[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

When do we admit it wasn't worth it?
Author Thread
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
1/22/2012  1:41 PM
RonRon wrote:
Yep, we could have added Tyson Chandler and resign Wilson Chandler to that core.

Eddy Curry's expiring
Moving Turiaf would have been more than enough to sign Tyson Chandler
IF we moved AR for a pick and exemption, we would also be able to sign Wilson Chandler to a 8-9m.
If not, we could offer him a 1 year deal, bigger than the qualifying offer.
If we kept AR, we could still sign him to the qualifying offer, or give him slightly more, and have his bird rights for next year.
The difference of adding

Iman Shumpert and Tyson Chandler to our Pre Melo core, is 10x better than the team we have now.
MOST IMPORTANTLY, was that our players understood the system, played as team, and had great chemistry.
Of course we went for the big name, and with Dolan, even if we made it to FA, I don't know if we would have targeted Tyson Chandler.
But I am sure Tyson Chandler would pick the Knicks over any team, even without Melo.
I am not sure if Baron Davis would be a Knick though, because he wouldn't be a lock for the starting PG with Felton here.
I also don't know if we would be able to resign Shawne Williams.
But I am pretty sure we would at least have Wilson CHandler or Shawne Williams, if not both.


Felton
Fields/Iman/Wilson Chandler
Gallo
Amare
Tyson Chandler

TD
Iman
Wilson Chandler
Jorts/JJ
MozGoV

Shawne WIlliams?
Baron Davis?

I really wonder what we could have done with this lineup? Actually, if we didn't get Melo, we would have gotten Deron. That is guaranteed and we would have paid less for him. Can you imagine Stat with Deron!

I hope this current "team" can turn things around, but there just ain't that feeling it seems. Hopefully we have already hit rock bottom or are close. We'll see what happens after this road trip. We might have a new coach if things don't change.

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
AUTOADVERT
jazz74
Posts: 22318
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/24/2002
Member: #371
1/22/2012  2:14 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
jazz74 wrote:
Panos wrote:Btw that "throw in", you know the guy who's not really a starter,Mosgov? Yeah, him. He scored 16 pts on 6-11 shooting, with 7 rbs and 3 assists in 30 mins.
STAT's line: 12, 5, and 1 in 45 mins.

Yeah, Mosgov sucked.

mosgov vs. chandler? i would take chandler 9 out of 10 times.


Why are you comparing the two? It's not like we directly traded one for the other.

nah, i am just putting things in perspective. you can argue that the trade for melo is the watershed moment where the team is right now but i implore you to think about how our team was in 2008. if you heard we would get melo and stat on our lineup in the future, we would sign up. hell, we would sign up last year! we did give up a lot of depth but we got a player who was and i still think will be great. before the trade, we werent exactly blazing through the league. bewsides that run in november and december, whihc was exciting, we were sputtering through january and february. we had our issues with these players we call fringe "all stars" ( at least that is what people made it sound like). i still think our froncourt will be the best in the league and shgould be. either dantoni and his staff have to figure it out or we get someone who will. if he made crawford and zbo work well together before they were traded, he can get these three to. we cant belly ache and make excuses. this is who we have, bad trade or not. however, i am more optimistic than i was when layden used to give guys like howard eisley, shannon anderson and clarence weatherspoon multi year contracts.

RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
1/22/2012  6:40 PM
loweyecue wrote:
RonRon wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Do yourselves a favour and watch a game from last season, because some peoples memory has become warped with nostalgia! I found a Knicks-Hawks game from before the trade yesterday- the first time Amar'e got the ball, he drove into the opposing players and was charged with an offensive foul. Next time he drove into 3 defenders, and had the ball swiped away. He is the same player, only last year he could make the jumpshot, and Felton made some good passes to him once they'd played together a while.

Actually, I was suprised at how thin Amar'e looked, and the fact that he sprinted across the court every play, where as this year he seems to jog up and down.

Last years team couldn't play defense, we couldn't rebound- we only won games when we shot well from 3pt land- it was not a championship contender. Felton was a flawed point guard, people started off hostile to him, warmed to him, then turned against him again just before the trade.

If we could have added Tyson Chandler to that team- then great, I'd much rather have that team than the one we do now, but the truth is we couldn't add a centre like him with those salaries- this year we would have had to stumped up for Wilson Chandler, next year we'd of done it for Gallo and Felton- that team was deeply flawed (like this one!)

Honestly, watch some games from last year, we were never as good as people are making out.

You are also looking at the games in which our players were affected by the trade rumors.
All of the players that we traded in the deal, aside from Curry, wanted to be in New York.
They finally changed the culture, from the Curry/Marbury days, and broke out of that funk of losing that Wizards have, and Clippers/Wolves once had.
It is very rare, to have young players that were not stat whores, setting aside EGOs, trying to produce for the team, and not for themselves, for a better contract. That is why Gallo was picked and Jennings was not even scouted. After going through Marbury era, Walsh didn't want to draft a players that
Jennings portrayed himself to be before the draft. Him talking smack about Rubio and he has a big EGO, that Walsh didn't want to chance at.
Walsh picks players with the "right mentality and work ethic" over skill and talent.

We did go in scoring droughts last year but we also did average over 100pts a game.
Adding Iman, Jorts, and Tyson CHandler, provides us with the scoring and defense, to take us a greater level.
Our roles, chemistry, improvement in our yoots, same core of players, and young legs would be in our advantage with this schedule.

How's the weather in your alternate reality? Out here it's snowing.

I misunderstood, smackeddoggs comments and points wrong.
Sorry, you make plenty of sense.
However, adding Tyson Chandler and retaining Wilson Chandler were both possible, without the Melo trade.
The 2 factors would be shipping out Turiaf and possibly moving AR for an future pick *I think we can at least get a 2nd pick for him*

Although, I don't know if we would have targeted Tyson Chandler if we didn't trade for Melo, I think Tyson would have loved to come to New York over Golden State.
With Wilson Chandler, we would be able to offer him a deal in the 7-8million range, he might seek a little more.
But we could still at least sign him to a one year deal, like we did with David Lee, and retain his rights till at least one more year, possibly resigning him as well.
I don't know if we would be able to keep Shawne Williams under those circumstances and if Baron Davis would still pick New York over other teams with Felton here.
If Wilson Chandler didn't resign here, I would think the Knicks would at keep Shawne Williams if it was possible though.
But if we did sign Tyson Chandler, it would surely help our chances with them being good friends.
Tyson Chandler added to that core, would have a very similar effect to Dallas adding Tyson Chandler, making us contenders with added defense provided by
Iman and Tyson Chandler.

I agree, adding Tyson Chandler to this group, might not be a good fit with his salary. But no one ever expected us to be this bad offensively either.
Amare, Melo, and TD have taken a big step back from last year. I think losing Shawne Williams's production really hurt us as well.
But pointing the finger at Tyson Chandler's salary, vs trading for Melo is not even close.
If anything, Dolan, deserves the blame.

A lot of people on these forums are much more delusional than be my far. Not sure what your beef is with me loweyeue.
If I ever offended you by any means, I apologize. It's been frustrating being a Knick fan and after Walsh put us in a position to be competitive for many of years,
with our yoots, changing our selfish culture, losing culture, and providing us with players that had chemistry with bright future really hurt.

With the ability to add a big FA this year, the extra draft picks, and Dolan's ability to open his wallet, we could have had a plan for a bright future, maybe for another good decade.

JCrusher
Posts: 21553
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/3/2011
Member: #3685

1/22/2012  6:44 PM
RonRon wrote:
loweyecue wrote:
RonRon wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Do yourselves a favour and watch a game from last season, because some peoples memory has become warped with nostalgia! I found a Knicks-Hawks game from before the trade yesterday- the first time Amar'e got the ball, he drove into the opposing players and was charged with an offensive foul. Next time he drove into 3 defenders, and had the ball swiped away. He is the same player, only last year he could make the jumpshot, and Felton made some good passes to him once they'd played together a while.

Actually, I was suprised at how thin Amar'e looked, and the fact that he sprinted across the court every play, where as this year he seems to jog up and down.

Last years team couldn't play defense, we couldn't rebound- we only won games when we shot well from 3pt land- it was not a championship contender. Felton was a flawed point guard, people started off hostile to him, warmed to him, then turned against him again just before the trade.

If we could have added Tyson Chandler to that team- then great, I'd much rather have that team than the one we do now, but the truth is we couldn't add a centre like him with those salaries- this year we would have had to stumped up for Wilson Chandler, next year we'd of done it for Gallo and Felton- that team was deeply flawed (like this one!)

Honestly, watch some games from last year, we were never as good as people are making out.

You are also looking at the games in which our players were affected by the trade rumors.
All of the players that we traded in the deal, aside from Curry, wanted to be in New York.
They finally changed the culture, from the Curry/Marbury days, and broke out of that funk of losing that Wizards have, and Clippers/Wolves once had.
It is very rare, to have young players that were not stat whores, setting aside EGOs, trying to produce for the team, and not for themselves, for a better contract. That is why Gallo was picked and Jennings was not even scouted. After going through Marbury era, Walsh didn't want to draft a players that
Jennings portrayed himself to be before the draft. Him talking smack about Rubio and he has a big EGO, that Walsh didn't want to chance at.
Walsh picks players with the "right mentality and work ethic" over skill and talent.

We did go in scoring droughts last year but we also did average over 100pts a game.
Adding Iman, Jorts, and Tyson CHandler, provides us with the scoring and defense, to take us a greater level.
Our roles, chemistry, improvement in our yoots, same core of players, and young legs would be in our advantage with this schedule.

How's the weather in your alternate reality? Out here it's snowing.

I misunderstood, smackeddoggs comments and points wrong.
Sorry, you make plenty of sense.
However, adding Tyson Chandler and retaining Wilson Chandler were both possible, without the Melo trade.
The 2 factors would be shipping out Turiaf and possibly moving AR for an future pick *I think we can at least get a 2nd pick for him*

Although, I don't know if we would have targeted Tyson Chandler if we didn't trade for Melo, I think Tyson would have loved to come to New York over Golden State.
With Wilson Chandler, we would be able to offer him a deal in the 7-8million range, he might seek a little more.
But we could still at least sign him to a one year deal, like we did with David Lee, and retain his rights till at least one more year, possibly resigning him as well.
I don't know if we would be able to keep Shawne Williams under those circumstances and if Baron Davis would still pick New York over other teams with Felton here.
If Wilson Chandler didn't resign here, I would think the Knicks would at keep Shawne Williams if it was possible though.
But if we did sign Tyson Chandler, it would surely help our chances with them being good friends.
Tyson Chandler added to that core, would have a very similar effect to Dallas adding Tyson Chandler, making us contenders with added defense provided by
Iman and Tyson Chandler.

I agree, adding Tyson Chandler to this group, might not be a good fit with his salary. But no one ever expected us to be this bad offensively either.
Amare, Melo, and TD have taken a big step back from last year. I think losing Shawne Williams's production really hurt us as well.
But pointing the finger at Tyson Chandler's salary, vs trading for Melo is not even close.
If anything, Dolan, deserves the blame.

A lot of people on these forums are much more delusional than be my far. Not sure what your beef is with me loweyeue.
If I ever offended you by any means, I apologize. It's been frustrating being a Knick fan and after Walsh put us in a position to be competitive for many of years,
with our yoots, changing our selfish culture, losing culture, and providing us with players that had chemistry with bright future really hurt.

With the ability to add a big FA this year, the extra draft picks, and Dolan's ability to open his wallet, we could have had a plan for a bright future, maybe for another good decade.

donnie walsh wanted to resign chandler and i think we could have gotten him for a good price since he liked and still likes new york. I feel bad donnie did such a good job cleaning up isiah's mess and just when we are building something dolan pulls the rug out from under. Now I know people think i'm a melo hater but thats not true. I didn't mind getting melo in free agency or just trading gallo,fields, and picks but losing felton,chandler, and even mozgov hurt.
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
1/22/2012  6:57 PM
earthmansurfer wrote:
RonRon wrote:
Yep, we could have added Tyson Chandler and resign Wilson Chandler to that core.

Eddy Curry's expiring
Moving Turiaf would have been more than enough to sign Tyson Chandler
IF we moved AR for a pick and exemption, we would also be able to sign Wilson Chandler to a 8-9m.
If not, we could offer him a 1 year deal, bigger than the qualifying offer.
If we kept AR, we could still sign him to the qualifying offer, or give him slightly more, and have his bird rights for next year.
The difference of adding

Iman Shumpert and Tyson Chandler to our Pre Melo core, is 10x better than the team we have now.
MOST IMPORTANTLY, was that our players understood the system, played as team, and had great chemistry.
Of course we went for the big name, and with Dolan, even if we made it to FA, I don't know if we would have targeted Tyson Chandler.
But I am sure Tyson Chandler would pick the Knicks over any team, even without Melo.
I am not sure if Baron Davis would be a Knick though, because he wouldn't be a lock for the starting PG with Felton here.
I also don't know if we would be able to resign Shawne Williams.
But I am pretty sure we would at least have Wilson CHandler or Shawne Williams, if not both.


Felton
Fields/Iman/Wilson Chandler
Gallo
Amare
Tyson Chandler

TD
Iman
Wilson Chandler
Jorts/JJ
MozGoV

Shawne WIlliams?
Baron Davis?

I really wonder what we could have done with this lineup? Actually, if we didn't get Melo, we would have gotten Deron. That is guaranteed and we would have paid less for him. Can you imagine Stat with Deron!

I hope this current "team" can turn things around, but there just ain't that feeling it seems. Hopefully we have already hit rock bottom or are close. We'll see what happens after this road trip. We might have a new coach if things don't change.

Yep, we had a lot of options/flexibility, with our young players, depth, and picks, we would be in the driver's seat for teams looking to rebuild.
We could realistically get trades that favored us more, or at the very least, a good trade for both teams could have been very reasonable vs the 1 sided one we gave for Melo.

As bad as Amare has been playing, we could live with one player having a big drop off, and still keep our amnesty, to use possibly next year, or in the future.
Locking in 2 max salary players, that aren't great 2 way players, and have big weaknesses to their games, really hurts.
It's sad, if Walsh only completed his job, before Dolan stepped in. MDA would have the talent, bench, and quality players needed to run his system.
I am not a believer in his system but regardless, he was screwed, to his tenure here.
He has his faults, not playing Darko, when he cleary could have helped our rebounding, shot blocking.

Playing JJ and Duhon, over Jordan Hill and TD, constantly.
Walsh wasn't perfect here, but he did a hell of a job and had a plan.
I think if he kept Crawford and ZBo, with Dantoni's 1st year, he still would have been able to trade them in the future with a better package/picks.
But I guess he didn't want to gamble, which Isiah, was always willing to do, at the team and Dolan's pockets expense.
Not picking a PG, instead of TD, in Lawson or Holiday. I totally understood not picking Jennings at the time though.
But trading down and possibly getting Deandre Jordan would have been the best scenario, instead of Jordan Hill.
Overall, he still did the best job of any GM here for the past decade with what he was handed down with.

BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
1/22/2012  7:40 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/22/2012  8:02 PM
Oh wonderful, another chance for posters to admit it wasn't worth it.

When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Marbury?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Eddy Curry?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for sign Amare Stoudemire?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Carmelo?

I'm seeing a pattern here. Maybe the problem isn't any individual player or particular move, but an organization that is not operating at a high level. (Insert obligatory "It's all Dolan's fault!" here). Every season we hit a point where we begin to fear things won't come together (again) and there is always at least a subset that says we need to give it more time - which is usually true. I would say it's too early to say "it wasn't worth it" especially with all the injuries, but it does sound to me like we don't have a well balanced team right now.

https:// It's not so hard.
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
1/22/2012  7:48 PM
We didn't trade for Stoudemire.
"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
1/22/2012  8:02 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:We didn't trade for Stoudemire.

Noted and corrected.

https:// It's not so hard.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/22/2012  8:20 PM
BasketballJones wrote:Oh wonderful, another chance for posters to admit it wasn't worth it.

When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Marbury?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Eddy Curry?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for sign Amare Stoudemire?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Carmelo?

I'm seeing a pattern here. Maybe the problem isn't any individual player or particular move, but an organization that is not operating at a high level. (Insert obligatory "It's all Dolan's fault!" here). Every season we hit a point where we begin to fear things won't come together (again) and there is always at least a subset that says we need to give it more time - which is usually true. I would say it's too early to say "it wasn't worth it" especially with all the injuries, but it does sound to me like we don't have a well balanced team right now.


You have to go back further and include McDyess. But I agree with what you wrote.
Knixkik
Posts: 35449
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
1/22/2012  9:05 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
BasketballJones wrote:Oh wonderful, another chance for posters to admit it wasn't worth it.

When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Marbury?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Eddy Curry?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for sign Amare Stoudemire?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Carmelo?

I'm seeing a pattern here. Maybe the problem isn't any individual player or particular move, but an organization that is not operating at a high level. (Insert obligatory "It's all Dolan's fault!" here). Every season we hit a point where we begin to fear things won't come together (again) and there is always at least a subset that says we need to give it more time - which is usually true. I would say it's too early to say "it wasn't worth it" especially with all the injuries, but it does sound to me like we don't have a well balanced team right now.


You have to go back further and include McDyess. But I agree with what you wrote.

When you have a plan you have to see it thru. Anthony is the best player we have had since Ewing. You can build around him, just have to be careful how you do it. His weaknesses don't matter if you have the supporting cast to cover them up. You have to take gambles in this league. Clearly Denver won in the short term, but Denver has no chance at winning at title with this core. We will win in the long run if we add the right pieces.
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
1/22/2012  9:38 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/22/2012  9:39 PM
Knixkik wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BasketballJones wrote:Oh wonderful, another chance for posters to admit it wasn't worth it.

When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Marbury?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Eddy Curry?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for sign Amare Stoudemire?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Carmelo?

I'm seeing a pattern here. Maybe the problem isn't any individual player or particular move, but an organization that is not operating at a high level. (Insert obligatory "It's all Dolan's fault!" here). Every season we hit a point where we begin to fear things won't come together (again) and there is always at least a subset that says we need to give it more time - which is usually true. I would say it's too early to say "it wasn't worth it" especially with all the injuries, but it does sound to me like we don't have a well balanced team right now.


You have to go back further and include McDyess. But I agree with what you wrote.

When you have a plan you have to see it thru. Anthony is the best player we have had since Ewing. You can build around him, just have to be careful how you do it. His weaknesses don't matter if you have the supporting cast to cover them up. You have to take gambles in this league. Clearly Denver won in the short term, but Denver has no chance at winning at title with this core. We will win in the long run if we add the right pieces.

umm...exactly right, we had a plan, but Dolan didn't see through it.
No way Walsh, would have agreed to that trade.
Go to FA, last summer, was the end of rebuilding and being contenders, if we added the right pieces.
Adding Tyson Chandler and Iman Shumpert, while keeping the rest of the core.

Is this your way of justifying the trade?
With what salary are you going to build the team?
You don't win a championship with one player.
We went way backwards buddy, I don't know what you are watching.
Denver is way closer to use, while they have plenty of draft picks, cap room, and they are better than us.

I don't understand how we have so many idiots here that don't realize what we gave up.
Still trying to justify the trade, Still believe we are heading the right direction, and still don't realize how much we fell behind...
Keep dreaming, keep positive, and lay keep smoking dat sh!t

Knixkik
Posts: 35449
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
1/22/2012  10:44 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/22/2012  10:48 PM
RonRon wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BasketballJones wrote:Oh wonderful, another chance for posters to admit it wasn't worth it.

When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Marbury?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Eddy Curry?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for sign Amare Stoudemire?
When do we admit it wasn't worth it to trade for Carmelo?

I'm seeing a pattern here. Maybe the problem isn't any individual player or particular move, but an organization that is not operating at a high level. (Insert obligatory "It's all Dolan's fault!" here). Every season we hit a point where we begin to fear things won't come together (again) and there is always at least a subset that says we need to give it more time - which is usually true. I would say it's too early to say "it wasn't worth it" especially with all the injuries, but it does sound to me like we don't have a well balanced team right now.


You have to go back further and include McDyess. But I agree with what you wrote.

When you have a plan you have to see it thru. Anthony is the best player we have had since Ewing. You can build around him, just have to be careful how you do it. His weaknesses don't matter if you have the supporting cast to cover them up. You have to take gambles in this league. Clearly Denver won in the short term, but Denver has no chance at winning at title with this core. We will win in the long run if we add the right pieces.

umm...exactly right, we had a plan, but Dolan didn't see through it.
No way Walsh, would have agreed to that trade.
Go to FA, last summer, was the end of rebuilding and being contenders, if we added the right pieces.
Adding Tyson Chandler and Iman Shumpert, while keeping the rest of the core.

Is this your way of justifying the trade?
With what salary are you going to build the team?
You don't win a championship with one player.
We went way backwards buddy, I don't know what you are watching.
Denver is way closer to use, while they have plenty of draft picks, cap room, and they are better than us.

I don't understand how we have so many idiots here that don't realize what we gave up.
Still trying to justify the trade, Still believe we are heading the right direction, and still don't realize how much we fell behind...
Keep dreaming, keep positive, and lay keep smoking dat sh!t

It's 16 games. You need to keep that in mind. We gave up role players. No future stars. Far less than LA gave up for Paul. I liked Gallo and co but don't believe they are the nucleus of a championship team. Knicks fans are far too impatient and it give us a bad rep. No one is blowing this thing up unless Howard can be added. As for your statement about going into last summer and becoming contenders, what moves would have made us contenders? Players are not going to free agency with the new CBA. What don't you understand about that? You use assets to acquire the best player possible and that is what the Knicks did. Had we not done that we would still be an average team with what most of you think is a broken down Stoudemire leading the way. Do you really think that is going to be the recipe for a title? Understand we need stars and we got the best players available. We have only begun to build around them. A championship team is a core of high quality players with a supporting cast that fills in the blanks. We have a lot of blanks that are not filled in yet. You are just a typical Knicks fan throwing in the towel instead of looking for real solutions. And not realizing what we gave up? We gave up role players that will expect to be paid star money in a year. That is far worst than where we are now.

Knixkik
Posts: 35449
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
1/22/2012  10:52 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/22/2012  10:57 PM
Gallo 12 million per
Stat 18 million per
Wilson Chandler 8 million per
Felton 10 million per
Moz 3 million per

If we didn't make that trade, here is what your team is getting paid in 2 years, putting us over salary cap with the other roster pieces. Exciting huh? This is what most of you want instead of Melo.

People who diss the trade don't recognize these players need to be paid and live in a fantasy world were there will always be flexibility, Gallo is a championship cornerstone, and our missing pieces were going to be lining up to sign here in free agency no matter how much money they lose.

Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
1/22/2012  10:59 PM
Knixkik wrote:Gallo 12 million per
Stat 18 million per
Wilson Chandler 8 million per
Felton 10 million per
Moz 3 million per

If we didn't make that trade, here is what your team is getting paid in 2 years, putting us over salary cap with the other roster pieces. Exciting huh? This is what most of you want instead of Melo.

People who diss the trade don't recognize these players need to be paid and live in a fantasy world were there will always be flexibility, Gallo is a championship cornerstone, and our missing pieces were going to be lining up to sign here in free agency no matter how much money they lose.

Tha fantasy world you live in believes Carmelo Anthony is a playmaker who will not stagnate the offense.

"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/23/2012  1:30 AM

islesfan wrote:When are you people going to understand that Carmelo Anthony is not the problem. The Melo Trade had to be made, plain and simple. The NBA is a star league and Melo is a star.

The Knicks aren't winning because of 3 things and none of them have to do with Melo:

1) The head coach
2) The Point Guard
3) Amare is already breaking down

The way some of you talk, the Golden Age of Knicks basketball was just prior to the Melo trade. Get it into your skulls, the Knicks sucked before the Melo trade and they weren't going anywhere. This pathetic need to constantly criticize the Melo trade stems from a pathological need to overvalue every scrub on the Knicks. The Knicks got the best player in that deal by far. The type of player you build around. Get over it. There isn't another star player that could win with the aforementioned Knicks problems.

¿ △ ?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/23/2012  6:45 AM    LAST EDITED: 1/23/2012  7:00 AM
Knixkik wrote:Gallo 12 million per
Stat 18 million per
Wilson Chandler 8 million per
Felton 10 million per
Moz 3 million per

If we didn't make that trade, here is what your team is getting paid in 2 years


That's if you kept those players rather than trading them for picks and/or players with more years of rookie contracts. Or you could include those players in a trade for a real star.
MarburyAnd1Crossover
Posts: 23120
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/24/2011
Member: #3650

1/23/2012  6:55 AM
I don't like this "it's a star league, you HAD to make the trade" crap.

Who was the star on the Piston's most recent championship?

And, in any case, we already had a star in Amar'e and very good pieces around him, pieces that fit.

Carmelo Anthony is ANTI-BASKETBALL
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/23/2012  6:59 AM
MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:I don't like this "it's a star league, you HAD to make the trade" crap.

Who was the star on the Piston's most recent championship?

And, in any case, we already had a star in Amar'e and very good pieces around him, pieces that fit.


We also probably had the right pieces to pull off a trade Dwight Howard and get a real star before the Melo deal but no longer do.
MarburyAnd1Crossover
Posts: 23120
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/24/2011
Member: #3650

1/23/2012  7:00 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Knixkik wrote:Gallo 12 million per
Stat 18 million per
Wilson Chandler 8 million per
Felton 10 million per
Moz 3 million per

If we didn't make that trade, here is what your team is getting paid in 2 years


That's if you kept those players rather than trading them for picks and/or players with more years of rookie contracts.

Even if you don't trade them, that's still a better team than what we have now.

Gallo improves with every game and he's a perfect second option behind Amar'e.

Carmelo Anthony is ANTI-BASKETBALL
MarburyAnd1Crossover
Posts: 23120
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/24/2011
Member: #3650

1/23/2012  7:04 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
MarburyAnd1Crossover wrote:I don't like this "it's a star league, you HAD to make the trade" crap.

Who was the star on the Piston's most recent championship?

And, in any case, we already had a star in Amar'e and very good pieces around him, pieces that fit.


We also probably had the right pieces to pull off a trade Dwight Howard and get a real star before the Melo deal but no longer do.

True. We were in a good position and could afford to be patient. The team before the Melo trade was a lock for the playoffs.

Clippers got Chris Paul for Gordon, Kaman, and Aminu?

Carmelo Anthony is ANTI-BASKETBALL
When do we admit it wasn't worth it?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy