The knicks haven't had cap flexibility since the 70's.
You gotta take a chance, and crawford and marbury (cause he came with penny) are taking that chance.
Q is not taking a chance, he's established that he can play with the big boys.
That basically leaves Frye and TT...if one of them step up, we are playoffs second round...if both step up and we get a sprinkle from ANYBODY else...we contend this year!
Posted by bobs3304:
I never said it didn't make sense, but I just don't like it.
Especially with Isiah overpaying for everyone, how can you even expect us to be able to use Crawford and acquisitions like that to bring in a "potential" JO or Artest?
I understand about the whole championship feeling, but again, it just doesn't make sense to me to be SOO over the cap, with contracts lasting the next 2-3 years holding you up, and STILL add all this young talent. How many roster spots do you expect to have - 30?
Only Timmy and Penny will be gone by next year. Everyone else will still be here. Forget cap flexability - we don't even have roster flexability...that's NOT how you build championship teams.
So in my mind, forgoing talent for instant substance is what I'm looking at. It's not ideal, it's not perfect, but it gets the job done.
[Edited by - bobs3304 on 08/02/2005 12:18:17]
all kool aid all the time.