[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Bush reelected :-(
Author Thread
MaTT4281
Posts: 34894
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
5/19/2006  12:58 AM
This thread is going terribly terribly wrong

On the bright side....900!
AUTOADVERT
MaTT4281
Posts: 34894
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
5/20/2006  12:43 AM
899
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
5/20/2006  10:26 PM
because we can never get enough of this picture:

Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
5/21/2006  7:28 AM
http://www.counterbias.com/650.html
Thank God for George W. Bush
As the Bush presidency implodes, let us thank a wise and merciful God for the wonderful job W is doing to discredit the whole hateful conservative agenda


May 19 2006
Counterbias.com
STEVE HOROWITZ


Sept. 11, 2001, was doubly tragic for our nation. For Osama bin Laden may have been even more diabolical than we think. Not only did his hijackers succeed in killing nearly 3,000 Americans; that was damaging enough. But he made sure that a laughing stock of a president would finally seem presidential. And might be able to ride a wave of national anguish and fear into an eight-year orgy of subverting long-cherished American ideals. (Instead of what otherwise would certainly have been the quickly forgotten four-year watch of a quickly forgotten man.)

Bin Laden knew that no foreigner could destroy what America stands for; only an American could do that. And, indeed, Karl Rove ably exploited the 9/11 tragedy for years, keeping the American people reliably distracted from the harm Bush was doing. For that America will be paying the consequences for generations -- and may indeed never recover. Which is, I believe, the true genius of bin Laden's plan.

But now, nearly five years later, George Bush's incompetence is once again shining brightly for all to see. No one can avoid it -- not even the willfully blind know-nothings referred to as his "base." And as his approval ratings take on Nixonian dimensions, we should at least say thanks. Because he's doing what we, his passionately patriotic opponents, never could: making it undeniably clear that the worst president in American history will have served in our lifetimes. And that every view he has espoused, every plan he's proposed, is a bad idea, since no one as malicious and ignorant as he is could have a good idea.

It should have been clear to all when he made his less-than-Solomonic decision on stem cell research, in the halcyon days before 9/11. Remember how hard he thought; how many important people he consulted! His little brain nearly burst a capillary, so strenuously was it exercised. And then ... and THEN ... he announced it. A decision based on inaccurate information and false assumptions, and immediately deemed inadequate by informed citizens on both sides of the issue.

Such would have been the legacy of the Bush presidency when it ended, with no one regretting it, in January 2005.

The 9/11 attacks saved him from that ignominious fate. But only temporarily, as we are seeing now.

Social Security. Warrantless domestic eavesdropping. The Medicare prescription scam. Katrina. The video showing Bush being warned about Katrina's potential for unprecedented damage and suffering, after he denied being warned.

Tom DeLay. Duke Cunningham. Jack Abramoff. The Dubai ports deal. The continuing Iraq disaster. The continuing stream of information proving he lied to get us into that disaster, after claiming that the many mistakes he made in the run-up to war were honest and unintentional.

The reckless fiscal policy. The feckless foreign policy. The CIA leak case. The incapacitating plunge in morale at the CIA, leading to the resignation of his handpicked choice for director -- all this time after 9/11, while he claimed he was making us safer.

His failures and deceptions are breathtaking in scope, almost inconceivable in harm. But at least even people who voted for him twice can see them now. Because everything Bush has said and done reveals him to be an idiot, a liar, a criminal, or all three.

Bush's credibility is now such that he could propose a tree-planting initiative, and people would conclude that trees must be harmful to the environment. He could suggest sending blankets and canned goods to Darfur, and we'd remember that suffering builds character.

He could go on television with a solution to illegal immigration, and we'd decide that all borders, visas and passports should be abolished.

So thanks, George. The things you supposedly stand for -- smaller government, fiscal responsibility, "traditional values," the "right to life," -- are now exposed as empty slogans and cynical campaign ploys. You've shown -- much better than I ever could -- that the true agenda of Republicans is to acquire and retain power by the most ruthless and undemocratic methods; to expand the ever-growing gap between the rich and the rest of us; and to make intolerance once again as American as apple pie.

Finally, George Bush has succeeded at something.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
MaTT4281
Posts: 34894
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
5/21/2006  5:35 PM
898
martin
Posts: 76268
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/23/2006  12:18 AM
it's a freakishly long article but we should all bone up on this 2008 prospect.

The Comeback Kid
As Democrats worry about their 2008 chances, out of the wilderness comes a stranger to save them. Wait a minute. That’s no stranger. that’s . . . Al Gore!?!

http://www.newyorkmag.com/news/politics/17065/
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
MaTT4281
Posts: 34894
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
5/23/2006  11:37 PM
5/24/06
895
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
5/25/2006  8:15 AM
Posted by MaTT4281:

5/24/06
895

are you consolidating days now?

will it hasten his departure?
MaTT4281
Posts: 34894
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
5/25/2006  3:14 PM
Lil reminder that it was for the 24th, not the 23rd.
Anyways 854
MaTT4281
Posts: 34894
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
5/26/2006  5:11 AM
853
MaTT4281
Posts: 34894
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
5/27/2006  3:13 AM
852
MaTT4281
Posts: 34894
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
5/28/2006  12:42 AM
851
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
5/29/2006  7:14 AM
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article621189.ece

Bush 'planted fake news stories on American TV'
By Andrew Buncombe in Washington
Published: 29 May 2006

Federal authorities are actively investigating dozens of American television stations for broadcasting items produced by the Bush administration and major corporations, and passing them off as normal news. Some of the fake news segments talked up success in the war in Iraq, or promoted the companies' products.

Investigators from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are seeking information about stations across the country after a report produced by a campaign group detailed the extraordinary extent of the use of such items.

The report, by the non-profit group Centre for Media and Democracy, found that over a 10-month period at least 77 television stations were making use of the faux news broadcasts, known as Video News Releases (VNRs). Not one told viewers who had produced the items.

"We know we only had partial access to these VNRs and yet we found 77 stations using them," said Diana Farsetta, one of the group's researchers. "I would say it's pretty extraordinary. The picture we found was much worse than we expected going into the investigation in terms of just how widely these get played and how frequently these pre-packaged segments are put on the air."

Ms Farsetta said the public relations companies commissioned to produce these segments by corporations had become increasingly sophisticated in their techniques in order to get the VNRs broadcast. "They have got very good at mimicking what a real, independently produced television report would look like," she said.

The FCC has declined to comment on the investigation but investigators from the commission's enforcement unit recently approached Ms Farsetta for a copy of her group's report.

The range of VNR is wide. Among items provided by the Bush administration to news stations was one in which an Iraqi-American in Kansas City was seen saying "Thank you Bush. Thank you USA" in response to the 2003 fall of Baghdad. The footage was actually produced by the State Department, one of 20 federal agencies that have produced and distributed such items.

Many of the corporate reports, produced by drugs manufacturers such as Pfizer, focus on health issues and promote the manufacturer's product. One example cited by the report was a Hallowe'en segment produced by the confectionery giant Mars, which featured Snickers, M&Ms and other company brands. While the original VNR disclosed that it was produced by Mars, such information was removed when it was broadcast by the television channel - in this case a Fox-owned station in St Louis, Missouri.

Bloomberg news service said that other companies that sponsored the promotions included General Motors, the world's largest car maker, and Intel, the biggest maker of semi-conductors. All of the companies said they included full disclosure of their involvement in the VNRs. "We in no way attempt to hide that we are providing the video," said Chuck Mulloy, a spokesman for Intel. "In fact, we bend over backward to make this disclosure."

The FCC was urged to act by a lobbying campaign organised by Free Press, another non-profit group that focuses on media policy. Spokesman Craig Aaron said more than 25,000 people had written to the FCC about the VNRs. "Essentially it's corporate advertising or propaganda masquerading as news," he said. "The public obviously expects their news reports are going to be based on real reporting and real information. If they are watching an advertisement for a company or a government policy, they need to be told."

The controversy over the use of VNRs by television stations first erupted last spring. At the time the FCC issued a public notice warning broadcasters that they were obliged to inform viewers if items were sponsored. The maximum fine for each violation is $32,500 (£17,500).

Federal authorities are actively investigating dozens of American television stations for broadcasting items produced by the Bush administration and major corporations, and passing them off as normal news. Some of the fake news segments talked up success in the war in Iraq, or promoted the companies' products.

Investigators from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) are seeking information about stations across the country after a report produced by a campaign group detailed the extraordinary extent of the use of such items.

The report, by the non-profit group Centre for Media and Democracy, found that over a 10-month period at least 77 television stations were making use of the faux news broadcasts, known as Video News Releases (VNRs). Not one told viewers who had produced the items.

"We know we only had partial access to these VNRs and yet we found 77 stations using them," said Diana Farsetta, one of the group's researchers. "I would say it's pretty extraordinary. The picture we found was much worse than we expected going into the investigation in terms of just how widely these get played and how frequently these pre-packaged segments are put on the air."

Ms Farsetta said the public relations companies commissioned to produce these segments by corporations had become increasingly sophisticated in their techniques in order to get the VNRs broadcast. "They have got very good at mimicking what a real, independently produced television report would look like," she said.

The FCC has declined to comment on the investigation but investigators from the commission's enforcement unit recently approached Ms Farsetta for a copy of her group's report.

The range of VNR is wide. Among items provided by the Bush administration to news stations was one in which an Iraqi-American in Kansas City was seen saying "Thank you Bush. Thank you USA" in response to the 2003 fall of Baghdad. The footage was actually produced by the State Department, one of 20 federal agencies that have produced and distributed such items.

Many of the corporate reports, produced by drugs manufacturers such as Pfizer, focus on health issues and promote the manufacturer's product. One example cited by the report was a Hallowe'en segment produced by the confectionery giant Mars, which featured Snickers, M&Ms and other company brands. While the original VNR disclosed that it was produced by Mars, such information was removed when it was broadcast by the television channel - in this case a Fox-owned station in St Louis, Missouri.

Bloomberg news service said that other companies that sponsored the promotions included General Motors, the world's largest car maker, and Intel, the biggest maker of semi-conductors. All of the companies said they included full disclosure of their involvement in the VNRs. "We in no way attempt to hide that we are providing the video," said Chuck Mulloy, a spokesman for Intel. "In fact, we bend over backward to make this disclosure."

The FCC was urged to act by a lobbying campaign organised by Free Press, another non-profit group that focuses on media policy. Spokesman Craig Aaron said more than 25,000 people had written to the FCC about the VNRs. "Essentially it's corporate advertising or propaganda masquerading as news," he said. "The public obviously expects their news reports are going to be based on real reporting and real information. If they are watching an advertisement for a company or a government policy, they need to be told."

The controversy over the use of VNRs by television stations first erupted last spring. At the time the FCC issued a public notice warning broadcasters that they were obliged to inform viewers if items were sponsored. The maximum fine for each violation is $32,500 (£17,500).
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
MaTT4281
Posts: 34894
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
5/29/2006  12:34 PM
850
MaTT4281
Posts: 34894
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
5/30/2006  6:22 AM
849
MaTT4281
Posts: 34894
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
5/31/2006  12:12 AM
848
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
5/31/2006  6:42 AM
^^^^ Silver, think of just how bad Bush's ratings woudl be if he WEREN'T manufacturing news stories on his own behalf!
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
5/31/2006  9:36 PM
Posted by Marv:

^^^^ Silver, think of just how bad Bush's ratings woudl be if he WEREN'T manufacturing news stories on his own behalf!
HAHAHA!!
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
MaTT4281
Posts: 34894
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
6/1/2006  5:28 AM
847
MaTT4281
Posts: 34894
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
6/1/2006  5:31 AM
Oh wow my brain must be screwed up with end of the year tests/essays/projects...atleast no one else noticed I jumped from 895 to 854.
Sadly....that makes today 887. My appologies.
Bush reelected :-(

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy