GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:AnubisADL wrote:GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:AnubisADL wrote:GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:to get Melo in a trade the Nugs have be abble to sell it to their fanbase. They can sell a package of Fields, Gallo, and a pick (which I assume would come from a team dumb enough to acquire AR, or TD). I like the Wes Matthews comparison. We all said we'd be happy if Gallo turned into Peja... I think he can become that but with a more aggressive offensive game. Can I live with trading Wes Matthews, a player that may become an improved Peja, and a bust for Carmelo Anthony? YES.
The Nugs will also have to face the prospect of selling their fans on "So uhhh yeah..Melo is gone..there's no sign and trade with the Knicks either..he's just gone. And we got nothing in return for him. So yeah.."
Then Carmelo is the scape goat.
and...?
Life goes on. Just look at Cleveland and Toronto.
Yes life goes on.
Supreme was saying that the Nugs would not settle for a trade package unless it was something like Fields, Gallo, pick because they have to sell the trade to their fans.
I commented by saying I don't think that's really the case as the fans have to be aware that Anthony can just play out his contract and walk, leaving them with nothing but cap space. So anything we give them beyond cap space via Curry's contract is better than the squat they get if Melo just leaves with no trade.
I hear you, which is why signing him outright in free agency is likely more prudent. Because if I'm a Nugs fan, I'd rather watch him one more time in the playoffs than trade him for the pupu platter
The other thing about trading for Melo now is the Knicks can sign Chandler to an extension and retain Turiaf. In order to sign him in the offseason they'll have to renounce both players (I believe). I do think Melo + Chandler + Turiaf is greater than Melo + Gallo + Fields, if only because I get to watch Melo for an extra 50 games. Long way of saying even if we sign Melo as a UFA, the Knicks still have to pay a pretty steep price