[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Islesfan, Fish....for the last time....Brown Wanted Francis & Rose
Author Thread
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

6/16/2006  3:54 PM
On the francis trade....

Some deals had Cato coming along with him from Orlando. Others had him involved in three way deals that would have included Earl Watson and K-Mart.

i think it's fair to assume it was the additional guys who Brown was most interested in and Francis was just a vehicle to obtain them. But Isiah didn't want to give anything up, he's only interested in adding, even if they have bad attitudes and are redundant.

Brown wanted Jalen and Francis for what else they could bring, if not in the original deals then in subsequent ones. But all he got was the was the vehicle, without the supposed cargo in the trunk.
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/16/2006  3:59 PM
Those are bizarre assumptions based on Brown's actual statements
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
6/16/2006  4:00 PM
Everybody on the team had worst seasons then last year. No story, no probablys, no mind readings, no 500 word post. Everyone on the team, period. If you are working on a car and the more screws you tighten the more the car smokes ................ you don't continue to do the same thing. YOu don't gun the engine more when the trunk is on FIRE!!!
Horrible.... this season was so horrible nobody can calm what brown was trying to do.




Other then that he was sabotaging the season.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

6/16/2006  4:59 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

Those are bizarre assumptions based on Brown's actual statements


Lord knows who you are talking to or about what, but I'll bite:

Oh yeah, like what?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/16/2006  5:36 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Those are bizarre assumptions based on Brown's actual statements


Lord knows who you are talking to or about what, but I'll bite:

Oh yeah, like what?
See statements by Brown at the beginning of this thread. None mention interest in any "other players"; they all express extremely high praise for/interest in J. Rose and Francis

BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

6/16/2006  6:36 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by BlueSeats:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Those are bizarre assumptions based on Brown's actual statements


Lord knows who you are talking to or about what, but I'll bite:

Oh yeah, like what?
See statements by Brown at the beginning of this thread. None mention interest in any "other players"; they all express extremely high praise for/interest in J. Rose and Francis

Man you're a lazy poster. How 'bout quoting things you consider crucial to your case?

Are these to quotes to which you refer?
This is Brown and Thomas discussing Francis and Rose......
Quote:
"He's exactly what we need," Brown said before the game. "I think it's a no-brainer. I haven't seen a drop-off in his game. We don't have enough ball-handlers, guys that have experience back there."


Quote:
“This is a move that coach and I have been talking about and we are both in agreement. This is a (small forward) spot where he’s had a lot of people trying to fill that void. This is a player that Larry wanted. And I will continue to go out and try to get the players that he wants.”


Those came after the trade when they were in PR mode. What do you expect, Brown to hold a press conference to say "Isiah stuck me with these guys" so you can declare him in breech of contract or something?

How abouty looking at some trade rumors from that time. Here, I'll kick us off:

According to a league source, the Knicks have offered Penny Hardaway's expiring contract to Denver plus another player. The Knicks may be forced to part with rookie David Lee, but they insist on not giving up Frye.

"It seems like everyone wants Frye," said one GM. "I think that's why the Knicks are going to keep him."

Denver is working on several deals, including a trade for Orlando's Steve Francis. But in order to get Francis, the Nuggets want to rid themselves of Martin's contract, which calls for him to make $65 million over the next four years. With Carmelo Anthony looming as a restricted free agent, the Nuggets are reluctant to go over the luxury tax threshold in the future.

The Knicks are willing to provide Denver with salary cap relief but not at the expense of losing Frye, their top rookie. A deal for Martin likely would include point guard Earl Watson and guard Voshon Lenard heading to New York, with Jamal Crawford and Trevor Ariza going to Orlando along with the Nuggets' Nene. The Nuggets would get Francis.

Orlando, like the Knicks, is desperately trying to revamp its team. The Magic have another deal in place with the Pistons that includes Darko Milicic and Carlos Arroyo coming to Orlando in return for Kelvin Cato and a first-round pick. That deal is contingent on Orlando's three-team trade with the Knicks and Denver being completed.

Martin would provide the Knicks with a rugged power forward to play alongside Eddy Curry, whom Larry Brown feels doesn't rebound or defend enough. The addition of Watson would give Brown the flexibility of moving Stephon Marbury to shooting guard, a position Brown feels best suits him. Marbury is currently sidelined with a sore left shoulder. The Knicks entered last night's game against Dallas 0-9 in games Marbury has missed.

Even when Marbury was healthy, Brown bemoaned the team's lack of a backup point. Crawford and rookie Nate Robinson are more suited to play shooting guard, which is why the Knicks traded for Jalen Rose two weeks ago.

A deal for Watson wouldn't be the last move that Thomas, the Knicks' president, makes this month. Because Brown is unhappy with the roster, Thomas is committed to making changes in order to placate his coach.

One of those deals includes the Knicks trying to acquire Seattle power forwards Reggie Evans and/or Danny Fortson.

Thomas also has interest in Cleveland's Drew Gooden, whom the Knicks nearly acquired last year for Kurt Thomas before the Cavs pulled out of the deal at the last minute.

Originally published on February 14, 2006



Orlando GM On Francis Trade: 'Still In The Process'
16th February, 2006 - 3:57 am
NY Post - The Knicks have been speaking to Orlando about Steve Francis for 10 days, offering Penny Hardaway's expiring contract in a would-be megadeal.

But the Magic traded center Kelvin Cato — a piece of a proposed Knick deal — to Detroit last night, a move that could make any deal a longshot bid, team sources said.

"We're no closer to getting Francis than we were 10 days ago," said one Knicks official, bleakly.

If the Orlando-Knicks talks are deadened, it could spring Denver back into action and revive the three-team deal that would send Francis to the Nuggets and point guard Earl Watson to the Knicks. Watson is the backup point guard Brown believes his team needs.



The deals that Brown was interested in didn't materialize and he got stuck with the pieces he cared less about.



Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/16/2006  7:01 PM
I'm still waiting to read statements--even ONE--by Brown himself saying he was interested in any of the players you're referring to. I don't care what some reporter thinks Brown might be interested in.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/16/2006  7:02 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

I'm still waiting to read statements--even ONE--by Brown himself saying he was interested in any of the players you're referring to. I don't care what some reporter thinks Brown might be interested in.


you do realize that if brown actually said those player names it would be considered tampering.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/16/2006  7:56 PM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by Bonn1997:

I'm still waiting to read statements--even ONE--by Brown himself saying he was interested in any of the players you're referring to. I don't care what some reporter thinks Brown might be interested in.


you do realize that if brown actually said those player names it would be considered tampering.
It depends on what he says. I've seen people give away their views without technically tampering, saying to a reporter something like, "You know I can't comment on my interest in specific players, but XXXX is the *type* of player who would fill a lot of team's needs."
That's still far from indicating he wants the player on his team, but I'd at least give more than five seconds of attention to that kind of comment (unlike some reporter's unquoted feelings/beliefs).




[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 06-16-2006 8:02 PM]
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
6/17/2006  1:37 AM
I reading all of these replies and checking my dictionary's thesaurus trying to figure out were saying Brown wanted other players but was stuck with Rose and Francis equals Brown didn't want/get/push for them??? Or he cared less for, or they where on the bottom of his list or settled for them or he wanted them the least absolve the fact that he WANTED THEM??? Isn't the argument over once you admit this?!?!?!?!?!?!? Even if only a tiny, little, ity bit.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
6/17/2006  2:25 AM
Posted by BlueSeats:

1) if we sat Marbury, Q, Crawford, Curry, etc, and won 23 games with the rookies people would be killing Larry for benching our "best" players.

2) isiah and dolan would be up in arms that Larry was wasting their 125M roster.

3) this NYC scrutiny and pressure is not good for rookies. It's simply not wise to make THEM try to carry us to the playoffs, which certainly was the directive.

4) creeps like Marbury, Francis and Mo were whining enough as it was; can you imagine if they were all benched for kids? talk about a mutiny!!!

5) two rookies ranked 4th and 5th in total minutes in a season without a draft pick. The were edged out only by Marbury, Crawford and Curry. The year prior, when draft positioning mattered and the coaches were dominated by Isiah, the top 5 were all veterans.

Just accept that this team was not constructed to feature rookies last year. It was constructed for guys like Marbury, crawford, Q, AD, M. Rose, and James to carry the team while the rookies learned the ropes and increased their role as the year wore on.

The problem was that the veterans came into camp out of shape and with their egos up their butts and they slacked themselves into deficits they couldn't pull themselves out of. The rookies got cast into situations they weren't prepared for, and shouldn't have been expected to shoulder. But the veterans provided zero positive leadership, and then had the gall to get b/tchy when their heads and hearts got called into question. They let themselves be shown up and embarrassed NBDL refuges, and rookies.

Everyone says Brown should have established roles. He did, the veterans were assigned to start and be the leaders.

THEY FAILED HIM.

Marbury, Q, AD, Curry.

Which of them best fulfilled their role?

Marbury, the guard brown gave more freedom to than any other but who could never quit get any system that didn't entail him freelancing to his heart's content?

Q, who entered the season with a bad back and ankle befor ehis brother was murdered?

AD, who got suspended just when we got cooking?

Curry, who's "condition" justified him being out of condition?

What about Jerome James, our other "starting" center? The guy who halfway thru the season he was still begging out after 5 minutes of play?

But if Brown actually gave up on those 125M veterans- who isiah, dolan and so many fans had invested so much hope and expectations in - where would that leave us? People say that Brown killed everyones trade value. Well what would having guys like Marbury and Curry playing BEHIND Nate and Butler do to their trade value?

4 potential lottery picks were given up for just those two, but they should play behind the 5'7 21st pick and a 6'8 undrafted NBDL center?

So what did Larry do? He kept the expectations on the veterans to show leadership and to bear the pressure of the season while still allowing the opportunity for the kids to grow. Nobody got a free ride and nobody got shut out. There was a leadership vacuum that anybody was allowed to fill.

Who did best fill the leadership vacuum? Probably Malik, QR, Crawford, and Frye. (You can add Nate for his work on the floor but off the floor leaves questions. And Lee is still an unknown but shows promise.)

Don't like 'em as leaders? Is that Brown's fault, or Isiah's?

Please don't expect a poor rookie to have to unseat the Grand Negative: Mr Starbury. Remember: "he's the second most important person in the organization after dolan. And he's not in play and he'll never be in play. We don't get down like that!!!"

But what if we get him and his ilk out of here and see what some positive people can do?

Some of you guys are so afraid of what Brown will do to the roster - like that he wants all aged veterans. Have you really convinced yourselves that he wants to trade Nate, Butler, Frye, Lee, Crawford, etc so he can add cripple braindeads to add to Marbury, Francis, Jalen, and Jerome?

Just get rid of the poisons and let the guys who can lead lead and have the others get out of the damn way. Our problem wasn't that brown didn't establish roles or that the kids didn't get enough time, it was that the veterans failed in their roles, and that put all of the coach, management and the rookies in extremely difficult and awkward positions.

fantastic post......
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
6/17/2006  11:29 PM
BlueSeats you are wasting your time. The people who hate Brown and are picking IT over him are not rational. Nalod already mentioned that there are reasons other than basketball inovolved, but I'm not gonna get into that, too ugly a topic. Either way it seems he'll be gone regardless, so no point to agrue. Just seat back and enjoy as IT will crash and burn as the head coach.

I for once will not watch a game or buy anything having to do with the Knicks untill IT is gone if they really do fire Brown.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
rojasmas
Posts: 21207
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/25/2004
Member: #639
6/17/2006  11:32 PM
Poor Simrud. His uncle LB is going, going, gone. And such a resume. I wonder what went wrong this year.
We could be the Dallas Mavs of the East.
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
6/17/2006  11:36 PM
What went wrong is reatards like you who will still come to games next year. And then after another 30 win season will buy Marbury's jersey and come again.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
rojasmas
Posts: 21207
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/25/2004
Member: #639
6/17/2006  11:42 PM
Yeah, you got me down. Dude you may be the most clueless poster on the board. You insult but know nothing and besides can't spell. Get an education.
We could be the Dallas Mavs of the East.
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
6/18/2006  7:22 PM
I'm sorry for not spellchecking my internet forum posts numnuts. I'm willin to bet I have more education than your GED. People like you deserve the current Knick team. Stupidity personified.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
Islesfan, Fish....for the last time....Brown Wanted Francis & Rose

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy