Posted by TMS:
Posted by fishmike:
not its not, but since you put exact in caps it must be true.
Once again the point in this is a bit lost. People arent down on Balkman as a player or a guy that can help up. Plenty of solid guys have gone undrafted and become impact players.
The point is Isiah passed on lottery talent which at the very worst could have been used as a chip later to take a player that wasnt on anyone's board or radar for that matter
fish, if an undrafted guy like Ben Wallace were picked in the 1st round over legitimate lottery talent, i'm sure no one would have a problem with it now... but back then you might have heard some of the same hemming & hawing about it for sure... maybe we should see how Balkman pans out before we start complaining that he was taken too high? i think that's the fairest way to judge any pick or trade, regardless if it's Isiah making it or someone else... being upset that the player you may have wanted (not you specifically) wasn't picked is fine, but to say that Balkman wasn't worthy of being picked that high is presumptuous & speculative at best... no one can say for sure 1 way or the other until we see how these guys' talents translate in the real NBA on their respective teams.
[Edited by - TMS on 10-19-2006 09:39 AM]
again... this has nothing to do with Balkman, it has everything to do with getting best value for what we have. If you can get Balkman at 30, or sign him as a FA (remember he wasnt even in the top 300 NBA draft guide) it lets you use the 20 pick for something else.
Just because your hungry doesnt justify spending 50 bucks on a cheeseburger. Sure its juice, its tastes good as hell, and it satisfies your hunger. But is it a good use of your assets?
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs