tkf wrote:

mrKnickShot wrote:

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:Tkf I knew you were gonna be around to defend dk but wheres dk to defend himself? A high volume shooters % are skewed to any other kind of shooter. A high volume shooter takes more shots therefore his % will be different that a low volume shooter. Melo has been a high volume shooter all his NBA career,esp when he was in Denver. So this isnt even worth discussion esp with you tkf because you and dk hate Melo anyway.

would you consider kevin durant a high volume shooter? what about wade? Lebron? all of those guys shoot quite a bit and they have or currently shoot over 50% or around that area..

lets go back in time a bit.. reggie miller? bernard king? alex english? all of those guys shot a lot, and they shot a high percentage..

maybe carmelo needs to shoot less........ever thought of that...if carmelo's high volume is hurting his shooting %, therefore in some ways hurting his team... why shoot so much? what is your point here?

how about Kobe?

Your guy ("best since jordan")

41 shots last night. Never stops shooting and is at 45 pct for his career. Heat checks?

Durant, Wade and Lebron are all efficient. Yes.

Your arguments are at times really inconsistent.

with that said when carmelo gets 5 rings, then you can mention him along with kobe....

waves white flag.

Have a nice day - LOL LOL

Btw, mr basketball, 4.6 career assists while essentially being the teams PG is awful. AWFUL!

Phil Jackson seemed to believe in many ways that they won despite him. I am sure you know that he tried to get rid of him numerous times. Yes him. PJAX. His coach - cooch - LOL LMAO

Looks like MDA will get his his sixth ring. LOL

Bonn1997 wrote:TKF has the right idea about the importance of scoring efficiency and should not be afraid to apply that idea consistently. Iverson and Kobe had other strengths but they hurt their teams by taking lots of **** shots. Kobe has the rings for at least three reasons: A) he is very good in all areas of the game other than scoring efficiency, B) he had one of the best coaches ever in the game, and C) regarding quality of teammates, he is probably the luckiest man in the history of the game.

other than passing and assists. He should have and could have done far better here.

Bonn1997 wrote:TKF has the right idea about the importance of scoring efficiency and should not be afraid to apply that idea consistently. Iverson and Kobe had other strengths but they hurt their teams by taking lots of **** shots. Kobe has the rings for at least three reasons: A) he is very good in all areas of the game other than scoring efficiency, B) he had one of the best coaches ever in the game, and C) regarding quality of teammates, he is probably the luckiest man in the history of the game.

IMHO B and C got kobe his rings.Just my opinion

cooch2584 wrote:Anyone notice that once tkf signed off, we havent heard from dk7th. Just saying.

cooch2584 wrote:dk,
You have already insulted one poster in the process of 4 years in getting her diploma in psychology. Your really coming off as a pompous ass and its not name calling because your posts on being a psychologist, shows your pompasity and proves the point. You can not sit there and watch people and call yourself a psychologist. It doesnt work that way.

you're on tilt, cooch. you need to calm down. i have insulted nobody here. there's a difference between an outright insult and someone taking frivolous offense at an observation.

as to tkf and me, he understands the game and sees things as i do-- therefore he is an excellent basketball mind. and people who do not agree with his views are automatically stupid basketball fans.

here's how you can tell the difference between me and tkf: i am not a fan of iverson at all or bryant for that matter and he seems to be somewhat of a fan of both. in fact i maintain that bryant has underachieved his entire career, which i am sure tkf disagrees with. we also don't see eye to eye about blake griffin. he doesn't think much of griffin while i think he can become great.

we both dislike melo and melo's game but i hold my nose and try my best to see the good and the improvement in his game, though it is challenging.

but outside of this we both like the same sort of player. here's my list of guys who play the game the right way:

marc gasol
joakim noah
duncan
ginobili
pierce
garnett
horford
paul
rondo
dre miller
gallinari yes i went there

there are others but these come to mind.

if you don't like my posts remember the ignore button!

dk7th wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:dk,
You have already insulted one poster in the process of 4 years in getting her diploma in psychology. Your really coming off as a pompous ass and its not name calling because your posts on being a psychologist, shows your pompasity and proves the point. You can not sit there and watch people and call yourself a psychologist. It doesnt work that way.

you're on tilt, cooch. you need to calm down. i have insulted nobody here. there's a difference between an outright insult and someone taking frivolous offense at an observation.

as to tkf and me, he understands the game and sees things as i do-- therefore he is an excellent basketball mind. and people who do not agree with his views are automatically stupid basketball fans.

here's how you can tell the difference between me and tkf: i am not a fan of iverson at all or bryant for that matter and he seems to be somewhat of a fan of both. in fact i maintain that bryant has underachieved his entire career, which i am sure tkf disagrees with. we also don't see eye to eye about blake griffin. he doesn't think much of griffin while i think he can become great.

we both dislike melo and melo's game but i hold my nose and try my best to see the good and the improvement in his game, though it is challenging.

but outside of this we both like the same sort of player. here's my list of guys who play the game the right way:

marc gasol
joakim noah
duncan
ginobili
pierce
garnett
horford
paul
rondo
dre miller
gallinari yes i went there

there are others but these come to mind.

if you don't like my posts remember the ignore button!

So it was "frivolous offense" that a woman thats going to school for her psychology degree, amid spending bu ku bucks and hours of hard work was offended that you "self proclaimed" yourself a psychologist? Again explain this to all of us.

Gallo flops like a fish and "plays the game like its supposed to be played?"
Pierce and Garnett are 2 of the dirtiest players ever in the NBA and they are the same as gallo, playing the game wise. I agree with the others but you get no points for that.

dk7th wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:dk,
You have already insulted one poster in the process of 4 years in getting her diploma in psychology. Your really coming off as a pompous ass and its not name calling because your posts on being a psychologist, shows your pompasity and proves the point. You can not sit there and watch people and call yourself a psychologist. It doesnt work that way.

you're on tilt, cooch. you need to calm down. i have insulted nobody here. there's a difference between an outright insult and someone taking frivolous offense at an observation.

as to tkf and me, he understands the game and sees things as i do-- therefore he is an excellent basketball mind. and people who do not agree with his views are automatically stupid basketball fans.

here's how you can tell the difference between me and tkf: i am not a fan of iverson at all or bryant for that matter and he seems to be somewhat of a fan of both. in fact i maintain that bryant has underachieved his entire career, which i am sure tkf disagrees with. we also don't see eye to eye about blake griffin. he doesn't think much of griffin while i think he can become great.

we both dislike melo and melo's game but i hold my nose and try my best to see the good and the improvement in his game, though it is challenging.

but outside of this we both like the same sort of player. here's my list of guys who play the game the right way:

marc gasol
joakim noah
duncan
ginobili
pierce
garnett
horford
paul
rondo
dre miller
gallinari yes i went there

there are others but these come to mind.

if you don't like my posts remember the ignore button!

Gallinari costs his team a game against the Lakers because of his flopping and KG punched Frye in the balls while he was in mid air. Thats playing the game the right way?

tkf wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:Anyone notice that once tkf signed off, we havent heard from dk7th. Just saying.

It's scary that you're following them that closely

exactly.. but this is typical side barring.. his argument has been smashed, now it is time to deflect..

Im not deflecting jack, I hit you with facts and you ran with your tail between your legs. "Gotta catch a flight" your a joke tkf

TeamBall wrote:

dk7th wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:dk,
You have already insulted one poster in the process of 4 years in getting her diploma in psychology. Your really coming off as a pompous ass and its not name calling because your posts on being a psychologist, shows your pompasity and proves the point. You can not sit there and watch people and call yourself a psychologist. It doesnt work that way.

you're on tilt, cooch. you need to calm down. i have insulted nobody here. there's a difference between an outright insult and someone taking frivolous offense at an observation.

as to tkf and me, he understands the game and sees things as i do-- therefore he is an excellent basketball mind. and people who do not agree with his views are automatically stupid basketball fans.

here's how you can tell the difference between me and tkf: i am not a fan of iverson at all or bryant for that matter and he seems to be somewhat of a fan of both. in fact i maintain that bryant has underachieved his entire career, which i am sure tkf disagrees with. we also don't see eye to eye about blake griffin. he doesn't think much of griffin while i think he can become great.

we both dislike melo and melo's game but i hold my nose and try my best to see the good and the improvement in his game, though it is challenging.

but outside of this we both like the same sort of player. here's my list of guys who play the game the right way:

marc gasol
joakim noah
duncan
ginobili
pierce
garnett
horford
paul
rondo
dre miller
gallinari yes i went there

there are others but these come to mind.

if you don't like my posts remember the ignore button!

Gallinari costs his team a game against the Lakers because of his flopping and KG punched Frye in the balls while he was in mid air. Thats playing the game the right way?

every player at some time cost his team a game.. but gallo has won two games this year with solid defense and playing the right way..

btw: were you impressed with the meltdowns carmelo has been having this year? just asking..

tkf wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:

tkf wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

cooch2584 wrote:Anyone notice that once tkf signed off, we havent heard from dk7th. Just saying.

It's scary that you're following them that closely

exactly.. but this is typical side barring.. his argument has been smashed, now it is time to deflect..

Im not deflecting jack, I hit you with facts and you ran with your tail between your legs. "Gotta catch a flight" your a joke tkf

your facts are irrelevant... they have not supported any of your arguments, and I am being kind calling them that...

Thats loser talk tkf,point out how my facts are irrelevant.CALLING YOU OUT RIGHT NOW oh but you have a flight to catch I bet