| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. oh It's Coming ES
|
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
knicks1248 wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. I'm making popcorn for the occasion. ¿ △ ?
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. STRAW MAN ARGUMENT!!! This is not the same situation. Why do you think people came up with the whole DadMelo thing? This team needs Melo to take on that kind of fatherly role. THIS AINT 2012-13!!! This really gets F'n ridiculous at a certain point. Melo was asked to play more Tean Oriented which actually would be easier for him and preserve his career but he's too F'n stubborn and selfish to stick to that approach. No matter what you guys say IT'S THE RIGHT THING TO DO! |
|
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/3/2014 Member: #5801 |
nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. Once a chucker.... I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
|
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. Nix, don't you worry, I'm going to make a separate thread comparing Melo's assist percentage to team wins throughout his career. Maybe the problem is someone trying to make Melo an initiator instead of a finisher. Last year was Melo's career high in assist percentage - did it correlate to a career high in wins? ¿ △ ?
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
meloshouldgo wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. Look I actually would love for Melo to be Olympic Melo or DadMelo cuz that is his best ball. Instead this year he's holding the ball too much on 58% of his touches. It's not with good purpose cuz he's not making plays for others. He's just freaking stopping the offense. At a certain point you have to acknowledge that your team's best players are not playing winning basketball. Melo and Rose both play a selfish style of ball and it has an impact. We finally could build a team full of players that buy into playing team ball and that is all we're asking. When we add better Frontline Talent that can play unselfish 2 way basketball then we'll see sustained winning. |
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
nixluva wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. You know what Olympic Melo's assist percentage was? It was pretty low, because he was playing with playmakers and was able to focus on what he does best - finishing. Phil has had three years - how many players would you say are worth keeping and buy into team ball? Are you counting Sasha? ¿ △ ?
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. You're oversimplifying the argument. No one is saying that Melo magically fixes everything that's wrong with the team if he buys in and moves the ball. We're saying that it's the RIGHT WAY TO PLAY and if he stuck to that a better culture could develop as the young players get used to that and everyone gets on the same page playing unselfish. You see you can't envision the long term effects cuz we've never seen it all the way through to it's conclusion. We now have a lot of young players and soon to be more. They need to be shown the right way to play and if you have a Star of the team that they look up to who is holding the ball too much then it sets the wrong example. You can save yourself the time and not create that thread cuz it's really not worth arguing over. You've lost sight of what really matters in all of this arguing. TEAM BALL. We don't give a FLIP about ISO Melo. We want to eventually become a Title Contender. You can live in the past of Melo former glory. We're moving on. |
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. Oh don't worry, I'm making it. And you've been arguing since you read that Phil Jackson quote that the reason we're not winning is Melo not moving the ball. You know what his second highest assist percentage year was? The Jeremt Lin year, when everyone wanted to run melo out of town for not passing enough. Maybe the issue is that Melo has been stuck playing in NY for dogmatic old men who would rather prove a point and lose, than win with what works best for their roster. You know another reason that the 2012-3 Knicks were good in spite of Melo's assist percentage? Because the rest of the roster wasn't a dumpster fire. Hey if Phil needs to trade Melo to learn how to make non dumpster fire rosters, so be it. I'll be sure to keep tabs on how he does. ¿ △ ?
|
|
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. Make that thread. Awesome research. Phil trading Melo is a pretty scary prospect. In addition to bad roster construction, lack of player/coach continuity, and bad contracts, Phil sucks at getting anything close to value in most trades. I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. We ALL watched the 54 win team. This is not about that unsustainable roster. The point isn't just Melo not passing but Rose also not passing and both being bad on D on top of that. Both are also not strong 4th qtr performers for this team. We lost 16 or more games of 5 or less points. Don't tell me this might not have been so bad if Melo and Rose in particular had bought in to TEAM BALL and gave max effort on D! Phil wasn't successful in turning this team around quickly but he also never completely sold out the future just to try win short term. Melo refused to buy in and so I think he should go and let this team move on and build a real TEAM. |
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
CrushAlot wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. That's not "awesome research"! That team no longer existed by the time Phil took over. What's the point of referring to it? Melo has a different role with the reduced talent than if he had great players around him. This is ALWAYS the case for great players in sports. Sure it's easy when you have a loaded team. Why does Melo get the big bucks??? It's not for when things are easy! In the end the truth of who Melo is came out. He knew from last year what was needed and demanded by Phil. He was told and his response was to be a selfish and stubborn player rather than to buy in and be unselfish. We don't need that from our Star player. |
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. Buy into what? Hornacek's system didn't put Melo at the point forward, that's why his assists were done. Noah didn't score at the percentage Rolo did, that's why Melo's assists were down. Rose held the ball longer than Calderon and wasn't available for kick out threes, that's why Melo's assists were down. Are you telling me you really don't see these things on the court? You really just see the mess this roster is and your honest best guess to figure it out is that Melo and Rose don't want to win badly enough? Do Melo and Rose seem particularly happy about this season? How does Melo and Rose's effort on defense have anything to do with the obvious structural issues this team has on D - as evidenced by how Boston picked the Knicks D apart last night? Btw, speaking of Boston, how did Rose and Melo march into Boston without KP in January and win concincingly? http://www.espn.com/nba/boxscore?gameId=400900051 Did they decide to buy in for one night? Maybe KP's defense is a bigger problem than you understand. And meanwhile, Shumpert and JR have been in the finals two years in a row, with a good shot to get there a third time. How was their play not sustainable? Maybe forcing them into the triangle wasn't sustainable. ¿ △ ?
|
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
nixluva wrote:CrushAlot wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. So if you were made president of a company, you'd go out and pay top dollar for a master programmer and try to turn him into your HR director? Smart bosses put their employees in positions to succeed. ¿ △ ?
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. There's a right way to play and a wrong way. No matter what you say it can't excuse Melo stopping the ball and not giving effort on D. It's not like Melo hasn't been told this the last 3 years. Melo still gets the same touches and shots but he's less of a Team Player this year. Why do you insist on bringing up KP as if he's on the same level as Melo and Rose in terms of where they are in their careers? By now Melo should have adjusted his mentality to being more of a leader and teacher. More of a facilitator who makes things easier for his younger teammates. Show them how it's done. Win or Lose everyone would praise Melo for doing that but that isn't what he did this year. |
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:CrushAlot wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned. You're analogy is off. Melo was at his best last year and should've continued along that path and improved on that approach to the game. It's actually the case that his "smart boss" was right and Melo should've looked to be more of a facilitator and saved some energy for defense. That's what he did last year and we needed more of that this year. Instead he's passing less and defending less. |
|
Uptown
Posts: 31375 Alba Posts: 3 Joined: 4/1/2008 Member: #1883 |
crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:holfresh wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:nixluva wrote:knicks1248 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:nixluva wrote:I appreciate Melo as a player and his loyalty to the Knicks. I wish things had worked out better with him here. I thought Melo had turned the corner last year when he was passing at the highest rate of his career. He did not continue in that growth and this is what led Phil to lash out. Let's not forget this key fact!!!It's funny because Melo is pretty much the same player he was when he came to the Knicks. He is an elite scorer. He has been called the toughest cover by his peers in the past. Now because Melo didn't change enough in year 14 of his career he is the bad guy? That just doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Fourteen years in Melo's faults probably aren't changing much. They weren't changing much twelve years in when Phil gave him the NTC and the huge trade kicker. During the broadcast yesterday MJax and JVG brought up coaching continuity, roster continuity and roster construction. There has been no continuity with the roster and there have been 4 coaches in Phil's 3 plus years. JVG also brought up that he thought roster construction was much better when Woodson was coaching. Grunwald knew Melo's strengths and weaknesses and built a team around them. Phil gave Melo a contract that can't be traded and now is mad because Melo is playing like he has for his entire tenure in the nba. But it's on Melo. If you dont know what type of player Melo is after 12 years you are a fool. If you make that huge commitment and then continue to cobble together rosters that don't compliment Melo and aren't competitive in today's nba you should be let go or reassigned.
|