tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:reggie miller took 6486 3s and made 2560 for a 39% average so tkf YOU go do some research.

39% is a lot better than 33, but I was referring to him being an efficient all around shooter, which is why i mentioned bernard king as well.. I wasn't talking about threes and you know it.. if so why not mention how bernard king never took threes... this was just another one of your attempt to try to one up someone in a conversation you are getting pretty much beat up in.. sorry , but that is the truth... it is equivalent to not having an answer and just yelling back... "yo mamma"...

for the record miller was a 47% shooter from the field, but I would not consider him a volume shooter so he most likely doesn't belong in the convo. if anything, THAT should have been your argument...

Nice try tkf/dk7th, but you know this was all about shooting the "heat ck 3" and you or your alter ego brought other players into it and when confronted with the facts you ran away with your tail between your legs.Nice try tho.

lol... jeez man... ok, so tell me, what was the significance of your post with reggie miller.. what are you trying to prove here?

this should be interesting.. can't wait cooch...

If you take 6500 3s theres a good chance your % is gonna be up there.

cooch2584 wrote:

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:

tkf wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:Anyone notice that once tkf signed off, we havent heard from dk7th. Just saying.

It's scary that you're following them that closely

exactly.. but this is typical side barring.. his argument has been smashed, now it is time to deflect..

Im not deflecting jack, I hit you with facts and you ran with your tail between your legs. "Gotta catch a flight" your a joke tkf

your facts are irrelevant... they have not supported any of your arguments, and I am being kind calling them that...

Thats loser talk tkf,point out how my facts are irrelevant.CALLING YOU OUT RIGHT NOW oh but you have a flight to catch I bet

i am asking you to point out one fact that you made that was relevant to this conversation.. one that actually supported what you said or proved wrong what myself or dk are saying.. just one?

tkf wrote:

TeamBall wrote:Gallinari costs his team a game against the Lakers because of his flopping and KG punched Frye in the balls while he was in mid air. Thats playing the game the right way?

every player at some time cost his team a game.. but gallo has won two games this year with solid defense and playing the right way..

btw: were you impressed with the meltdowns carmelo has been having this year? just asking..

Speaking of Melo's meltdowns, couldnt that fit in your "every player costs his team a game" statement? And no I havent been impressed (I dont know if thats really the right word to use in this sitation). I dont see how any Knick fan could be.

cooch2584 wrote:You and dk brought up players that have been playing much longer than Melo,ie nash,kobe etc and Melo hasnt taken half the 3s as them. Logic tells you, if players takes more shots he could either have more or less of a 3 pt %.Even you can understand that.

cooch, just stop it... more or less? tell me, other than more.. or less what else can it be????????

cooch not one person on this board will back up what you are saying, even if they don't agree with me and dk, not one person will vouch for your post.. because it doesn't make sense...

cooch2584 wrote:

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:reggie miller took 6486 3s and made 2560 for a 39% average so tkf YOU go do some research.

39% is a lot better than 33, but I was referring to him being an efficient all around shooter, which is why i mentioned bernard king as well.. I wasn't talking about threes and you know it.. if so why not mention how bernard king never took threes... this was just another one of your attempt to try to one up someone in a conversation you are getting pretty much beat up in.. sorry , but that is the truth... it is equivalent to not having an answer and just yelling back... "yo mamma"...

for the record miller was a 47% shooter from the field, but I would not consider him a volume shooter so he most likely doesn't belong in the convo. if anything, THAT should have been your argument...

Nice try tkf/dk7th, but you know this was all about shooting the "heat ck 3" and you or your alter ego brought other players into it and when confronted with the facts you ran away with your tail between your legs.Nice try tho.

lol... jeez man... ok, so tell me, what was the significance of your post with reggie miller.. what are you trying to prove here?

this should be interesting.. can't wait cooch...

If you take 6500 3s theres a good chance your % is gonna be up there.

LOL.. I knew this was above your head.... dude that is not true.... your percentage is what it is.....that is why they have what is called an AVERAGE! that is why you usually need a good enough sample size.... for instance if I take 2 threes and hit 1, then my percentage is 50%.. well that may not be indicative of how good of a shooter I may really be, too small of a sample size.. but after 100 threes you have a good enough sample size where you can trust the percentages... therefore If I shoot 40% after 2,000 threes taken, then it is pretty much assumed that I will be around 40% after I take 4,000 threes.... taking more doesn't increase my percentage if anything it can have an adverse effect..

usually cooch the less you take the higher your % is... for example why do you think they put a minimum number of attempts in order for someone to qualify for a batting title, or shooting percentage leader....

Pretty much assumed?? So your examples,that took 2 and 3x as many 3s as Melo are better shooters because you ASSUME their %?? Nope not flying with me. And if Melo shoots 50% one yr where does your assumption go? Hes shooting at 44.8 right now.

i give up... seriously someone, please help cooch. seriously... someone on here who is a carmelo fan, because he just doesn't get it.. maybe coming from someone he can't call a hater will make much more sense.. again, maybe not and there is just no hope... but I am done..

dk, run... you are not going to get anywhere with this one man.....

cooch, I will say this final thing.... them taking more shots than carmelo from three, doesn't help their percentage!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

lets play this game... cooch takes 100 shots..

tkf takes 80 shots...

cooch makes 40 shots

tkf makes 60

guess what cooch?.................

later cooch....

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:reggie miller took 6486 3s and made 2560 for a 39% average so tkf YOU go do some research.

39% is a lot better than 33, but I was referring to him being an efficient all around shooter, which is why i mentioned bernard king as well.. I wasn't talking about threes and you know it.. if so why not mention how bernard king never took threes... this was just another one of your attempt to try to one up someone in a conversation you are getting pretty much beat up in.. sorry , but that is the truth... it is equivalent to not having an answer and just yelling back... "yo mamma"...

for the record miller was a 47% shooter from the field, but I would not consider him a volume shooter so he most likely doesn't belong in the convo. if anything, THAT should have been your argument...

Nice try tkf/dk7th, but you know this was all about shooting the "heat ck 3" and you or your alter ego brought other players into it and when confronted with the facts you ran away with your tail between your legs.Nice try tho.

lol... jeez man... ok, so tell me, what was the significance of your post with reggie miller.. what are you trying to prove here?

this should be interesting.. can't wait cooch...

If you take 6500 3s theres a good chance your % is gonna be up there.

LOL.. I knew this was above your head.... dude that is not true.... your percentage is what it is.....that is why they have what is called an AVERAGE! that is why you usually need a good enough sample size.... for instance if I take 2 threes and hit 1, then my percentage is 50%.. well that may not be indicative of how good of a shooter I may really be, too small of a sample size.. but after 100 threes you have a good enough sample size where you can trust the percentages... therefore If I shoot 40% after 2,000 threes taken, then it is pretty much assumed that I will be around 40% after I take 4,000 threes.... taking more doesn't increase my percentage if anything it can have an adverse effect..

usually cooch the less you take the higher your % is... for example why do you think they put a minimum number of attempts in order for someone to qualify for a batting title, or shooting percentage leader....

Pretty much assumed?? So your examples,that took 2 and 3x as many 3s as Melo are better shooters because you ASSUME their %?? Nope not flying with me. And if Melo shoots 50% one yr where does your assumption go? Hes shooting at 44.8 right now.

i give up... seriously someone, please help cooch. seriously... someone on here who is a carmelo fan, because he just doesn't get it.. maybe coming from someone he can't call a hater will make much more sense.. again, maybe not and there is just no hope... but I am done..

dk, run... you are not going to get anywhere with this one man.....

later..

SEE YA DONT WANNA BE YA.

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:reggie miller took 6486 3s and made 2560 for a 39% average so tkf YOU go do some research.

39% is a lot better than 33, but I was referring to him being an efficient all around shooter, which is why i mentioned bernard king as well.. I wasn't talking about threes and you know it.. if so why not mention how bernard king never took threes... this was just another one of your attempt to try to one up someone in a conversation you are getting pretty much beat up in.. sorry , but that is the truth... it is equivalent to not having an answer and just yelling back... "yo mamma"...

for the record miller was a 47% shooter from the field, but I would not consider him a volume shooter so he most likely doesn't belong in the convo. if anything, THAT should have been your argument...

Nice try tkf/dk7th, but you know this was all about shooting the "heat ck 3" and you or your alter ego brought other players into it and when confronted with the facts you ran away with your tail between your legs.Nice try tho.

lol... jeez man... ok, so tell me, what was the significance of your post with reggie miller.. what are you trying to prove here?

this should be interesting.. can't wait cooch...

If you take 6500 3s theres a good chance your % is gonna be up there.

LOL.. I knew this was above your head.... dude that is not true.... your percentage is what it is.....that is why they have what is called an AVERAGE! that is why you usually need a good enough sample size.... for instance if I take 2 threes and hit 1, then my percentage is 50%.. well that may not be indicative of how good of a shooter I may really be, too small of a sample size.. but after 100 threes you have a good enough sample size where you can trust the percentages... therefore If I shoot 40% after 2,000 threes taken, then it is pretty much assumed that I will be around 40% after I take 4,000 threes.... taking more doesn't increase my percentage if anything it can have an adverse effect..

usually cooch the less you take the higher your % is... for example why do you think they put a minimum number of attempts in order for someone to qualify for a batting title, or shooting percentage leader....

Pretty much assumed?? So your examples,that took 2 and 3x as many 3s as Melo are better shooters because you ASSUME their %?? Nope not flying with me. And if Melo shoots 50% one yr where does your assumption go? Hes shooting at 44.8 right now.

i give up... seriously someone, please help cooch. seriously... someone on here who is a carmelo fan, because he just doesn't get it.. maybe coming from someone he can't call a hater will make much more sense.. again, maybe not and there is just no hope... but I am done..

dk, run... you are not going to get anywhere with this one man.....

cooch, I will say this final thing.... them taking more shots than carmelo from three, doesn't help their percentage!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

lets play this game... cooch takes 100 shots..

tkf takes 80 shots...

cooch makes 40 shots

tkf makes 60

guess what cooch?.................

later cooch....

cooch is saying if you coach actually gave a player the green light to shoot 6500 hundred shots, chances are you are a pretty good three point shooter. and then you turn to the discussion into the definition of percentages and averages... you are such a troll. common bull**** real gm tactic - have nothing worthwhile to say, turn the discussion to semantics about nothing worth discussing. next time just link to actual definitions and save yourself some time