[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

crazy question but would you trade curry AND frye for dwight howard?
Author Thread
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/24/2006  3:10 PM
Well for one our record would've been worst and we wouldn't have made the playoffs only to get completely embarrassed by the Nets, so we would've had a great chance at a high lotto pick. I'm still embarrassed as a Knicks Fan living in NJ. and again we wouldn't add salaries like penny, JJ, Baker & Taylor
AUTOADVERT
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
1/24/2006  4:05 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

What would have played out differently in the draft lottery? Which ping pong balls would have come out differently with Knicks logos and why?

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 01-24-2006 3:05 PM]

Unreal he's still stuck on logos as if that's the only thing that changes. Go watch Back to the Future and get back to us.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
MS
Posts: 27063
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
1/24/2006  4:26 PM
Had we not made the Marbury trade we were not getting Howard or Okafur, nor Livingston who is always injured....but Josh Smith or JR Smith would have been there.....Isiah doesn't have a clue in the world how to run a team, we should not be having this discussion because our pick should have be top 5 protected this year.....

And yeah if we get the number one pick this year Isiah should be fired, i like what i see out of the rookies but we'll see if anyone of them is built to be a superstar at both ends of the floor. Frye may turn into Shareef or Zach Randolf.....Nate is going to need sometime to play the game but he is what he is a sixth man that needs to limit his to's....he is a good rebounding energy role player off the bench.....

Teams trade good players for picks or multiple picks that could help build us a strong nuclues........

Crawford and Ariza are not good players lets be realistic people, nor will they ever be......Ariza has no offensive ability none! Crawford gets beat nearly every play and doesn't know how to follow a man around a screen
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
1/24/2006  9:56 PM
Posted by MS:

Had we not made the Marbury trade we were not getting Howard or Okafur, nor Livingston who is always injured....but Josh Smith or JR Smith would have been there.....Isiah doesn't have a clue in the world how to run a team, we should not be having this discussion because our pick should have be top 5 protected this year.....

And yeah if we get the number one pick this year Isiah should be fired, i like what i see out of the rookies but we'll see if anyone of them is built to be a superstar at both ends of the floor. Frye may turn into Shareef or Zach Randolf.....Nate is going to need sometime to play the game but he is what he is a sixth man that needs to limit his to's....he is a good rebounding energy role player off the bench.....

Teams trade good players for picks or multiple picks that could help build us a strong nuclues........

Crawford and Ariza are not good players lets be realistic people, nor will they ever be......Ariza has no offensive ability none! Crawford gets beat nearly every play and doesn't know how to follow a man around a screen


and if we don't, should his job be spared for that reason alone? just doesn't make sense man.
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
1/24/2006  10:05 PM
Posted by tkf:
Posted by MS:

Had we not made the Marbury trade we were not getting Howard or Okafur, nor Livingston who is always injured....but Josh Smith or JR Smith would have been there.....Isiah doesn't have a clue in the world how to run a team, we should not be having this discussion because our pick should have be top 5 protected this year.....

And yeah if we get the number one pick this year Isiah should be fired, i like what i see out of the rookies but we'll see if anyone of them is built to be a superstar at both ends of the floor. Frye may turn into Shareef or Zach Randolf.....Nate is going to need sometime to play the game but he is what he is a sixth man that needs to limit his to's....he is a good rebounding energy role player off the bench.....

Teams trade good players for picks or multiple picks that could help build us a strong nuclues........

Crawford and Ariza are not good players lets be realistic people, nor will they ever be......Ariza has no offensive ability none! Crawford gets beat nearly every play and doesn't know how to follow a man around a screen


and if we don't, should his job be spared for that reason alone? just doesn't make sense man.

For that reason alone should he lose his job? No. Should he lose his job for the cumulative negative effect that all of his moves as GM are going to have on this team for the next 5+ years? Absolutely.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
rojasmas
Posts: 21207
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/25/2004
Member: #639
1/24/2006  11:01 PM
No way. Even if Howard turns out to be Tim Duncan, he can't win by himself. I think the ceiling on Curry and Frye is such that with a star guard, not Marbury, they could win a championship in time if they progress.
We could be the Dallas Mavs of the East.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/24/2006  11:03 PM
Your sig's about a month late!
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/25/2006  12:52 AM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by Killa4luv:

so lets argue about the possibility that a pick that we traded away could have been the #1 pick? This is ridiculous.

There is a possibility that we could have gotten the #1 pick. That possibility was remote. However, we can hypothesize what record we would have had and where we would have picked without the Steph trade and I don't think its reasonable to assume we would have had the #1 or #2 pick.

With the pick that we most reasonably would have had without the Steph trade, we ALREADY know that those other slots did not win the #1 or #2 pick. We can argue over slight possibilities, or we can discuss what is mathmatically, and reasonably most likely.

Is it a possibility that the knicks could have gotten the #1 pick being the 6th seed? Yes.
Has it happened before? Yes, once.
Is it highly unlikely? Yes.
Does it make some people sound bitter when they need to reach back into time to discuss highly unlikely-hypothetical scenarios in order to make a move that they did not like seem exponentially worse?
Yes.

Its stupid to try to equate the Steph trade with passing up on Dwight Howard.

Dwight Howard could have been drafted by New York and got high on cocaine and died. Thats a possibility as well, and that has happened as well. So lets rejoice that we didn't tank and get the #1 pick who died from a cocaine overdose.

[Edited by - killa4luv on 01-24-2006 1:13 PM]

Nobody is trying to say that the Marbury trade equates to us passing up on Dwight Howard. I'm saying it equates to us giving up a potentially high lottery pick in 2004 (Which could have possibly gotten us Howard or Okafor or at the very least a good young player), another unprotected #1 in a few years, large expiring contracts and the financial flexibility that comes with not adding close to $200MM in salaries.
It could have more likely gotten us Josh Smith. It makes more sense to discuss what we would look like with him, not thee worst possible scenario (missing out on Howard or Okafor) especially when they are extremely highly unlikely scenarios.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/25/2006  2:40 AM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by Killa4luv:

so lets argue about the possibility that a pick that we traded away could have been the #1 pick? This is ridiculous.

There is a possibility that we could have gotten the #1 pick. That possibility was remote. However, we can hypothesize what record we would have had and where we would have picked without the Steph trade and I don't think its reasonable to assume we would have had the #1 or #2 pick.

With the pick that we most reasonably would have had without the Steph trade, we ALREADY know that those other slots did not win the #1 or #2 pick. We can argue over slight possibilities, or we can discuss what is mathmatically, and reasonably most likely.

Is it a possibility that the knicks could have gotten the #1 pick being the 6th seed? Yes.
Has it happened before? Yes, once.
Is it highly unlikely? Yes.
Does it make some people sound bitter when they need to reach back into time to discuss highly unlikely-hypothetical scenarios in order to make a move that they did not like seem exponentially worse?
Yes.

Its stupid to try to equate the Steph trade with passing up on Dwight Howard.

Dwight Howard could have been drafted by New York and got high on cocaine and died. Thats a possibility as well, and that has happened as well. So lets rejoice that we didn't tank and get the #1 pick who died from a cocaine overdose.

[Edited by - killa4luv on 01-24-2006 1:13 PM]

Nobody is trying to say that the Marbury trade equates to us passing up on Dwight Howard. I'm saying it equates to us giving up a potentially high lottery pick in 2004 (Which could have possibly gotten us Howard or Okafor or at the very least a good young player), another unprotected #1 in a few years, large expiring contracts and the financial flexibility that comes with not adding close to $200MM in salaries.
It could have more likely gotten us Josh Smith. It makes more sense to discuss what we would look like with him, not thee worst possible scenario (missing out on Howard or Okafor) especially when they are extremely highly unlikely scenarios.

Yeah, Josh Smith, Haffa, maybe Igoudala are more plausible candidates. Not that those are terrible options (other than Haffa) but I'd take Marbury over them by far.


[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 01-25-2006 02:41 AM]
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
1/25/2006  8:44 AM
killa what seed was Orlando when they moved up for Penny?
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/28/2006  1:02 PM
Posted by McK1:

killa what seed was Orlando when they moved up for Penny?

I don't know, but I do know that that was about 12 years ago, maybe I was in high school.

As of the orlando game here are the stats:
Frye 18 and 7
Curry 27 and 10

Howard 10 and 14

Again, I am not disputing the fact that Howard looks to be a complete monster. IF he ever learns some post moves, he has the kind of body to really be able to put some points up. His arms are so stupidly long that he could really be something, its a big part of the reason why he rebounds so well. But there are no signs that he will ever be as dominant as Curry or as effecient as Frye on the offense. Frye and Curry both have very soft hands and Howard does not.

To suggest Howard is better than both of them combined is totally ridiculous. As a rookie Frye averages the virtualy the same points, fg% and half the rebounds as Howard, while playing about 1/3 less minutes. I repeat Frye is a rookie. SO yes Howard is clearly a stud, but the notion that he is worth as much or or will ever have equal or more impact as Frye AND Curry, is totally rididculous. Unless you beleavie he will someday average 30+ and 14.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/28/2006  1:05 PM
AND in the 3 games against Orlando Curry is averaging 26 and 8 shooting 59.5%!!!! And Curry is still learning the game.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/28/2006  1:08 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:

AND in the 3 games against Orlando Curry is averaging 26 and 8 shooting 59.5%!!!! And Curry is still learning the game.

Give me the offer, Ill take Howard for Frye and Curry.
RIP Crushalot😞
PhilinLA
Posts: 24941
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/12/2004
Member: #696
1/28/2006  1:36 PM
Nah, if Howard played for the Knicks, they wouldn't let him get away with all of those fouls.
http://amonthhoffundays.blogspot.com/ We got a ringer.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/28/2006  2:03 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by Killa4luv:

AND in the 3 games against Orlando Curry is averaging 26 and 8 shooting 59.5%!!!! And Curry is still learning the game.

Give me the offer, Ill take Howard for Frye and Curry.
I'd do the deal too but I'm surprised by how much Curry is destroying the Magic with Dwight in the middle.

Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/28/2006  2:28 PM
well both of you guys are idiots.
crazy question but would you trade curry AND frye for dwight howard?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy