smackeddog wrote:

jrodmc wrote:
Only women can spend days looking at a menu.

The rest of us order steak and get to work.

What, are you posting on these boards from the 1950s?!

What, do you take an hour to figure out what you want to eat? You wearing a fanny pack?
Go change your panty liner.

At least in 1950, it would only be 20 years until we win a chip. (Yeah, dktf/tkf, that's for you)

Nalod wrote:

dk7th wrote:hiring which coach will really be incumbent on what jackson decides to do with anthiny. anthiny will not be able to subsume his ego with kerr and this will be waste of everyone's time.

if the knicks decide to retain anthiny's services then really they are going to be forced to bring in doc rivers who is one of the few coaches that anthiny will perhaps obey.

it would be so much easier if we simply got rid of anthiny and started from scratch.

We wouldn't have expected any less from you!

BTW, you know that Melo would be subservent to Doc Rivers? Hire the coach, ask melo if its a negative or positive but understand Melo gonna do what Melo gonna do.

and that is the problem. nonetheless you are being very fatalistic, almost resigned to being held hostage by anthiny. antiny. anti-ny.

i like the sound and look of that: marshmelo anti-ny. the 25-million dollar man with the 50-year old shoulders.

RonRon wrote:the truth is Phil Jackson will not pay Melo the MAX, it is a given

Phil Jackson was brought here to execute all basketball decisions, giving Melo a max contract would limit any future possible deals to build a team, much less a contender
If that was the plan, Phil Jackson would not need FULL CONTROL of basketball decisions or needed to come in to be paid 10-12m per year to say "Yes, Dolan"

Steve Kerr "I HATE ISO BASKETBALL"

Phil Jackson wants Steve Kerr as head coach, it cannot be anymore obvious, he will rather CA walk than pay him a max deal, it is what it is....

Word RonRon!!!

holfresh wrote:Kerr hates ISO-ball..I wonder if he mentioned that to Michael when he played..

But seriously what does that have to do with anything? Kerr wasn't the coach at the time.

holfresh wrote:

TeamBall wrote:

holfresh wrote:Kerr hates ISO-ball..I wonder if he mentioned that to Michael when he played..

Could be why he got punched in the face.

But seriously what does that have to do with anything? Kerr wasn't the coach at the time.

ISO ball is such a bad word in today's game..All great offensive players does ISO...That's the point..

holfresh wrote:

TeamBall wrote:

holfresh wrote:

TeamBall wrote:

holfresh wrote:Kerr hates ISO-ball..I wonder if he mentioned that to Michael when he played..

Could be why he got punched in the face.

But seriously what does that have to do with anything? Kerr wasn't the coach at the time.

ISO ball is such a bad word in today's game..All great offensive players does ISO...That's the point..

I do get what you're saying but I think on this forum when someone says "ISO ball" they mean something a little more specific

Like?

I don't think ISO itself is bad but we've all seen how over reliance on it can be a bad thing.

mreinman wrote:
We build niche (don't want to really elaborate on the niche because that will give away who I work for) applications for most fortune 100 companies. Mostly Java, DB, Linux and a bunch of proprietary stuff ... Our company has many patents and they have cornered this particular market.

What do you do?

i do IT for a school-district, although i worked in corporate prior to. mostly deal with deployment solutions and managing exchange. always good to know some other IT people on the forum, ya never know..

TeamBall wrote:

holfresh wrote:

TeamBall wrote:

holfresh wrote:

TeamBall wrote:

holfresh wrote:Kerr hates ISO-ball..I wonder if he mentioned that to Michael when he played..

Could be why he got punched in the face.

But seriously what does that have to do with anything? Kerr wasn't the coach at the time.

ISO ball is such a bad word in today's game..All great offensive players does ISO...That's the point..

I do get what you're saying but I think on this forum when someone says "ISO ball" they mean something a little more specific

Like?

Our last second "don't know what to do so let's dump it to Melo and hope for the best" occurrences that Phil pointed out and Melo himself even alluded to. Also, the fact that down the stretch our only play was to just give him the ball over and over again and hope it works out.

I don't think ISO itself is bad but we've all seen how over reliance on it can be a bad thing.

That's exactly what Phil meant when he said the players felt that they had talent but often forced the "Talent"(in this case Melo) down teams throats late in games.

Knicks had been so predictable late in games under Woodson it was embarassing

holfresh wrote:

TeamBall wrote:

holfresh wrote:

TeamBall wrote:

holfresh wrote:

TeamBall wrote:

holfresh wrote:Kerr hates ISO-ball..I wonder if he mentioned that to Michael when he played..

Could be why he got punched in the face.

But seriously what does that have to do with anything? Kerr wasn't the coach at the time.

ISO ball is such a bad word in today's game..All great offensive players does ISO...That's the point..

I do get what you're saying but I think on this forum when someone says "ISO ball" they mean something a little more specific

Like?

Our last second "don't know what to do so let's dump it to Melo and hope for the best" occurrences that Phil pointed out and Melo himself even alluded to. Also, the fact that down the stretch our only play was to just give him the ball over and over again and hope it works out.

I don't think ISO itself is bad but we've all seen how over reliance on it can be a bad thing.

Well that's a function of the players isn't it...When people refer to ISO around here, they are often referring to the style of play Woody likes, which isn't necessarily true true or the style of play Melo likes...That is what I garner from the ISO ball reference...