[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The Spurs Business Model: How Long Did It Require To Build The Atlanta Hawks?
Author Thread
Knixkik
Posts: 35477
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
1/19/2015  4:58 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
misterearl wrote:Continuity

Knixkik - excellent summary and perspective. If Melo is our Al Horford, the question is whether Uncle Phil will acquire that special player who he is compatible with on the court... or select players with Melo as an afterthought.

Of the current roster, is there one player who meets the criteria of core player?

No there isn't, and that is the main problem. We have a ton of guys who can end up being quality role players and guys to round out the bench, but we don't have the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th guy needed to put together that core, like Atl has.

horford is a two-way player and earns 12 mill
milsap is a two-way player and earns 9.5 mill

that's a total of 21.5 million for a core frontcourt

then there's teague who is turning into a two-way player

and

korver who, well, lets just say he is the ultimate advanced stat player with a TS% of 74 and a usg:ast of 1:1, which means he is a great team passer.

they got rid of josh smith and williams, both of whom are expensive, inefficient one-way players.

here with the knicks we have one player in carmelo anthony who you claim or imply is a core player, but he merely is a one-way player who yet earns more than both horford and milsap combined.

how can any player be considered a "core player" if he does not defend adequately?

carmelo anthony is not a core player so the honest response is that the knicks lack a single core player that is of starting-level caliber.
the knicks have a handful of potential two-way players who right now look to become solid bench-caliber personnel.

This is why nothing you say can be taken seriously.

i honestly think the joke's on you and others who share your point of view, but tell me... what is it about carmelo anthony that allows him to earn the right to start on a championship-level team? the money he being overpaid? or is it something else?

i see a very good sixth man being paid more than twice of what he is worth.

so you don't think that he is good enough to start on a championship team??

no.

i see a guy who is actually closer to a boozer/josh smith type of player than a lebron/durant player.

i know... right?

Your goal has always been to turn these threads into Melo bash threads. We aren't even talking about superstar, #1 option, or anything, just "core player" and you try to bring him down to a level below starting caliber or whatever lol. You will argue he isn't even an NBA player and he belongs in the Dleague if that was what the thread was about. Saying you don't like the guy and don't think he's a star is understandable, as it is up for interpretation. But not a starting caliber player or capable core player just destroys any credibility as a poster that you have or had.

he is closer to josh smith and carlos boozer in terms of floor impact, and further from lebron james and kevin durant.

do you agree with that measure?

based on WS48 he is smack in between.

His 162 WS48 as a knick is 3rd star quality and way above average.


Based on WS48, he's quite close to Boozer actually. Both their career #s and this season #s are pretty close.
(I'm not saying that's the only metric I'd use, though it's an important one.)

Last season he was 13th overall in win shares. But no matter what, people can find any data to support any agenda either way.

AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/19/2015  5:00 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/19/2015  5:02 PM
Knixkik wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
misterearl wrote:Continuity

Knixkik - excellent summary and perspective. If Melo is our Al Horford, the question is whether Uncle Phil will acquire that special player who he is compatible with on the court... or select players with Melo as an afterthought.

Of the current roster, is there one player who meets the criteria of core player?

No there isn't, and that is the main problem. We have a ton of guys who can end up being quality role players and guys to round out the bench, but we don't have the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th guy needed to put together that core, like Atl has.

horford is a two-way player and earns 12 mill
milsap is a two-way player and earns 9.5 mill

that's a total of 21.5 million for a core frontcourt

then there's teague who is turning into a two-way player

and

korver who, well, lets just say he is the ultimate advanced stat player with a TS% of 74 and a usg:ast of 1:1, which means he is a great team passer.

they got rid of josh smith and williams, both of whom are expensive, inefficient one-way players.

here with the knicks we have one player in carmelo anthony who you claim or imply is a core player, but he merely is a one-way player who yet earns more than both horford and milsap combined.

how can any player be considered a "core player" if he does not defend adequately?

carmelo anthony is not a core player so the honest response is that the knicks lack a single core player that is of starting-level caliber.
the knicks have a handful of potential two-way players who right now look to become solid bench-caliber personnel.

This is why nothing you say can be taken seriously.

i honestly think the joke's on you and others who share your point of view, but tell me... what is it about carmelo anthony that allows him to earn the right to start on a championship-level team? the money he being overpaid? or is it something else?

i see a very good sixth man being paid more than twice of what he is worth.

so you don't think that he is good enough to start on a championship team??

no.

i see a guy who is actually closer to a boozer/josh smith type of player than a lebron/durant player.

i know... right?

Your goal has always been to turn these threads into Melo bash threads. We aren't even talking about superstar, #1 option, or anything, just "core player" and you try to bring him down to a level below starting caliber or whatever lol. You will argue he isn't even an NBA player and he belongs in the Dleague if that was what the thread was about. Saying you don't like the guy and don't think he's a star is understandable, as it is up for interpretation. But not a starting caliber player or capable core player just destroys any credibility as a poster that you have or had.

he is closer to josh smith and carlos boozer in terms of floor impact, and further from lebron james and kevin durant.

do you agree with that measure?

based on WS48 he is smack in between.

His 162 WS48 as a knick is 3rd star quality and way above average.


Based on WS48, he's quite close to Boozer actually. Both their career #s and this season #s are pretty close.
(I'm not saying that's the only metric I'd use, though it's an important one.)

Last season he was 13th overall in win shares. But no matter what, people can find any data to support any agenda either way.


A) We were talking about WS48, not total win shares, which is confounded with playing time.
B) That doesn't contradict anything I said anyway. If the discussion was specifically about who played better last season, the answer would be that Melo was light years ahead of Boozer (but light years behind Lebron and Durant too). Boozer may just be aging one year ahead of Melo. Hopefully, Melo can get back to normal though.
Knixkik
Posts: 35477
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
1/19/2015  5:07 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
misterearl wrote:Continuity

Knixkik - excellent summary and perspective. If Melo is our Al Horford, the question is whether Uncle Phil will acquire that special player who he is compatible with on the court... or select players with Melo as an afterthought.

Of the current roster, is there one player who meets the criteria of core player?

No there isn't, and that is the main problem. We have a ton of guys who can end up being quality role players and guys to round out the bench, but we don't have the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th guy needed to put together that core, like Atl has.

horford is a two-way player and earns 12 mill
milsap is a two-way player and earns 9.5 mill

that's a total of 21.5 million for a core frontcourt

then there's teague who is turning into a two-way player

and

korver who, well, lets just say he is the ultimate advanced stat player with a TS% of 74 and a usg:ast of 1:1, which means he is a great team passer.

they got rid of josh smith and williams, both of whom are expensive, inefficient one-way players.

here with the knicks we have one player in carmelo anthony who you claim or imply is a core player, but he merely is a one-way player who yet earns more than both horford and milsap combined.

how can any player be considered a "core player" if he does not defend adequately?

carmelo anthony is not a core player so the honest response is that the knicks lack a single core player that is of starting-level caliber.
the knicks have a handful of potential two-way players who right now look to become solid bench-caliber personnel.

This is why nothing you say can be taken seriously.

i honestly think the joke's on you and others who share your point of view, but tell me... what is it about carmelo anthony that allows him to earn the right to start on a championship-level team? the money he being overpaid? or is it something else?

i see a very good sixth man being paid more than twice of what he is worth.

so you don't think that he is good enough to start on a championship team??

no.

i see a guy who is actually closer to a boozer/josh smith type of player than a lebron/durant player.

i know... right?

Your goal has always been to turn these threads into Melo bash threads. We aren't even talking about superstar, #1 option, or anything, just "core player" and you try to bring him down to a level below starting caliber or whatever lol. You will argue he isn't even an NBA player and he belongs in the Dleague if that was what the thread was about. Saying you don't like the guy and don't think he's a star is understandable, as it is up for interpretation. But not a starting caliber player or capable core player just destroys any credibility as a poster that you have or had.

he is closer to josh smith and carlos boozer in terms of floor impact, and further from lebron james and kevin durant.

do you agree with that measure?

based on WS48 he is smack in between.

His 162 WS48 as a knick is 3rd star quality and way above average.


Based on WS48, he's quite close to Boozer actually. Both their career #s and this season #s are pretty close.
(I'm not saying that's the only metric I'd use, though it's an important one.)

Last season he was 13th overall in win shares. But no matter what, people can find any data to support any agenda either way.


A) We were talking about WS48, not total win shares, which is confounded with playing time.
B) That doesn't contradict anything I said anyway. If the discussion was specifically about who played better last season, the answer would be that Melo was light years ahead of Boozer (but light years behind Lebron and Durant too). Boozer may just be aging one year ahead of Melo. Hopefully, Melo can get back to normal though.

Yes i understand that, but WS48 can show many bench players who put up empty numbers in limited time as well. It's easy to get fancy with the numbers, and forget to look at the players production playing real minutes over a long period of time. When you look at WS overall, you generally see the best players in the league at the top.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/19/2015  5:18 PM
Knixkik wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
misterearl wrote:Continuity

Knixkik - excellent summary and perspective. If Melo is our Al Horford, the question is whether Uncle Phil will acquire that special player who he is compatible with on the court... or select players with Melo as an afterthought.

Of the current roster, is there one player who meets the criteria of core player?

No there isn't, and that is the main problem. We have a ton of guys who can end up being quality role players and guys to round out the bench, but we don't have the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th guy needed to put together that core, like Atl has.

horford is a two-way player and earns 12 mill
milsap is a two-way player and earns 9.5 mill

that's a total of 21.5 million for a core frontcourt

then there's teague who is turning into a two-way player

and

korver who, well, lets just say he is the ultimate advanced stat player with a TS% of 74 and a usg:ast of 1:1, which means he is a great team passer.

they got rid of josh smith and williams, both of whom are expensive, inefficient one-way players.

here with the knicks we have one player in carmelo anthony who you claim or imply is a core player, but he merely is a one-way player who yet earns more than both horford and milsap combined.

how can any player be considered a "core player" if he does not defend adequately?

carmelo anthony is not a core player so the honest response is that the knicks lack a single core player that is of starting-level caliber.
the knicks have a handful of potential two-way players who right now look to become solid bench-caliber personnel.

This is why nothing you say can be taken seriously.

i honestly think the joke's on you and others who share your point of view, but tell me... what is it about carmelo anthony that allows him to earn the right to start on a championship-level team? the money he being overpaid? or is it something else?

i see a very good sixth man being paid more than twice of what he is worth.

so you don't think that he is good enough to start on a championship team??

no.

i see a guy who is actually closer to a boozer/josh smith type of player than a lebron/durant player.

i know... right?

Your goal has always been to turn these threads into Melo bash threads. We aren't even talking about superstar, #1 option, or anything, just "core player" and you try to bring him down to a level below starting caliber or whatever lol. You will argue he isn't even an NBA player and he belongs in the Dleague if that was what the thread was about. Saying you don't like the guy and don't think he's a star is understandable, as it is up for interpretation. But not a starting caliber player or capable core player just destroys any credibility as a poster that you have or had.

he is closer to josh smith and carlos boozer in terms of floor impact, and further from lebron james and kevin durant.

do you agree with that measure?

based on WS48 he is smack in between.

His 162 WS48 as a knick is 3rd star quality and way above average.


Based on WS48, he's quite close to Boozer actually. Both their career #s and this season #s are pretty close.
(I'm not saying that's the only metric I'd use, though it's an important one.)

Last season he was 13th overall in win shares. But no matter what, people can find any data to support any agenda either way.


A) We were talking about WS48, not total win shares, which is confounded with playing time.
B) That doesn't contradict anything I said anyway. If the discussion was specifically about who played better last season, the answer would be that Melo was light years ahead of Boozer (but light years behind Lebron and Durant too). Boozer may just be aging one year ahead of Melo. Hopefully, Melo can get back to normal though.

Yes i understand that, but WS48 can show many bench players who put up empty numbers in limited time as well. It's easy to get fancy with the numbers, and forget to look at the players production playing real minutes over a long period of time. When you look at WS overall, you generally see the best players in the league at the top.


Well, I do agree with that, but Boozer has averaged 32 mpg for his career. I would look at both total and per 48 WS for players though. You seem heavily invested in showing that there's a meaningful difference in the win share data between Boozer and Melo.
F500ONE
Posts: 23899
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5844

1/19/2015  5:22 PM

This will definitely be the summer of "SHOW ME THE MONEY"

dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
1/20/2015  8:11 AM
Knixkik wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
misterearl wrote:Continuity

Knixkik - excellent summary and perspective. If Melo is our Al Horford, the question is whether Uncle Phil will acquire that special player who he is compatible with on the court... or select players with Melo as an afterthought.

Of the current roster, is there one player who meets the criteria of core player?

No there isn't, and that is the main problem. We have a ton of guys who can end up being quality role players and guys to round out the bench, but we don't have the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th guy needed to put together that core, like Atl has.

horford is a two-way player and earns 12 mill
milsap is a two-way player and earns 9.5 mill

that's a total of 21.5 million for a core frontcourt

then there's teague who is turning into a two-way player

and

korver who, well, lets just say he is the ultimate advanced stat player with a TS% of 74 and a usg:ast of 1:1, which means he is a great team passer.

they got rid of josh smith and williams, both of whom are expensive, inefficient one-way players.

here with the knicks we have one player in carmelo anthony who you claim or imply is a core player, but he merely is a one-way player who yet earns more than both horford and milsap combined.

how can any player be considered a "core player" if he does not defend adequately?

carmelo anthony is not a core player so the honest response is that the knicks lack a single core player that is of starting-level caliber.
the knicks have a handful of potential two-way players who right now look to become solid bench-caliber personnel.

This is why nothing you say can be taken seriously.

i honestly think the joke's on you and others who share your point of view, but tell me... what is it about carmelo anthony that allows him to earn the right to start on a championship-level team? the money he being overpaid? or is it something else?

i see a very good sixth man being paid more than twice of what he is worth.

so you don't think that he is good enough to start on a championship team??

no.

i see a guy who is actually closer to a boozer/josh smith type of player than a lebron/durant player.

i know... right?

Your goal has always been to turn these threads into Melo bash threads. We aren't even talking about superstar, #1 option, or anything, just "core player" and you try to bring him down to a level below starting caliber or whatever lol. You will argue he isn't even an NBA player and he belongs in the Dleague if that was what the thread was about. Saying you don't like the guy and don't think he's a star is understandable, as it is up for interpretation. But not a starting caliber player or capable core player just destroys any credibility as a poster that you have or had.

he is closer to josh smith and carlos boozer in terms of floor impact, and further from lebron james and kevin durant.

do you agree with that measure?

based on WS48 he is smack in between.

His 162 WS48 as a knick is 3rd star quality and way above average.


Based on WS48, he's quite close to Boozer actually. Both their career #s and this season #s are pretty close.
(I'm not saying that's the only metric I'd use, though it's an important one.)

Last season he was 13th overall in win shares. But no matter what, people can find any data to support any agenda either way.


last season carmelo was not even in the top 20 in win shares per 48, a truer reflection of his lack of effectiveness. moreover, the box plus/minus statistic has him ranked at 19th for the regular season, where his defense was not anywhere near the top 20 at negative 1.0.

translation: he is not a two-way player and therefore not a "core player." how many one-way players have there been who were core players? steve nash maybe? and before you say "dirk," dirk is a better player on defense than anthony and a far better offensive player to boot. dirk is a positive-sum player.

i consider anthony much closer to a zero-sum player.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
1/20/2015  10:35 AM
Yes, Melo = Jamal Crawford. Just bigger and fatter. And franchises all over the world known to be offering Boozer 90 million to sign.
It's all settled.

NBA GM's are dumb.

fishmike
Posts: 53866
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/20/2015  11:01 AM
jrodmc wrote:Yes, Melo = Jamal Crawford. Just bigger and fatter. And franchises all over the world known to be offering Boozer 90 million to sign.
It's all settled.

NBA GM's are dumb.

its funny... I dont read every thread on this board. Other times I just post a comment and move on not really caring to discuss further. So I had to snicker a bit when I posted on page 6 of this thread wondering what I would read. DK trying to pump up Josh Smith and Boozer as better than Melo. Sigh... dude has a lot of energy, Ill give him that.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
1/20/2015  11:25 AM
fishmike wrote:
jrodmc wrote:Yes, Melo = Jamal Crawford. Just bigger and fatter. And franchises all over the world known to be offering Boozer 90 million to sign.
It's all settled.

NBA GM's are dumb.

its funny... I dont read every thread on this board. Other times I just post a comment and move on not really caring to discuss further. So I had to snicker a bit when I posted on page 6 of this thread wondering what I would read. DK trying to pump up Josh Smith and Boozer as better than Melo. Sigh... dude has a lot of energy, Ill give him that.

no i think both smith and boozer are lesser players than carmelo, but as has been repeated several times on this thread:

on one end of a spectrum you have lebron and durant and on the other you have boozer and smith.

all that is being asserted is that melo is closer in [in]effectiveness to the latter-- something that many are loath to admit-- and further from the effectiveness of the former, especially in the playoffs.

do you agree with this?

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/20/2015  11:34 AM
He's very far from Smith, Lebron, and Durant.
With Boozer, you at least have a discussion, and the answer will depend on which metrics you rely on.
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
1/20/2015  11:59 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:He's very far from Smith, Lebron, and Durant.
With Boozer, you at least have a discussion, and the answer will depend on which metrics you rely on.

what metrics have melo being "far" from smith? i see

(1)poor shot selection
(2)underwhelming defense
(3)inability to make plays for others

there are differences in kind and differences in degree. i see similarities in kind and you are pointing out apparent dissimilarities in degree. correct?

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/20/2015  12:07 PM
Melo was a better teammate yesterday. His probably is sustaining team ball without reverting back to chucking Melo. He showed he had confidence in his teammates lastnight none more evident than the pass to calderon for the game winner. Knicks will be a better team for it despite the notion that it's always everyone's fault but Melo.

We saw Lin lift guys like Jeffries, Fields, Shumpert and Tyson. Melo has to buy in and not revert back to bad habits

fishmike
Posts: 53866
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/20/2015  12:18 PM
gunsnewing wrote:Melo was a better teammate yesterday. His probably is sustaining team ball without reverting back to chucking Melo. He showed he had confidence in his teammates lastnight none more evident than the pass to calderon for the game winner. Knicks will be a better team for it despite the notion that it's always everyone's fault but Melo.

We saw Lin lift guys like Jeffries, Fields, Shumpert and Tyson. Melo has to buy in and not revert back to bad habits

Is this your first day here? Pretty sure you have that backward.

Melo is willing passer. Needs to be more willing.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/20/2015  12:53 PM
The more legit players we put around Melo the more his assists should improve. Often he passes to no effect because guys either miss the open shot or turn down the open shot. This is a team problem and not so much just a Melo problem. Should he get better at being more of a team player, YES, but he's made to look worse due to the players he's been surrounded by most of his time here.

Melo has his flaws and i've had my issues with him over the years, but it's FAR more important to fix the rest of the roster than to be worrying about Melo. We literally have to establish a new core to this team. We need a starting quality PG, SG, PF and Center!!! This is what Phil needs to be most concerned with fixing.

Following an Atlanta Model ie "Money Ball" is within Phil's ability to accomplish with his current options. Draft pick, 3 Solid Free Agents and maybe a trade using his trade exceptions. It's going to really be important to make smart decisions and we'll have to see just what they do. Gotta make every decision count.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

1/20/2015  1:06 PM
fishmike wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Melo was a better teammate yesterday. His probably is sustaining team ball without reverting back to chucking Melo. He showed he had confidence in his teammates lastnight none more evident than the pass to calderon for the game winner. Knicks will be a better team for it despite the notion that it's always everyone's fault but Melo.

We saw Lin lift guys like Jeffries, Fields, Shumpert and Tyson. Melo has to buy in and not revert back to bad habits

Is this your first day here? Pretty sure you have that backward.

Melo is willing passer. Needs to be more willing.

not so much. that is his biggest problem by miles. he needs to be much more willing.

he did pass really well last night even though it did not show up in the stats. He would have had many more assists had Jose not bricked every one of his shots (aside from the last one).

there were still times yesterday that he resorted to old habits and did not play team ball but rome was not built in a day.

I was so happy to see him making passes, quickly, that I have never seen him have any interest in making.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
1/20/2015  1:12 PM
nixluva wrote:The more legit players we put around Melo the more his assists should improve. Often he passes to no effect because guys either miss the open shot or turn down the open shot. This is a team problem and not so much just a Melo problem. Should he get better at being more of a team player, YES, but he's made to look worse due to the players he's been surrounded by most of his time here.

Melo has his flaws and i've had my issues with him over the years, but it's FAR more important to fix the rest of the roster than to be worrying about Melo. We literally have to establish a new core to this team. We need a starting quality PG, SG, PF and Center!!! This is what Phil needs to be most concerned with fixing.

Following an Atlanta Model ie "Money Ball" is within Phil's ability to accomplish with his current options. Draft pick, 3 Solid Free Agents and maybe a trade using his trade exceptions. It's going to really be important to make smart decisions and we'll have to see just what they do. Gotta make every decision count.

it is the responsibility of the best player to do whatever it takes to make others around him better. if he is incapable or incompetent in this regard then... why does he ask for max money in new york with a meaningless discount?

and if it isn't his responsibility to make others around him better and he needs to get better players around him then, again... what is he doing asking for max money in new york with a meaningless discount?

does he honestly expect to win without putting in the hard work required and making some genuine sacrifices? how is that digital athlete thing going to work out when he has left behind a losing legacy, or someone who simply gave up on the knicks?

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
1/20/2015  1:32 PM
if we are unable to target the FA's we desire and CA is unable to lure FA's over
At that point, we will be forced to either do what The Laker's did last season, or look for a total rebuild with our own young players and CA is unlikely to want any part of that

So trading him to a team, with no state tax and is in the state of Texas would be our best bet
We will not be contending by next season and I am sure CA and Phil Jackson didn't anticipate this season
With that said, CA is still a good scorer and VERY GOOD shooter (especially if the takes less shots and plays in a team that hides his weakness's in terms of DEFENSE/leadership/inability to facilitate/create plays for the team
However, he is not the building block to build around at his price, he is the luxury that is the final piece to add to a contender


We are fortunate that we have STANKED, a blessing in disguise with our own draft pick this year and OK4 being the prize
With this one pick we are against multiple teams with 15-20picks in the next 3 seasons
So if we do not land OK4 or a TOP 2/3 pick we will be in a huge disaadvantage

Trading CA could bring back some of the picks/young players that we traded away since acquiring him

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/20/2015  2:09 PM
nixluva wrote:The more legit players we put around Melo the more his assists should improve. Often he passes to no effect because guys either miss the open shot or turn down the open shot. This is a team problem and not so much just a Melo problem. Should he get better at being more of a team player, YES, but he's made to look worse due to the players he's been surrounded by most of his time here.

Melo has his flaws and i've had my issues with him over the years, but it's FAR more important to fix the rest of the roster than to be worrying about Melo. We literally have to establish a new core to this team. We need a starting quality PG, SG, PF and Center!!! This is what Phil needs to be most concerned with fixing.

Following an Atlanta Model ie "Money Ball" is within Phil's ability to accomplish with his current options. Draft pick, 3 Solid Free Agents and maybe a trade using his trade exceptions. It's going to really be important to make smart decisions and we'll have to see just what they do. Gotta make every decision count.

dk7th wrote:it is the responsibility of the best player to do whatever it takes to make others around him better. if he is incapable or incompetent in this regard then... why does he ask for max money in new york with a meaningless discount?

Melo is who he is. I expect him to put forth his best effort to do all that he can to help the team win, but we have also accept him for who he is. He's not Lebron. He's a scorer and he does quite well in that role when he has a good floor leader and a decent team around him. He's not going to be that player who does it all but he can be a very good piece on a good team.

dk7th wrote:and if it isn't his responsibility to make others around him better and he needs to get better players around him then, again... what is he doing asking for max money in new york with a meaningless discount?

Melo is paid what the CBA says he can make. He's getting paid what MSG is willing to pay him. It's not about him asking for Max money and it's not about the small discount. Let's also remember that Melo could've asked for a short contract where he could take advantage of the Cap increase which is going to be coming. His small discount actually locks him into the old CBA cap numbers which is a further savings for the team.

dk7th wrote:does he honestly expect to win without putting in the hard work required and making some genuine sacrifices? how is that digital athlete thing going to work out when he has left behind a losing legacy, or someone who simply gave up on the knicks?

Now you're just being nasty towards him for no reason. Who said he doesn't put in hard work or sacrifice? You aren't easily pleased by anything he does so I doubt he could sacrifice enough for you to be happy with him. At this point we know who and what Melo is. He isn't likely to change drastically at this point. It's not even necessary for him to change into someone he's not. The key is for Phil to build a good team and let Melo do what he does best. This is what happened on the WCF's team in Denver and for a while during the early part of the 54 win season in NY before it fell apart.

dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
1/20/2015  2:12 PM
nixluva wrote:
nixluva wrote:The more legit players we put around Melo the more his assists should improve. Often he passes to no effect because guys either miss the open shot or turn down the open shot. This is a team problem and not so much just a Melo problem. Should he get better at being more of a team player, YES, but he's made to look worse due to the players he's been surrounded by most of his time here.

Melo has his flaws and i've had my issues with him over the years, but it's FAR more important to fix the rest of the roster than to be worrying about Melo. We literally have to establish a new core to this team. We need a starting quality PG, SG, PF and Center!!! This is what Phil needs to be most concerned with fixing.

Following an Atlanta Model ie "Money Ball" is within Phil's ability to accomplish with his current options. Draft pick, 3 Solid Free Agents and maybe a trade using his trade exceptions. It's going to really be important to make smart decisions and we'll have to see just what they do. Gotta make every decision count.

dk7th wrote:it is the responsibility of the best player to do whatever it takes to make others around him better. if he is incapable or incompetent in this regard then... why does he ask for max money in new york with a meaningless discount?

Melo is who he is. I expect him to put forth his best effort to do all that he can to help the team win, but we have also accept him for who he is. He's not Lebron. He's a scorer and he does quite well in that role when he has a good floor leader and a decent team around him. He's not going to be that player who does it all but he can be a very good piece on a good team.

dk7th wrote:and if it isn't his responsibility to make others around him better and he needs to get better players around him then, again... what is he doing asking for max money in new york with a meaningless discount?

Melo is paid what the CBA says he can make. He's getting paid what MSG is willing to pay him. It's not about him asking for Max money and it's not about the small discount. Let's also remember that Melo could've asked for a short contract where he could take advantage of the Cap increase which is going to be coming. His small discount actually locks him into the old CBA cap numbers which is a further savings for the team.

dk7th wrote:does he honestly expect to win without putting in the hard work required and making some genuine sacrifices? how is that digital athlete thing going to work out when he has left behind a losing legacy, or someone who simply gave up on the knicks?

Now you're just being nasty towards him for no reason. Who said he doesn't put in hard work or sacrifice? You aren't easily pleased by anything he does so I doubt he could sacrifice enough for you to be happy with him. At this point we know who and what Melo is. He isn't likely to change drastically at this point. It's not even necessary for him to change into someone he's not. The key is for Phil to build a good team and let Melo do what he does best. This is what happened on the WCF's team in Denver and for a while during the early part of the 54 win season in NY before it fell apart.

well phil said that melo had another level he could get to as a player. do you disagree with phil's assessment?

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
F500ONE
Posts: 23899
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5844

1/20/2015  2:16 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/21/2015  8:38 AM
dk7th wrote:
nixluva wrote:
nixluva wrote:The more legit players we put around Melo the more his assists should improve. Often he passes to no effect because guys either miss the open shot or turn down the open shot. This is a team problem and not so much just a Melo problem. Should he get better at being more of a team player, YES, but he's made to look worse due to the players he's been surrounded by most of his time here.

Melo has his flaws and i've had my issues with him over the years, but it's FAR more important to fix the rest of the roster than to be worrying about Melo. We literally have to establish a new core to this team. We need a starting quality PG, SG, PF and Center!!! This is what Phil needs to be most concerned with fixing.

Following an Atlanta Model ie "Money Ball" is within Phil's ability to accomplish with his current options. Draft pick, 3 Solid Free Agents and maybe a trade using his trade exceptions. It's going to really be important to make smart decisions and we'll have to see just what they do. Gotta make every decision count.

dk7th wrote:it is the responsibility of the best player to do whatever it takes to make others around him better. if he is incapable or incompetent in this regard then... why does he ask for max money in new york with a meaningless discount?

Melo is who he is. I expect him to put forth his best effort to do all that he can to help the team win, but we have also accept him for who he is. He's not Lebron. He's a scorer and he does quite well in that role when he has a good floor leader and a decent team around him. He's not going to be that player who does it all but he can be a very good piece on a good team.

dk7th wrote:and if it isn't his responsibility to make others around him better and he needs to get better players around him then, again... what is he doing asking for max money in new york with a meaningless discount?

Melo is paid what the CBA says he can make. He's getting paid what MSG is willing to pay him. It's not about him asking for Max money and it's not about the small discount. Let's also remember that Melo could've asked for a short contract where he could take advantage of the Cap increase which is going to be coming. His small discount actually locks him into the old CBA cap numbers which is a further savings for the team.

dk7th wrote:does he honestly expect to win without putting in the hard work required and making some genuine sacrifices? how is that digital athlete thing going to work out when he has left behind a losing legacy, or someone who simply gave up on the knicks?

Now you're just being nasty towards him for no reason. Who said he doesn't put in hard work or sacrifice? You aren't easily pleased by anything he does so I doubt he could sacrifice enough for you to be happy with him. At this point we know who and what Melo is. He isn't likely to change drastically at this point. It's not even necessary for him to change into someone he's not. The key is for Phil to build a good team and let Melo do what he does best. This is what happened on the WCF's team in Denver and for a while during the early part of the 54 win season in NY before it fell apart.

well phil said that melo had another level he could get to as a player. do you disagree with phil's assessment?


Then as the year went on and Melo didn't reach the next level

Phil told him he needs to "FLESH OUT HIS GAME"

So Nixluva back into the cage to run on the wheel

The Spurs Business Model: How Long Did It Require To Build The Atlanta Hawks?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy