nixluva wrote:You guys are really too much. It's Ok tho. keep up the faith. Stay Negative Nancy Doubters to the end. No amount of evidence will convince you that you're wrong, so go on in your ignorance. Wallow in it like pigs in mud. Bury your heads in the sand on this issue if you like. It won't change reality. No one is saying Jose is the best PG in the NBA. He's clearly got flaws. His poor D, he's not very athletic and won't attack the hoop like more athletic PG's. He is however, better than Felton and that's a good thing for this team.
Point guard in the NBA has the lowest positional value in the modern era. The core of available talent in the NBA is completely height dependent. It's why there are so few superstar players and so few players who can make such a massive impact on a team from season to season. How many people in the world period are tall enough to play in the NBA? Average height in an American male is about 5'8 to 5'9. Men who are 6 feet tall and over are about 9-10 percent of the total adult male population. People who are 6'5 and over are like in the 1 percent range.
Do you know how hard it is to find people who are 6'8 and over? How many people in the world are 7 feet tall? How many of those are male. How many of those have the coordination and athleticism to play NBA level basketball?
The absolute hardest thing to find in the NBA is an elite two way center. Someone who can be a 7 foot pivot who can defend the rim, show good fundamentals and footwork and offer some offensive upside. This is absolutely rare. It's like finding a unicorn. It's why even mediocre big men in the NBA can rack up 10-12 million dollar a year contracts.
The 2nd hardest thing to find are elite wing players. Athletic guys in the 6'6 to 6'9 range who can provide length, defense, shooting and able to penetrate and finish at the rim. Not quite unicorns, but the odds of finding one are about the same odds are you getting a blowjob from Jessica Alba tomorrow night. They are rare and well paid and the market reflects this. Avery Bradley got paid. Gordon Hayward got paid. And they aren't even top tier players.
The most available type of player in the NBA, much more plentiful are power forwards and point guards. Given the influx of Euro talent, there is more of a glut of the 6'10 big man who can shoot long range and stretch the floor. Often they aren't asked to defend the rim, but open driving lanes for wings and become fall back shooting options, especially for the three ball. Point guards are a dime a dozen. It's just easier to find 6'2 to 6'4 guys in the total population. You can find a serviceable point guard all around the draft. Just because the Knicks have had so many problems finding a good point guard doesn't mean that's true for the rest of the league. The 76ers didn't blink to trade Jrue Holiday. The Mavs didn't hesitate to move Calderon to get a legit rim protector. The Rockets cycled through Aaron Brooks, Goran Dragic, Kyle Lowery and Jeremy Lin.
Look at the remaining restricted FAs on the market now. Bledsoe, a point guard with injury concerns who wants more money than the market will bear. And Greg Monroe, really a power forward, who can't defend the rim and doesn't have the long range shooting to space the floor.
Is Calderon a better player than Felton? Absolutely. But we are comparing a player against possibly the worst starting point guard in the entire NBA. There are teams whose reserve point guards were better than Felton.
Is Calderon the best long term fit for the Knicks winning a ring? No. He's a great shooter, but there's a reason he's been traded so many times the past few years. He can't play defense, and the Knicks need defense more than they need another scorer.
Along with Melo, Calderon makes the Knicks good enough to grab a back end playoff spot maybe in the East, but not allow them to be bad enough to get a top end lottery pick to get real help. The Knicks are dangerously set up to be a "treadmill team" Winning just enough to squeak into the playoffs, never strong enough to contend, never bad enough to rearm with the best prospects in the draft. The Knicks will have to hope to attract a top level free agent in a year and/or hope they can hit gold with middle of the pack picks in the NBA draft, when they are able to have their picks again. As I mentioned before, how likely does open cap space work to really help most teams who carve out lots of space? It doesn't really work out for most teams. While rookies are great cost controlled labor, picks in the middle and back end of the first round become problematic. They are guaranteed money for guys not assured of even being rotational contributors.
Calderon is a useful player, he is not however going to be a massive difference maker. If he was, the Mavs wouldn't have traded him. He wouldn't have been available before that. Of course he looks awesome compared to Felton. That's like saying a muffin top nagging chick who works as a truck stop waitress is a better catch than the homeless toothless non bathing girl you were banging before. ( Yes in that case, Felton is the homeless toothless girl )
The Knicks have a shoot first scoring power forward who doesn't really care about defense and is generally in poor condition, despite his All Star status and a gunner point guard who can't defend and is losing his ability to break down a defense and finish around the rim.
Blaming Felton and Woodson doesn't change the fact that to contend, the Knicks need a rim protecting center and a couple of athletic defensive oriented wings with length who work as Dobermans on the perimeter.
What's the reality? That anyone and anything is better than banging a toothless homeless girl?
I'm happy the Knicks are moving in a positive direction ( I think Early was a good pick. I think Older Brother Antelope was another good acquisition. I'm happy to see the team not bleeding draft picks and throwing them away like in the past) But it's time to see some "reality" outside of the homer lenses. Blaming Felton and Woodson don't fix the core issues the Knicks have. That will take time.