[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

OT: It's VP debate day!!!
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/3/2008  6:30 AM
I think they both did a good job. It's obvious Biden is more knowledgable and competent than Palin but Palin did a very good job of covering up her limited knowledge by entirely avoiding questions.
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/3/2008  6:37 AM
Izybx: What's your reaction to Palin's statement that there is no difference between the two campaign's views of gay marriage or gay rights? Just curious how Republicans viewed that. I thought it was an issue that rallied the Republican base but she basically took the issue off the table.
TheGame
Posts: 26652
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
10/3/2008  7:03 AM
Posted by izybx:

A lot of you guys saying she did terrible. Seems to me that she did a very good job. Regardless of lowered expectations, or the perception of her as a fool among Obama supporters, any objective person would say that she did a good job. But than again, objectivity doesnt exist when discussing politics. Im guessing a lot of republicans are pleased, and a lot of Democrats are poopooing and nitpicking for anything and everything.

What debate were you watching? Palin did well because she pretty much convinced everyone that she was a bumbling idiot and last night managed to look average. She dodged questions and really had nothing to say other than memorized talking points.

[Edited by - thegame on 03-10-2008 07:15]
Trust the Process
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
10/3/2008  7:12 AM
Posted by Solace:

I caught part of this. I have to say that I'm not convinced Palin did nearly as poorly as she was portrayed to have done in this thread. Let's face it, most of this board wants Obama, and even if Palin came out flawless it wouldn't really matter, would it?

I think the country is in a very sad state when the judgments seem to be more based on a popularity contest and which candidate matches *your* party.

Welcome to life on earth.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
firefly
Posts: 23248
Alba Posts: 17
Joined: 7/26/2004
Member: #721
United Kingdom
10/3/2008  7:30 AM
An interesting read.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7649833.stm



Facts and figures were flying around in the debate between US vice-presidential candidates Joe Biden and Sarah Palin.

The BBC News website took a look to see which claims were accurate.


THE US COMMANDER IN AFGHANISTAN
Claim: Joe Biden said that the US "commanding general in Afghanistan said the surge principle in Iraq will not work in Afghanistan". Sarah Palin responded by saying that "McClellan did not say definitively the surge principles would not work in Afghanistan".

Fact: On 2 October, the Washington Post quoted the head of the Nato-led coalition in Afghanistan, Gen David McKiernan, as saying: "The word I don't use for Afghanistan is 'surge'."

Verdict: Mrs Palin not only got the name of the US commander in Afghanistan wrong, but it would seem she also distorted his position.


IRAQ'S BUDGET SURPLUS
Claim: Joe Biden said that "Iraqis have an $80bn surplus".

Fact: According to Factcheck.org, this is "an out-of-date projection. The Iraqis currently have $29bn in the bank, and could have $47bn to $59bn by the end of the year."


Verdict: Joe Biden is guilty of using out-of-date figures, but his substantive point - that the Iraqis have resources to "spend their own money... to take their own responsibility" - still holds.


OBAMA'S READINESS TO BE PRESIDENT
Claim: Sarah Palin reminded Joe Biden of his statement during the Democratic primaries that Barack Obama "was not ready to be commander in chief".

Fact: Joe Biden did indeed say this, on 19 August, 2007, in a TV debate between the various Democratic presidential hopefuls.

Verdict: Mrs Palin's quote was perfectly accurate. (However, Mr Biden did rethink his position. By May 2008 - before Mr Obama had sewn up the nomination, and before he had picked Mr Biden to be his running-mate - he was claiming that Mr Obama had "learned a hell of a lot".)


MCCAIN'S SUB-PRIME SURPRISE
Claim: Joe Biden pointed out that "John McCain said as early as last December, quote - I'm paraphrasing - 'I'm surprised about this subprime mortgage crisis'".

Fact: In a 4 November interview with a New Hampshire newspaper, the Keene Sentinel, John McCain said "I'd like to tell you I did anticipate [the mortgage crisis], but I have to give you straight talk, I did not".

Verdict: Mr Biden's paraphrase is a fair reflection of Mr McCain's words, although he got the date wrong by a month.


BIDEN'S SUPPORT FOR MCCAIN'S IRAQ POSITION
Claim: Sarah Palin said that Joe Biden "had supported John McCain's military strategies [in Iraq] pretty adamantly until this race".

Fact: Jonathan Weisman of the Washington Post characterises Mr Biden as "an outspoken opponent of... troop increases in Iraq as soon as Bush announced them after the 2006 elections". As Foreign Relations Committee Chairman, he led the most heated hearings before the troops were actually deployed.

Verdict: Mrs Palin's claim is untrue. Mr Biden opposed the surge - of which Mr McCain was a prominent proponent - long before the beginning of the presidential campaign, and maintained this position throughout the race.


MCCAIN ON SPAIN
Claim: Joe Biden asserted that "John McCain said as recently as a couple of weeks ago he wouldn't even sit down with the government of Spain".

Fact: John McCain, in an interview with a Spanish-language radio station, refused to commit to a meeting with the Spanish Prime Minister, saying only that he "would be willing to meet with those leaders who are our friends and want to work with us in a cooperative fashion".

Many observers said at the time that Mr McCain's answer was based on a mishearing of the question he had been asked (which had followed a series of questions about America's relationship with diplomatic foes in Latin America).

But a McCain campaign aide later confirmed that "the questioner asked several times about Senator McCain's willingness to meet [Spanish PM] Zapatero - and id'd him in the question so there is no doubt Senator McCain knew exactly to whom the question referred. Senator McCain refused to commit to a White House meeting with President Zapatero in this interview."

Verdict: While it would have been true for Mr Biden to say that Mr McCain had signalled (whether intentionally or not) a cooling in relations with Spain, Mr McCain did not rule out a meeting with the Spanish prime minister.

Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/3/2008  7:35 AM
I wish Biden had said, "How do you know when you're talking to someone from the McCain camp? Answer: All their sentences contain a noun, a verb, and the word 'maverick'"
(I can't take credit for the line; someone on another forum mentioned it.)
TheGame
Posts: 26652
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
10/3/2008  8:56 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:

I wish Biden had said, "How do you know when you're talking to someone from the McCain camp? Answer: All their sentences contain a noun, a verb, and the word 'maverick'"
(I can't take credit for the line; someone on another forum mentioned it.)

LOL.
Trust the Process
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
10/3/2008  9:34 AM
Posted by izybx:

A lot of you guys saying she did terrible. Seems to me that she did a very good job. Regardless of lowered expectations, or the perception of her as a fool among Obama supporters, any objective person would say that she did a good job. But than again, objectivity doesnt exist when discussing politics. Im guessing a lot of republicans are pleased, and a lot of Democrats are poopooing and nitpicking for anything and everything.
Sara Palin did fine in the debate in comparison to her disasters with her recent TV interviews. I was actually happy to see that she could speak with some intelligence. Her previous interviews were just too embarassing....for her and for our country.

While Palin did improve in her speaking, she still demonstrated that she is just not fit to be VP, and God-forbid, President of the U.S.

The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
10/3/2008  9:39 AM
Firefly's signature - "Some men see things as they are and ask why. I dream things that never were and ask why not?"
Nice quote from Robert Kennedy.

I met Obama briefly during his campaigning. My feeling of him was hat he is very similar to JFK in his vision, speaking ability, intelligence, sincerety and ability to lead. And there is no one else out there who is even close.
[Edited by - markji on 10-03-2008 08:42 AM]

[Edited by - markji on 10-03-2008 08:53 AM]
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
10/3/2008  9:39 AM
Posted by Markji:
Posted by izybx:

A lot of you guys saying she did terrible. Seems to me that she did a very good job. Regardless of lowered expectations, or the perception of her as a fool among Obama supporters, any objective person would say that she did a good job. But than again, objectivity doesnt exist when discussing politics. Im guessing a lot of republicans are pleased, and a lot of Democrats are poopooing and nitpicking for anything and everything.
Sara Palin did fine in the debate in comparison to her disasters with her recent TV interviews. I was actually happy to see that she could speak with some intelligence. Her previous interviews were just too embarassing....for her and for our country.

While Palin did improve in her speaking, she still demonstrated that she is just not fit to be VP, and God-forbid, President of the U.S.

this is someone that needs to be exposed to many more things around the world before she can be a serious candidate. in the meantime tho, i will expose myself to her and help her fix that bridge to nowhere...
jimimou
Posts: 23517
Alba Posts: 36
Lame Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/6/2004
Member: #681
USA
10/3/2008  10:10 AM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by Markji:
Posted by izybx:

A lot of you guys saying she did terrible. Seems to me that she did a very good job. Regardless of lowered expectations, or the perception of her as a fool among Obama supporters, any objective person would say that she did a good job. But than again, objectivity doesnt exist when discussing politics. Im guessing a lot of republicans are pleased, and a lot of Democrats are poopooing and nitpicking for anything and everything.
Sara Palin did fine in the debate in comparison to her disasters with her recent TV interviews. I was actually happy to see that she could speak with some intelligence. Her previous interviews were just too embarassing....for her and for our country.

While Palin did improve in her speaking, she still demonstrated that she is just not fit to be VP, and God-forbid, President of the U.S.

this is someone that needs to be exposed to many more things around the world before she can be a serious candidate. in the meantime tho, i will expose myself to her and help her fix that bridge to nowhere...

dj - you really need a girlfriend bro......
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
10/3/2008  12:34 PM
If they had kept her under wraps between the Convention and last night with only an interview granted with Fox News--there would trouble. How she was exposed between the two events helped alleviate the gains she made for McCain although this $ disaster was the main conduit. Is she much different than Dan Quayle?
RIP Crushalot😞
Nalod
Posts: 72107
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
10/3/2008  1:19 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

Izybx: What's your reaction to Palin's statement that there is no difference between the two campaign's views of gay marriage or gay rights? Just curious how Republicans viewed that. I thought it was an issue that rallied the Republican base but she basically took the issue off the table.

Bonnie,

You can marry anyone one you want!

izybx
Posts: 22366
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/16/2006
Member: #1178
USA
10/3/2008  2:26 PM
Posted by EnySpree:
Posted by GKFv2:

Obama can put together a coherent sentence.

Tell him GKF.

Fuck this republican democratic bull****. Palin didn't answer a question the entire debate. Much like McCain. They dance around and say catch phrases all day. I'm sick of it.

Bottom line....if you vote for McCain and this 72 year old dude crokes God forbid? Palin is the president?

Obama may not have "experience" but McCain allegedly has the experience.......so much so he chose a retard to be his running mate.

Another bold statement......if you vote for McCain/Palin you are a ****ing retard. Common sense. Nothing to do with any title or category you wanna put me in. Both of them are retarded. Pull out of the debate to consentrate on the economy? What?

I repeat.......you are a ****ing idiot if you waste your right to vote on McCain/palin.

This from someone who cant articulate why he prefers one candidate over another, except to say that Obama is smart, and Mccain is old. But I guess of you are unable to engage others in debate in an intelligent manner you can always fall back on name calling, so youre good money then.
Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
izybx
Posts: 22366
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/16/2006
Member: #1178
USA
10/3/2008  2:30 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

Izybx: What's your reaction to Palin's statement that there is no difference between the two campaign's views of gay marriage or gay rights? Just curious how Republicans viewed that. I thought it was an issue that rallied the Republican base but she basically took the issue off the table.

Im not a Republican, so I dont know the party line on gay rights. My personal view is that gays deserve the same legal rights as heterosexual couples, including civil unions. I dont believe they should adopt or get married. Beyond that its not really an issue to me what they do.
Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
10/3/2008  3:02 PM
I think the country is in a very sad state when the judgments seem to be more based on a popularity contest.

I think your "sadness" is misplaced, Solace. Its ironic that you would demonize this board as viewing the debates through a frivilous lens when all Palin has to do is look cute and not completely screw up and disintegrate.

This whole charade is insulting to any intelligent voter. She doesn't answer any questions, she's obviously reading prepared answers and/or repeating keywords ad nausem. She then simply peppers her nonsense responses with "I'm just an average person!" folkisms.

This is an updated version of "I can have a beer with him" bullshyt, that got Bush elected, and us in this quagmire.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
10/3/2008  4:43 PM
She outright refused to answer questions and actually indicated that she won't. Why agree and come to a debate if you don't have intentions on debating the issues. Biden provided the Obama/Biden exit strategy for Iraq while she gave a "what is porn" response. "We will declare victory when we can tell we won." ok. I still didn't understand her view of nuclear weapons except that it is the last stage and the end of the world. Ok, any middle school student can tell you that. She focus on drilling for oil which seems to be her strong point.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
10/3/2008  4:46 PM
Posted by izybx:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Izybx: What's your reaction to Palin's statement that there is no difference between the two campaign's views of gay marriage or gay rights? Just curious how Republicans viewed that. I thought it was an issue that rallied the Republican base but she basically took the issue off the table.

Im not a Republican, so I dont know the party line on gay rights. My personal view is that gays deserve the same legal rights as heterosexual couples, including civil unions. I dont believe they should adopt or get married. Beyond that its not really an issue to me what they do.
What's the basis of your view on the adoption issue? There's a huge body of scientific research (that most people don't even know about unfortunately) revealing that children of gay and lesbian parents are not harmed in any way psychologically and are no more likely to become gay than children of heterosexual parents. (I teach on the topic in Intro Psych.) A diverse range of organizations including the American Medical Association, American Psychological Association, American Pediratric Association, and American Bar Association have all made official statements indicating that a large body of research has revealed no negative effects. What happens when gays and lesbians aren't allowed to adopt is that many children remain in orphanages or live in terrible conditions of poverty throughout the world.


[Edited by - bonn1997 on 10-03-2008 4:47 PM]
loweyecue
Posts: 27468
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 11/20/2005
Member: #1037

10/3/2008  5:15 PM
Posted by Solace:

I caught part of this. I have to say that I'm not convinced Palin did nearly as poorly as she was portrayed to have done in this thread. Let's face it, most of this board wants Obama, and even if Palin came out flawless it wouldn't really matter, would it?

I think the country is in a very sad state when the judgments seem to be more based on a popularity contest and which candidate matches *your* party.

Not sure what you mean by "how she is being portrayed"? How do you positively portary someone who cant answer a single question without changing the subject and switching to vague generalizaations? This was supposed to be a debate for crying out loud, you come here to discuss issues not recite memorized garbage out of sequence. She showed only one thing clearly she doesn't have enough knowledge about any issue outside of energy independence to hold an intelligent conversation. This is soemone who has to aspire to be average and the country is indeed in a very sad state that people like her are even considered for a VP job.
TKF on Melo ::....he is a punk, a jerk, a self absorbed out of shape, self aggrandizing, unprofessional, volume chucking coach killing playoff loser!!
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
10/3/2008  5:17 PM
Posted by loweyecue:
Posted by Solace:

I caught part of this. I have to say that I'm not convinced Palin did nearly as poorly as she was portrayed to have done in this thread. Let's face it, most of this board wants Obama, and even if Palin came out flawless it wouldn't really matter, would it?

I think the country is in a very sad state when the judgments seem to be more based on a popularity contest and which candidate matches *your* party.

Not sure what you mean by "how she is being portrayed"? How do you positively portary someone who cant answer a single question without changing the subject and switching to vague generalizaations? This was supposed to be a debate for crying out loud, you come here to discuss issues not recite memorized garbage out of sequence. She showed only one thing clearly she doesn't have enough knowledge about any issue outside of energy independence to hold an intelligent conversation. This is soemone who has to aspire to be average and the country is indeed in a very sad state that people like her are even considered for a VP job.

Conservatives take great pride in their lack of intellectual honesty.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
OT: It's VP debate day!!!

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy