Posted by VDesai:
Actually blitzing may have made a huge difference...at least it would've been better than sitting on your hands and letting Drew Brees take 10 seconds to find his targets downfield and beat your zone coverages. They needed something to disrupt his timing and rhythm. They barely even hit the guy! I mean, did you see the game against the Jets where the Saints offense struggled? They didn't sack the guy a ton, but the Jets basically blitzed all game long and held those guys to 17 pts. Not saying we would've done that, but maybe if we could've forced a turnover or two, we'd have scored enough to be in the game. Yeah we would've been susceptible to big plays, but basically we were susceptible to big plays playing conservatively.
I don't really know why we kept at what we were doing when they were scoring relentlessly against us. Bad gameplan+lack of adjustments is on Sheridan this week. There was some execution things (Webster's missed INT), and some weird penalty calls and bad luck things, but mostly we were just playing the wrong kind of defense to disrupt an offense like that. Right now our front 4 is not healthy enough to rely on to generate all of our pressure. Osi is not all the way back from his injury and Tuck really shouldn't even be playing with his shoulder injury.
I totally agree about the blitzing. I know alot of people say the Giants couldn't blitz because they had to respect the Saints running game, but if you ask me, the Saints running game works so well because the passing game works so well. I woulda blitzed the **** out of Brees instead of letting him pick the D apart with every single pass attempt. If the run game beats you, so be it, but don't let a guy like Brees just roll you over.