[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Where the heck is Hillary Clinton?
Author Thread
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

9/23/2016  9:26 PM
Trump said drugs are a very, very big factor in the protest...
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
9/23/2016  10:08 PM    LAST EDITED: 9/23/2016  10:09 PM
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:Sure they are of consequence, But like I posted before, HRC has not earned my vote. I am not interested in voting against someone, and she is yet to convince me that I should vote for her.

Who cares what Hillary earns or deserves. Vote for her because you will actually get to live in a better country than with a Trump presidency.

I care. It's my vote. And I know Hillary doesn't care. Somewhere in there is the crux of the problem.


So you care more about whether Hillary deserves your vote than about the quality of the country that *you* live in? Are you willing to have a tanking economy in which you or people you love lose their jobs just under Trump just because of how you personally feel towards Hillary?
martin
Posts: 76218
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
9/24/2016  1:11 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:Sure they are of consequence, But like I posted before, HRC has not earned my vote. I am not interested in voting against someone, and she is yet to convince me that I should vote for her.

Who cares what Hillary earns or deserves. Vote for her because you will actually get to live in a better country than with a Trump presidency.

I care. It's my vote. And I know Hillary doesn't care. Somewhere in there is the crux of the problem.


So you care more about whether Hillary deserves your vote than about the quality of the country that *you* live in? Are you willing to have a tanking economy in which you or people you love lose their jobs just under Trump just because of how you personally feel towards Hillary?

+1

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
9/24/2016  1:19 AM
meloshouldgo wrote:Or maybe it has sunk in that they are just stuck with Congress. The POTUS on the other hand can be recycled. You can fire those every 4 years, but you just can't clean House (or Seante)

True. If Hillary wins nothing changes. If Trump wins there's a good chance a lot if not everything changes

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

9/24/2016  5:51 AM
gunsnewing wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:Or maybe it has sunk in that they are just stuck with Congress. The POTUS on the other hand can be recycled. You can fire those every 4 years, but you just can't clean House (or Seante)

True. If Hillary wins nothing changes. If Trump wins there's a good chance a lot if not everything changes


If you want changes in Washington then don't vote for your congressman..Otherwise you are just serving up lip service..Congress has single digits approval rating but you vote for them anyway..90% of the country want gun reform but Congress won't do it..Congress won't compromise on an infrastructure bill..Drug prices cannot be controlled because of your congressman..Do you want to make a change?..It's not the executive branch, it's Congress..I'm voting for the other guy, will you?
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30118
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
9/24/2016  7:39 AM
holfresh wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:Or maybe it has sunk in that they are just stuck with Congress. The POTUS on the other hand can be recycled. You can fire those every 4 years, but you just can't clean House (or Seante)

True. If Hillary wins nothing changes. If Trump wins there's a good chance a lot if not everything changes


If you want changes in Washington then don't vote for your congressman..Otherwise you are just serving up lip service..Congress has single digits approval rating but you vote for them anyway..90% of the country want gun reform but Congress won't do it..Congress won't compromise on an infrastructure bill..Drug prices cannot be controlled because of your congressman..Do you want to make a change?..It's not the executive branch, it's Congress..I'm voting for the other guy, will you?

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30118
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
9/24/2016  7:56 AM
We want change and solutions then middle class and poor class have to unite. Stop being manipulated by the elite class hoping to get a piece of the left over scraps.

Perfect example is how so many have been up in arms over Kapernick. Yet most of us either haven't been informed or didn't care enough to voice the same critic about the healthcare for 9/11 first responders getting blocked. Or benefits for homeless veterans. But we want to talk about disrespecting these veterans by not standing for the anthem.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

9/24/2016  9:26 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:Sure they are of consequence, But like I posted before, HRC has not earned my vote. I am not interested in voting against someone, and she is yet to convince me that I should vote for her.

Who cares what Hillary earns or deserves. Vote for her because you will actually get to live in a better country than with a Trump presidency.

I care. It's my vote. And I know Hillary doesn't care. Somewhere in there is the crux of the problem.


So you care more about whether Hillary deserves your vote than about the quality of the country that *you* live in? Are you willing to have a tanking economy in which you or people you love lose their jobs just under Trump just because of how you personally feel towards Hillary?

LOL - No, I should vote for Hillary because you can read the tea leaves. There's too much hyperbole in your question. This negative voting rationale is not going to change my mind.

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
markvmc
Posts: 21995
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2008
Member: #1797

9/24/2016  9:37 AM
In safe states such as New York or Alabama, your vote hasn't a chance of affecting the outcome, so there's an argument that in such states you would do better to take the long view, and vote third party. If enough people did that, and such parties could get financing, entry to the debate, a permanent place on ballots in certain states, then third party candidates might eventually get a real shot in this country.

If you live in a swing state, the lesser of two evils strategy is clearly the wiser option.

meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

9/24/2016  9:38 AM
gunsnewing wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:Or maybe it has sunk in that they are just stuck with Congress. The POTUS on the other hand can be recycled. You can fire those every 4 years, but you just can't clean House (or Seante)

True. If Hillary wins nothing changes. If Trump wins there's a good chance a lot if not everything changes

I am not interested in any of the changes advocated by Trump.

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
9/24/2016  9:39 AM
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:Sure they are of consequence, But like I posted before, HRC has not earned my vote. I am not interested in voting against someone, and she is yet to convince me that I should vote for her.

Who cares what Hillary earns or deserves. Vote for her because you will actually get to live in a better country than with a Trump presidency.

I care. It's my vote. And I know Hillary doesn't care. Somewhere in there is the crux of the problem.


So you care more about whether Hillary deserves your vote than about the quality of the country that *you* live in? Are you willing to have a tanking economy in which you or people you love lose their jobs just under Trump just because of how you personally feel towards Hillary?

LOL - No, I should vote for Hillary because you can read the tea leaves. There's too much hyperbole in your question. This negative voting rationale is not going to change my mind.


I just don't get the mindset where you care more about the candidate's personal thoughts, feelings, or whatever than about your own well-being. I just vote based on what I think will be in my own interest and the interest of those around me. If I think path A will lead to a better outcome than path B, I follow path A.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
9/24/2016  9:40 AM
markvmc wrote:In safe states such as New York or Alabama, your vote hasn't a chance of affecting the outcome, so there's an argument that in such states you would do better to take the long view, and vote third party. If enough people did that, and such parties could get financing, entry to the debate, a permanent place on ballots in certain states, then third party candidates might eventually get a real shot in this country.

If you live in a swing state, the lesser of two evils strategy is clearly the wiser option.


Potentially but you don't want a scenario where the less evil candidate wins the electoral vote but loses the popular vote.
markvmc
Posts: 21995
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2008
Member: #1797

9/24/2016  9:41 AM
Why would that matter?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
9/24/2016  9:44 AM
markvmc wrote:Why would that matter?

Well, you have a weakened president then. It matters for perception.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
9/24/2016  9:46 AM
meloshouldgo wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:Or maybe it has sunk in that they are just stuck with Congress. The POTUS on the other hand can be recycled. You can fire those every 4 years, but you just can't clean House (or Seante)

True. If Hillary wins nothing changes. If Trump wins there's a good chance a lot if not everything changes

I am not interested in any of the changes advocated by Trump.


Agreed. But I'd reject Guns premise. When Hillary appoints SC justices and it changes the balance of the SC, A LOT will change in the country.
markvmc
Posts: 21995
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2008
Member: #1797

9/24/2016  9:50 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
markvmc wrote:Why would that matter?

Well, you have a weakened president then. It matters for perception.

Didn't seem to affect Bush that way at all. What matters for weak/strong presidency is congress. And unless the democrats take both houses, there is no way that the republicans will work with Hillary, no matter what the outcome of the popular vote.

meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

9/24/2016  10:47 AM    LAST EDITED: 9/24/2016  10:52 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:Sure they are of consequence, But like I posted before, HRC has not earned my vote. I am not interested in voting against someone, and she is yet to convince me that I should vote for her.

Who cares what Hillary earns or deserves. Vote for her because you will actually get to live in a better country than with a Trump presidency.

I care. It's my vote. And I know Hillary doesn't care. Somewhere in there is the crux of the problem.


So you care more about whether Hillary deserves your vote than about the quality of the country that *you* live in? Are you willing to have a tanking economy in which you or people you love lose their jobs just under Trump just because of how you personally feel towards Hillary?

LOL - No, I should vote for Hillary because you can read the tea leaves. There's too much hyperbole in your question. This negative voting rationale is not going to change my mind.


I just don't get the mindset where you care more about the candidate's personal thoughts, feelings, or whatever than about your own well-being. I just vote based on what I think will be in my own interest and the interest of those around me. If I think path A will lead to a better outcome than path B, I follow path A.

I don't get why you are projecting that mindset on me. I have said two things.
1. Based on her lack of charisma/passion/convictions and the level of republicans opposition she is not going to get the job done or make America better.

2. I am not interested in voting for who makes America less worse, because I think voters need to send a message to establishment politicians that they need to get their **** together. I am done voting for the next person who will pander to the 1℅. I get that right now it feels like there's too much at stake here in this election. But,i have been around long enough to know every election feels this way.

I am still going to vote for every other race on the ticket. I am not trying to make the same political statement at every level, and I don't have enough information to make reasonable assessments in every race. But I will vote to keep the right wing ideology out.

The gesture of not voting for Hillary is largely symbolic, but I believe that if more people resisted voting "against" candidates we would have a much better democracy and a better country. You may not agree with this but I am voting or not voting in this case to make the country better. I am taking a stand and given what little influence I have in the system, quite possibly the only stand I can take.

The message I am trying to send is more important than removing the spectre of Donald Trump. Because this corrupt partisan politics is why we have problems like Donald Trump to start with. This is not a one time problem. It won't go away if he loses. Next election there'll be another pompous scumbag spewing this hateful garbage and people will be eating it up.

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

9/24/2016  10:49 AM    LAST EDITED: 9/24/2016  11:03 AM
markvmc wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
markvmc wrote:Why would that matter?

Well, you have a weakened president then. It matters for perception.

Didn't seem to affect Bush that way at all. What matters for weak/strong presidency is congress. And unless the democrats take both houses, there is no way that the republicans will work with Hillary, no matter what the outcome of the popular vote.

Yes agreed. Presidents have very little direct impact. SC justices and Fed Chair are two most important things they do and both are indirect.

Need to add Vetoes - but given that Bill didn't veto repeal of Glass Stegall or the law that started these mass incarcerations of black people and Hillary voted for Iraq War and bailouts, I don't see why I should vote for her. They are right wing Democrats.

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
9/24/2016  11:03 AM
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:Sure they are of consequence, But like I posted before, HRC has not earned my vote. I am not interested in voting against someone, and she is yet to convince me that I should vote for her.

Who cares what Hillary earns or deserves. Vote for her because you will actually get to live in a better country than with a Trump presidency.

I care. It's my vote. And I know Hillary doesn't care. Somewhere in there is the crux of the problem.


So you care more about whether Hillary deserves your vote than about the quality of the country that *you* live in? Are you willing to have a tanking economy in which you or people you love lose their jobs just under Trump just because of how you personally feel towards Hillary?

LOL - No, I should vote for Hillary because you can read the tea leaves. There's too much hyperbole in your question. This negative voting rationale is not going to change my mind.


I just don't get the mindset where you care more about the candidate's personal thoughts, feelings, or whatever than about your own well-being. I just vote based on what I think will be in my own interest and the interest of those around me. If I think path A will lead to a better outcome than path B, I follow path A.

I don't get why you are projecting that mindset on me. I have said two things.
1. Based on her lack of charisma/passion/convictions and the level of republicans opposition she is not going to get the job done or make America better.

2. I am not interested in voting for who makes America less worse, because I think voters need to send a message to establishment politicians that they need to get their **** together. I am done voting for the next person who will pander to the 1℅. I get that right now it feels like there's too much at stake here in this election. But,i have been around long enough to know every election feels this way.

I am still going to vote for every other race on the ticket. I am not trying to make the same political statement at every level, and I don't have enough information to make reasonable assessments in every race. But I will vote to keep the right wing ideology out.

The gesture of not voting for Hillary is largely symbolic, but I believe that if more people resisted voting "against" candidates we would have a much better democracy and a better country. You may not agree with this but I am voting or not voting in this case to make the country better. I am taking a stand and given what little influence I have in the system, quite possibly the only stand I can take.

The message I am trying to send is more important than removing the spectre of Donald Trump. Because this corrupt partisan politics is why we have problems like Donald Trump to start with. This is not a one time problem. It won't go away if he loses. Next election there'll be another pompous scumbag spewing this hateful garbage and people will be eating it up.

"spewing this hateful garbage and people will be eating it up" I think you're drinking the juice here. What hateful garbage is he spewing--show me the facts.

RIP Crushalot😞
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

9/24/2016  11:16 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:Sure they are of consequence, But like I posted before, HRC has not earned my vote. I am not interested in voting against someone, and she is yet to convince me that I should vote for her.

Who cares what Hillary earns or deserves. Vote for her because you will actually get to live in a better country than with a Trump presidency.

I care. It's my vote. And I know Hillary doesn't care. Somewhere in there is the crux of the problem.


So you care more about whether Hillary deserves your vote than about the quality of the country that *you* live in? Are you willing to have a tanking economy in which you or people you love lose their jobs just under Trump just because of how you personally feel towards Hillary?

LOL - No, I should vote for Hillary because you can read the tea leaves. There's too much hyperbole in your question. This negative voting rationale is not going to change my mind.


I just don't get the mindset where you care more about the candidate's personal thoughts, feelings, or whatever than about your own well-being. I just vote based on what I think will be in my own interest and the interest of those around me. If I think path A will lead to a better outcome than path B, I follow path A.

I don't get why you are projecting that mindset on me. I have said two things.
1. Based on her lack of charisma/passion/convictions and the level of republicans opposition she is not going to get the job done or make America better.

2. I am not interested in voting for who makes America less worse, because I think voters need to send a message to establishment politicians that they need to get their **** together. I am done voting for the next person who will pander to the 1℅. I get that right now it feels like there's too much at stake here in this election. But,i have been around long enough to know every election feels this way.

I am still going to vote for every other race on the ticket. I am not trying to make the same political statement at every level, and I don't have enough information to make reasonable assessments in every race. But I will vote to keep the right wing ideology out.

The gesture of not voting for Hillary is largely symbolic, but I believe that if more people resisted voting "against" candidates we would have a much better democracy and a better country. You may not agree with this but I am voting or not voting in this case to make the country better. I am taking a stand and given what little influence I have in the system, quite possibly the only stand I can take.

The message I am trying to send is more important than removing the spectre of Donald Trump. Because this corrupt partisan politics is why we have problems like Donald Trump to start with. This is not a one time problem. It won't go away if he loses. Next election there'll be another pompous scumbag spewing this hateful garbage and people will be eating it up.

"spewing this hateful garbage and people will be eating it up" I think you're drinking the juice here. What hateful garbage is he spewing--show me the facts.

Dude, seriously? Go back to Fox TV, quit while you are ahead.

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
Where the heck is Hillary Clinton?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy