[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Walsh's rating so far
Author Thread
Knicksfan
Posts: 33593
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
12/4/2008  2:27 PM
Posted by Rookie:
Posted by Knicksfan:
Posted by Rookie:
Posted by TMS:

last night they showed clips of D'Antoni coaching the game & all he was doing was telling guys to D up & rotate on guys... i think his reputation for never stressing defense is severely overblown.

On a night where they had no energy, whats the point of asking them to play harder on D which forces them to expend more energy than they have? Was it so the blow out wouldn't look as bad on paper?

LOL everything is wrong for you man

Nah, it's all good. I just feel like bitching a little. Losing sucks, getting blown out blows...Harrington's smackdown on the King...Priceless!!

I know man, I hate it too. Can only wait for the best. But Harrington's play on LeBron made me happy last night. And the explanation he gave indeed was priceless. We need more guys willing to do that. Haven't you noticed how many charges he has caused since he got here? The guy does seem motivated to be here and thats refreshing.
Knicks_Fan
AUTOADVERT
Rookie
Posts: 27322
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274

12/4/2008  2:43 PM
Like I've said before, Harrington's my kind of ballplayer. He's seems like a hell of a nice guy off the court, but as soon as it's game time, he turns into an animal hell bent on scoring (and he has plenty of tools) D'ing up and sending a message if he has to...although I think he meant to tie Lebron up. He was just too tired and a step slow.
Knicksfan
Posts: 33593
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
12/4/2008  2:49 PM
Posted by Rookie:

Like I've said before, Harrington's my kind of ballplayer. He's seems like a hell of a nice guy off the court, but as soon as it's game time, he turns into an animal hell bent on scoring (and he has plenty of tools) D'ing up and sending a message if he has to...although I think he meant to tie Lebron up. He was just too tired and a step slow.

Yeah, but his reason to stop LeBron was great to read later in the recap. He was tired of LeBron getting those highlight dunks and wasn't going to let him. Thats vintage Knicks and I love that attitude! Don't care if its the 2010 guy. Its still 2008.
Knicks_Fan
martin
Posts: 80009
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/4/2008  2:55 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by martin:
Posted by islesfan:

I'm not defending Curry for who he is. I'm just saying that he has more trade value when he's playing and putting up 15&7 than when he's getting DNP-CDed. I'm sure you can agree with that.

D'Antoni is notorious for having short practices and Balkman exhibited effort on defense which of course doesn't count with D'Antoni. Like I said earlier, there was no role for him going into the season but minutes always open up as they're available now. If Balkman is going to succeed in any system it would have been D'Antoni's with the up and down style. It would have been interesting to see.

If Gallo rarely plays because of his back, does that mean we can't conclude anything?

What you orginally said about Curry was that the GM was destroying his value. If Curry were in shape and played within the MDA system and averaged 15&7 and the coach chose to DNP his fat ass, then I would agree that the GM and coach were destroying his value, but that is far from what is happening. Do you agree with that?

Dude, feel free to watch a few Knicks games, catch the Portland game. If you don't think the coach is not stressing defense you are not watching.

Can't conclude anything about Gallo right now. If we find out that his career is done after the year or whatever, then we conclude.

It depends on what your definition of "in shape" is. Was Curry in drastically different shape than he's been in the past when he's averaged between 15-18 pts? Was D'Antoni holding Curry to a much higher standard that, for Curry, would be near impossible to achieve? Could it be that D'Antoni just doesn't want Curry around because he's a horrible fit for his system? If that's the case, and I believe that it is, what is Walsh's role in that?

Curry came "in shape" into training camp and then abruptly sat out for that entire training camp bedridden and recovering from a bacterial infection. He was so bedridden and sick he had to get IVs administered by doctors back at the hotel. He played 3 short preseason games and looked lost. After 2 games he came up lame because of a bone bruise and a month later is still out and not getting a lick better because of something that happened a month prior.

I think Walsh and MDA orchestrated the whole bacterial infection thing and missing out on learning a new system during training camp thing so that they could purposely de-value their center.

That was the plan.

Isles, you have never been able to get past what is right in front of you to make a sensible argument.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Rookie
Posts: 27322
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274

12/4/2008  3:01 PM
Posted by Knicksfan:
Posted by Rookie:

Like I've said before, Harrington's my kind of ballplayer. He's seems like a hell of a nice guy off the court, but as soon as it's game time, he turns into an animal hell bent on scoring (and he has plenty of tools) D'ing up and sending a message if he has to...although I think he meant to tie Lebron up. He was just too tired and a step slow.

Yeah, but his reason to stop LeBron was great to read later in the recap. He was tired of LeBron getting those highlight dunks and wasn't going to let him. Thats vintage Knicks and I love that attitude! Don't care if its the 2010 guy. Its still 2008.

I missed that. I need to start DVRing the post game. I like watching the Coach and player comments this way I don't need to read the tabloids, but I've been missing alot of it. I'm glad he said that. Looks like he's stepping up as a leader of this team....a leader by his actions and not just words.

"Don't care if its the 2010 guy. Its still 2008." EXACTLY!! The guys looked like the Lebron hoopla is getting under their skin. We need a win to get positive on.
Rookie
Posts: 27322
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274

12/4/2008  4:29 PM
1970 New York Knicks

Rookie
Posts: 27322
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274

12/4/2008  4:31 PM
1970 New York Knicks Season

islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
12/4/2008  4:38 PM
Posted by martin:

Curry came "in shape" into training camp and then abruptly sat out for that entire training camp bedridden and recovering from a bacterial infection. He was so bedridden and sick he had to get IVs administered by doctors back at the hotel. He played 3 short preseason games and looked lost. After 2 games he came up lame because of a bone bruise and a month later is still out and not getting a lick better because of something that happened a month prior.

I think Walsh and MDA orchestrated the whole bacterial infection thing and missing out on learning a new system during training camp thing so that they could purposely de-value their center.

That was the plan.

Isles, you have never been able to get past what is right in front of you to make a sensible argument.

You're right, my bad. I forgot about the infection. But Curry was back playing by the end of training camp and well enough to play in those exhibition games. Then he was DNP-CDed in the first 2 games, while a rookie who sat out all of training camp and the exhibition games with a bad back, that still hasn't healed, was given minutes in both of those games. Kind of odd, don't you think?

You're right, I've never been able to see what is right in front of me, like those of you who were fooled by Isiah for years.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/4/2008  5:26 PM
Roberson is having a better year than Balkman (our wonderful 1st round, 20th pick in the 2006 draft)that people are complaining that Walsh traded.

Balkman 15 game 13 min 4.4 ppm
Roberson 14 games 14mpg 6.4 ppm

i didn't realize ppm determined everything in the NBA... i guess defense, shotblocking & rebounding have no bearing in this discussion?

anyway, who's complaining about Balkman being traded? the complaint is about replacing him w/an undersized SG who can't knock down a consistent J or orchestrate an offense... there were imminently more suitable options available than that guy... again, if u don't care about 15th men on the roster, that's fine for you... everyone doesn't have to be happy with every single move a GM makes no matter if they like him or not.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Knicksfan
Posts: 33593
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
12/4/2008  5:42 PM
Great clips, Rookie.

I think the Knicks can be like that under D'Antoni.
Knicks_Fan
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
12/4/2008  6:28 PM
Posted by TMS:
Roberson is having a better year than Balkman (our wonderful 1st round, 20th pick in the 2006 draft)that people are complaining that Walsh traded.

Balkman 15 game 13 min 4.4 ppm
Roberson 14 games 14mpg 6.4 ppm

i didn't realize ppm determined everything in the NBA... i guess defense, shotblocking & rebounding have no bearing in this discussion?

anyway, who's complaining about Balkman being traded? the complaint is about replacing him w/an undersized SG who can't knock down a consistent J or orchestrate an offense... there were imminently more suitable options available than that guy... again, if u don't care about 15th men on the roster, that's fine for you... everyone doesn't have to be happy with every single move a GM makes no matter if they like him or not.
I'm curious who you would have signed for minimum salary that would have been so much better than Roberson. I am not saying Roberson was my first choice, but I am saying he has performed adequetely for #15 on the roster. I was hoping that Walsh would have goten an early 2nd round pick and taken Mario Chalmers or Chris Douglas Roberts.

It should have been ppg(points per game) not ppm. My mistake in typing this quickly.

But you left off the second part of my post - stats so I'll repeat it.
And Roberson in his last 2 games has had 5 steals.
In his last 5 games where he has been getting playing time 18 min to 28 min/game, playing Cleveland twice, Detroit,Portland - all top teams, and Golden State - a bad team;

he has scored: 19, 6,8 , 8, 10 ppm - had 6 steals and is hitting almost 40% from the 3 pt. He isn't Steve Nash....or Duhon, but he is doing just fine for what he is.

Roberson is probably playing better than any 15th man on any NBA Team's roster!
Roberson was essentially a 24 year old, 1/2 year rookie when he joined the Knicks. He had played in a total of 36 games , a total of 315 min. ( 8.75 min/game). So he came into camp pretty raw. With some more playing experience he has upped his game. He may never be a very good player, but he tries, has a lot of energy, and has been performing well.

It's true points don't mean everything. Re: defense, he probably is a better defender than Craw at SG.
I did post his steals....5 in the last 2 games against Cleveland and Portland. 6 over the last 4 games. Also 38% from 3 pt over the last 4 games and 33.3% for the year. Shooting the 3 was essentially his role.

He needs to drive to the basket more and draw fouls. He takes very few foul shots. I am OK with Roberson. I do hope we bring on PE Jr soon.



The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/4/2008  6:35 PM
I'm curious who you would have signed for minimum salary that would have been so much better than Roberson.

i already discussed some possible alternate options that i thought would have made a little more sense... i dunno if they would have been better than Roberson or not but i do know that i would like to see a SG w/some size who can drive to the hole & finish instead of an undersized SG w/a highly inconsistent jumpshot... Gerald Green, Sonny Weems (trade w/DEN)... there has to be other guys like that out there who we could easily get who would have more of an upside for us than Roberson... this is strictly my own personal preference.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Rookie
Posts: 27322
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274

12/4/2008  6:54 PM
Posted by TMS:
I'm curious who you would have signed for minimum salary that would have been so much better than Roberson.

i already discussed some possible alternate options that i thought would have made a little more sense... i dunno if they would have been better than Roberson or not but i do know that i would like to see a SG w/some size who can drive to the hole & finish instead of an undersized SG w/a highly inconsistent jumpshot... Gerald Green, Sonny Weems (trade w/DEN)... there has to be other guys like that out there who we could easily get who would have more of an upside for us than Roberson... this is strictly my own personal preference.

Hey thanks TMS, I think you've made some very good points. You would think that in the NBA there wouldn't be such a disparity in talent between a 10th man and a 15th man, after all, 400k isn't exactly chump change. I can't add anything, but i've enjoyed the back and forth by both sides.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
12/4/2008  7:47 PM
Having a plan and sticking to it.

The D'Antoni move was great!

The Duhon move was excellent.

The Roberson move was fair (so far).

Galinari draft pick: Verdict is still out and if Galinari can make it back, then no doubt, he'll be a threat.

The Al Harrington move wasn't bad either.

The Mobley move is turning out to be good, because he may retire now.

The awe-eye opening and powerful..............."TIM"! was expected, so hang tight.

Opening up cap room was totally awesome!

The Marbury move's? I still say they had no choice.

So if Mobley goes and they get rid of Marbury, then it will be even greater, because we'll have two roster spots open, and two more players we desperately, desperately need. Take Jr., another guard and call me in the morning.

All of this in just what? Two months??

"A"

If he can get rid of Curry before season's end, then it's gonna be an "A+"
I'll never trust this' team again.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
12/4/2008  7:47 PM
Posted by martin:

^I give an 'F' on this post.

I'll never trust this' team again.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
12/4/2008  7:49 PM
Posted by Rookie:
Posted by martin:

^I give an 'F' on this post.

Exhibit A - The Jason Kidd trade is paying major dividends for the Nets. This is a great example of how to handle a situation where your star guard becomes a sideshow distraction. They also turned their 2008 draft picks they recieved in this deal into gold. They became stronger through good management. Can you compare Thorn to Walsh?

Man' this guy is really dissing our team!
I'll never trust this' team again.
OldFan
Posts: 21456
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2003
Member: #446
12/4/2008  9:29 PM
Posted by Rookie:
Posted by martin:

^I give an 'F' on this post.

Exhibit A - The Jason Kidd trade is paying major dividends for the Nets. This is a great example of how to handle a situation where your star guard becomes a sideshow distraction. They also turned their 2008 draft picks they recieved in this deal into gold. They became stronger through good management. Can you compare Thorn to Walsh?

I'll give an 'F' on this post. Are you seriously comparing Marbs to Jason Kidd.
Erniecat
Posts: 20577
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2005
Member: #851
12/4/2008  9:33 PM
This is one of the most ridiculous "serious" posts I've seen on this forum. (I'm assuming this was not meant as a joke.)

The bottom line is, Walsh has given the Knicks an actual future, and he did it pretty quickly. We now have a chance to sign perhaps two superstars in 2010, thanks to Walsh.

A couple of months ago, Randolph was considered untradable. (Remember how Isiah was blasted for taking on Zach's contract.) So we pump up his value and dump him without taking back any deals that go after next season. Yeah, sounds like he deserves a D for that move.

Yes, he should have released Marbury in training camp, we all know that. But overall, I love what Walsh is doing -- which is basically the opposite of what Zeke did.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
12/5/2008  10:10 AM
walsh's grade: incomplete
knicks fans' grade: D minus
martin
Posts: 80009
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/5/2008  10:32 AM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by martin:

Curry came "in shape" into training camp and then abruptly sat out for that entire training camp bedridden and recovering from a bacterial infection. He was so bedridden and sick he had to get IVs administered by doctors back at the hotel. He played 3 short preseason games and looked lost. After 2 games he came up lame because of a bone bruise and a month later is still out and not getting a lick better because of something that happened a month prior.

I think Walsh and MDA orchestrated the whole bacterial infection thing and missing out on learning a new system during training camp thing so that they could purposely de-value their center.

That was the plan.

Isles, you have never been able to get past what is right in front of you to make a sensible argument.

You're right, my bad. I forgot about the infection. But Curry was back playing by the end of training camp and well enough to play in those exhibition games. Then he was DNP-CDed in the first 2 games, while a rookie who sat out all of training camp and the exhibition games with a bad back, that still hasn't healed, was given minutes in both of those games. Kind of odd, don't you think?

You're right, I've never been able to see what is right in front of me, like those of you who were fooled by Isiah for years.

Gallo has nothing to do with Curry.

My guess was that Curry was still in very bad game shape at the beginning of the season and didn't understand one iota of MDA's offense. To me that would be good enough reason not to play him.

How is that considered the GM devaluing a player?
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Walsh's rating so far

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy