Knickoftime wrote:mreinman wrote:Knickoftime wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Uhm, I'm not sure that you know what hypocrite is. I'm not saying one thing then believing another thing. I truly truly think these are all band-aid win now at any costs moves that are detrimental to the future of the franchise.
I believe you. What you ARE doing is criticizing fans for being receptive to moves like Rose and Noah and then complaining when someone if critical of you.
I already spoke my peace about the alternatives the last few months, while you were busy switching screen names.
No, you complained about that 6 months ago when it actually occurred.
Hard to when you avoid answering simple, fair, direct questions, like,
...or the one trying to question if there's an alternative and more sustainable way?
To what end?
WHY are you trying to do that?
if you are so fair and balanced how come you are not criticizing the other extreme/ists? Are they not criticizing other fans for not just sticking to the party line? Aren't there two extremes in play here? Seems like one who only sees one of them is either part of that faction or disingenuous.
You always had your TKF and on the other end, your/our Nixluva ... they are both extreme and not at all objective so either, they should cancel each other out or both be called out for their extreme view especially when constantly calling others out for not agreeing with their rosy or sh1tty take.
I guess the argument to that is its ok to be a blind lover but not to be a blind hater, I guess I get that to some extent ... never mind then ... just glad I can talk it out and now I feel better.
Good, relevant questions.
Yes, it does go both ways, and those people are not more objective than their opposite numbers, and yes, we aren't talking about being critical of the team (which is fine), we're talking about ONLY be critical of the team.
But here's the thing.
Sports is supposed to be recreational. It's supposed to be a pastime. It's supposed to be enjoyable. Its why Cubs fans exist (this year, noted).
But this fact has somehow gotten lost along the way. People have assigned virtue to being loyally miserable. And they can't explain it (I ask). All the can reply is "well, that's sports, that what you do", despite it really not making any sense.
It does make more sense to be optimistic, even overly so. It's sort of the point of it all. To ENJOY the experience.
You guys either consistently choose to be miserable with "loyalty" as your crutch or being miserable IS the fun part.
Either way, sort of f---ed.
Yes, being a homer is more logical, since sports is a pastime.
amateur sports are a pastime.
professional sports are not a pastime, nor are they merely business, nor merely entertainment or spectacle.
professional sports is about winning and winning is derived from both making war and from pre-agricultural hunting societies.
knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%