[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

starbury on cold pizza this morning
Author Thread
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
8/19/2006  4:10 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by nyk4ever:

If the Knicks play Team basketball and Marbury, Curry, Frye are all playing good defense you can come knocking at my door and I will be right there saying you guys were right. I'm firm in my beliefs but I also know when I'm wrong. I don't think I'll be wrong here but I'll be happy if I am because if those guys do that than the Knicks will be winning basketball games and that is by far the most important thing.

How about if the team simply WINS no matter how it gets that done? Its to vague to say playing good defense. If they play well enough to win games that is sufficient. Not every team is going to be good on both ends. Tho I expect the defense to be better than last year. For one thing there will be consistency and that alone helps ANY team to play better defense. I'm not expecting miracles tho. Having Jared will help cuz now at least we have someone who can hold his own in most cases at the SF spot where we often got torched.

Look this is an OFFENSIVE team and if we're functioning on a high level as we should that will put more pressure on the other team. We didn't see that last year for a lot of reasons. Tho this team should've been a VERY good offensive team. I expect that to actually happen this year. I thought we'd have to win with our offense last year and nothing much has changed. Sure we'll have to be better defensively, but this ain't the Pistons. In truth teams often blew us out, cuz we SUCKED on offense. It was easy to defend our lame attack thanks to LB. We made too many TO's, most of which were unforced. I think that will change due to having an offense that actually fits the players strengths. We're gonna put points up and we'll have to use TIMELY defensive stops to win games, cuz we can't expect this team to defend great for 48 minutes. Its just not equipped to be that kind of team. But I think you'll all be pleasantly surprised with how much better we look on D this year. We may start off slow, but I expect things to pick up as the team gets more familiar with the new system.

Why the hell must Knick fans keep settling for mediocrity. The only way you get anywhere in this league is by playing defense. The offense comes for EVERY team but what seperates the good teams from the bad teams are the ones that play defense. I'm sick of the Knicks not playing any defense, they haven't played defense since Ewing, LJ, Spree, Houston were here. Winning games is nice but if you don't win with playing some semblance of defense then your not getting anywhere in this league. I don't want the defense to come in a few years, I want the defensive mentality instilled the first practice for the coming season, not midway through, not at the all-star break, the first practice.

Offense keeps you in games but Defense wins them.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 08-19-2006 4:11 PM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
AUTOADVERT
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
8/19/2006  6:43 PM
So we are measuring who has got the internet balls again. Great, because putting your internet balls on the line is really a tough thing to do.

I mean if you are wrong, you loose all your credibility on, omfg, a internet forum.

So here goes, I say we are not going to get to 40 wins this year, we will top out at 33 mas, and I will consider this a total failure, a a sing for IT to be let go.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
8/19/2006  6:45 PM
among other people!
Posted by simrud:

a sing sign for IT to be let go.

all kool aid all the time.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
8/20/2006  7:54 PM
Posted by rvhoss:

among other people!
Posted by simrud:

a sing sign for IT to be let go.

Uh oh, simrud is gonna sing???
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
8/20/2006  8:23 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by nyk4ever:

If the Knicks play Team basketball and Marbury, Curry, Frye are all playing good defense you can come knocking at my door and I will be right there saying you guys were right. I'm firm in my beliefs but I also know when I'm wrong. I don't think I'll be wrong here but I'll be happy if I am because if those guys do that than the Knicks will be winning basketball games and that is by far the most important thing.

How about if the team simply WINS no matter how it gets that done? Its to vague to say playing good defense. If they play well enough to win games that is sufficient. Not every team is going to be good on both ends. Tho I expect the defense to be better than last year. For one thing there will be consistency and that alone helps ANY team to play better defense. I'm not expecting miracles tho. Having Jared will help cuz now at least we have someone who can hold his own in most cases at the SF spot where we often got torched.

Look this is an OFFENSIVE team and if we're functioning on a high level as we should that will put more pressure on the other team. We didn't see that last year for a lot of reasons. Tho this team should've been a VERY good offensive team. I expect that to actually happen this year. I thought we'd have to win with our offense last year and nothing much has changed. Sure we'll have to be better defensively, but this ain't the Pistons. In truth teams often blew us out, cuz we SUCKED on offense. It was easy to defend our lame attack thanks to LB. We made too many TO's, most of which were unforced. I think that will change due to having an offense that actually fits the players strengths. We're gonna put points up and we'll have to use TIMELY defensive stops to win games, cuz we can't expect this team to defend great for 48 minutes. Its just not equipped to be that kind of team. But I think you'll all be pleasantly surprised with how much better we look on D this year. We may start off slow, but I expect things to pick up as the team gets more familiar with the new system.

Why the hell must Knick fans keep settling for mediocrity. The only way you get anywhere in this league is by playing defense. The offense comes for EVERY team but what seperates the good teams from the bad teams are the ones that play defense. I'm sick of the Knicks not playing any defense, they haven't played defense since Ewing, LJ, Spree, Houston were here. Winning games is nice but if you don't win with playing some semblance of defense then your not getting anywhere in this league. I don't want the defense to come in a few years, I want the defensive mentality instilled the first practice for the coming season, not midway through, not at the all-star break, the first practice.

Offense keeps you in games but Defense wins them.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 08-19-2006 4:11 PM]

If you were paying attention you would've noticed that defense was on the minds of our players in Summer League and on the lips of Isiah and the coaching staff. He has no intention of letting them feel its ok not to play hard on D. Did you just take a super long vacation or did you just ignore the fact that Isiah got a bunch of defensive players for this team. One who will be a starter, in Jared Jeffries. Cleearly he wants the team to play better D. However, tho I expect a better effort, that still won't mean we'll be a top defensive team, nor does it mean we have to be the best. This is a PROCESS and this team has so many young players that its gonna take time for us to develop great defensive chemistry. We're not going from the worst to the best over night. So I'm being reasonable in my expectations for the defense this year. However I expect that the defense will continue to improve steadily. Just don't expect the Pistons lite.

So that's why I say we'll win games more with our offense than our D. We'll play just enough D to win games.

nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
8/20/2006  11:44 PM
Posted by nixluva:


If you were paying attention you would've noticed that defense was on the minds of our players in Summer League and on the lips of Isiah and the coaching staff. He has no intention of letting them feel its ok not to play hard on D. Did you just take a super long vacation or did you just ignore the fact that Isiah got a bunch of defensive players for this team. One who will be a starter, in Jared Jeffries. Cleearly he wants the team to play better D. However, tho I expect a better effort, that still won't mean we'll be a top defensive team, nor does it mean we have to be the best. This is a PROCESS and this team has so many young players that its gonna take time for us to develop great defensive chemistry. We're not going from the worst to the best over night. So I'm being reasonable in my expectations for the defense this year. However I expect that the defense will continue to improve steadily. Just don't expect the Pistons lite.

So that's why I say we'll win games more with our offense than our D. We'll play just enough D to win games.

Wow, so your saying just because a FEW guys on the summerleague roster played defense; mind you guys that are fighting just to earn the right to play in the NBA. So because they played defense now players like Stephon Marbury, Steve Francis, Eddy Curry, Jerome James, Maurice Taylor etc etc are going to now start playing defense? These guys all have their guarenteed contracts, they will play in the NBA again if they are cut or traded from the Knicks, these guys don't have a THING to worry about, which is much much much different than the guys who played on the summer roster have to worry about.

Defense is about WILL, nothing more nothing less. If your in the NBA, then you can play defense, you just have to want to and clearly these Knick players(minus Crawford, Lee, Jeffries) don't want to play defense because they haven't played it for the Knicks or for any other team. According to you though, now that Isiah is the coach, the team is magically going to change and he's going to say, play defense and their going to run right out there and play defense. I'm sorry but I don't see that happening not with the personalities that are on this team and not with the way they've conducted themselves in the past with other teams and with the Knicks.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Masterplan
Posts: 21571
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2002
Member: #362
8/20/2006  11:52 PM
If you were paying attention you would've noticed that defense was on the minds of our players in Summer League and on the lips of Isiah and the coaching staff. He has no intention of letting them feel its ok not to play hard on D.

not to open up a can of worms or anything, but that sounds a lot like last summer/last coach...
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
8/21/2006  12:51 AM
Posted by Masterplan:
If you were paying attention you would've noticed that defense was on the minds of our players in Summer League and on the lips of Isiah and the coaching staff. He has no intention of letting them feel its ok not to play hard on D.

not to open up a can of worms or anything, but that sounds a lot like last summer/last coach...



Too late...



oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
Panos
Posts: 30590
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
8/21/2006  9:17 AM
Posted by oohah:
by "true colors" i mean that they underachieved last year, but we have no real idea how much. the debate is, do we have a team of underacheiving losers, or was it larry's fault? i see no reason this year should be effected by last year. whatever their record is, that is what our team is now. if we win 33 games, IT has assembled an expensive lottery team of losers. if we win 40, we have a borderline playoff team with some youth not yet at their potential that got screwed last season. no excuses.

does that make more sense?

Hmmm, what you say makes absolute sense and it does not contradict what I am saying either.

And let's not forget the original question you asked me: "oohah- so, if we win somewhere in the mid-30's, then does that mean that IT has actually assembled a cast of losers and should be gone?"

This team is pretty much in the exact same spot they were last year. (This is really the only relevance LB has and why we can use his job as a standard.) They are not improved except slightly on paper with JJ2 and Balkman. They do not know each other on the court the way they should, they still need to establish an identity, who the real leaders are, etc... I don't know if you would consider this to be "effected by last year" or not.

All it means is we should not be expecting miracles just because LB has been ejected and IT is standing in his spot. It will take time. This team will have to learn to play together and they will probably take some lumps along the way.

That is why I am looking for a quite reasonable 37-41. Just like I was last year. I hold IT and LB to the same standard. Other guys seem eager to see "Marsiah" fail and have projected "higher minimum wins for satisfaction" based on what "Should have happened last year". This is absurd. We cannot build on something that never happened. They cannot build on a non-existant result.

What should have happened last year is what better happen this year: The Knicks should be reasonably competitive, contend for a playoff spot and hopefully make the playoffs. But if It wins just 37, he has shown what I would have expected last year, and I will be satisfied, though not happy.

I think that is fair and reasonable, don't you?

oohah



[Edited by - oohah on 08-18-2006 4:36 PM]


I disagree that we have the same team as last year at this time.
Last year we didn't have the predicament of having both Marbs and Francis on the same team
This is the single biggest potential for terrible chemistry that we have on this team.
Until proven otherwise, I consider this a *major* roster flaw.
TheGame
Posts: 26652
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
8/21/2006  9:55 AM
Defense is about WILL, nothing more nothing less. If your in the NBA, then you can play defense, you just have to want to and clearly these Knick players(minus Crawford, Lee, Jeffries) don't want to play defense because they haven't played it for the Knicks or for any other team. According to you though, now that Isiah is the coach, the team is magically going to change and he's going to say, play defense and their going to run right out there and play defense. I'm sorry but I don't see that happening not with the personalities that are on this team and not with the way they've conducted themselves in the past with other teams and with the Knicks.

I agree to a certain extent defense is about will. However, you also need instincts, quick reaction time, lateral quickness, strength, and discipline to study opponents. On this team, I think Lee, JJ2, and Q-Rich are solid defenders. Frye, Marbury, and Crawford showed last year that they were committed to try and play defense but were still only average at it. Francise and Curry have a long way to go and I doubt Francise will ever play defense. With this group of players, this team is likely to only be average on defense at best. What gives me hope this year is that IT is not going to take LB's approach. LB basically said you will play defense or else and I am going to mess with your playing time and rotations until you play defense how I want you to play it and at the same time I am going to be calling to have you traded from the team. IT is going to demand that players play defense, but is going to understand that Curry is not going to become Ewing and Fyre is not going to become Oakley. In addition to defense, he is going focus on allowing these guys to do what they do well, which is score points. If the offense plays at an above average level and the defense can consistently be average, this team will win alot of games. Dallas used to win all the time like this and Phoenix is doing it now. IT is trying to get us there. Then, as with Dallas and Phoenix, once we establish an offensive identity, we can then focus on improving the defense to get us to a championship level. That's how Dallas got to the Finals, by adding defense players to complement their offensive players and convincing the offensive players to focus a little more on defense.
Trust the Process
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
8/21/2006  10:00 AM
I refuse to measure this team on wins. To me it just sounds funny to say if we win 37 games it's a success but if we win 33 grrrrr...It all stinks. The fact that we have 2 "superstars" in the backcourt and guys on the roster that have produced at other places and are still hoping for 30+ wins says so much about our situation. Wins cannot be an issue. Talentwise this team should win 50 games. But they won't because of chemistry.

So technically anything less than 50 wins is failure. 33-41 wins is abysmal. But I'm also realistic and I know what we have. I know our problem is chemistry and not talent. So a successful season for me is very different. Instead of wins I am looking for nightly effort and no excuses. When things go wrong I don't want players saying it's the coach or the system or their teammates because this just means there is nothing they can do to improve the situation so why try. What I want are players that take personal accountability. That play hard. When things go wrong, they play harder. When things go wrong they beleive in their coach, the system and their teammates more. I want professionals, not babies. If Isiah can pull that off that would be success for me. 33-37 wins is unimportant.

[Edited by - bippity10 on 08-21-2006 10:02 AM]
I just hope that people will like me
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
8/21/2006  9:36 PM
Funny thing is, every player on a bad team always say, it's really not the coachs falt, hardly anyone ever says, I DONT HAVE ENOUGH TALANT AROUND ME, and u never hear it's management. LB was as obvious as it gets, But our 2 previous coachs were just as bad as any we ever had. Talant or no talant and to top it off were never given a fair shot, just like the numerous payers that have come and gone since JVG.
ES
starbury on cold pizza this morning

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy