[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Year 2 of the Melo trade. Where are they now?
Author Thread
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

5/8/2012  7:03 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

It disregards context so the answer is yes. It is irrational.


What context is that? Whatever context you have in mind, I do not see how the most logical conclusion is to ignore the actual wins and losses.

Do arrive at the logical conclusion that MDA was an awful coach based on his record here?


No. Likewise, I never said that Melo was an awful player. Now are you going to answer the question about context? "Context" is often though not always just a vague way of saying "Please don't judge me by my results."

That makes absolutely no sense! What are "results"? How are results measured? If Charlotte wins 30 games next year is that a success or failure? How would you measure their results?

Analytical reasoning and CONTEXT might help you get passed simplistic thinking and and non-quantifiable measurements.

A team is in the lottery every year, drafts a player, for the next 8 years they are in the playoff in the 6-8th seeds with the 10th best talent ...

Simplistic comparisons make one seem foolish and uneducated - now I know you are educated ...


Again, they're not in the playoffs because of the sub .500 ball they've played in games Melo has played in. Making the playoffs is no accomplishment anyway. The *majority* of the teams in the league make the playoffs.

You are really reaching - now you're not even trying.


I'll I did was state the factual record of the team with and without Melo. I didn't reach for anything that wasn't an immediately available fact.

Ok ... so you judge a players value on his win loss record? That can't be true - I withdraw the question

AUTOADVERT
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
5/8/2012  7:13 PM
Agenda is what people have against Melo as opposed to Gallo when it is clear who the better player is
NUPE
Posts: 21221
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/29/2012
Member: #4205

5/8/2012  7:56 PM
gunsnewing wrote:Agenda is what people have against Melo as opposed to Gallo when it is clear who the better player is
Uptown
Posts: 31323
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

5/8/2012  8:24 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/8/2012  8:26 PM
nixluva wrote:
Uptown wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Uptown wrote:
nixluva wrote:MDA did not have a losing record last year. This year with Melo playing his worst BB for most of the season, that was a major contributor to the losing record. Yeah we had the stretch with the no PG thing, but even in that instance if Melo was playing great they could've overcome the lack of a PG. Sometimes you have to look at the players as the PRIMARY source of why a team plays well or not. Take Tyson and Jared off the floor and the team still stinks on D even with Woody. The players are the bulk of the reason teams win. The coach can set an agenda and get a team to operate at a higher level in many areas, but the bulk of the work is still on the players. This is why Melo get's so much blame for the teams record since he's come here.

Just think about how little press Scott Brooks gets in OKC. The credit goes mostly to the players. No one thinks that they win because Brooks is such a masterful head coach. Tho he's doing a GREAT job and should get more credit. It's just that people rightly acknowledge that it's the great talent they have and the players holding up their end of the bargain. Doc Rivers is a great coach, but it's not like he doesn't have a top tier level of talent in KG, Pierce, Allen and Rondo. Melo has had GOOD coaches. He's really only got himself to blame for not doing more in his career. He can look in the mirror and say to himself that he needs to take his conditioning MUCH more seriously. He needs to listen to his coaches that have tried to get him to play more team oriented. Karl and MDA have very good track records for getting players to play team ball at a high level. There's no excuse for Melo not to have learned the lessons. Instead now he has a coach that believes in ISO ball and Melo is happy. I can only hope that Woody can get thru to Melo about taking things more seriously.

Woodson recognized the strength of the roster and planned accordingly to play to that strength. He's a coach not a GM. Coach what you have and make it work. Woodson coached this team to an over .700 win percentage and had this team playing better than any team in the league that didn't play in San Antonio. The Previous coach ignored the strength, and didn't coach the players he had but coached them into what he wanted them to be. It was foolish; it didn't work and MDA knew this thats why he quit.

Also, what do you mean Melo has only himself to blame for not doing more i his career? In terms of what? Going further in the playoffs? Those Denver teams were not better than the Lakers or Spurs the teams they lost to and you know it. Was he supposed to beat Boston by himself last year while Stat and Billups sat on the bench?

These top teir players you speak of are successful because they ave each other. KG, Ray and Pierce were on losing teams until they teamed up. What the hell did KG do in the playoffs in Minny? The Celts and Pierce were as bad as us before KG and Allen. The Sonics never did a thing in the playoffs either. Swap and Pierce and Melo and Pierce would be the one we would call and under achiever and Melo would be the standard for Pierce.

The team as a whole was not against MDA!!! This so called ignored strength is 100% total BS. In what way did MDA not use Melo? He put the ball in his hands and basically allowed him to do whatever he wanted for most of the year. The only time Melo was restricted in any way was when he came back in the 10 game stretch before MDA resigned. The TEAM was winning before Melo came back and it was clear that the LOVED playing team ball MDA's way just like MOST players love playing in that system. You NEVER hear any player saying "OH NO! I don't wanna play in that players system and score a ton of points".
The team was winning with Defense and offense before Melo came back. People don't want to admit the defense part, even tho it's true!!! They didn't only start defending under Woody!!!

As for Melo not going further, he was part of a TEAM and only one time did that team advance playing TEAM BALL because Billups made sure they did!!!

The team as a whole was not against MDA!!! This so called ignored strength is 100% total BS. In what way did MDA not use Melo? He put the ball in his hands and basically allowed him to do whatever he wanted for most of the year.

Having Melo run point forward setting up plays 30 feet from the basket is not playing to his strength. When Melo came back, he was camping out on the wing behind the 3 point line like Shawne Williams. Melo is a career 31% 3 pt shooter. That is not a strength. He's a high post rhythm shooter who excells mid range and in. That wasn't happening on a consistant level.

The TEAM was winning before Melo came back and it was clear that the LOVED playing team ball MDA's way just like MOST players love playing in that system. You NEVER hear any player saying "OH NO! I don't wanna play in that players system and score a ton of points".

The team won some games before Melo came back and won way more after MDA left. So whats your point? Its not about loving a system its about winning with the players you have. Yes, they played defense during the Linsanity streak and they played even better defense when Woodson took over. They won more games when Lin and Stat sat-out than they did when Melo was out. Theres no way they win those games without Lin had MDA not resigned.

As for Melo not going further, he was part of a TEAM and only one time did that team advance playing TEAM BALL because Billups made sure they did!!!

So the only reason the Nuggs advanced is because Billups made sure they played team ball? Dude, how biased does that sound?! How about, they advanced because Melo finally had a legit second option and a legit PG to play alongside him. Just like KG finally advanced because he was paired with a legit 2nd and third option.

The team most certainly would've won a ton of games with the same D they played during Linsanity and Melo actually trying like he did the second that MDA resigned. There's not a thing you or anyone else can say that will change my mind about Melo dogging in and then flipping a switch the day MDA resigned. Had he given the same effort the last 10 games MDA was coach, there's no way this team ends up in the 7th spot.

Same goes for Melo slumping for the majority of the season. If he's playing at his usual level and in shape enough to play on both ends without hurting himself, the team would've won games even with MDA. This whole idea that the team couldn't win with MDA is utter BULL!!! This entire thing has been about Melo since the day he got here. That's what happens when a team banks it's future on a star player. He has to play like a star and be the leader of the team. Melo did that for exactly one month this year. It wasn't anything that Woody did, despite what people seem to think. Woody didn't improve the offense!!! When asked the players admitted that there really weren't any changes to what they do on defense. The big difference was Melo from day one. He played like he gave a damn. If Melo plays great and leads his team with a winning attitude this team would've won more games this year PERIOD!!!

There's not a thing you or anyone else can say that will change my mind about Melo

No Sh*t!!!!

If he's playing at his usual level and in shape enough to play on both ends without hurting himself, the team would've won games even with MDA.

So being out of shape caused him to hurt his wrist and thumb? I guess it was from doing curls with hot dogs. Seriously, how does a fat, out of shape player start the year off putting up these numbers: 37, 23, 35, 32 and 37 pts. So maybe he started the year in shape, then lost his shape, then found it again when Woody took over. Or maybe, just maybe the poor shooting slump cohensides with the wrist injury he suffered against Memphis.

This whole idea that the team couldn't win with MDA is utter BULL!!!

MDA 121 wins and 167 loses....Yeah, its total BS!!!

This entire thing has been about Melo since the day he got here. That's what happens when a team banks it's future on a star player.

So basically, your upset that Dolan pulled the trigger on the trade and you're taking your angst out on Melo? I get it.

It wasn't anything that Woody did, despite what people seem to think. Woody didn't improve the offense!!! When asked the players admitted that there really weren't any changes to what they do on defense.

Jeff Vangundy and Hubie Brown who have covered Knick before and after Woodson took over vehemently disagree with you. Both have stated the offense is better mainly because everyone knows there roles and now and they know where the ball is going. You may call it boring or iso, but Woodson calls it winning. So does Hubie Brown who during the Chicago game (MDA's last) was calling to post Melo up. But hey, what does Hubie and Van Gundy know...

And the defense is better now than it was before, just look at the numbers. And according to your posts, Melo gets all the blame for us losing in the beginning (not MDA) and Melo gets all the credit for us winning since the coaching change (not Woodson). Wow, Melo has that much impact on a game? who does he think he is, a SuperStar or Something.....

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/8/2012  9:46 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/8/2012  9:47 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

It disregards context so the answer is yes. It is irrational.


What context is that? Whatever context you have in mind, I do not see how the most logical conclusion is to ignore the actual wins and losses.

Do arrive at the logical conclusion that MDA was an awful coach based on his record here?


No. Likewise, I never said that Melo was an awful player. Now are you going to answer the question about context? "Context" is often though not always just a vague way of saying "Please don't judge me by my results."

That makes absolutely no sense! What are "results"? How are results measured? If Charlotte wins 30 games next year is that a success or failure? How would you measure their results?

Analytical reasoning and CONTEXT might help you get passed simplistic thinking and and non-quantifiable measurements.

A team is in the lottery every year, drafts a player, for the next 8 years they are in the playoff in the 6-8th seeds with the 10th best talent ...

Simplistic comparisons make one seem foolish and uneducated - now I know you are educated ...


Again, they're not in the playoffs because of the sub .500 ball they've played in games Melo has played in. Making the playoffs is no accomplishment anyway. The *majority* of the teams in the league make the playoffs.

You are really reaching - now you're not even trying.


I'll I did was state the factual record of the team with and without Melo. I didn't reach for anything that wasn't an immediately available fact.

Ok ... so you judge a players value on his win loss record? That can't be true - I withdraw the question


Of course I judge a player based on how much he contributes to winning, and you can't judge that while ignoring the actual wins and losses.
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

5/8/2012  9:55 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

It disregards context so the answer is yes. It is irrational.


What context is that? Whatever context you have in mind, I do not see how the most logical conclusion is to ignore the actual wins and losses.

Do arrive at the logical conclusion that MDA was an awful coach based on his record here?


No. Likewise, I never said that Melo was an awful player. Now are you going to answer the question about context? "Context" is often though not always just a vague way of saying "Please don't judge me by my results."

That makes absolutely no sense! What are "results"? How are results measured? If Charlotte wins 30 games next year is that a success or failure? How would you measure their results?

Analytical reasoning and CONTEXT might help you get passed simplistic thinking and and non-quantifiable measurements.

A team is in the lottery every year, drafts a player, for the next 8 years they are in the playoff in the 6-8th seeds with the 10th best talent ...

Simplistic comparisons make one seem foolish and uneducated - now I know you are educated ...


Again, they're not in the playoffs because of the sub .500 ball they've played in games Melo has played in. Making the playoffs is no accomplishment anyway. The *majority* of the teams in the league make the playoffs.

You are really reaching - now you're not even trying.


I'll I did was state the factual record of the team with and without Melo. I didn't reach for anything that wasn't an immediately available fact.

Ok ... so you judge a players value on his win loss record? That can't be true - I withdraw the question


Of course I judge a player based on how much he contributes to winning, and you can't judge that while ignoring the actual wins and losses.

And how to you define "contributes to winning"? Win Shares? Ryan Anderson more valuable than Kobe Bryant?

NUPE
Posts: 21221
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/29/2012
Member: #4205

5/8/2012  10:29 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/8/2012  10:30 PM
The team we have now is better than the team we had with Amare, Gallo, Chandler, Mozgov, Felton, etc. I don't see how anyone can say otherwise. The later team lacked any sort of post d, was far too reliant on three chucking and was barely over .500. The current team with the current coach went 18-6 and had the best defense in the league for a period of time. Melo is better than Gallo. T. Chandler is better than Mozgov and Jordan Hill. Anare is Amare. Lin looks to be better than Felton overall. I don't see why this thread even exists.
technomaster
Posts: 23348
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
5/8/2012  10:44 PM
I really liked the potential of our roster from 6 weeks ago, but we're really quite devastated by injury right now.

I like the core of a healthy Lin/Shumpert/Melo/Amare/Chandler. That lineup that should be able to match up with any starting lineup in the league... on paper.

I'm a bit bummed out that JR likely won't be back next year. He's really got all of the tools and moves to be a star - but has his quirks. He's capable of playing 3 positions, making him a nice versatile piece. I figure getting him the first place was a stroke of good fortune, but without effectively our starting backcourt, our backup PG, and our versatile backup filler guy (Jeffries), we don't really have as high an upside, leaving us with less margin for error.

As far as what we lost to get Melo - Gallo hasn't clearly improved since year #2 with the Knicks. I'm still a fan of his, but watching his box score night after night is an exercise in frustration. Somewhere along the way he became more of a poor man's Bargnani than a poor man's Dirk. This guy may never sniff 45% FG shooting. Not sure if it's shot selection or what.

“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/9/2012  6:55 AM    LAST EDITED: 5/9/2012  6:57 AM
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:
Uptown wrote:
Nalod wrote:I still don't know who whines about Denver?

I don't read every thread so maybe I am missing.

"Boston Moments"?

Jrod, I get you. YOur in the moment and enjoying the team. So am I.

Is it leading us anywhere?

It looked like the Amare/Gallo knicks were gong to make the playoffs last year. We still did. Boston Moment was a sweep.

We might have still been swept with Amare getting hurt and I doubt Gallo carries the team as Melo can. But we lost. I have not read a thing that mentions melo getting any blame for that.

Or Really that our team was just 4 games over .500 this year and our current playoff seeding.

I think we might have just been in the same place without Melo. With Picks, with some cap space or instead maybe with CP3, Deron or Dwight.

We got StarMelo and your happy!

Good for you!

Replace MDA with Woodson about 2 weeks/3 weeks earlier and the Knicks are the 3rd or 4th seed in the east, far from the same record as leat years group. When healthy, with Woodson at the helm we proved to be a better team than the Pacers, Sixers and Magic.

CP3 toasted with Melo and Stat to join the Knicks. No way was he coming here without Melo, nor was Tyson Chandler.

Careful trying to be rational instead of worshiping MDA & Gallo


Is it irrational to note that we've been sub .500 in games Melo has played in for us? It's more rational to ignore that, right?

It disregards context so the answer is yes. It is irrational.


What context is that? Whatever context you have in mind, I do not see how the most logical conclusion is to ignore the actual wins and losses.

Do arrive at the logical conclusion that MDA was an awful coach based on his record here?


No. Likewise, I never said that Melo was an awful player. Now are you going to answer the question about context? "Context" is often though not always just a vague way of saying "Please don't judge me by my results."

That makes absolutely no sense! What are "results"? How are results measured? If Charlotte wins 30 games next year is that a success or failure? How would you measure their results?

Analytical reasoning and CONTEXT might help you get passed simplistic thinking and and non-quantifiable measurements.

A team is in the lottery every year, drafts a player, for the next 8 years they are in the playoff in the 6-8th seeds with the 10th best talent ...

Simplistic comparisons make one seem foolish and uneducated - now I know you are educated ...


Again, they're not in the playoffs because of the sub .500 ball they've played in games Melo has played in. Making the playoffs is no accomplishment anyway. The *majority* of the teams in the league make the playoffs.

You are really reaching - now you're not even trying.


I'll I did was state the factual record of the team with and without Melo. I didn't reach for anything that wasn't an immediately available fact.

Ok ... so you judge a players value on his win loss record? That can't be true - I withdraw the question


Of course I judge a player based on how much he contributes to winning, and you can't judge that while ignoring the actual wins and losses.

And how to you define "contributes to winning"? Win Shares? Ryan Anderson more valuable than Kobe Bryant?


I'd look at win shares and wins produced, and then make my best assessment of how good the player is at the components of defense that the stats don't take into account (man-to-man defense, drawing charges). Because WS and WP already correlate very strongly with team wins, any adjustment for nonstatistical aspects of the game has to be very small.
Nalod
Posts: 71197
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
5/9/2012  7:43 AM

So now we can't even watch the games to form an opinion. Its in the box score?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/9/2012  7:53 AM    LAST EDITED: 5/9/2012  7:55 AM
Nalod wrote:
So now we can't even watch the games to form an opinion. Its in the box score?

No, I think you must have missed part of my answer. You should definitely watch games for fun and if looking for the right things, it could slightly alter your opinion. The most important thing though is not to let your eyes deceive you. Actually, in all fields I've read about, statistical (or actuarial to use the fancier term) outperform intuitive/subjective assessments. Most people in any field, including sports, don't like hearing that because they are invested in thinking of themselves as great intuitive evaluators. It takes a lot of modesty to realize how limited your own and human intuition in general is.

fishmike
Posts: 53846
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
5/9/2012  10:13 AM
Melo is easily the better and more talented player in the trade. He's an impact player, Gallo and everyone else were good, but core/role player types. The argument was always that we needed stars to win big and go deep into the playoffs. Whenever I bring up Carmelo's post season failures to simple win games the unfair mismatch is always brought up. Yet the knuggets are winning games. Difficult to explain
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
5/9/2012  10:18 AM
fishmike wrote:Melo is easily the better and more talented player in the trade. He's an impact player, Gallo and everyone else were good, but core/role player types. The argument was always that we needed stars to win big and go deep into the playoffs. Whenever I bring up Carmelo's post season failures to simple win games the unfair mismatch is always brought up. Yet the knuggets are winning games. Difficult to explain

If the knuggets get out of the first round, then you have something, but saying they are winning games is a bit of a misnomer.

Everyone is in a greenest the Miami Heat, which were in the finals last year, is looking unstoppable. Had the knuggets played San Antonio, would they not be winning games? Also, we have all agreed that the team played much better under Woodson, with that record being more in line with the type of team we should have had all year.

I say the jury is still out...

But, my opinion is that we clearly got the better of that deal and are currently one of the top 4 teams in the east, top 3 in the east with a healthy Lin and shump.

The same cant be said for the knuggets as they are full strength now.

Let's go Knicks. That's amare
MS
Posts: 27060
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
5/9/2012  10:24 AM
Your objective is to build a team that can beat the heat. Chandler, Amare, Stoudamire are our "big three" and they aren't enough to beat the Heat. We have some nice pieces and melo is a great talent, but Moz, Chandler, Gallo are costing less then Melo/Balkman and retaining our picks is important as evidence by Shumpert, Fields, Douglas the Knicks have done a good job of picking up useful players in the draft. We would have also had the cap room to go after Chandler or another player while retaining our guys. Does it make us a tougher team I would say yes. We have limited room for improvement going forward once we resign Lin we are without a bench.
Uptown
Posts: 31323
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

5/9/2012  10:49 AM
MS wrote:Your objective is to build a team that can beat the heat. Chandler, Amare, Stoudamire are our "big three" and they aren't enough to beat the Heat. We have some nice pieces and melo is a great talent, but Moz, Chandler, Gallo are costing less then Melo/Balkman and retaining our picks is important as evidence by Shumpert, Fields, Douglas the Knicks have done a good job of picking up useful players in the draft. We would have also had the cap room to go after Chandler or another player while retaining our guys. Does it make us a tougher team I would say yes. We have limited room for improvement going forward once we resign Lin we are without a bench.

Dont kid yourself, a core of Gallo, Moz and Stat is not competing with the Heat. Highly doubt Chandler signs with the Knicks if Melo isn't here. With Felton and Douglas in tow, there would have been no need to sign Lin.

Yes we are capped out and our had are somewhat tied, but I believe a healthy Knicks team under Woodson this year was one of the top 3 teams in the East. If we didn't pull the trigger on the Melo deal we would have kept the salary-slot-seat open, feebly hoping Dwight, Paul, or someone would occupy it only to be rejected while the seat grows and cold and Gallo and the like grow old....

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/9/2012  10:56 AM
Uptown wrote:
MS wrote:Your objective is to build a team that can beat the heat. Chandler, Amare, Stoudamire are our "big three" and they aren't enough to beat the Heat. We have some nice pieces and melo is a great talent, but Moz, Chandler, Gallo are costing less then Melo/Balkman and retaining our picks is important as evidence by Shumpert, Fields, Douglas the Knicks have done a good job of picking up useful players in the draft. We would have also had the cap room to go after Chandler or another player while retaining our guys. Does it make us a tougher team I would say yes. We have limited room for improvement going forward once we resign Lin we are without a bench.

Dont kid yourself, a core of Gallo, Moz and Stat is not competing with the Heat. Highly doubt Chandler signs with the Knicks if Melo isn't here. With Felton and Douglas in tow, there would have been no need to sign Lin.

Yes we are capped out and our had are somewhat tied, but I believe a healthy Knicks team under Woodson this year was one of the top 3 teams in the East. If we didn't pull the trigger on the Melo deal we would have kept the salary-slot-seat open, feebly hoping Dwight, Paul, or someone would occupy it only to be rejected while the seat grows and cold and Gallo and the like grow old....


Ah the old "we had to trade for Melo or else the franchise was doomed half a decade" argument
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
5/10/2012  9:46 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Nalod wrote:
So now we can't even watch the games to form an opinion. Its in the box score?

No, I think you must have missed part of my answer. You should definitely watch games for fun and if looking for the right things, it could slightly alter your opinion. The most important thing though is not to let your eyes deceive you. Actually, in all fields I've read about, statistical (or actuarial to use the fancier term) outperform intuitive/subjective assessments. Most people in any field, including sports, don't like hearing that because they are invested in thinking of themselves as great intuitive evaluators. It takes a lot of modesty to realize how limited your own and human intuition in general is.

It takes even more insight and brilliance to point out your own modesty and humility.
And don't forget, playoffs don't matter. Playing the actual games doesn't matter.

All that really matters is statistical analysis after the fact utilizing your own unbiased, detached and humble deductions. Provided the sample size is large enough. Except when it isn't.

Priceless.

ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
5/10/2012  10:40 AM
MeloBall starring Billy Bonn1997


babyKnicks
Posts: 22486
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/31/2006
Member: #1191
USA
5/10/2012  7:31 PM
MS wrote:Your objective is to build a team that can beat the heat. Chandler, Amare, Stoudamire are our "big three" and they aren't enough to beat the Heat. We have some nice pieces and melo is a great talent, but Moz, Chandler, Gallo are costing less then Melo/Balkman and retaining our picks is important as evidence by Shumpert, Fields, Douglas the Knicks have done a good job of picking up useful players in the draft. We would have also had the cap room to go after Chandler or another player while retaining our guys. Does it make us a tougher team I would say yes. We have limited room for improvement going forward once we resign Lin we are without a bench.

If game 4 taught me anything is a healthy stat and chandler plus Lin and shumpert and it's 7 games with us possibly taking it.

A year of training camp and a year of gelling and we add more depth, we are built to beat the heat.

Shumpert and Lin are major losses. And bdiddy wasn't all that bad.

I'm confident a healthy team beats the heat.

Even Jeffries was hurt.

It was a rough run this year, next year, much better. Hopefully.

Let's go Knicks. That's amare
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/10/2012  7:33 PM
babyKnicks wrote:
MS wrote:Your objective is to build a team that can beat the heat. Chandler, Amare, Stoudamire are our "big three" and they aren't enough to beat the Heat. We have some nice pieces and melo is a great talent, but Moz, Chandler, Gallo are costing less then Melo/Balkman and retaining our picks is important as evidence by Shumpert, Fields, Douglas the Knicks have done a good job of picking up useful players in the draft. We would have also had the cap room to go after Chandler or another player while retaining our guys. Does it make us a tougher team I would say yes. We have limited room for improvement going forward once we resign Lin we are without a bench.

If game 4 taught me anything is a healthy stat and chandler plus Lin and shumpert and it's 7 games with us possibly taking it.

A year of training camp and a year of gelling and we add more depth, we are built to beat the heat.

Shumpert and Lin are major losses. And bdiddy wasn't all that bad.

I'm confident a healthy team beats the heat.


Year 2 of the Melo trade. Where are they now?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy