Dagger wrote:F500ONE wrote:Splat wrote:Trying to determine what Phil is really thinking based on what he publicly states is hilarious. The guy is plenty smart in the game of perception. I see tons of affirmations in response to his comments as if one can take anything he says literally on face value. He has plenty of P.T. Barnum in him and many of you fall for his rap every time.For instance, whether he wanted to tank or not may not matter. He may embrace the tank now and you can be sure he will say the opposite.
Preserving our future is meaningless GM talk. He'd almost surely trade just about anyone on this roster if the right deal came up.
In F5's quotes above, Phil said nothing that is out of the ordinary. The only thing I think you can derive from it is he has used the public platform to send a message to the players more than once, i.e. get on board or get lost. But he will not call out names and devalue assets just yet.
The only thing Phil can be judged on is what team he assembles. His words are pretty much meaningless at this point.
Very vague in surmising what he'd do as this would apply
To any GM in a position of weakness but let's take what he said
And start plugging in scenarios
Would Phil trade Bargnani for Ersan Illyasova{probably not]
Although Ersan>Bargs by a wide margin
Would Phil trade Smith for Avery Bradley[probably not]
Although Bradley>J.R. by a decent margin
Would Phil trade Amare for Ryan Anderson[probably not]
Although Ryan>Amar'e by a wide margin
Would Phil trade Jose and Larkin for Mo Williams and Kevin Martin[probably not]
Although Mo and K-Mart>Calderon and Crack Baby by a wide margin
Saying "right deal" is ambiguous but I think I get the
Oil that sits beneath the water point
What a nonsense post...
First you make up your own trade scenarios, then you assume Phil's role and turn down those hypothetical trade situations you yourself created (as if you have any idea what Phil would do), then you go on to criticize "Phil" for turning down those imaginary trade situations that you've created and rejected yourself while pretending to be Phil.
Thoughtless drivel
It's not thoughtless drivel
I painted scenarios of trading for players
Who'd probably make us better short term dump siting the deadweight
But compromise our long term flexibility somewhat
They were exactly that, a hypothetical of what Phil may be alluding to in terms of compromising
I was more so return serving Splat's response in that Phil didn't offer a lot to the public
Touching on trades///// to do or not to do
So back to the point, making a trade that makes sense for us
That's what GMs should always be working towards
But Phil may sit on his hands out of fear of taking a chance on a player like Waiters
Or maybe a player like Lance or say O.J. Mayo
Which to be honest outside of landing a Max Cat or near Max Cat player this summer
We're not gonna find better calibers on the market