Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
![]() knickscity wrote:nixluva wrote:knickscity wrote:Firstly dallas obviously saw something that they TOOK the pg role away from and gave to Monta, but thats another issue... CHERRY PICKING!!! What a punk move!!! You think you've made some great point here but that's not really that insightful since the Mavs were playing the freakin SPURS!!! How did the Heat do against the Spurs??? It's not that unexpected that in a tough series like this that a player like Jose will have his ups and downs. No one is suggesting he's a superstar. Your expectations are totally unrealistic and i've never held him out to be a superstar. The Spurs were pretty damn good this year don't you think? It would be pretty damn amazing if Jose dominated against the Spurs for an entire series. The Mavs took the eventual World Champion Spurs to 7 games and your lame attempt to try and diminish Jose is to point to 3 bad games. Rather than your Cherry Picked stats trying to make Jose look bad, lets look at the whole series: 2013-2014 POSTSEASON GAME LOG You seem to want to make some case about Jose from a purely individual basis and view him in a vacuum rather than what i've been contending in terms of him being here in place of Felton. On this team in this system Jose is a better player for this team. Let's stop with the ridiculous and unrealistic takes on Jose and what he brings to the table. I understand that you guys want to try and make me look bad but you're going to have to do better than this kind of garbage!!! |
F500ONE
Posts: 23899 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5844 |
![]() nixluva wrote:knickscity wrote:nixluva wrote:knickscity wrote:Firstly dallas obviously saw something that they TOOK the pg role away from and gave to Monta, but thats another issue... nixluva wrote:F500ONE wrote:
Introduce these two You wanted ascribe the Boston series as a "team win" when stats prove Felton played well The Pacers series you Cherry Picked his 2 bad performaces out of 6gms played 4 he played well
Nope their 3 wins in that series were "team wins" you'd agree right
|
knickscity
Posts: 24533 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/2/2012 Member: #4241 USA |
![]() nixluva wrote:knickscity wrote:nixluva wrote:knickscity wrote:Firstly dallas obviously saw something that they TOOK the pg role away from and gave to Monta, but thats another issue... How can i cherry pick when I posted 3 out of 4 losses.....it's obvious he shot well in wins. didnt you post felton bad shooting in losses just a page or so ago? yet i didnt accuse YOU of cherrypicking. I find it hard to being you're up in age when every post you make involves namecalling, but anyway..... The Spurs were good, but not on defense. Calderon shot bad being he isnt built for the bigger stage....never has been which is why he's rarely been there. He isnt a good player, he's a decent pg...thats all he ever has been. His numbers are highly misleading as last years playoffs show. he shot extremely well in wins, extremely poor in losses.....the epitome of inconsistency, the story of his career and quite well known. And he's signed here during BOTH of our free agency spending periods for much more money than Fatty, which is why I state the Knicks HAVE TO WIN games otherwise no quality free agents are coming to sign when they see the money locked up in two players not known for big time playoff winning in Melo and Calderon. I have no issue saying Calderon is a better player than Felton...he is. But felton has had more success.....thats a fact. Players seem to get better when they leave us quite often and players typically get worse when they come here...no matter who is in charge. And I woulndt be surprised if that continues in Dallas for felton and Tyson, and I wouldnt be surprised to see Calderon regress here. Dallas gave up quite a bit to get two guys who sucked terribly last year with us, and thats not like them to make a bad trade, but we're notrotious for it....and irnoically I havent called it bad for us, i've stated I like Phil's moves. I'm just not gleeming over them to the point I'm posting videos, graphs, charts, slide shows, schematics and power point presentations or sending bat signals in the sky. As far as making you look bad...only you can do that, you're actually rather good at that.....two seasons running actually. You were dead wrong last year, and while I doubt you could be totally wrong this season as the team cant get worse, they wont do all well as you think. Unless Fisher scraps the trangle.....it's not built for THIS group at the moment. |
knickscity
Posts: 24533 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/2/2012 Member: #4241 USA |
![]() F500ONE wrote:nixluva wrote:knickscity wrote:nixluva wrote:knickscity wrote:Firstly dallas obviously saw something that they TOOK the pg role away from and gave to Monta, but thats another issue... nixluva is like the boxer on the ropes, he gets caught in lies so much it's amazing, but swears he nevers loses when he's always getting punched to the mat. I honestly dont think his screenaname belongs to just one user, it's like three different people are posting to his account and none are even conferring what they write. |
knickscity
Posts: 24533 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/2/2012 Member: #4241 USA |
![]() fishmike wrote:F500ONE wrote:That's cool, if you want to pin the majority of our failures on Felton last year go for it.do you? Dont wanna back track but thats exactly what Calderon did in the playoffs last year. |
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
![]() You guys are really doing a helluva job of trying to confuse the issues here. You guys are the ones trying to make this argument limited to Felton's and Jose's playoff performances. I've been taking a much more comprehensive view of the value of not only replacing Felton with Jose but how that fits into the leadership of the team from Dolan, Woody and Felton to Phil, Fish and Jose. This is just your way of trying to find a small point to make a big deal about and win an argument. It is only a small part of my overall point in this thread.
Phil, Fish and Jose >>>>>>>>> Dolan, Woody and Felton!!! Stop trying to confuse everyone and make this into an argument about specific games. Sure that's part of it, but it's not the most important part. We're in better shape now based on how Phil, Fish and Jose fit as a unit. They have a focus on TEAM that we really didn't see from Dolan, Woody and Felton. Phil is 110% focused on TEAM and he developed Fish into a PG that was focused on TEAM and has the same approach to the game. Jose is totally focused on team and is known to be that kind of player. Felton gets caught up trying to prove he's an elite player and often it gets him into trouble. Whereas Jose's own words underscore his team focus: "That's my game," he said. "I'm not a 25-point, whatever. I'm a team player, a [pass-first] point guard. I'm going to try to put everybody in position, try to make the right decision at the end. I've been playing for a while. I know how to handle those situations. I will try to do what Coach wants at the end of the game and execute the right way." So back to my overall point. Phil, Fish and Jose IMO represent a more solid and unified chain of command and should be able to execute the game plan and get the rest of the team in line on that game plan much more effectively because they are unified and focused. Not to mention more capable leaders and communicators in terms of BB. We've lacked this kind of unity and clarity of focus. |
knickscity
Posts: 24533 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/2/2012 Member: #4241 USA |
![]() nixluva wrote:You guys are really doing a helluva job of trying to confuse the issues here. You guys are the ones trying to make this argument limited to Felton's and Jose's playoff performances. I've been taking a much more comprehensive view of the value of not only replacing Felton with Jose but how that fits into the leadership of the team from Dolan, Woody and Felton to Phil, Fish and Jose. This is just your way of trying to find a small point to make a big deal about and win an argument. It is only a small part of my overall point in this thread. I really think it's you that has to go back and read your posts....it literally looks like 3-4 poeple have access to your account as you're all over the place. Dolan is the one who put this together, after all, the overall point of your thread is about ROOTS is it not? So....Dolan-Phil-Fish-Calderon seems appropriate as none of it's possible without Jimmy. And sorry dude, none of your vaunted trifecta have proven ANYTHING in the roles they are currently in....yet. Calderon has never led a team anywhere but lotto. Fisher has never coached from the sideline. Phil has never been a chief exec before. We all have to wait and see.....as it could be successful, but it could fail as well. |
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
![]() knickscity wrote:nixluva wrote:You guys are really doing a helluva job of trying to confuse the issues here. You guys are the ones trying to make this argument limited to Felton's and Jose's playoff performances. I've been taking a much more comprehensive view of the value of not only replacing Felton with Jose but how that fits into the leadership of the team from Dolan, Woody and Felton to Phil, Fish and Jose. This is just your way of trying to find a small point to make a big deal about and win an argument. It is only a small part of my overall point in this thread. I've only been dragged off into tangents by you and others who keep making these smaller and less important arguments. Most of you negative guys have missed the point of the thread entirely. That's my fault for taking the bait. Dolan is no longer at the top of the day to day decision making and that is the point I was making. I've been very clear about that. Dolan in his own words has stepped aside and given that job to Phil. So no it's not Dolan, Phil, Fish and Jose in the way it was in fact Dolan, Woody and Felton. It's Phil, Fish and Jose in that chain. Of course it could fail. That's the case with anything in life. I don't think it's likely. The pedigree of Phil, Fish and Jose is that they are known to be good leaders and focused on team first. That will permeate the rest of the franchise and change the culture to one that should make it more successful. I've made no guarantee. I've only suggested that there is reason to believe in this team due to a better, more unified and more focused group leading the way. That was the genesis of this thread, regardless of how it may have drifted off course. I keep trying to bring it back to the main point. |
F500ONE
Posts: 23899 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5844 |
![]() You say it's about Phil, Fish, Jose>>>>>>>Grunwald, Woodson, Felton
Whereas you've spent the majority discussing Calderon and Felton///// Exposing more so what you feel was holding us back
Did they prove you right
Did you ever suggest trading for Calderon last year since his whole career has been one of efficiency
Because not 1 game has been played yet
Phil Kerr Jose
Phil Fish Felton or Phil Kerr Felton and Woodson would be the only fall guy-scapegoat
6 pages in you fail to see our problems loom deeper
Nothing more, nothing less
To not address J.R. Smith-Shumpert-Amar'e-Bargnani in your first post as core-root problems is impetuous |