[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Thanks Grunwald.
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/25/2012  1:22 PM
mrKnickShot wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:Amare has a decent showing if we go deep into the playoffs, and all this fades away.

We suck, we hate MDA, MDA is gone. Woody has us playing .750 ball, crazy D.

We suck, we hate Melo, Melo has a stretch that almost overcomes the lack of Linsanity.

We don't suck, we're going to the playoffs, we can't hate on the new coach, we need to hate, so lets hate the first starphucque on board who carried the team for most of a season, but now is not performing when not injured.

Is it too much to ask to just play-GM things that haven't happened and are dead issues already?


It doesn't make sense to say the GM is the only person in the franchise whose actions we aren't supposed to evaluate.

It does make sense to say we should un-sign the first max contract we were able to get with all that cap space we suffered through to get? I'd love to go back and read all your posts about how you hated Stat prior to the Melo signing, but the water's so far under the bridge it's evaporated into the clouds.

Why does one need to hate stat to think that it was a bad/dangerous/risky signing?


You must have forgotten that any and all criticism implies hatred.
AUTOADVERT
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

4/25/2012  1:27 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
mrKnickShot wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:Amare has a decent showing if we go deep into the playoffs, and all this fades away.

We suck, we hate MDA, MDA is gone. Woody has us playing .750 ball, crazy D.

We suck, we hate Melo, Melo has a stretch that almost overcomes the lack of Linsanity.

We don't suck, we're going to the playoffs, we can't hate on the new coach, we need to hate, so lets hate the first starphucque on board who carried the team for most of a season, but now is not performing when not injured.

Is it too much to ask to just play-GM things that haven't happened and are dead issues already?


It doesn't make sense to say the GM is the only person in the franchise whose actions we aren't supposed to evaluate.

It does make sense to say we should un-sign the first max contract we were able to get with all that cap space we suffered through to get? I'd love to go back and read all your posts about how you hated Stat prior to the Melo signing, but the water's so far under the bridge it's evaporated into the clouds.

Why does one need to hate stat to think that it was a bad/dangerous/risky signing?


You must have forgotten that any and all criticism implies hatred.

I am not even criticizing him, I am worried his sustainability.

Constant nit-picking about ones game can often come of as hating (web talk)

fishmike
Posts: 53841
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/25/2012  1:59 PM
Stat was a bad/risky signing? again... WOW. Dude has one bad injury season and has shown he's still got the hops that made him great.

The only risk w. Amare was we wouldnt be able to get other stars. Check the roster... so Amare has paid and continues to pay dividends.

Maybe you guys should stick with trading cards? Because TEAMS are built.

JRod Im a loyalist too. Amare's done good things here and gets to work himself back to all star form. Knicks can thank Amare for taking their money because if he doesnt this roster is VERY different and probably not in a good way.

100% we would amnesty Amare? 100% stupid statement

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
fishmike
Posts: 53841
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
4/25/2012  2:00 PM
why didnt we amnesty Amare instead of Billups? We could have had more cap space AND we needed a PG. 100% my ass
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
mrKnickShot
Posts: 28157
Alba Posts: 16
Joined: 5/3/2011
Member: #3553

4/25/2012  2:07 PM
fishmike wrote:Stat was a bad/risky signing? again... WOW. Dude has one bad injury season and has shown he's still got the hops that made him great.

The only risk w. Amare was we wouldnt be able to get other stars. Check the roster... so Amare has paid and continues to pay dividends.

Maybe you guys should stick with trading cards? Because TEAMS are built.

JRod Im a loyalist too. Amare's done good things here and gets to work himself back to all star form. Knicks can thank Amare for taking their money because if he doesnt this roster is VERY different and probably not in a good way.

100% we would amnesty Amare? 100% stupid statement

I am surprised you are a loyalist to a player that does not give max effort every night - I thought that meant everything to you.

As smart as you are, I guess you are smarter than all the other teams who thought it was risky.

"The only risk w. Amare was we wouldnt be able to get other stars."

Now that is certainly the STUPIDEST statement I have seen!

jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
4/25/2012  2:26 PM
fishmike wrote:why didnt we amnesty Amare instead of Billups? We could have had more cap space AND we needed a PG. 100% my ass

+10000000000000000000

'nuff said. Leave it to the weedhead to bring clarity to an hate argument/opinion clash/critique/friendly discussion.

Thanks Grunwald.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy