sheesh

Pharzeone - obviously you never watched the movie "Animal House"

c'mon dude, get with the freakin' program!

Posted by Solace:

Posted by Pharzeone:

Posted by misterearl:

Solace - that's not an admission. It's a simple truth.

Is it logical to pay $1000 for a seat to a basketball game?

Is it logical for djsu to sit in section 404, when he deserves, at very least, section 332?

Was it logical for Patrick to attempt a finger roll against Indiana in game 7, when he shoulda reared back and dunked that bad boy?

Was it logical when the Germans bombed Paerl Harbor?!?


(why is it so important for you to be "right"?)

Germans!!! Come on man.

LOFL!!! That had to be intentional. Nobody is *that* dumb (*searches around for dido*).

It's a honest mistake. I was just giving him a rough time on it but far worst is said on this forum as truth.

Posted by misterearl:

sheesh

Pharzeone - obviously you never watched the movie "Animal House"

c'mon dude, get with the freakin' program!

LOL. Sorry.

Posted by Pharzeone:

It's a honest mistake. I was just giving him a rough time on it but far worst is said on this forum as truth.

You mean like the claim that the Knickerbockers are named after Nixluva?

Solace - while you were too busy calling me dumb, you missed a reference to one of the great movies of our time

who is really the dumb one?

Posted by Solace:

Posted by misterearl:

Solace - that's not an admission. It's a simple truth.

Is it logical to pay $1000 for a seat to a basketball game?

Is it logical for djsu to sit in section 404, when he deserves, at very least, section 332?

Was it logical for Patrick to attempt a finger roll against Indiana in game 7, when he shoulda reared back and dunked that bad boy?

Was it logical when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?!?

So, what you're trying to say is: "it ain't that deep"?

I highly disagree with your perception of depth. Nearsightedness plauges the lovers.

Seriously, what's the problem Solace. Some people are die hard fans. What's the point? You want to beat it out of them or something? You are not such. No big deal. LOL, I don't run around screaming at everyone wearing a Yankee cap calling them a fake fan. Everyone has their level of interest.

"logic... we don't need no steenkin' logic!"

>>No, we just can't tolerate lies.

c'mon... Admit it, you are simply a cross-dressing Celtics fan

Posted by Pharzeone:

Seriously, what's the problem Solace. Some people are die hard fans. What's the point? You want to beat it out of them or something? You are not such. No big deal. LOL, I don't run around screaming at everyone wearing a Yankee cap calling them a fake fan. Everyone has their level of interest.

That's the problem. Criticizing the Knicks in any way means we're not fans anymore. Or not die-hard fans or whatever. I'm desperate for the team to get good. I'm still waiting for the move that turns the corner. Maybe it's Zach, but I'm skeptical. Point is, the Knicks are a bad team and a worse organization until proven otherwise. People who want happiness and satisfaction from every fan, when the team has put up a combined 89 wins over the past three seasons is going to be sorely disappointed.

why is that such a difficult concept to grasp?

or

why is it so important to throw rocks at it?

Posted by misterearl:

Panos - what don't you like about the direction the Knicks are going in?

Not the individual transactions, but the "direction"?

I'm not sure you can divorce the direction from the transactions.
There have been lots of moves that Isiah has made that have made me
pull my hair out. I don't want to list them again, unless you need me too.
But things like grossly overpaying, and duplication of talents in place of filling
needs and building a "team".
I was fooled yet again that perhaps discipline had been instilled until the Randolph
trade. But once again, we've pushed back the horizon to cap-sanity. Was the trade
good from a talent perspective, absolutely hands-down. However, from a chemistry
perspective (I wanted a rugged enforcer) and from a cap situation, I am not so sure.
I am not sure we have any true "direction". It seems to change every 6 months.

I love the Knicks. However, I don't love a single one of the high priced players
on this team. Marbury, Curry, Zach, Crawford, Malik, can all go as far as I'm concerned.
That is really a dilemma as a fan. Loving a team, and not liking the players on it.
Now Lee and Balkman, I can get behind. EVEN NATE. He may be stupid, but he plays with
passion.

Then there is the issue of the #23 pick this year. I hope this kid ends up being great,
I really do. But we'll see...

Panos - i have some bad news for you

They're ALL high-priced. Every last one of them

Right down to Wilson Chandler

[Edited by - misterearl on 07-31-2007 4:25 PM]