Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
jskinny35
Posts: 21582 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/27/2005 Member: #928 USA |
![]() Yes - the max should be reserved for the best 2 way players only... there's probably only 3-5 players that deserve the max. Just because we have a history of overvaluing and overpaying doesn't mean we should do it once again. If LeBron and Kawhi are A+ players, Durant an A, Kyrie is an A-/B+ player at best, considering he's injured often and is defensively challenged. He may be the best available talent but it doesn't change the fact that it is unlikely to work 2/3 years from now. Don't understand maxing out a player that you then have to adjust the remaining starters/roster to offset his deficiencies... and this is assuming he stays healthy. KP (if healthy) will get a max... then what are you left with? Why not just resist the urge, continue to add talent and if an A/A+ talent is available - then you max out. If not, will continue to add draft talent and maybe one or two of our young guards continues to develop... Frank, Burke, Mudiay all are young and would likely play point anyway. Kyrie really wants to play near home, then tell him to do it for less. Our team has such low self-esteem because we've sucked for so long
|
reub
Posts: 21836 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/13/2016 Member: #6227 |
![]() Kyrie is hurt more than he's healthy. Do we need that at a max contract for 4 or 5 years?
|