[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Kyrie to Knicks should be about as easy to Shaq to the Lakers
Author Thread
technomaster
Posts: 23348
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
6/30/2018  12:48 PM
fwk00 wrote:I don't think the Knicks will need Kyrie. They'll have a generational backcourt with Mudiay, Frankie, THJ, Dotson and Baker.

Who they should concentrate on signing are 5 star bench players who can spell the starting five when injuries occur.

And we thought that the Warriors had a generational 73 win team then got Durant.

I mean, I figure we could deploy Kyrie off the bench with KP when he returns. I'm debating whether Knox/THJr as a starter, depending on chemistry. It might be good to get Knox some burn with the starters.

“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
AUTOADVERT
fwk00
Posts: 22163
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048

6/30/2018  1:59 PM
technomaster wrote:
fwk00 wrote:I don't think the Knicks will need Kyrie. They'll have a generational backcourt with Mudiay, Frankie, THJ, Dotson and Baker.

Who they should concentrate on signing are 5 star bench players who can spell the starting five when injuries occur.

And we thought that the Warriors had a generational 73 win team then got Durant.

I mean, I figure we could deploy Kyrie off the bench with KP when he returns. I'm debating whether Knox/THJr as a starter, depending on chemistry. It might be good to get Knox some burn with the starters.

I think Waaaay too much faith is being put in KP ever reaching his former potential. Aside from his injury, his ego and exposure to Melo has been a toxic handicap to his career.

I hope we trade him before he becomes a fiscal dead weight.

fwk00
Posts: 22163
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048

6/30/2018  2:06 PM
As for the Warriors, they don't absolutely need Durant. Whoever signed with them (except Melo) would have shined, IMO. They don't play hero ball.e

They have great ownership.

IMO, in a year or two sCurry will peal himself away and play with the Knicks - one of his lifelong dreams. Unlike LeBron.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
6/30/2018  2:09 PM
fwk00 wrote:I don't think the Knicks will need Kyrie. They'll have a generational backcourt with Mudiay, Frankie, THJ, Dotson and Baker.

Who they should concentrate on signing are 5 star bench players who can spell the starting five when injuries occur.

You include Ron but leave out Burke for our generational back court. I am hoping Mudiay figures things out, but my guess is that group will not include Ron or Mudiay after next year.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
fwk00
Posts: 22163
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/20/2015
Member: #6048

6/30/2018  2:40 PM
I realize there are lots of fans who think Baker is the throwaway and that Mudiay is a bum.

Baker is a rock solid rotation bench player who gives the Knicks a guy who slaps the team upside the head and gets the game back on track - that's his role, its what he does. He's smart and nobody's fool on the floor and in the locker room. He's not the 15 player, he's your seventh or eighth. Certainly not untouchable but whoever takes that role better have the goods.

PG's notoriously take 3-5 years to get it together and that average is for one and done college guys. Mudiay has another few months to either belly up or be shown the door.

IFF, he gets his sh@t together he's going to be better than average. He's in a good place now. Let's give him some time.

I do discount Burke more as a tradable asset than a long time asset. First he has real value as a back-up to teams needing that and two, he eats minutes Mudiay, Frankie, Dotson, and others may have greater value for.

Promoting Burke is about winning enough to be mediocre.

meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

6/30/2018  3:15 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
fishmike wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
martin wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
fishmike wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
fishmike wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:
Panos wrote:This clip of plays from just one game is flat out incredible. This isn't someone just hoisting up volume 3pt or long range shots. He's taking it to the rim hard and scoring with hands in his face. Let some of that rub off on KP! I think the pairing would be outstanding.


meloshouldgo wrote:
fishmike wrote:
But I guess now Kyrie is just a dumb scorer. Yea.. lets pass.

This is not Melo

Knicks are building a supporting cast of athletic smart guys. Fans dont want to add one of the leagues best scorers?

While some guys are talking if Kyrie makes sense the rest of us can watch him win game 7 by lighting up GS best defenders. Kyrie made Klay and Draymond look like Melo and Afflalo

I would like to add a scorer that's as committed to defense as he is to scoring. Would you say Kyrie is and elite or an above average defender?

Great, and it doesn't even address my question, much less answer it.

try asking a better question

So it's not ok to ask if he can play defense at a high level when considering him for the max contract?

That isnt what you are asking, so spare me... So its not ok to ask what imaginary players you would like to spend money on?

But yea... lets avoid signing chuckers like Kyrie so we can remain flexible to sign the guys you like who dont exist. Your position is clear.

Well, actually that is my position. You don't spend cap space just because u have it. I think staying flexible and waiting for the right type of player to hit the market us more prudent. I am very much focused on the long game.

Which players are you targeting for 2019, 2020, or 2021?

What I am preaching is flexibility and opportunism, it's the opposite of locking in on one or two players and then outbidding ourselves to make it happen. That last part is how the Knicks have operated for the last several years. If Kwahi becomes an FA or Klay can be traded for, I would definitely jump on it, but I would also make sure I am not overpaying. There's always going to be some "star player" wanting to move. I just want to get the ones that fit our proclaimed team philosophy.

flexibility and opportunism are going to yield a better player than Irving? How? You have no plan. Those are cute ideas. How are you molding them into an elite NBA team? Maybe provide an example of the kind of trade or move you are looking to make? Like hey.. Team X did this and now look at them... thats what I want to do.

Who are the players you are targeting and what is your plan to get them? YOu want Klay but dont want to overpay... is this your first 10 minutes following the NBA? Its a talent driven league. Its why teams throw money at any turd with upside, because high end NBA talent is so hard to acquire. Do you understand this? I am great with you having an alternate plan worth discussing... but flexibility and opportunism are not a plan.

If you are going to push back against signing one of the league's best players at 26 I would hope something better than flexibility and opportunism.

Jmpasq.. Kanter walks, Mudiay walks, stretch Noah.... they can sigh Kyrie pretty easily. You max out KP immediatly after Kyrie signs. This saves you the diff on KP's cap hold vs. the actual deal he gets.

The "plan" is not doing the same stupid things we keep doing. That is the plan
Every chucker that becomes available and wants to exploit the NY Media grabs the imagination of fans who starts making the cases for hon to be the ONLY way we can get better. This is classic Knicks fan bullshyt. You already know that the well run franchises don't overpay for one dimensional talent and get there by doing that. We have already overpayed for McDyess, Curry, Amare, Melo, Noah ...everyone of these turds had some level of fan support as "Max players" or "near Max players"-- and the results speak for themselves.

Fantasizing about a set of named players becoming Knicks isn't planning, its starfukking.

When in a hole, don't keep digging.


After the next draft the Knicks will have had a high lottery pick in 4 of the last 5 years. Mills and Perry have stated they aren't signing anyone to more than a one year deal and that they are targeting the summer of 2019 to be players in free agency. Mills has sat d they will have a max slot open to sign someone. Who do you want them to target?
Also, I call bs on Ainge doing it the right way with Kyrie. If anyone running the Knicks traded what was projected to be a top 5 lottery pick in the next draft plus Thomas and Crowder for a player they lost for nothing two years later the fans and media would kill them. You don't give up that much to try someone out.
I absolutely think Kyrie is trying to push the Celtics into giving him an extension. But the Celtics still
Looked really good without him and committing max money to him might not be in their best interest. If they decide that and he is interested in the Knicks then I think
Perry/Mills sign him. We know they want to get a max guy to pair with KP. Who is your target for 2019 with max slot they plan on using?

I want them to target high IQ two way players like they said they would. I have also already said Okay and Kwahi are great targets

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
jskinny35
Posts: 21582
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #928
USA
6/30/2018  6:03 PM
Yes - the max should be reserved for the best 2 way players only... there's probably only 3-5 players that deserve the max. Just because we have a history of overvaluing and overpaying doesn't mean we should do it once again. If LeBron and Kawhi are A+ players, Durant an A, Kyrie is an A-/B+ player at best, considering he's injured often and is defensively challenged. He may be the best available talent but it doesn't change the fact that it is unlikely to work 2/3 years from now. Don't understand maxing out a player that you then have to adjust the remaining starters/roster to offset his deficiencies... and this is assuming he stays healthy. KP (if healthy) will get a max... then what are you left with? Why not just resist the urge, continue to add talent and if an A/A+ talent is available - then you max out. If not, will continue to add draft talent and maybe one or two of our young guards continues to develop... Frank, Burke, Mudiay all are young and would likely play point anyway. Kyrie really wants to play near home, then tell him to do it for less. Our team has such low self-esteem because we've sucked for so long
reub
Posts: 21836
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2016
Member: #6227

6/30/2018  9:07 PM
Kyrie is hurt more than he's healthy. Do we need that at a max contract for 4 or 5 years?
Kyrie to Knicks should be about as easy to Shaq to the Lakers

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy