[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Karl Towns is more Duncan than Okafor
Author Thread
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/24/2015  1:48 PM
Again I have no problems drafting Ok4 but Towns is the guy I want #1 for these Knicks. If they draft Ok4 over Towns than I will get behind their decision and see how things play out on the court
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/24/2015  1:55 PM
gunsnewing wrote:Ok4 is a better passer than Jefferson/Boozer I will give you that

Al Jeff wishes he could move like OK4. Boozer is a huge finesse player. He doesn't dominate inside like OK4. I just think there's no real comparison in terms of OK4's overall talent. I'd advise everyone to go back and look at all of the posted games and highlights of OK4 and really pay attention to the things he does physically and how smart he is in setting up his teammates. He may not be a defensive rim protector but in every other way he's a franchise type of talent that you can build an offense around.

FistOfOakley
Posts: 21079
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/18/2010
Member: #3075

2/24/2015  2:02 PM
no one denies his offensive talent.. i don't think his biggest critics have him rated outside of the top 5... we can talk all day about his offensive talent.. it's not a secret...

its' just the defense is less than adequate and no one wants to talk about how bad he is there... this is not a pg we are talking about either.. this is a center... and these are the same kinds of people who fall in love with a guy like enes kanter or vucevic... and the defense is precisely why their teams don't do well...

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/24/2015  2:03 PM
FistOfOakley wrote:no one denies his offensive talent.. i don't think his biggest critics have him rated outside of the top 5... we can talk all day about his offensive talent.. it's not a secret...

its' just the defense is less than adequate and no one wants to talk about how bad he is there... this is not a pg we are talking about either.. this is a center... and these are the same kinds of people who fall in love with a guy like enes kanter or vucevic... and the defense is precisely why their teams don't do well...

Exactly Fist. Amare is an offensive beast too

fishmike
Posts: 53866
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/24/2015  2:06 PM
gunsnewing wrote:Ok4 is a better passer than Jefferson/Boozer I will give you that
Stop with Boozer comparisons.. your ruining any credibility in this discussion. Boozer is not a 6'11/7'4 player scoring almost 20 a game at 65% getting doubled at 19 YO. Please.. for your own sake, just stop
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/24/2015  2:08 PM
FistOfOakley wrote:no one denies his offensive talent.. i don't think his biggest critics have him rated outside of the top 5... we can talk all day about his offensive talent.. it's not a secret...

its' just the defense is less than adequate and no one wants to talk about how bad he is there... this is not a pg we are talking about either.. this is a center... and these are the same kinds of people who fall in love with a guy like enes kanter or vucevic... and the defense is precisely why their teams don't do well...


There's more to a teams defense than the Center spot. The most important area is the guys you have on the perimeter. The better they are the more effective any big you have will be. I can always get a PF/C with Shot blocking ability to play next to OK4. It's very hard to find a player that will anchor your offense on the level that he projects to be. He's still a boy and hasn't even really gained full strength yet. Personally I think that he is told not to risk fouling out. I can't imagine that Coach K is just letting him play and not try to protect the rim at his size without it being part of the plan. It's just too risky for him to waste fouls on a couple of blocked shots. People make a bit too much of that one aspect IMO. There's more to a defense than the rim protection aspect. Especially now with teams launching so many 3's. I'd rather focus on better perimeter D.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/24/2015  2:10 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/24/2015  2:13 PM
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Ok4 is a better passer than Jefferson/Boozer I will give you that
Stop with Boozer comparisons.. your ruining any credibility in this discussion. Boozer is not a 6'11/7'4 player scoring almost 20 a game at 65% getting doubled at 19 YO. Please.. for your own sake, just stop

I was referring to Boozer's empty numbers but fair enough. I will not mention Boozer again. However I don't always trust Yours or Nix opinions. So thats a bit of a red flag for me

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39944
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

2/24/2015  2:18 PM
nixluva wrote:
FistOfOakley wrote:no one denies his offensive talent.. i don't think his biggest critics have him rated outside of the top 5... we can talk all day about his offensive talent.. it's not a secret...

its' just the defense is less than adequate and no one wants to talk about how bad he is there... this is not a pg we are talking about either.. this is a center... and these are the same kinds of people who fall in love with a guy like enes kanter or vucevic... and the defense is precisely why their teams don't do well...


There's more to a teams defense than the Center spot. The most important area is the guys you have on the perimeter. The better they are the more effective any big you have will be. I can always get a PF/C with Shot blocking ability to play next to OK4. It's very hard to find a player that will anchor your offense on the level that he projects to be. He's still a boy and hasn't even really gained full strength yet. Personally I think that he is told not to risk fouling out. I can't imagine that Coach K is just letting him play and not try to protect the rim at his size without it being part of the plan. It's just too risky for him to waste fouls on a couple of blocked shots. People make a bit too much of that one aspect IMO. There's more to a defense than the rim protection aspect. Especially now with teams launching so many 3's. I'd rather focus on better perimeter D.

Plus, he's still averaging more than a block and a steal a game, which isn't horrendous. It's similar to what Blake Griffin did in college. OK4 needs to stay in the game because Duke has a good chance of losing if he plays 14 mins a game. Coach Cal has no problem pullin Towns out of the game because he knows he has bodies to plug in.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/24/2015  2:22 PM
Anyway I'm about done with this thread. We can bookmark it and refer back to it in a year and see whats what
fishmike
Posts: 53866
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/24/2015  2:25 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Ok4 is a better passer than Jefferson/Boozer I will give you that
Stop with Boozer comparisons.. your ruining any credibility in this discussion. Boozer is not a 6'11/7'4 player scoring almost 20 a game at 65% getting doubled at 19 YO. Please.. for your own sake, just stop

I was referring to Boozer's empty numbers but fair enough. I will not mention Boozer again. However I don't always trust Yours or Nix opinions. So thats a bit of a red flag for me

I actually dont have an opinion. Both are great prospects, but one has a ton of data to look at and one is full of promises, what ifs and question marks. My only opinion is that it would be folly to pass on something proven for something not.

You generally fall in love with a player, then that player can do no wrong and is the best ever. Kind of like "the best two-way player since Ewing" type of stuff. OR you choose to loath a player and will agree with any fodder posted on that player regardless of whether or not there is a shred of proof. I can tell you love Towns. Im not sure why but OK. You would take him over OK4 and Russell? I would take both before Towns (at 3). Havent seen enough of Muiday to make any call.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/24/2015  2:40 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/24/2015  2:40 PM
Shumpert was playing like our best 2way player since Ewing/Sprewell when I said that but fair enough. I know where you stand
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
2/24/2015  3:06 PM
Does anyone not agree with me that Towns's size/mobility/athleticism and physical abilities resembles Tyson Chandler?
While I know that Town's has much more skills on OFFENSE and the upside to improve, he currently is VERY RAW

The thing about Towns that makes it hard to evaluate is that he plays with many 7 footers and surely benefits from it, playing with such dominate talent together
While OK4 is the only legit BIG that all teams concentrate and put the #1 priority on stopping every game
But since Kentucky has so many BIGS, they cannot concenrate on just 1 player
OK4's footwork, hands, post ability, the way he uses his body to get position/post/receive the pass, and finish in the paint are all far more advanced than Town's
It is safe to say that OK4 will have the skills needed to be a post player in the NBA while I personally cannot say the same for Town's despite his ceiling
Playing in New York, there a lot of distractions, and a lot of pressure from fans/anaylst etc, always under a microscrope, for the immaturity and lack of focus at his age, I think we would need a strong mentor/veteran and some strong development coaches to work with him
Anthony Davis improved tremndously the past couple years, his rookie year is NOTHING like the game we see from him today, especially with his body and shooting mechanics and shooting abilities, in addition to his strength/foot work/post play

While Willie Stein pretty much resembles Tyson Chandler's game almost identical
Stein looks like he is much stronger to me than Town's, a area that he will also have to work on, I think Stein might even be more NBA ready right now on DEFENSE better than Town's
They both know their limits and will not try to do much more but it Chandler has just gained the confidence to pull a wide open 17footer


For Town's I feel we will need a very good playmaker to get him the ball in spots, where as for OK4, he just has to get strong and fight for position and let him initiate the OFFENSE through the post which was how Shaq and Gasol operated

How and if Town's reaches his ceiling is a question that we all can not answer...
He not only moves like Tyson Chandler, his entire game is like Tyson Chandler


For NYK's, we will have to see how we will build our team, if it will be a G/F type of Offense that resembles the Bulls, Shaq/Kobe Lakers, or Gasol/Odom/Bynum/Kobe
But CA isn't Kobe, especially the young Kobe, he just doesn't have the ability that Kobe can defend/handle the ball/penetrate/create for others
And with this injury to CA, we do not know what to expect out of CA either


By this summer, we will get a better idea what kind of team we resemble and hopefully by the end of next season, we will get a sense of how much whoever we draft will develop with the rest of the team
If Thanasis could be a lock down defender and be a starter for the years to come, along with how hard our draft pick will develop and work in practice/gym to develop their games like Anthony Davis did...
If we show much promise, in 2017, when the cap will rise much, we could draw the attention of ALL STAR FA's to make NYK an attractice place to seriously consider if CA is still a top scorer and could evolve his game or not....

RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
2/24/2015  3:12 PM
gunsnewing wrote:Shumpert was playing like our best 2way player since Ewing/Sprewell when I said that but fair enough. I know where you stand


Yeah, I always liked him, yet so many posters here kept pointing blame at him
He always sacrificed for the better of the team but he was never teamed up with anyone that suited his skill set, outside of the style that he played with Lin in an uptempo system
Sure, his game took a step back with his injury but Woodson's inability to involve anyone but CA and JR Smith surely didn't help his development

Our lack of play makers, 2way players *Fields, JJ, Novak, Tyson Chandler* all looked great on both ends on the floor and we actually played as a team
The following year, our older players provided leadership that we lack for the season, but in the end, we simply were not good enough to win when it counts, especially not at the style of play we did play with

So we need the combination of leaders and talent to go with HIGH IQ/DEFENSIVE YOUNGER players, with more talents that fit to be considered seriously to be a contender
The thing is how many years does CA have in him to play at a high level at his age/injury concerns?
How will his ego come in to play if he does decline? Will

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/24/2015  3:13 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/24/2015  3:15 PM
Towns entire game like Tyson Chandler? I don't see it. Has Tyson ever hit a 20 footer? Tyson's 10ft shots would draw a sarcastic oh & ah from the Garden crowd. Can Tyson dribble and dish like Towns. Not at all. One of Tyson's weakness was passing. Terrible passer. Dribbling? Forget it with Tyson!

You have to really watch Towns Ron

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/24/2015  3:19 PM
RonRon wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Shumpert was playing like our best 2way player since Ewing/Sprewell when I said that but fair enough. I know where you stand


Yeah, I always liked him, yet so many posters here kept pointing blame at him
He always sacrificed for the better of the team but he was never teamed up with anyone that suited his skill set, outside of the style that he played with Lin in an uptempo system
Sure, his game took a step back with his injury but Woodson's inability to involve anyone but CA and JR Smith surely didn't help his development

Our lack of play makers, 2way players *Fields, JJ, Novak, Tyson Chandler* all looked great on both ends on the floor and we actually played as a team
The following year, our older players provided leadership that we lack for the season, but in the end, we simply were not good enough to win when it counts, especially not at the style of play we did play with

So we need the combination of leaders and talent to go with HIGH IQ/DEFENSIVE YOUNGER players, with more talents that fit to be considered seriously to be a contender
The thing is how many years does CA have in him to play at a high level at his age/injury concerns?
How will his ego come in to play if he does decline? Will

Exactly Ron. Thats what guys like Fish(CAA-Camelo Anthony Apologists(thanks Waltlongmire) don't get. You need 2way players to win. You can win with Melo & OK4 despite them not being a great 2way players but you have to surround them with really good defenders and a rim protector which I truly believe Towns is. He's the whole package

StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

2/24/2015  3:22 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/24/2015  3:22 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
RonRon wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Shumpert was playing like our best 2way player since Ewing/Sprewell when I said that but fair enough. I know where you stand


Yeah, I always liked him, yet so many posters here kept pointing blame at him
He always sacrificed for the better of the team but he was never teamed up with anyone that suited his skill set, outside of the style that he played with Lin in an uptempo system
Sure, his game took a step back with his injury but Woodson's inability to involve anyone but CA and JR Smith surely didn't help his development

Our lack of play makers, 2way players *Fields, JJ, Novak, Tyson Chandler* all looked great on both ends on the floor and we actually played as a team
The following year, our older players provided leadership that we lack for the season, but in the end, we simply were not good enough to win when it counts, especially not at the style of play we did play with

So we need the combination of leaders and talent to go with HIGH IQ/DEFENSIVE YOUNGER players, with more talents that fit to be considered seriously to be a contender
The thing is how many years does CA have in him to play at a high level at his age/injury concerns?
How will his ego come in to play if he does decline? Will

Exactly Ron. Thats what guys like Fish(CAA-Camelo Anthony Apologists(thanks Waltlongmire) don't get. You need 2way players to win. You can win with Melo & OK4 despite them not being a great 2way players but you have to surround them with really good defenders and a rim protector which I truly believe Towns is. He's the whole package

Im a big Towns fan but im interested to see how well he does as the main guy in the frontcourt. Kentucky is obviously loaded in the frotcourt wich makes it easier for all he big guys. Not trying to put down Towns at all but its something to think about. I do love is defense and rebounding and hope the offense develops
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

2/24/2015  4:16 PM
FistOfOakley wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:there might be a few teams who might not want to take on 1st rd salary. Okc, GSW, Cle, and maybe Portland might trade this years pick for a future pick. Those teams will have to make some tough choices and if they want to keep there current players they might look to save some money. Most of the teams could have team salaries totaling $80m+.

the latter third of the draft are all filled with pretty sharp front offices... you have the cap projected to go up by 25mm next year... an impending free agent frenzy in this offseason... you really think these teams are just giving up a late 1st rder in this year's draft?

i don't see it... i sincerely hope i'm wrong for our sakes but in this environment especially it's a hard sell...

I think that Cle. and Okc are in win now mode and if Cle tries to keep Shump and Tristan they will be on the hook for some serious money. They also have Love, JR, and Miller to worry about depending on if they take their options and wait until next year. Of the 3 Love is probably the only one who want opt in which could lead to him costing the Cavs more money. I think they will try to cut cost similar to what Miami did when they kept giving away 1st rders.

GSW is in a similar situation with a younger core band they will pick last in the draft. So it would make sense for them to move back into the 2nd, get a future 1st, or some cash.

Okc has a starting 5 and now they have solidified their bench with youth through trades. If they give Kanter his money then they might not want to waste money now on a player. They are known for their cost cutting ways and will look to get a vet pg to back up Russell.

Portland is the only iffy one in my mind.

FistOfOakley
Posts: 21079
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/18/2010
Member: #3075

2/24/2015  4:24 PM
the cap is going up by more than 20mm in 2016... i don't think any of these teams are fretting about money...

and even if they do.. i know cle and okc have protections on future outgoing picks so they might not even be able to trade it...

sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

2/24/2015  4:26 PM
FistOfOakley wrote:the cap is going up by more than 20mm in 2016... i don't think any of these teams are fretting about money...

and even if they do.. i know cle and okc have protections on future outgoing picks so they might not even be able to trade it...

dont count on that. the owners will lockout the players long before they let an increase of that amount occur.

GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
fishmike
Posts: 53866
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/24/2015  4:54 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
RonRon wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Shumpert was playing like our best 2way player since Ewing/Sprewell when I said that but fair enough. I know where you stand


Yeah, I always liked him, yet so many posters here kept pointing blame at him
He always sacrificed for the better of the team but he was never teamed up with anyone that suited his skill set, outside of the style that he played with Lin in an uptempo system
Sure, his game took a step back with his injury but Woodson's inability to involve anyone but CA and JR Smith surely didn't help his development

Our lack of play makers, 2way players *Fields, JJ, Novak, Tyson Chandler* all looked great on both ends on the floor and we actually played as a team
The following year, our older players provided leadership that we lack for the season, but in the end, we simply were not good enough to win when it counts, especially not at the style of play we did play with

So we need the combination of leaders and talent to go with HIGH IQ/DEFENSIVE YOUNGER players, with more talents that fit to be considered seriously to be a contender
The thing is how many years does CA have in him to play at a high level at his age/injury concerns?
How will his ego come in to play if he does decline? Will

Exactly Ron. Thats what guys like Fish(CAA-Camelo Anthony Apologists(thanks Waltlongmire) don't get. You need 2way players to win. You can win with Melo & OK4 despite them not being a great 2way players but you have to surround them with really good defenders and a rim protector which I truly believe Towns is. He's the whole package

nice... so calling out guys for just making up stuff makes me an apologist? Nice...

Guns.. we get it get it just fine. Playing defense doesnt make you a 2-way player. Playing GOOD defense and GOOD offense makes you a 2-way player. Kind of why I would laugh when you would call Shump the best 2-way player since Ewing. He wasnt even a 2-way player because he sucked on both sides of the ball... but yea dude, glad your hear to set me straight.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Karl Towns is more Duncan than Okafor

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy