TMS wrote:& how many damn times do i have to tell u what my problem is with MDA anyway? u just looking for an argument here or do u want an exchange of viewpoints? if u want me to give it a rest stop asking for me to repeat the same things to you to explain my point... i don't like bullsh!t slingers... IMO MDA slings a lot of bullsh!t... if u wanna keep on making ur moronic assumptions about my feelings on MDA's coaching ability even after i've told u time & time again i like him as our coach then maybe u oughta put me on ignore... liking a coach doesn't mean ur not allowed to call him out when he deserves it.

OK TMS I'm callin you on your B.S. cuz I don't see what your argument against MDA really is. What kind of point do you really have to make about a coach that is pushing all the right buttons at this point? You want to call him on the carpet for statements to the damn MEDIA! Man give me a freakin break. Top coachea have done similar things for years and it really hasn't meant a dang thing. YOu don't have a valid point. It's petty and totally insignificant. Who but you and maybe a few others here really cares about his statements to the media? In the end all that really matters is how this team plays. Call me when you have something of value to say about his actual coaching.

TMS wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:atleast the trolls come out when the knicks win now instead of when they lose.

i've been presenting valid points & reasons for each point i've made on this topic... bro, i haven't heard u comment a thing all night... trolls post things with the sole purpose of trying to incite arguments on a forum... i don't think anything i've said or oohah has said tonight qualifies us as trolls... if u were talking about someone else, my mistake.

and im sorry dude, but whenever you're agreeing with oohah and holfresh.. cmon.

TMS wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:atleast the trolls come out when the knicks win now instead of when they lose.

i've been presenting valid points & reasons for each point i've made on this topic... bro, i haven't heard u comment a thing all night... trolls post things with the sole purpose of trying to incite arguments on a forum... i don't think anything i've said or oohah has said tonight qualifies us as trolls... if u were talking about someone else, my mistake.

and one last thing? comment a thing the whole night? take a look at the posts from 7:30 to 10. I was on here the whole night in various threads talking about nate so maybe you weren't looking hard enough, douchebag.

TMS wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:

TMS wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:atleast the trolls come out when the knicks win now instead of when they lose.

i've been presenting valid points & reasons for each point i've made on this topic... bro, i haven't heard u comment a thing all night... trolls post things with the sole purpose of trying to incite arguments on a forum... i don't think anything i've said or oohah has said tonight qualifies us as trolls... if u were talking about someone else, my mistake.

and im sorry dude, but whenever you're agreeing with oohah and holfresh.. cmon.

i've agreed with lots of posters & disagreed with a lot of posters over the years... i speak my mind, if my opinion is shared by certain posters that's just the way it is dude... fishmike & I have had plenty of arguments, same with Allanfan & EnySpree, but i respect all of them... you not so much.

that's fine.

nixluva wrote:

TMS wrote:& how many damn times do i have to tell u what my problem is with MDA anyway? u just looking for an argument here or do u want an exchange of viewpoints? if u want me to give it a rest stop asking for me to repeat the same things to you to explain my point... i don't like bullsh!t slingers... IMO MDA slings a lot of bullsh!t... if u wanna keep on making ur moronic assumptions about my feelings on MDA's coaching ability even after i've told u time & time again i like him as our coach then maybe u oughta put me on ignore... liking a coach doesn't mean ur not allowed to call him out when he deserves it.

OK TMS I'm callin you on your B.S. cuz I don't see what your argument against MDA really is. What kind of point do you really have to make about a coach that is pushing all the right buttons at this point? You want to call him on the carpet for statements to the damn MEDIA! Man give me a freakin break. Top coachea have done similar things for years and it really hasn't meant a dang thing. YOu don't have a valid point. It's petty and totally insignificant. Who but you and maybe a few others here really cares about his statements to the media? In the end all that really matters is how this team plays. Call me when you have something of value to say about his actual coaching.

really is no point in debating anything with you cuz you will take the homer stance on every topic every time without fail... not everyone sees everything as hunky dory all the time like u do... if i have a problem w/the comments MDA makes to the media, i have that right... who the hell are you to call my points invalid, petty & insignificant? you keep wanting to make this about MDA's coaching, it's weird... not once have i ever dissed MDA's coaching ability... all i've ever had to say were positive things about MDA's coaching ability... i've consistently said i've supported Donnie Walsh's decision to hire MDA & am glad he's our head coach... i've told u these things numerous times but apparently reading comprehension is not your strong point.

nyk4ever wrote:

TMS wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:

TMS wrote:

nyk4ever wrote:atleast the trolls come out when the knicks win now instead of when they lose.

i've been presenting valid points & reasons for each point i've made on this topic... bro, i haven't heard u comment a thing all night... trolls post things with the sole purpose of trying to incite arguments on a forum... i don't think anything i've said or oohah has said tonight qualifies us as trolls... if u were talking about someone else, my mistake.

and im sorry dude, but whenever you're agreeing with oohah and holfresh.. cmon.

i've agreed with lots of posters & disagreed with a lot of posters over the years... i speak my mind, if my opinion is shared by certain posters that's just the way it is dude... fishmike & I have had plenty of arguments, same with Allanfan & EnySpree, but i respect all of them... you not so much.

that's fine.

i was just kidding douchebag

TMS wrote:DJ, i am with u on this all the way... i admire MDA's coaching ability, but he's made this entirely personal w/Nate & i don't think it needed to go there... when you see Duhon & Hughes having horrible nights & when Gallo can't even hit the side of the basket, no one can tell me inserting a scorer like Nate couldn't have helped this team tonight... this has become more about MDA exerting control over his team than focusing on trying to get the W, i don't care what other kinda BS MDA wants to shovel at this point... MDA has obviously made up his mind to never play Nate ever again no matter what the circumstances... fine, as a coach that's his right, but if that's the case then get this man traded or buy him out & let him pursue a living someplace else... stop making him into a spectacle on the bench cuz it doesn't reflect positively on our franchise.

Hi TMS pal,
I agreed with all you said.
I also mentioned Nate has always had maturity problems but no one ever questioned his desire to BALL and win. He plays hard
usually every nite regardless of outcome. I agree if playing Nate or someone else gives Knicks a chance to win a tough game
that is the point. I think MDA at times let fans know he was tired of all the Nate chants at the Garden home losses early
and also wasnt interested in playing Nate which at times seem to get personal after 2 wks. I think MDA made his point and
even Nate says last night after leading Knicks to win over HAWKs (21 - 10 ?) with 41pts Nate says it was a humbling experience
but he remained positive.

MDA went to Nate and he had a great game leading Knicks back to a win over a good team.

nixluva wrote:

TMS wrote:i'd respect MDA's methods a lot more if he weren't such a phoney sometimes... stop the BS Mike.

Man you really are nitpicking when it comes to MDA. Coaches in general get into giving the media something to chew on, but not really always how they feel. ...There's still a chance that Nate get's back in the rotation and I hope that he has improved on his D and team play, so that he can have a positive impact in helping us get more wins.

Howdy
like to clarify my intent wasnt about to have Nate R. get back into rotation it was intented
to teach, grow and learn. The intent was also to help with minutes occasionally to help NYK
players from breaking down especially when they were playing poorly in their overalll play
as we seen from Gallo, Duhon and Al Harrington in long stretches even W.Chandler has lots of
clunkers.

But MDA is developing Chandler and Gallo, so why not Nate? Nate does not have to play each night.
I mention also Knicks are not there yet or GOOD enough to set 6-7 rotations indefinitie thru all
season. The shorter rotation is good and I say is if a player is having horrid week you bring some
one in to give them a spark.

Nate is no Marbury (horrid seed) and he is here this 2009/10 season. Until he's cut OR traded which I
expect use him ? why not ? he makes nba salary. I want to win games. We got NO draft picks 2010

Sure he's not always the answer If Nate acts up or breaks plays then you sit him again.
I dont think Nate need to be firm in rotation to help Knicks. He needs to grow and develop and
that is my only gripe with MDA whom only came here last yr

loweyecue wrote:

DJMUSIC wrote:

JohnWallace44 wrote:Your posting privileges should be revoked.

Do not thing that remark was called for

Listen I am happy they are winning and how its going but if anyone thinks for 1 sec we really have a PG
here in Chris Duhon as a leader and starter whom makes difference then I guess we're doing better than
I am seeing.

You try to win the game
making remarks he'd rather play Satan than Nate isnt right.

I hear what you're saying about using what he got and the success knicks recently had especially at home msg,

However no one is ever going to convince me Mike saying he'd play satan is the right professional remark to make
you try to win the game. Chandler and Harrington does their thing on the wing are far too much rather hoist than
go to basket when Knicks are in games tight games that could go in their favor.

I Guess Nate is only one that cant play Defense since he got here so perhaps Knicks should cut him.
AI would have not been good enough here either.

Our winning team is Chandler, the consisten David Lee (whom plays D these days), Harrington and Duhon.

Lost souls Larry Hughes, Bender and Jarred Jeffries are consistently inconsistent & are those other role players on
this team whom likely wont be here next year.

Its understandable you win with defense so Knicks play it now better without Nate Robinson on court
better than anyone else in their conference at least to D'Antoni. We'll see how this team does in 2010
personally I think team is gonna break down playing 6-7 guys whom have played better but isnt there yet.

I dont believe NY is good enough to play 6-7 guys seven to eigth weeks in a row without some probability for
injury. Early in the year Duhon was the guy entire NY want to run out of town cause he STUNK. He's doing better
now but aint the answer in a long season. Not enough as_sists, not enough pts, not enough defense and not enough
timely jumpers by Duhon as starter PG like the rest of Knickerbocker team.

Guess later on that will be Nate Robinson's fault also when D'Antoni calls his number in March 2010

Are you just spewing random rants with a spattering of "whom"s or are you trying to make a case for something? You are entitled to any opinion but why post threads calling people names? Who sits who plays is MDAs decision he is doing what he think is best. If you know better go apply for his job. Most coaches in the NBA have team to work with we had given MDA a lose bunch of prospects and has beens with no identity. Out of that he has created a neucleus of people who are playing moderately good team defense and trying hard to win. Do you have any appreciation for how hard that is to do????

He came to team where the players openly ridiculed the last two coaches do you see that going on? Can you ever give people credit for what they do instead of this incessant whining?

In a year and a couple of months we have gone from the dregs of the NBA to a halfway respectable team that can hang with some of the better teams because of good defense. But no all you can think about is stupid effing Nate Robinson. We are not going to win the title even with Lebron in 2011 there is enough time to play the young players later on. Right now the coach is trying to build a "TEAM" and selfish pricks like Nate Robinson...

Wow more new words like pr_cks and all said here This was a simple post opinion.
lol, nothing more nothing less. But all this cussing and rise in blood pressure
resulted *grins. Listen brother we're all Knicks fans.

You read some comments it seem like MDA made Knicks 30 - 3 instead of 13-20.

Didnt know saying MDA is A_Hole was going to be so very upsetting. Remarkable.

maybe I should offer a pedigree instead of an opinion regarding MDA. No one ever mentioned critique on MDA track record or coaching
abilities.

Triple H
pedigree

Most of Nate's issues is nate. But if you get exiled in MDA's system its as good as kicking you to curb
or into the sea without life support. Nate needs a bit of help. What's wrong with a coach helping on that ?
Especially a coach as great as MDA reputation and skillset knowledge.

MDA tried to help him a bunch. Before last year he said he could lead the league in steals, all types of praise. With MDA's reputation as a generally great guy, you have to wonder how stupid and ****ed up Nate is to get in his doghouse.

Nate needs to take a little responsibility. Other people can only help you as much as you want to help yourself.