fishmike wrote:Nalod wrote:Panos wrote:Philc1 wrote:Nalod wrote:Philc1 wrote:TheGame wrote:Duece looked like he could not score his rookie year too. It takes time for guys to get comfortable. I have no doubt Kolek is going to a VERY GOOD player. You cannot teach his level of passing. Once he gets more comfortable playing defense and scoring, it will be hard to keep him on the bench. By year 4, I predict we will be having the Brunson or Kolek debate.
If Kolek can improve his shooting he could be a good offensive pg in the nba. So far he has struggled in summer league but it is just summer league. His passing and handles are already there.
Remarkable insight! Its like you have a real feel for game and seeing things few of us can.
Most of us just vacillate between boom or bust but not you! Unstead you break the game down in way that takes the intricate details and makes it so even my dog could understand it.
I mean I have read all kinds of remarks over the months from blogs, beat writers and perhaps even the UK faithful but nobody comes close to seeing it like you do. Taking 3d chess and making is into a concise sentence is true gift.
Im enjoying this rent free space in your head. Amazing how no one is allowed to have an opinion unless they write a 26 paragraph essay about it according to you
Nalod likes to have one poster at a time to hound after every post until they leave the site. Then he moves on to someone new. Considers himself some kind of content police. Currently you're that person.
What's your claim to fame?
Pano's and PhilC........Like a new WWE alliance thing?
Y'all gonna throw a chair at me and im suppose to cut my eyebrow and then you tell Martin he unfairly treats you?
he's the fastest poster here. Proven on 32nd street outside Stout
That was a long time ago! Wow, I sometimes forget who did what.
Pano's has hard opinions. I rarely get into it with him.
Gustav is sensitive and likes the last word. As do I.
PhilC is like the annoying kid in the lunch table in high school we all felt bad picking on in grade school but learned to chill a bit. It's fun bantering about because nobody knows each other and thus can't take any of it serious.
I think in 20 years I ran off perhaps just one poster. Tms. He melted down and could not stay civil.
Bonn19** was a trip. This dude was full out transparent but really set himself up. I bullied him like 15 years ago. I was wrong and none of this would pass anymore. "GayRobot" was funny for 10 minutes and this guy would go on about his dog, dates, rooming with his brother on family cruises, his teaching at a small liberal arts college, etc. He was dense and funny but did not know it. I think he just tired of us and got laid instead. Good call.
But let me be clear about something: State an opinion and I rarely go after it. State it like you in the room and know something without a footnote or where you got it is not an opinion. I might discuss an opinion I don't agree with but not blast it as I would a false proclamation. Big difference. It rarely occurs anymore.
Deflect like an adolescent who can't support a false statement and Im calling it out. Counter with an opinion then it stands on its own. Make **** up Im calling it.
There are rules for Nalod's madness.
Briggs was a good dude for a long time then just got abstinent about his beliefs and would not relent. He had some idiosyncranies but when his politics and personal views far exceeded basketball related discussion I believe he was given a choice. Martin does not ban folks without purpose or given a choice.
In the early days of the UK it was more raw and the common courtesy was being established. WE used to dig in pretty hard and argue. Nalod was not immune to being "monitored". Martin PM'd me and asked me to knock it off or be banned. Thus there were rules and I decided to abide. Others chose different. I might have pushed them over the edge but they were heading there in their own.
It's not about free speech. There are civilities to consider and we are guests of Martin.