Nalod wrote:KnickDanger wrote:So can the trade now be seen as Obi for DDV and two second rounders?
Of course. Don’t knicks fans know thats how we got DDV?
Obi was either due an extension or we had to take back salary.
Yes, Haliburton was the better pick. Yet, here we are after a very good season.
WE needed to not take back salary to sign DDV.
Do we really think FO did not think this thru?
Obi was a fan favorite. Changes are inevitable.
I don't think this is true. Obi was eligible for an extension this summer. Next summer he would be eligible for RFA if the Knicks extended a one year qualifying offer. With Josh Hart opting into his PO, Knicks had enough under tax space to use the full mle to sign DDV. Knicks could have had their Obi and ate DDV too.
If the Knicks want to use their Biannual exemption it will likely push them into the tax territory, depending on if they cut guys like Jeffries, Roby, and Sims. Of course being just a little in the tax is stupid because it opens you up to future repeater penalties.
I think jmpasq is right, this was basically doing Obi a solid to get him to a team where he can score a lot but his defensive limitations don't particularly stand out.
I'm with Martin on the Obi hype Machine> Obi the player, despite him shining in some meaningless games.
I think not holding on to Obi and the aggregate contract value he and Evan can provide is indicative of Knicks not trading for a 30 million guy this summer. Just from a trade stand point, Obi was almost an expiring contract and any team would be happy to get a look at him. Problem is Indy can almost guarantee playing time and help him get a nice new deal.