What is a "doompah" poo-seats? Is that the best you can come up with? Pathetic.
Nice try at the soft back-peddle, but I'm not asking for favors.
What the f are you talking about? The reason I said I would have eaten my words is because you already ate yours when you changed your sentence into what it should have been. Blueseats, that was an admission.
Dude, what you are about is slander, nothing more, nothing less.
Slander you say! And I am the one who needs to get over myself? I am the one with delusions of grandeur? This is an internet board dude! You keep going on about credibility and reputations. What I said must have cut real deep! You must worry about me a little too much! Lick your wounds and stop crying!
By the way, slander is verbal. The word you are looking for is libel. Okay Hemingway?
You accuse me of making stuff up and passing them off as facts while presenting nothing to even refute my assertions. Have you proved brown has a LARGE playbook? No!!!
Your reading is as poor as your writing. The point is that we don't know if Brown has a big or small playbook, while you are going around writing as if you know, providing a false foundation for the rest of your theories.
You merely repeat your slanders and and perpetuatt your ill-formed accusations. Truth be told, it is you who've made stuff up and passed it off as fact in your accusations against me.
Right, because it is common knowledge that Marbury led a coup d'etat against the coach. I guess you did not make that up. My bad.
And you think the more boisterous and attention mongering you become the farther from sight that truth becomes. Doesn't work that way, doompah.
Damn, you ran out of basketball argument over a week ago, and you have spent all that time since them festering with anger and insults. What a sad little sucker you are.
I think you've done a better job at establishing yourself as a world-class attention whore.
Who called who out? Wouldn't the caller be the one wo is looking for attention? I'll bet you won't answer that question!
The attention whore is the pansy who is worried about people libeling his credibility and reputation.
If you can't even get the timeline straight of who began the insults and rehetoric in this thread and the last, how can you be expected to have a trustworthy recounting of what happened during the basketball season?
Answer: You can't.
To compensate for your feelings of inadequacies you perform all kinds of acts of grandiouslity, from your hoilier-than-thou stance throughout, to now positing yourself as some sort of mentor or professor.
Yes, I am the one compensating, because I am so wound up about someone insulting my credibility and reputation. Oh wait, that is you.
You should look at me as your professor since I obviously look at your posts with more scrutiny than you do. And one thing I am certain of, when you next post one of you boring as turd article-clipping posts, you will check your facts a lot harder and trim much more of the innuendo, so I have done us all a favor.
You convince yourself each of your posts are so special that you sign them individually, (with a quill pen perhas?) as if some day you'll sell them.
I love the way guys interpret the simple signing of a post. It says so much about where their head is at. In your case it is so telling especially since you are all wound up with "slander", "reputation", and "credibility".
Try to stand on your own blueseats, even if it is against the tide. You don't need a fan club. Oh, well maybe you do, but I don't.
Bitter, unfulfilled, possibly unloved. At the slightest provocations you initiate and perpetuate massive extravaganzas of pettiness. ("I called you a 'd.ckhead,' but you paraphrased it as 'c.cksucker.' You're a lying cheat and that proves it!", etc). You've tried to assault me on every ground from intelligence, through deciet, to grammatical deficiencies.
Of course you will ignore that all insults were begun by you, the same way you ignore 50% of the evidence that does not support your preconcieved 'points'.
And I am really not trying to insult your poor grammar and lack of knowledge of the definitions of the words you insist on using. I am trying to help you out, so you say what you really mean. That way you won't have to go back and change things up like you have so many times in our discussions.
By the way, I'm so bitter that I came seeking you out to put you in your place. Oh wait, that was you.
You seem to turn your torrent of hate, that is usually focused inwardly as self-loathing, outward at a straw-man, like myself, who you can set up to represent all who've left you feeling unnoticed or unappreciated before. Through me you validate your pain and have us all bear witness that with your qualities (like intelligence, anal-retention, and a will to never admit mistakes,) you truly are worthy of recognition, love and respect.
Was the straw-man the one who did not have a heart or a brain? Since we are talking about you, let's go with brain. Go back and look at who has thrown the most insults, go back and look at your motivation for seeking me out to prove me wrong, and you will have your answer about who feels bitter, inadequate, and loathes himself. It seems that a little comment about the poor state of your 'evidence' has shaken you so badly that you can't control yourself.
As a merciful man I'm willing to play that role for you. You clearly find some form of solace and validation for yourself in these otherwise meaningless exchanges, and that pleases me.
This sentence is so convoluted, you are beginning to remind me of those guys who dress up like sinbad and rant and rave in times square.
It is obvious that these exchanges are much more important to you than me, since you have taken the time to seek me out (a week later), and you still cannot cap the rage and hurt bubbling inside of you since I proved that you were full of beans.
Don't worry, I've never held a grudge against anyone in my life, and I'm not about to start with you. Knock yourself out.
I think you'll have to amend that sentence since you have obviously been holding a grudge against since last week, so much so that you felt you had to swoop down on me and put me in my place.
Of course that would require that you be able to wiegh and interpret evidence, not just clip articles in the paper and point at them while going: "what he said!"
oohah
[Edited by - oohah on 05-30-2006 4:33 PM]
5/30/2006 3:31 PM
