Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
holfresh
Posts: 38679 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/14/2006 Member: #1081 |
![]() Sure 10 mil matters...Just like 50 to 60 mil matters as well...
|
infinitilov100
Posts: 20362 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2012 Member: #4318 |
![]() knicks1248 wrote:VCoug wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:VCoug wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:VCoug wrote:martin wrote:VCoug wrote:CrushAlot wrote:VCoug wrote:CrushAlot wrote:If you are asking would I care if the Knicks decided to spend the money, no I don't, I would love to have him on the team. If you are asking why do I point out the rational for not resigning him it is because I have read a lot about it and I don't think it was an easy decision and I also don't think it was a reactionary one. I think that kind of money makes even billionaires blink and is a ridiculous sum to pay to have a guy that has only played 25 games in the nba. Resigning the guy to trade him or use the stretch provision make no sense to me. I have no ill will for Lin but I hope Moray's poison pill contracts to Lin and Asik somehow bite him in the @ss. you have to care about the turnovers if you want to win a championship! |
infinitilov100
Posts: 20362 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2012 Member: #4318 |
![]() Nalod wrote:Dolan made a good financial decision but a bad basketball one. how is that? |
infinitilov100
Posts: 20362 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2012 Member: #4318 |
![]() knicks1248 wrote:holfresh wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:holfresh wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:knicks1248 wrote:57.85 mil in year 3, no sign and trades, any trade has to be dollar for dollar so no relief from year three of that contract unless the knicks waive Lin and stretch the cost out over several years. Those numbers and the limited options the Knicks had after commiting to that contract are why it was ummatchable from a business prospective. I assume the commitment to 3 point guards includes Pablo's 1 year deal at 488,000. I would just take that right out of your argument. The Knicks got Pablo because they wanted him and he cost them nothing. Kidd was obtained to mentor Lin and both his and Felton's contracts are much more reasonable in my opinion.holfresh wrote:knicks1248 wrote:DurzoBlint wrote:gunsnewing wrote:knickstorrents wrote:Reason is because it was personal, not business Only the Nyets would have traded for Joe Johnson's contract. No one else would. |
infinitilov100
Posts: 20362 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/24/2012 Member: #4318 |
![]() Bonn1997 wrote:3 years from now, Melo will be in his 13th season, Camby in his 20th, Chandler in his 14th, Felton in his 10th, Amare in his 13th, and Kidd in his 21st. It should have been obvious that you keep Lin and if you're worried about the luxury tax, you trade as many of those players for shorter deals as you can at some point before the 2014-2015 season. Well it hasn't happened. Get over it. You damn if you, you damn if you don't. Great decision by Knicks management! |