[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

KURT TRADED PENDING LEAGUE APPROVAL!?!?!?!?!?
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/23/2005  9:52 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:

yeah, if he plays like a chucker, it's not a good trade on the basis that we wont improve. added chunks of back end salary and would be stuck with an undiscplined player. If we dont instill discipline back into his game, the trade would be bad if it was for howard eisley. This is a good, not great trade that depends on development, but he has the tools to do it.

But if he is able to go back to the form he had his first two years than the value of the trade is very reasonable
It's hard to think of any reasons why he wouldn't go back to the style of play he had in LA. Phoenix required him to be strictly a 3 point shooter; it's not like he asked for that role. He used to love playing in the high post in LA.
AUTOADVERT
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/23/2005  9:55 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by fishmike:

its too bad Tim Thomas is such a girl. Even with Frye we could have a very strong bunch of guys starting
Marbury - pitbull
Q- 6'6 235
TT- 6'10 240
MS- 6'8 400
Frye- 6'10

Thats a lot of meat but you have some serious athletes there as well.
bench: Crawford, JYD, Rose, Ariza, Mo
We know how the Knicks use expiring contracts. I can't see TT on the team much longer.

I think this a pretty BAD deal for Phoenix. Kurt is not what they need. They need a center, not a 32 year old, slow PF. They must be planning to (a) use Kurt as the starting center (a horrible move); (b) use Kurt as a backup PF for about 10 mpg (which is not a big enough role to justify giving up Q-Rich for); or (c) plan to use Kurt at PF and Amare at C. This latter option is okay for them, but they really need to move Amare down to PF and forget about getting Kurt. They should go after Ty Chandler, Sam Dalembert, maybe Jamal Magloire. There are far better options for them with the assets they have than to get Kurt.

exactly the reason I am worried about this trade not going down! even Magloire would be a hell of a lot better, longer and younger than KT and the Hornets would take Q. Well I'll have my fingers crossed
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/23/2005  9:55 AM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by MS:

I like this move, because it means that others are coming, and Zeke may really be thinking about moving Marbury, which I like, if you utlize Q in the post more it could be a real asset....

His shot selection wasn't great but thats only because he played in a system that didn't have structure.....

If we can get boozer for an expiring contract I would be very excited. And Q is movable which makes the deal extremely appealing and frees up a slot in the front court.....

Don't waste money on Hunter or a pick on Frye......I still like Granger or Brynum with the pick

We need a pick that could explode down the road not just be a role player
Yeah I think Isiah maybe looking to move Marbury now too and just go young. I think both Herb and Isiah envision Crawford as a pg and not a sg. Funny enough, I don't think Isiah would be able to trade Marbury even if he wanted to. I mean he can find a taker but there is no way he is going to convince his owner that he now wants to trade away the only star player his team has, Dolan getting some nice returns on Marbury despite the bad season.
I think Marbury would greatly improve Q's and Frye's games (if we're drafting Frye). He may be planning to use Q as the starting SF, featuring him sometimes on the perimter and sometimes in the post. I could see something like

Marbury
Crawford
Q-Rich
Boozer
Frye

OR

Marbury
Crawford
Q-Rich
Frye
Gasol
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/23/2005  9:55 AM
I'm still not convinced moving Marbury makes sense unless its for a bigtime frontcourt player

I think
Marbury/Q/Granger (SL)
Crawford/Ariza (bench)
is a group you can build a frontcourt around.

You need size for sure, but this is a good start.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/23/2005  9:58 AM
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by fishmike:

its too bad Tim Thomas is such a girl. Even with Frye we could have a very strong bunch of guys starting
Marbury - pitbull
Q- 6'6 235
TT- 6'10 240
MS- 6'8 400
Frye- 6'10

Thats a lot of meat but you have some serious athletes there as well.
bench: Crawford, JYD, Rose, Ariza, Mo
We know how the Knicks use expiring contracts. I can't see TT on the team much longer.

I think this a pretty BAD deal for Phoenix. Kurt is not what they need. They need a center, not a 32 year old, slow PF. They must be planning to (a) use Kurt as the starting center (a horrible move); (b) use Kurt as a backup PF for about 10 mpg (which is not a big enough role to justify giving up Q-Rich for); or (c) plan to use Kurt at PF and Amare at C. This latter option is okay for them, but they really need to move Amare down to PF and forget about getting Kurt. They should go after Ty Chandler, Sam Dalembert, maybe Jamal Magloire. There are far better options for them with the assets they have than to get Kurt.

exactly the reason I am worried about this trade not going down! even Magloire would be a hell of a lot better, longer and younger than KT and the Hornets would take Q. Well I'll have my fingers crossed
Magloire's a good defensive center who will give you 14/9. I think they would demand Joe Johnson or Marion. I wouldn't trade Magloire for Q. But the main point is right--that the Suns have so many better options than giving up one of their solid young starters for Kurt.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
6/23/2005  9:58 AM
This is a odd trade, I like the Q I saw with the clippers better than the one with the suns. With the clipps he posted up took the ball to the hoop and got on the boards, with the suns he was just a 3 point shooter... I have to see what IT has going on during draft night before I judge this trade...
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
JayNYC
Posts: 20732
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/7/2004
Member: #682
USA
6/23/2005  9:59 AM
This would be a strong move by Isiah, even if it does cost us a future #1 pick.

Obviously, I agree that it puts priority on us drafting a big man. But it may not be the one that everyone here is thinking its gonna be. The NBA draft is full of "smoke screens". To be honest I don't know who Isiah is gonna draft, but it would be nice if:

We draft-
#8- Charlie Villanueva PF
#30- Martynas Andriuskevicius C
#54 John Gilchrist PG

Trade Penny Hardaway for a 2005 2nd rd pick to a team that wants to trim salary.

Sign and trade Sweetney/T.Thomas for Zydrunas Ilgauskas

CUT- Allan Houston, and save 40 mil in luxury taxes.


Ilgauskas/Andriuskevicius
Villanueva/Rose/Taylor/Williams/Butler
Richardson/Ariza
Crawford/Jackson
Marbury/Gilchrist

This would give Steph a chance to play with a big man that runs and finishes on the break, someone that stretches the D, INCREASED DEFENSIVE PRESENCE, just an overall pretty decent team. We'd have youth, athleticism, a fun team to watch that would push the ball... a heck of a lot of power forwards but hey what else is new!


Inhale deep like the words of my breath/ I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death-- Circa 1994 Nasty Nas: NY State of Mind
GoNyGoNyGo
Posts: 23559
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/29/2003
Member: #411
USA
6/23/2005  10:01 AM
A trade that makes NY younger and gets rid of KT? Good move. IT is making moves to make NY younger and quicker. We have 4 other PF's on the roster. Rose and JYD are both better defenders than KT. Sweets is better offensively. Obviously NY needs to get a C now.

diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
6/23/2005  10:05 AM
You have to be kidding me........Dude are you insane???

We draft-
#8- Charlie Villanueva PF
#30- Martynas Andriuskevicius C
#54 John Gilchrist PG

Trade Penny Hardaway for a 2005 2nd rd pick to a team that wants to trim salary.

Sign and trade Sweetney/T.Thomas for Zydrunas Ilgauskas

CUT- Allan Houston, and save 40 mil in luxury taxes.


Ilgauskas/Andriuskevicius
Villanueva/Rose/Taylor/Williams/Butler
Richardson/Ariza
Crawford/Jackson
Marbury/Gilchrist

This would give Steph a chance to play with a big man that runs and finishes on the break, someone that stretches the D, INCREASED DEFENSIVE PRESENCE, just an overall pretty decent team. We'd have youth, athleticism, a fun team to watch that would push the ball... a heck of a lot of power forwards but hey what else is new!
The true Knickabocker..........
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/23/2005  10:06 AM
Posted by JayNYC:

This would be a strong move by Isiah, even if it does cost us a future #1 pick.

Obviously, I agree that it puts priority on us drafting a big man. But it may not be the one that everyone here is thinking its gonna be. The NBA draft is full of "smoke screens". To be honest I don't know who Isiah is gonna draft, but it would be nice if:

We draft-
#8- Charlie Villanueva PF
#30- Martynas Andriuskevicius C
#54 John Gilchrist PG

Trade Penny Hardaway for a 2005 2nd rd pick to a team that wants to trim salary.

Sign and trade Sweetney/T.Thomas for Zydrunas Ilgauskas

CUT- Allan Houston, and save 40 mil in luxury taxes.


Ilgauskas/Andriuskevicius
Villanueva/Rose/Taylor/Williams/Butler
Richardson/Ariza
Crawford/Jackson
Marbury/Gilchrist

This would give Steph a chance to play with a big man that runs and finishes on the break, someone that stretches the D, INCREASED DEFENSIVE PRESENCE, just an overall pretty decent team. We'd have youth, athleticism, a fun team to watch that would push the ball... a heck of a lot of power forwards but hey what else is new!

my concern with that team is not one guy there other than Z plays any defense. Teams would light us up every night. Now the defense of Granger or Graham change the whole dynamics of that team. With Z and Granger we'll be very good defensively. We're fine with the PFs we have even if we don't get Boozer.
Knixkik
Posts: 35480
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
6/23/2005  10:10 AM
Yeah, i think there's no question we draft Frye, then trade Tim Thomas possibly for Boozer. Q Rich is 230lbs and does have a solid post up game, plus being one of the strongest swingmen in the league. How does he not play SF for us next year?

C Frye
PF Boozer
SF Richardson
SG Crawford
PG Marbury
6th Ariza
7th Sweetney
8th Rose
9th Taylor
10th 30th pick?
11th JYD
12th Butler/54th pick
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/23/2005  10:10 AM
Posted by GoNyGoNyGo:

A trade that makes NY younger and gets rid of KT? Good move. IT is making moves to make NY younger and quicker. We have 4 other PF's on the roster. Rose and JYD are both better defenders than KT. Sweets is better offensively. Obviously NY needs to get a C now.

that doesn't mean we need to draft a bust at 8. We'll get a center either by trading or the MLE
Andrew
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
6/23/2005  10:12 AM
The nice thing about this trade is it allows the Knicks to take 2 big men. Frye and Blatche? I wouldn't mind that.
PURE KNICKS LOVE
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/23/2005  10:12 AM
i think the logical next step is to get boozer in here ASAP.
JayNYC
Posts: 20732
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/7/2004
Member: #682
USA
6/23/2005  10:26 AM
Posted by diderotn:

You have to be kidding me........Dude are you insane???

Listen If you follow the game, you know that the major flaw to this trade would be defensively. Q, Crawford and Steph are not gonna be the best on this end. Although, I think defense is a skill that can be learned.. If you play ball you gotta know that learning how to score on offense is a way harder task.

Charlie Villanueva gives NYK a strong player on both ends of the court... he is certainly better than any big man we have. His downside is obviously the fact that he does not have a dominating mentality. To me, his potential upside is too intriguing to pass up. A 6'11 Do it all player? C'mon are you insane for not realizing the potential.. and knowing how much of an impact he can make paired w/ Starbury?

Ilgauskas gives us a Center that can play until Andriuskevicius develops. You gotta grab him if he slips to 30. Which is most likely, given the talks about his buyout clause. Remember Maciej Lampe??? This kid is 19, and could benefit from playing behind Big Z.

John Gilchrist, is nice.. Have you watched this kid play at MD??? He is like 20 years old and might be the steal of this years draft! At number 54, what is to think about? You eventually get a potential replacement should Steph be traded.

I know you have like 3000 posts or somethin like that, but you should have used a little reasoning before post'n that response to my hypothetical. But I ain't mad

[Edited by - JayNYC on 06/23/2005 10:32:59]
Inhale deep like the words of my breath/ I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death-- Circa 1994 Nasty Nas: NY State of Mind
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
6/23/2005  10:27 AM
Posted by fishmike:

the potential is there, and you have to love the body. We could feature him in the high post or top of the key. He's always been more physical on the rebounding end then on the scoring end.

Its got a shot. Its a good trade for Pho, and it there is potential for style of play as well, if we are going uptempo

I remember that block against Dirk I think Q had in the series vs the mavs, the kid can do a little more than just shoot, I think playing in pheonix he became a chucker than a all around player, something he has the skills to be, but isn't it odd that of late we have been getting young players like that, guys with all the talent in the world yet to be fullfilled?
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/23/2005  10:28 AM
yes...but one thing y'all are forgetting to mention is more brandy at knicks games - yeah baby!!!

ok, i'll stop sounding like a horny teenager, i'm 31 for isiah's sake!!!
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/23/2005  10:31 AM
#8- Charlie Villanueva PF


Jay if you think CV gives you a tough player on both ends of the floor I'm thinking you havent seen him play much. He's good, he's got skills... tough isnt a word I would use to describe him.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/23/2005  10:32 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

i think the logical next step is to get boozer in here ASAP.
I thought you were concerned about "the five-headed monster"; now we trade Kurt (according to the rumors) and everything's fine. Wasn't obvious we'd be able to trade some of the PFs from the beginning? That's why I never was concerned about having 5 PFs on our roster during the offseason.
NYK3
Posts: 23572
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/30/2004
Member: #725
USA
6/23/2005  10:32 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

ok, i'll stop sounding like a horny teenager, i'm 31 for isiah's sake!!!
hahaha
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers!!!
KURT TRADED PENDING LEAGUE APPROVAL!?!?!?!?!?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy