarding this team. I think it is ridiculous.. you are actually comparing francis to a FA the bulls might get? come on!!!
I actually thought he was being generous to the Knicks. I would have picked a draft pick over Frye, Nate, and Francis. Frye and Nate are inferior to the average player you'd get in a 1st rd pick. (That's why they weren't even close to making the rookie-sophomore game.) And Francis is awful.

my lord, I won't touch this one... ok bonn... whatever....
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Bulls' future vs. Knicks

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy