[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks get two FIRST ROUND PICKS!!!! NY/HOU/SA
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/24/2005  10:08 PM
Posted by fishmike:

we now have 5 PFs all about 6'8 that are all similar players. What happened to young and athletic? These guys are short and squat with bad contracts. Whats to like?

Yes Bonn... cant wait to see what Isiah does with $30mm in expiring deals. Maybe package them for Jalen Rose?

Lets look at the guys with at least 2 MORE years after this one:
Rose
JYD
KT
Mo Taylor
Houston

That sucks... hey, I had hopes for Layden all the way to the end, but this is his kind of move.
Fish, the purpose of the trade was to get DRAFT PICKS. That's what happened to the young and athletic plan. The two draft picks will likely be players more athletic than Baker, Norris, and Nazy combined. This is not a deviation from the young and athletic plan. If it was a Layden move, we'd be giving up not getting draft picks.

The Rose comment was so silly that it deserves no comment beyond this one sentence
AUTOADVERT
VDesai
Posts: 42818
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
2/24/2005  10:12 PM
What's the purpose of the Taylor trade? He's not young, not athletic and we didn't get a pick...
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/24/2005  10:25 PM
Posted by VDesai:

What's the purpose of the Taylor trade? He's not young, not athletic and we didn't get a pick...
Did we give up anyone young or athletic to get him? It was a slightly bad deal but the SA deal easily outweighs it
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/24/2005  10:26 PM
i dont mind the Taylor trade because is a lot better and a lot more tradeable then Baker and Moochie. And he's instant low post offense off the bench.

I just wish we didn't give up the 2nd rounder. did we officially give it up?

And Malik is averaging 6pts/4rebs in very little minutes and he plays excellent defense. He's a lot better than Nazr Mohammed!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/24/2005  10:33 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:

i dont mind the Taylor trade because is a lot better and a lot more tradeable then Baker and Moochie. And he's instant low post offense off the bench.

I just wish we didn't give up the 2nd rounder. did we officially give it up?

And Malik is averaging 6pts/4rebs in very little minutes and he plays excellent defense. He's a lot better than Nazr Mohammed!
The 2nd round pick will probably be around #50. I'm not sure if we gave it up or not, but it's not very valuable.
VDesai
Posts: 42818
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
2/24/2005  10:34 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by VDesai:

What's the purpose of the Taylor trade? He's not young, not athletic and we didn't get a pick...
Did we give up anyone young or athletic to get him? It was a slightly bad deal but the SA deal easily outweighs it

The problem is that Taylor is added to a glut of PF's and presents another potential obstacle for Sweetney's development. I don't know what the team's view of Sweetney is for the long term, I'd just rather it not be clouded and that he gets a legit shot to start and perform as a post threat.

Another problem is Taylor's game. He doesn't rebound or play much defense. He's got some post moves but is a pretty soft overall player for a guy his size. Last thing we need is more softies up front.

Isn't also harder to trade Taylor than Baker and Mooch, as Taylor's contract is larger and runs longer? Guys like Mooch and Baker can be put together to acquire lower salaried guys. It's gonna be a bit harder to slot up guys to trade Taylor for...
VDesai
Posts: 42818
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
2/24/2005  10:36 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by gunsnewing:

i dont mind the Taylor trade because is a lot better and a lot more tradeable then Baker and Moochie. And he's instant low post offense off the bench.

I just wish we didn't give up the 2nd rounder. did we officially give it up?

And Malik is averaging 6pts/4rebs in very little minutes and he plays excellent defense. He's a lot better than Nazr Mohammed!
The 2nd round pick will probably be around #50. I'm not sure if we gave it up or not, but it's not very valuable.

We definitely gave it up according to the Rockets and Knicks official websites. Why do you say it will be around 50? That's assuming the Knicks have a relatively decent seed in the playoffs next year, where it seems more likely that they will be in the lottery again and have a pick in the 30's or so.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
2/24/2005  10:44 PM
Who cares if the Knicks have 5 guys that are 6'8 this year that play PF this year, its over, the Knicks aren't making playoffs and you should not be rooting for them to make it, the lottery is the place for this team right now. My best guess is that Taylor or Rose is either bought out, traded outright, or packaged in a deal with one of our expiring contracts this summer. I really like Rose, he's a good great defender and has a infectious style of play to him, maybe he can knock some sense into Steph and Jamal. Draft picks are key and the glut of PFs will be resolved by the start of next season, the only way Isiah was going to get draft picks was by taking something else in return, this will be fixed, the pieces are STARTING to fall into place on Isiah's plan.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
2/24/2005  10:44 PM
What happened to the pick that Houston gave the Knicks for Van Gundy?
Masterplan
Posts: 21571
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2002
Member: #362
2/24/2005  10:44 PM

Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by VDesai:

What's the purpose of the Taylor trade? He's not young, not athletic and we didn't get a pick...
Did we give up anyone young or athletic to get him? It was a slightly bad deal but the SA deal easily outweighs it

so what if the SA deal was good? we would be better off making the positive trade and not the counterproductive one than making both.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/24/2005  10:45 PM
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by VDesai:

What's the purpose of the Taylor trade? He's not young, not athletic and we didn't get a pick...
Did we give up anyone young or athletic to get him? It was a slightly bad deal but the SA deal easily outweighs it

The problem is that Taylor is added to a glut of PF's and presents another potential obstacle for Sweetney's development. I don't know what the team's view of Sweetney is for the long term, I'd just rather it not be clouded and that he gets a legit shot to start and perform as a post threat.

Another problem is Taylor's game. He doesn't rebound or play much defense. He's got some post moves but is a pretty soft overall player for a guy his size. Last thing we need is more softies up front.

Isn't also harder to trade Taylor than Baker and Mooch, as Taylor's contract is larger and runs longer? Guys like Mooch and Baker can be put together to acquire lower salaried guys. It's gonna be a bit harder to slot up guys to trade Taylor for...

what i meant to say was Taylor's contract is a lot more valuable when matching contracts. Baker and moochie make peanuts compared to him and rose. We will get a much better player back for TT/Penny/Taylor/Rose & KT then we we would with TT/penny/baker & moochie.

One thing these trades prove is that the knicks are not letting TT/Penny's contracts expire. Zeke is going to use them.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/24/2005  10:51 PM
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by gunsnewing:

i dont mind the Taylor trade because is a lot better and a lot more tradeable then Baker and Moochie. And he's instant low post offense off the bench.

I just wish we didn't give up the 2nd rounder. did we officially give it up?

And Malik is averaging 6pts/4rebs in very little minutes and he plays excellent defense. He's a lot better than Nazr Mohammed!
The 2nd round pick will probably be around #50. I'm not sure if we gave it up or not, but it's not very valuable.

We definitely gave it up according to the Rockets and Knicks official websites. Why do you say it will be around 50? That's assuming the Knicks have a relatively decent seed in the playoffs next year, where it seems more likely that they will be in the lottery again and have a pick in the 30's or so.
The pick was originally Houston's. It's not the Knicks pick. The pick depends on Houston's record. Right now it would be in the late 40s.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/24/2005  10:53 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:

Who cares if the Knicks have 5 guys that are 6'8 this year that play PF this year, its over, the Knicks aren't making playoffs and you should not be rooting for them to make it, the lottery is the place for this team right now. My best guess is that Taylor or Rose is either bought out, traded outright, or packaged in a deal with one of our expiring contracts this summer. I really like Rose, he's a good great defender and has a infectious style of play to him, maybe he can knock some sense into Steph and Jamal. Draft picks are key and the glut of PFs will be resolved by the start of next season, the only way Isiah was going to get draft picks was by taking something else in return, this will be fixed, the pieces are STARTING to fall into place on Isiah's plan.

YOU are the most sensible fan here. I agree 100% with everything you said. I think people are really underestimating Rose. He averages close to 7 & 5 on a great team and plays very good defense at SF which can only help.

And Taylor is a heck of a lot better than Weatherspoon. He's just really overpaid but so is H20. Only H20 makes double what he makes. All these guys will be gone by 2007!
VDesai
Posts: 42818
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
2/24/2005  10:58 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by VDesai:

What's the purpose of the Taylor trade? He's not young, not athletic and we didn't get a pick...
Did we give up anyone young or athletic to get him? It was a slightly bad deal but the SA deal easily outweighs it

The problem is that Taylor is added to a glut of PF's and presents another potential obstacle for Sweetney's development. I don't know what the team's view of Sweetney is for the long term, I'd just rather it not be clouded and that he gets a legit shot to start and perform as a post threat.

Another problem is Taylor's game. He doesn't rebound or play much defense. He's got some post moves but is a pretty soft overall player for a guy his size. Last thing we need is more softies up front.

Isn't also harder to trade Taylor than Baker and Mooch, as Taylor's contract is larger and runs longer? Guys like Mooch and Baker can be put together to acquire lower salaried guys. It's gonna be a bit harder to slot up guys to trade Taylor for...

what i meant to say was Taylor's contract is a lot more valuable when matching contracts. Baker and moochie make peanuts compared to him and rose. We will get a much better player back for TT/Penny/Taylor/Rose & KT then we we would with TT/penny/baker & moochie.

One thing these trades prove is that the knicks are not letting TT/Penny's contracts expire. Zeke is going to use them.

I haven't read that its Houston's pick. Do you have a link to an article or story that says that?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/24/2005  11:03 PM
The Knicks don't have their own 2nd round pick this year. The only one they have is Houston's 2nd round pick. That's the only one they could have traded unless it was a future 2nd rd pick
Masterplan
Posts: 21571
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2002
Member: #362
2/24/2005  11:06 PM

Posted by nyk4ever:

Who cares if the Knicks have 5 guys that are 6'8 this year that play PF this year, its over, the Knicks aren't making playoffs and you should not be rooting for them to make it, the lottery is the place for this team right now. My best guess is that Taylor or Rose is either bought out, traded outright, or packaged in a deal with one of our expiring contracts this summer. I really like Rose, he's a good great defender and has a infectious style of play to him, maybe he can knock some sense into Steph and Jamal. Draft picks are key and the glut of PFs will be resolved by the start of next season, the only way Isiah was going to get draft picks was by taking something else in return, this will be fixed, the pieces are STARTING to fall into place on Isiah's plan.

whoa, a bunch of issues with that take.

infectious style of play? wasn't that JYD's job? it'll take more than malik rose to get our less-skilled defenders hustling out there.

rose and taylor are untradeable, and by that, i mean untradeable to anyone but us. think eisley, anderson. package them with ending contracts? for who, shaq? uh, hardaway and rose, for example, make close to $20 mil combined. TT and taylor? likewise. i'm not hopeful anyone will be available who isn't as big a mistake as any of those guys.

if the draft picks were the key, why do the taylor trade if he's jsut going to be bought out or put in a trade? baker and norris would have been easier to ship elsewhere, or let walk that much sooner.

think people are really underestimating Rose. He averages close to 7 & 5 on a great team and plays very good defense at SF which can only help.

i thought rose was a PF/C. don't let the fact that he's 6'7 fool you, he's no SF.
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
2/24/2005  11:08 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

The Knicks don't have their own 2nd round pick this year. The only one they have is Houston's 2nd round pick. That's the only one they could have traded unless it was a future 2nd rd pick

Where did their pick go?
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/24/2005  11:10 PM
Posted by Masterplan:

Posted by nyk4ever:

Who cares if the Knicks have 5 guys that are 6'8 this year that play PF this year, its over, the Knicks aren't making playoffs and you should not be rooting for them to make it, the lottery is the place for this team right now. My best guess is that Taylor or Rose is either bought out, traded outright, or packaged in a deal with one of our expiring contracts this summer. I really like Rose, he's a good great defender and has a infectious style of play to him, maybe he can knock some sense into Steph and Jamal. Draft picks are key and the glut of PFs will be resolved by the start of next season, the only way Isiah was going to get draft picks was by taking something else in return, this will be fixed, the pieces are STARTING to fall into place on Isiah's plan.

whoa, a bunch of issues with that take.

infectious style of play? wasn't that JYD's job? it'll take more than malik rose to get our less-skilled defenders hustling out there.

rose and taylor are untradeable, and by that, i mean untradeable to anyone but us. think eisley, anderson. package them with ending contracts? for who, shaq? uh, hardaway and rose, for example, make close to $20 mil combined. TT and taylor? likewise. i'm not hopeful anyone will be available who isn't as big a mistake as any of those guys.

if the draft picks were the key, why do the taylor trade if he's jsut going to be bought out or put in a trade? baker and norris would have been easier to ship elsewhere, or let walk that much sooner.

think people are really underestimating Rose. He averages close to 7 & 5 on a great team and plays very good defense at SF which can only help.

i thought rose was a PF/C. don't let the fact that he's 6'7 fool you, he's no SF.

Malik Rose is a heck of a lot better defender than JYD. All JYD can do is hustle. There's a reason he's been trade a gazillion times! Stephen A. Smith also agrees that Rose gives the knicks exactly what they need to change the face of the team..DEFENSE!
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
2/24/2005  11:50 PM
Posted by Masterplan:


whoa, a bunch of issues with that take.

infectious style of play? wasn't that JYD's job? it'll take more than malik rose to get our less-skilled defenders hustling out there.

rose and taylor are untradeable, and by that, i mean untradeable to anyone but us. think eisley, anderson. package them with ending contracts? for who, shaq? uh, hardaway and rose, for example, make close to $20 mil combined. TT and taylor? likewise. i'm not hopeful anyone will be available who isn't as big a mistake as any of those guys.

if the draft picks were the key, why do the taylor trade if he's jsut going to be bought out or put in a trade? baker and norris would have been easier to ship elsewhere, or let walk that much sooner.

To respond to your first argument. I'll take 2 JYD's on my team any day of the week. If the rest of the team sees JYD and Rose running their tales off out there for loose balls up and down the court, it's GOING to start to make an impression on them.

The NBA is all about pairing contracts with expiring ones for one team to get a player another team feels they don't want anymore ala Chris Webber or Peja Stoyakovich. The only way the Knicks could have gotten a guy LIKE that had their been one on the market was using a combination of a expiring contract and a player that is being overpaid but makes the deal work unless you are lucky and have something the other team wants. Look at the Webber trade, personally, I think the Kings got a RAW deal but the only way it worked was for having 3 big contracts to match Webbers. Im just throwing a name out there maybe Isiah has his sights set on Zach Randolph, I'm not saying I want him but thats what these contracts are here for, trade purposes.

I think the real reason Isiah obtained Mo Taylor was so that maybe sometime next year, possibly around the deadline have a player that can be valuable off the bench to a team making a playoff run. I firmly believe that either him or Malik will NOT be on the roster at the beginning of next year and if they are then they are but that means that Kurt Thomas and Sweetney won't be on the roster anymore.

Let Isiah work, think about it, why would he stack a team with PFs and no center? We all know it makes no sense and he did it for reason, he's planning his next move.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
2/25/2005  12:06 AM
That Houston Rockets deal is HORRIBLE if we don't land there first rd pick.

Please Taylor fail the physical or something.

Isiah just better know what he is doing with that one. He better have a plan that makes us say oh okay.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Knicks get two FIRST ROUND PICKS!!!! NY/HOU/SA

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy