Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/23/2011 Member: #3538 |
![]() nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:TPercydidnt know that... although its the ACC and didnt Toney Douglas win it there? They obviously wanted N'dour that were just cheap. They even wanted to get him to backout of a verbal agreement with Dallas. I get that you have a hard time saying Phil made a mistake and that's cool. Also, N'dour showed potential on both sides of the ball while Atkins didn't show much when the man lights came on. However like I said before it's not about either or because Atkins could have been camp invite too. http://nypost.com/2015/07/28/why-knicks-last-ditch-effort-to-sign-maurice-ndour-fell-short/ |
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
![]() yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:TPercydidnt know that... although its the ACC and didnt Toney Douglas win it there? I agree that it's not necessarily an either or situation with Ndour and Atkins, since there will be plenty of spots in TC. IMO if they felt Ndour was a player they simply couldn't take a chance with losing then they would've locked him up with a more substantial initial offer. Even if they did make another offer late, I have to imagine that Phil and his staff had to know Ndour would get other offers after his SL showing. Dallas is a bit more aggressive at this point after all that happened to them. Atkins did show offensive potential at the PIT. I suppose that it's possible he wasn't put in the same position in SL that he was at the PIT. Who knows for sure. In any event we'll get a look at him down the line. Maybe we'll see Ndour again too. |
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
![]() nixluva wrote:I think they thought they had Ndour. Initially it sounded like he would go overseas and then come back to the Knicks. I don't think they anticipated Dallas's offer.yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:TPercydidnt know that... although its the ACC and didnt Toney Douglas win it there? I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
![]() yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:TPercydidnt know that... although its the ACC and didnt Toney Douglas win it there? I dont understand the concept of being cheap with minimum players? If a guy makes 600 or 800K W is the difference if you believe in his skills? The NY Knicks--NOT 1 time NOT ONCE never have given a 2nd round pick a 3 or 4 year deal. If Langston Galloway has a good year this year financially he could absorb our free agent money because the Knicks did not add minimum option years. Thats on Phil Jackson--he cant say at the end if the year well we did not anticipate--uh thats your job... Im sure theyll be happy if L Gallo plays well but if he plays well enough to command 5-7mm????!!?? RIP Crushalot😞
|
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/26/2005 Member: #858 Germany |
![]() BRIGGS wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:TPercydidnt know that... although its the ACC and didnt Toney Douglas win it there? Exactly, it all doesn't make much sense. What is the difference. Show some reward just like you did with the two vets who you overpaid for (Amundson and Thomas). Nixluva - Your name says it all! lol I realize, as we all do, from your posts, that Phil and the Knicks can do little wrong. I think a little bit more complaining would make some of your arguments sound a little more believable. You are nice to have on board, regardless. The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
|
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/23/2011 Member: #3538 |
![]() nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:TPercydidnt know that... although its the ACC and didnt Toney Douglas win it there? If that was the case they would not have tried to counter. The misjudge the situation tried to be cheap on and already cheap deal and it back fired. Also, regarding Atkins and his PIT showing, it can hardly be trusted because of how bad he was in college. SL, PIT, and the combine should be a validation of what you see on the film of a player in college. Yes, there will always be exceptions to the rule but more likely than not you get a Iman Shumpert on offense. N'dour is someone that can make your team.`He showed you that his college ability at a small school is affective against a higher level of competition. His stroke was pure with a high release and on op of his offense he gave you energy and defense. Atkins is a camp invite that will likely go overseas and develop some offense. |
martin
Posts: 76513 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() earthmansurfer wrote:BRIGGS wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:TPercydidnt know that... although its the ACC and didnt Toney Douglas win it there? My understanding from the article is that NDour got a full year guarantee for next year and a partial for the following... off of a couple of SL games? Not for nothing, but I think Phil made the prudent choice. Guys got to prove themselves for more than just a spattering of games that aren't even at the top level. Dallas was desperate and NDour right place, We should be happy that we aren't bidding against ourselves and just throwing around money like drunken sailors, right? Even if it is for vet mins. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/23/2011 Member: #3538 |
![]() martin wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:BRIGGS wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:TPercydidnt know that... although its the ACC and didnt Toney Douglas win it there? Lance Thomas and Lou Amundson signings goes against this. They actually count against the cap unlike N'dour. Also, it was not just a couple of SL games it was that he displayed the same traits he showed at a small school on the SL level. His talent transferred and showed that he belonged on this level and should be payed like a minimum player. |
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
![]() yellowboy90 wrote:martin wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:BRIGGS wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:TPercydidnt know that... although its the ACC and didnt Toney Douglas win it there? Yes but Phil and Fish know what LT and Lou can at the NBA level. It's more of a risk with a kid like Ndour who you really only saw for a few SL games. I mean we really can't compare the 2 situations. Actual NBA players vs. a kid you saw flash in a few SL games is not a good comparison. |
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/23/2011 Member: #3538 |
![]() nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:martin wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:BRIGGS wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:TPercydidnt know that... although its the ACC and didnt Toney Douglas win it there? Yes, We all know what LT and Lou can do at the NBA level, suck. The entire league knows they suck and are vet minimum type players but the knicks use cap space to pay those two good guys. However, when it comes to a player that might have actual potential to excel they get cheap on a contract where they only have to pay part of. That's silly and dumb. It's kind of like Vcoug said about the phil-files, "everything is a contradiction", you can't use the save money excuse when you can't point to two examples of not saving money. You can't say, they didn't want him, when they tried to get him to back out a verbal agreement on top of that they actively recruited him to their summer league because of his play in college. Whatever though, its over and done with. |
fishmike
Posts: 53867 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
![]() yellowboy90 wrote:that's a pretty narrow point of view. Do the Knicks have cheap guys with potential on the roster? What would you call Early, Ledo, Thanasis and Galloway if not cheap talent with potential? So how many guys like this do you need and want to have on your roster? You want to surround Melo/Lopez/Calderon/Afflalo/Quin and hell KP for that matter with guys who have ZERO NBA experience, ZERO professional experience and ZERO knowledge and understanding of the system your running? How does that make sense from a team building sense? How does that help Fisher instill this system and style of play he's trying to run? How does that help KP and Grant's development as cornerstone players?nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:martin wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:BRIGGS wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:TPercydidnt know that... although its the ACC and didnt Toney Douglas win it there? Should these be considered factors in the Lou and Lance signings? They are one 1 year deals what? Please... there is plenty of scrap heap upside talent on this roster and its pretty good. If Ledo had Russell's season last year he could be a lottery pick. Instead he's trying to make it as a pro. Thananis has great potential as an impact defensive player. Galloway is already a rotation guy and plays with great toughness. Im sorry Yellow... saying Lou and Lance are bad simply because better talent was out there (I agree it was) isn't considering the whole picture. I like the signings. Nothing impressive about them, but it speaks volumes about what they are trying to accomplish. Lou and Lance will play good fundamental ball, and that's bringing something legit when you have Melo and Lopez on both sides of you. These guys will work their butts off and challenge KP, Ledo, Early, Thanasis to be smarter players or lose minutes. Yea... in a vacuum... lame signings. Big picture... makes tons of sense. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/23/2011 Member: #3538 |
![]() fishmike wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:that's a pretty narrow point of view. Do the Knicks have cheap guys with potential on the roster? What would you call Early, Ledo, Thanasis and Galloway if not cheap talent with potential? So how many guys like this do you need and want to have on your roster? You want to surround Melo/Lopez/Calderon/Afflalo/Quin and hell KP for that matter with guys who have ZERO NBA experience, ZERO professional experience and ZERO knowledge and understanding of the system your running? How does that make sense from a team building sense? How does that help Fisher instill this system and style of play he's trying to run? How does that help KP and Grant's development as cornerstone players?nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:martin wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:BRIGGS wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:TPercydidnt know that... although its the ACC and didnt Toney Douglas win it there? Thanasis is not on the roster yet(doesn't need to be,imo) and Early and Ledo have not shown that much at all. Galloway is okay and he is the only one of the young guys you listed that showed two-way potential. Overall he had a poor offensive season but when you look at his history you can see he has potential as a shooter. Ndour also showed two way potential and has a history unlike the other guys mentioned Re Lance and Lou: you just described the definition of what the vet minimum should be used for. You want to sign bad unproductive players that fit your culture fine, sign them but don't use cap space. IF you do then I do not want to hear excuses about you being cost effective. |
Finestrg
Posts: 27296 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/1/2006 Member: #1069 |
![]() nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:martin wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:BRIGGS wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:nixluva wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:nixluva wrote:fishmike wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:TPercydidnt know that... although its the ACC and didnt Toney Douglas win it there? You honestly don't consider Maurice Ndour a higher-end talent and therefore more of a priority to keep over LT or Lou Amundson? Or Alexey Shved for that matter? This is where people seem to be split on this issue. A good-looking young player with a promising future beyond just this coming year vs. 2 fringe NBA hanger-ons...See for me, Lance and Lou's "experience" means very little, so little I don't even consider it an asset when talking about either player.. They're not good players, certainly not good enough to get the guaranteed, cap-impacting money they did, not when there were still more-talented, higher-priority players out there we should've been focused on adding/motivated to bring back. I still think we should be in the accumulation phase in terms of bringing in talent, definitely before overspending to bring back two players who offer so little....Not trying to be a dick by any means--just asking a legit basketball pound for pound talent comparison question, taking all available info into account--Ndour's very good college numbers across the board, his SL play, Alexey Shved's very good body of work as a primary player with the ball in his hands within the triangle system, etc.. |