[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks Fans Forgiving b/c Lee is White?
Author Thread
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
3/28/2007  10:49 AM
What is racist in this? This all known facts.

No it isn't. By the way, the biological determining factor for African runners has nothing to do with "hunting in the flatlands", it has to do with living at a high altitude and possibly the sickle-cell condition.
All races will eventually mesh together anyway which is good.

Like in 50,000 years
Kids from mixed race parents are on average more talented and healthy.
They also are nice looking, especially women.

And yep… It is a bit sarcastic because this discussion in kind off stupid…

Frequently.

***

The other prejudice part was where you stated that whites "have more stable character.". Sorry buddy that is like saying Africans are "strong animals" and whites are "smart animals".

***

TO be fair, humans are animals and can be bred just like any other animal even though nobody likes to admit it. When Jimmy the Greek stated this he was crucified, but it wasn't completely untrue. The Africans who were brought to the Americas (Not just the U.S. but South America, and the Caribbean too.) had to survive the most terrible conditions just to get here, and once they were here, were subjected to generations of incredibly harsh treatment and work. The theory is that the weaker persons died and the stronger ones survived leaving a physically stronger group of people.

True? It could be.

However, if it is true, it doesn't manifest itself in every person and there are other determining factors such as poverty always seems to produce the best athletes no matter what the race.

Back to David Lee, he does get a pass because he is really hurt. And that is the same reason we should respect Francis playing through pain no matter how much we hate his game.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
AUTOADVERT
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
3/28/2007  10:55 AM
Posted by Marv:
Posted by tomverve:

Fair enough. I'm not trying to put a value spin on this or insinuate racism. Though I remain skeptical that preference due to race is driven only by a "I can relate to that guy" kind of thing.

what do you think it's driven by?


If preference for players due to race exists, I think it's possible that it's driven at least in part by subconscious value judgments associated with race that one might pick up from society at large. Although not entirely uncontroversial, there is evidence that such subconscious effects exist-- even in white people who might make every conscious effort otherwise, and even in black folks. People are often surprised to find that (at least as measured by this IAT) they have these subconscious effects going on. These effects are opaque to awareness and often at odds with how we consciously choose to act, but nonetheless they may play a role in forming how we perceive the world (e.g., contributing to what extent we like this player or that). To the extent that these effects are unconscious and can be entirely at odds with one's voluntary behavior, I don't think it's really appropriate to call them "racist" effects per se, though of course they are undesirable nonetheless.

Of course that's just speculation. I could be wrong about that, or preference due to race could be driven by some other factor not considered here. But to just say that whenever race plays a role in how much a fan likes a player it's just due to the fact that the race helps him relate to the player-- I think that view is optimistic and common sensical but probably naive.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
Andrew
Posts: 26601
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
3/28/2007  10:57 AM
Notice how Queenie started the topic with a couple posts and now is no where to be found! She is the enemy....focus your anger against the woman!

.
.
.
.
.

just kidding.
PURE KNICKS LOVE
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
3/28/2007  11:04 AM
Posted by oohah:
What is racist in this? This all known facts.

No it isn't. By the way, the biological determining factor for African runners has nothing to do with "hunting in the flatlands", it has to do with living at a high altitude and possibly the sickle-cell condition.
All races will eventually mesh together anyway which is good.

Like in 50,000 years
Kids from mixed race parents are on average more talented and healthy.
They also are nice looking, especially women.

And yep… It is a bit sarcastic because this discussion in kind off stupid…

Frequently.

***

The other prejudice part was where you stated that whites "have more stable character.". Sorry buddy that is like saying Africans are "strong animals" and whites are "smart animals".

***

TO be fair, humans are animals and can be bred just like any other animal even though nobody likes to admit it. When Jimmy the Greek stated this he was crucified, but it wasn't completely untrue. The Africans who were brought to the Americas (Not just the U.S. but South America, and the Caribbean too.) had to survive the most terrible conditions just to get here, and once they were here, were subjected to generations of incredibly harsh treatment and work. The theory is that the weaker persons died and the stronger ones survived leaving a physically stronger group of people.

True? It could be.

However, if it is true, it doesn't manifest itself in every person and there are other determining factors such as poverty always seems to produce the best athletes no matter what the race.

Back to David Lee, he does get a pass because he is really hurt. And that is the same reason we should respect Francis playing through pain no matter how much we hate his game.

oohah

I agree with you point but I think you a bit pessimistic about the timing.
In open societies the process is going pretty fast. I was in France and Holland and there are so many race-mixed unions.
They just don’t give a dam about the race thing.
The US society is miles away from being open. We have so much sh…t left from the past and politician and religion “leaders” using the race card all over the place. This is equally applied to white and black politicians and religious bustards
There are pure people among all races and white pure people are not less pure that black
And black criminals are not less or more criminal that whites






"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
3/28/2007  11:40 AM
Posted by oohah:
What is racist in this? This all known facts.

No it isn't. By the way, the biological determining factor for African runners has nothing to do with "hunting in the flatlands", it has to do with living at a high altitude and possibly the sickle-cell condition.
All races will eventually mesh together anyway which is good.

Like in 50,000 years
Kids from mixed race parents are on average more talented and healthy.
They also are nice looking, especially women.

And yep… It is a bit sarcastic because this discussion in kind off stupid…

Frequently.

***

The other prejudice part was where you stated that whites "have more stable character.". Sorry buddy that is like saying Africans are "strong animals" and whites are "smart animals".

***

TO be fair, humans are animals and can be bred just like any other animal even though nobody likes to admit it. When Jimmy the Greek stated this he was crucified, but it wasn't completely untrue. The Africans who were brought to the Americas (Not just the U.S. but South America, and the Caribbean too.) had to survive the most terrible conditions just to get here, and once they were here, were subjected to generations of incredibly harsh treatment and work. The theory is that the weaker persons died and the stronger ones survived leaving a physically stronger group of people.

True? It could be.

However, if it is true, it doesn't manifest itself in every person and there are other determining factors such as poverty always seems to produce the best athletes no matter what the race.

Back to David Lee, he does get a pass because he is really hurt. And that is the same reason we should respect Francis playing through pain no matter how much we hate his game.

oohah

Good post ooh ahh. I actually lived in Kenya when I was a child. And I'd like to add another reason to why they are such successful runners. Long distance running is the national sport. every kid wants to be a great long distance runner. The runnres there get the same attention that basketball players do here. Because so many people want to be runners the competition is fierce. And as we know fierce competition leads to better skills.

1.) AS for the other "facts". Everyone explains that there are more black basketball players because we just have natural athletic ability but noone explains why the best volleyball teams( a sport that relies on jumping ability almost entirely) in the US and world tend to be white.

2.)We would go into the rich schools of Darien and Greenwich and smack them in basketball. Teh excuse was that we were more athletic. Yet when they came into our place and stomped us and ran around us in football it wasn't because they were more athletic it was just that they were smarter and worked harder. Noone put together that we were actually one of the smallest basketball teams in the state. Had only one guy that could regularly dunk. We were clearly slower thna them on the football field but twice as fast on the bball court. The reason is because we had played ball since birth and they hadn't. We had worked our assesss off to develop our handles so that we could move with the ball as fast as we could without it. We were never credited for our work ethic. We outworked and outsmarted teams much bigger than us, but somehow it alwasy seemed to come down to our athleticism and probably because our ancesters chased lions int he fields.

3.) Lastly just because you are a great athlete and can dunk all over people does not also mean that you didn't have to work hard like some slow unskilled white guy who can stick jays. As a matter of fact if you can dribble through traffic, and go behind your back and then hit a fade away 16 footer with 5 hands in your face you probably have worked harder on your game then some guy who stands in the corner and just shoots Jumpshots all day. It's the media that creates this mystique of white's earning their way to the NBA, and blacks gettign there on athletic ability. It's not reality.

4.) As for the more stable character. What takes more character, fighting your way to million dollar riches from the slums or taking the short leap from the upper middle class. The reality is most athletes are extremely high character guys. Especially those that fought their way out of unbeleiveable poverty and near 0% odds. Now if you want to talk about some of the tomfoolery that goes on in the NBA. That to me is more of a reflection on the youth and immaturity we allow in the league.
I just hope that people will like me
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
3/28/2007  11:52 AM
Posted by tomverve:
Posted by Marv:
Posted by tomverve:

Fair enough. I'm not trying to put a value spin on this or insinuate racism. Though I remain skeptical that preference due to race is driven only by a "I can relate to that guy" kind of thing.

what do you think it's driven by?


If preference for players due to race exists, I think it's possible that it's driven at least in part by subconscious value judgments associated with race that one might pick up from society at large. Although not entirely uncontroversial, there is evidence that such subconscious effects exist-- even in white people who might make every conscious effort otherwise, and even in black folks. People are often surprised to find that (at least as measured by this IAT) they have these subconscious effects going on. These effects are opaque to awareness and often at odds with how we consciously choose to act, but nonetheless they may play a role in forming how we perceive the world (e.g., contributing to what extent we like this player or that). To the extent that these effects are unconscious and can be entirely at odds with one's voluntary behavior, I don't think it's really appropriate to call them "racist" effects per se, though of course they are undesirable nonetheless.

Of course that's just speculation. I could be wrong about that, or preference due to race could be driven by some other factor not considered here. But to just say that whenever race plays a role in how much a fan likes a player it's just due to the fact that the race helps him relate to the player-- I think that view is optimistic and common sensical but probably naive.

I just disagree because you take away Nash and Nowitzki(who are great players) and every player that is celebrated in this league is black. Again race is a factor but I don't think there is some kind of issue associated with basketball where somehow black players just aren't gettign the credit they deserve.

My question is how do you pick your favorite players? I just find it weird how for the last 15 years the favorite sons of the NY Knicks were Patrick and Oak and Starks and Sprewell. People kiss the ground they walk on. All black. Now suddenly Lee comes along. He plays his asse off, fans love him and suddenly we have some sort of race issue in NY were white players are gettign the benefit of the doubt. I ask you, who on this Knicks team do you think fans are goign to cling to? This is NY. A blue collar city. If you bust your asse people will love you. I'll even argue that per minute, Balkman has gotten as many or more standing ovations than David. The guys that don't get the benefit of the doubt are the guys that have either created issues everywhere they go. I just don't see any examples of any player on this team being treated unfairly and find it odd that SAS made it an issue. Noone has ever questioned Marbs' ability to play through injuries, noone has ever questioned Q at least giving it a go. Noone has questioned Jamal. Why is the fact that noone questions David suddenly a societal issue? I guess I don't get it.

Again, I ask the question how do you pick your favorite player? You pick who you relate to. I'm sure many people that come from mainland China who love the Kobe's and the Stephs of the world also have a special place in their heart for Yao Ming. Many openly root for him simply because he is from China. Should we all assume that they are part of some sinister move against blacks in america? Would we feel that way if a gay guy liked Jon Amaechi? Or if a Serbian liked Vlade Divac. No, most people can understand this and are okay with it, because they are a minority and minorities are allowed to think this way. Majorities of course can't follow this same line of thinking.
I just hope that people will like me
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
3/28/2007  11:56 AM
Steve Kerr is a guy that has a reputation as being a hard worker. He had no talent and no athletic ability and made it to the NBA because he just worked harder than everyone else. IT's a falsehood. The guy was a great jumpshooter and obviously worked on that. But he had no left hand, no ball handling skills and lacked many of the other skills that guys like Stephon Marbury currently has. Steve Kerr was smart enough to pick a strength and work on that and perfect it. But I am willing to bet that Stephon Marbury, Stevie Francis and yet even Nate Robinson were overall harder workers than STeve Kerr. Take away the athletic ability and quickness and the overall skill sets still don't lie.
I just hope that people will like me
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
3/28/2007  12:05 PM
Before this thread goes any further, I have three words:

Keith Van Horn.

Discuss.
https:// It's not so hard.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
3/28/2007  12:08 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:

Before this thread goes any further, I have three words:

Keith Van Horn.

Discuss.

only one word comes to mind and that's SAVIOR.

well that and ALFALFA.

BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
3/28/2007  12:08 PM
I remember Keith getting criticized for not playing hurt. I think he might be white too.
https:// It's not so hard.
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
3/28/2007  12:48 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

I just disagree because you take away Nash and Nowitzki(who are great players) and every player that is celebrated in this league is black. Again race is a factor but I don't think there is some kind of issue associated with basketball where somehow black players just aren't gettign the credit they deserve.

Well, there is the question-- if this race thing does exist, how strong is its influence? Clearly, it cannot be the main factor in how we perceive players, because of the very obvious counterexamples people have put forth. Yes, most celebrated NBA players are black, and yes, there are plenty of white players who the fans are not keen on. If the argument is whether race is the primary thing that most strongly affects how most people see basketball players, then I think there isn't really much of an argument at all. But the subtler versions of the question are interesting and it's not obvious what the answer is.

Again, the interesting question is not whether fans like Lee because he's white. (Well gee, Michael Doleac was white and he wasn't a fan favorite. This is not rocket science.) The interesting question is how we would perceive Lee differently (if at all) if he were black. Would there be quite as much of a buzz when he gets up to the scorer table, or would we look quite as favorably on him on this message board? Maybe, maybe not. If differences did exist I'm sure they would be subtle.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

3/28/2007  12:56 PM
If there is a racial element in the David Lee story it might relate to the perception that whites aren't generally as gifted athletically as blacks, and therefore to "make it" in the NBA have to work harder. They thus have an underdog, or blue collar, status that some find appealing.

In that sense these guys can be considered to be of "good character" because they have to, and do, work so hard to belong. Perhaps this is why an inferior athlete like Chris Dudley can be more appreciated by some than a guy like Eddy Curry. Is it cause Dudley is white, because he plays D, or because one feels he played up to his ability every night? I don't know.


I have no idea if there's anything to that theory. It's certainly not exclusive to whites. I think Charles Oakley fell under the same rubric.

People dig the guys who exceed expectations or who consistently get the most from what they've got. Lee happens to be one of the better examples of such a player on this team.

Lastly, and IMO, this has nothing to do with race....I don't think it hurts Lee either that he's a very positive voice for the team. He ends his interviews "go knicks," and rarely if ever gives a negative or sulking vibe. This is also a media driven town and we've been without charismatic spoke persons for a long time. Ewing and Marbury certainly never cut it. Lee has a rugged charisma not seen since Spree. Before that our media darlings were guys like Starks, Harper, Buck Williams, X-man, etc - not white, but charismatic, upbeat, rugged individuals.

Knicks fans are starving for someone they can believe in. I know Marbury has been that for a lot of folks, but even his most ardent supporters have been rocked too many times. Lee just happens to be the "it boy" right now. So long as he keeps charming the camera and playing above his abilities it might last a while. But make no mistake, this is an unforgiving town, as soon as he starts spouting off, loses his humility, or plays below his potential he'll be dropped faster than a hot white potato.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/28/2007  1:09 PM
tomverve - i have a tremendous amount of respect for your thoughtful writing. While watching this discussion evolve you bring to mind
a few random observations... without... as some might protest in "playing the race card".

I remember when Spree would report to the scoerers table and get a rise out of the crowd for his frenetic energy. Hell, Harthorne Wingo would be received like the conquering hero because if he was at the scorers table it meant the game was well in hand.

The Garden loves a good show. Although we look at Oak with rose-colored retro-goggles for diving into the stands, I also remember how the crowd would groan in unison anytime he attempted a jump shot or threw a wild pass into someone's drink seated at courtside. If anything, Oak demonstrated the ability to mask his flaws, and his purple suits, with sweat and hard work.

What I find disturbing are the negative labels that people are quick to attach to African American players they simply don't "like". As it is a matter of personal taste and tolerance, it is curious to see how many negative labels would ever be attached to David Lee as he might lose his man on the perimeter, or miss a free throw... or make any perfectly human mistake.

Where as Marbury must be reminded to STFU the moment he opens his mouth, I don't remember anyone flinching when David Lee felt entitled to comment on the vast difference in team climate between Larry Brown and this season.

And I love David Lee.
once a knick always a knick
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/28/2007  1:12 PM
BlueSeats - well stated on a difficult topic.

While many people may want to pretend that the world is color-blind the reality is that color affects nearly everything we do, to varying degrees of subtle and blatant expression.

once a knick always a knick
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
3/28/2007  1:20 PM
I bought up KVH because, although he was liked by some fans, he was fairly universally criticized by most fans, black & white. "KVH sucks" was something most of us could all agree on regardless of race.

I don't think fans in the large were forgiving of KVH regardless of his race. This is not to say race isn't an issue, but I have to wonder, if fans are so forgiving of David Lee because of his race (remember, that's the premise of this thread) why weren't they forgiving of Keith Van Horn?

I think there's more to liking or disliking a player than his race or his game. Who we like and dislike is a pretty complicated subject.
https:// It's not so hard.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/28/2007  1:30 PM
BasketballJones - just for the record, Van Horn did not suck as a Knick. The smile he and Marbury shared during a victory spoke volumes about them mending ripped fences from New Jersey.

Besides, If KVH sucked I don't think there would have been the backlash against the Tim Thomas deal, or the comparison stats posted in the daily papers.

once a knick always a knick
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
3/28/2007  1:42 PM
Posted by misterearl:

BasketballJones - just for the record, Van Horn did not suck as a Knick. The smile he and Marbury shared during a victory spoke volumes about them mending ripped fences from New Jersey.

Besides, If KVH sucked I don't think there would have been the backlash against the Tim Thomas deal, or the comparison stats posted in the daily papers.

You're right. KVH never sucked, in fact he was quite good. The probelm is he was supposed to be the "next Larry Bird" and instead he was just a pretty good player.

Kenyon Martin is an ass. KVH plays better than him all the way to the finals then Martin rips him for a couple of bad games.

Now who is the better play historically over his career? And who was more of a disappointment and bogus for where he was picked? #1 pick Kenyon Martin, or #2 pick KVH?

Martin = more disappointing.

oohah



[Edited by - oohah on 28-03-2007 1:42 PM]
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
3/28/2007  1:46 PM
redemption came the following finals when kmart went 3-16 in the decisive game.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
3/28/2007  1:50 PM
Again reading this post, what person has posted the world is color blind. If you read the post most have suggested that color is probably a factor in picking a favorite player. They are jsut wondering if that is as big an issue as it should be.

I guess I will need to see examples of how Lee is being treated differently. I guess i"m not at the garden every night but to me it seems like Balkman has raised a pretty big buzz the last couple nights.

It also seems to me that if marbs does "just shut his mouth and play" he seems to get a pretty hefty response fromt he fans. His first games here he received a standing ovation just for wearing a uniform. It wasn't until he called himself the greatest, pouted on the bench and fought his teammates that people turned on him.

We can whine and cry about the color issues all we want. But the fact of the matter is this. It's a league of black guys. White people fill the stands. When a white player can play, white fans will gravitate to him. Because they are the majority this will create a buzz. Call it racism. I call it human nature. Not sure why anyone is surprised by this. Shocked and hurt? Why. No different than being the only black guy at a hockey game and quietly rooting for the rare black face to do well. It all has to do with color and it's a fact of life.

I think there is definitely a difference in the way blacks and whites are percieved on the court. I agree with TomVerve that this is a factor in this world and on the basketball court. But what this has to do with Lee's injury and SAS' show, I have no idea. It was a misplaced moment to bring up this topic.
I just hope that people will like me
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

3/28/2007  2:19 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

Again reading this post, what person has posted the world is color blind. If you read the post most have suggested that color is probably a factor in picking a favorite player. They are jsut wondering if that is as big an issue as it should be.

I guess I will need to see examples of how Lee is being treated differently. I guess i"m not at the garden every night but to me it seems like Balkman has raised a pretty big buzz the last couple nights.

It also seems to me that if marbs does "just shut his mouth and play" he seems to get a pretty hefty response fromt he fans. His first games here he received a standing ovation just for wearing a uniform. It wasn't until he called himself the greatest, pouted on the bench and fought his teammates that people turned on him.

We can whine and cry about the color issues all we want. But the fact of the matter is this. It's a league of black guys. White people fill the stands. When a white player can play, white fans will gravitate to him. Because they are the majority this will create a buzz. Call it racism. I call it human nature. Not sure why anyone is surprised by this. Shocked and hurt? Why. No different than being the only black guy at a hockey game and quietly rooting for the rare black face to do well. It all has to do with color and it's a fact of life.

I think there is definitely a difference in the way blacks and whites are percieved on the court. I agree with TomVerve that this is a factor in this world and on the basketball court. But what this has to do with Lee's injury and SAS' show, I have no idea. It was a misplaced moment to bring up this topic.


But how much does color play a role? If everyone listed their 5 favorite players in the NBA, and then also noted their race, do you think we'd see definite trends based on the race of the voters?

I'm not convinced we would, though I'm not convinced we wouldn't. Actually, it might vary depending on whether the question was which players do you think are the best, vs, who do you like best.

Two guys I think are rather polarizing are Nash and Dirk. I don't think they're over valued by whites, but I do think they get undervalued by blacks when their talent is always called into question. I think there's a certain subliminal assumption that white players can't be as good as blacks, so any MVP talk for a white guy must be biased, and some sort of "fix" must be in.

Personally, Nash makes both my "best" list and "favorite" list, but I'd feel obliged to put Dirk on my best list, but he's nowhere near a favorite.
Knicks Fans Forgiving b/c Lee is White?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy