[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

What's this?? Carmelo Reconsidering Bulls As Option
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 5 of 8 « First‹ Previous 3  4  5  6  7 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
7/11/2014  3:22 PM
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.

why would he need leverage with the knicks?

i mean he is not in a position to get max money.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
AUTOADVERT
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
7/11/2014  3:23 PM
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.

why would he need leverage with the knicks?

i mean he is not in a position to get max money.

huh? its already on the table.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
7/11/2014  3:25 PM
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.

why would he need leverage with the knicks?

i mean he is not in a position to get max money.

huh? its already on the table.

are you sure?

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
7/11/2014  3:26 PM
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.

why would he need leverage with the knicks?

i mean he is not in a position to get max money.

huh? its already on the table.

are you sure?

I am not sure about anything, who is.

I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Clean
Posts: 30335
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/22/2004
Member: #743
7/11/2014  3:38 PM
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.

why would he need leverage with the knicks?

i mean he is not in a position to get max money.

huh? its already on the table.

are you sure?

I am not sure about anything, who is.

I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.

I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
7/11/2014  3:38 PM
I hope he doesnt "steve kerr" us
ES
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451
7/11/2014  3:39 PM
knicks1248 wrote:I hope he doesnt "steve kerr" us
as long as we get back some nice assets from Chicago i dont give a damn lol
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
7/11/2014  3:40 PM
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.

why would he need leverage with the knicks?

i mean he is not in a position to get max money.

huh? its already on the table.

are you sure?

I am not sure about anything, who is.

I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.

I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.

The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
Nalod
Posts: 71356
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/11/2014  3:41 PM
Mirotic is not a bull and would have to agree to sign with NY.

I think some of you are hoping for more in return from Melo.
Whats scarey is Rockets can take Melo. I know we read Bosh has been offered it, but things can happen. Not saying it will, saying it could.
Media portraying Melo as taking money if he goes with knicks has to be playing with his head.
Clean
Posts: 30335
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/22/2004
Member: #743
7/11/2014  3:42 PM
mreinman wrote:
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.

why would he need leverage with the knicks?

i mean he is not in a position to get max money.

huh? its already on the table.

are you sure?

I am not sure about anything, who is.

I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.

I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.

The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.

Is that 75 mil with them trading Taj? or is that without? So many Cap numbers have been thrown around that they are all a blur to me right now.
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
7/11/2014  3:42 PM
Nalod wrote:Mirotic is not a bull and would have to agree to sign with NY.

I think some of you are hoping for more in return from Melo.
Whats scarey is Rockets can take Melo. I know we read Bosh has been offered it, but things can happen. Not saying it will, saying it could.
Media portraying Melo as taking money if he goes with knicks has to be playing with his head.

the rockets still scare the sh1t out of me. that sneak.

I cannot wait for Bosh to actually sign.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
7/11/2014  3:43 PM
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.

why would he need leverage with the knicks?

i mean he is not in a position to get max money.

huh? its already on the table.

are you sure?

I am not sure about anything, who is.

I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.

I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.

The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.

Is that 75 mil with them trading Taj? or is that without? So many Cap numbers have been thrown around that they are all a blur to me right now.

I think without though they can't really contend without him.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451
7/11/2014  3:43 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/11/2014  3:44 PM
Nalod wrote:Mirotic is not a bull and would have to agree to sign with NY.

I think some of you are hoping for more in return from Melo.
Whats scarey is Rockets can take Melo. I know we read Bosh has been offered it, but things can happen. Not saying it will, saying it could.
Media portraying Melo as taking money if he goes with knicks has to be playing with his head.

Cant make Melo the victim. I mean he wanted this whole free agent tour and he was the one who said publicly he would take less.
Clean
Posts: 30335
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/22/2004
Member: #743
7/11/2014  3:46 PM
mreinman wrote:
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.

why would he need leverage with the knicks?

i mean he is not in a position to get max money.

huh? its already on the table.

are you sure?

I am not sure about anything, who is.

I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.

I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.

The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.

Is that 75 mil with them trading Taj? or is that without? So many Cap numbers have been thrown around that they are all a blur to me right now.

I think without though they can't really contend without him.

that never stopped melo from getting his money before.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
7/11/2014  3:54 PM
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.

why would he need leverage with the knicks?

i mean he is not in a position to get max money.

huh? its already on the table.

are you sure?

I am not sure about anything, who is.

I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.

I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.

The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.

Is that 75 mil with them trading Taj? or is that without? So many Cap numbers have been thrown around that they are all a blur to me right now.

I think without though they can't really contend without him.

that never stopped melo from getting his money before.

And thats exactly why he won't sign there.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451
7/11/2014  3:55 PM
mreinman wrote:
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.

why would he need leverage with the knicks?

i mean he is not in a position to get max money.

huh? its already on the table.

are you sure?

I am not sure about anything, who is.

I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.

I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.

The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.

Is that 75 mil with them trading Taj? or is that without? So many Cap numbers have been thrown around that they are all a blur to me right now.

I think without though they can't really contend without him.

that never stopped melo from getting his money before.

And thats exactly why he won't sign there.

I think it will prove melo just wants the money which most knew anyway
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
7/11/2014  3:55 PM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:I hope he doesnt "steve kerr" us
as long as we get back some nice assets from Chicago i dont give a damn lol


they can't get melo unless a sign and trade, phil is not even entertaining the idea, melo doesnt want chicago to gut its team to sign him

ES
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189
7/11/2014  3:56 PM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
Clean wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:
mreinman wrote:
dk7th wrote:if carmelo anthony had any leverage with the knicks it's all but evaporated now.

why would he need leverage with the knicks?

i mean he is not in a position to get max money.

huh? its already on the table.

are you sure?

I am not sure about anything, who is.

I hope that I am wrong though since it would make me sad.

I think max is on the table. If Melo is going to take a lesser amount of money why would he do it in NY rather than the Bulls. I would love for him to take less money and stay but that is unrealistic. The only thing keeping us in the conversation with the bulls is money. If we take that away I think it is obvious that the choice is easily to go to the Bulls.

The bulls can only offer about 75 million. If the knicks give him 90-100 then everybody wins.

Is that 75 mil with them trading Taj? or is that without? So many Cap numbers have been thrown around that they are all a blur to me right now.

I think without though they can't really contend without him.

that never stopped melo from getting his money before.

And thats exactly why he won't sign there.

I think it will prove melo just wants the money which most knew anyway

"just wants"??

I think he wants to eat and be healthy and be liked and win and ... all the other stuff that people want

so here is what phil is thinking ....
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451
7/11/2014  3:56 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/11/2014  3:56 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:I hope he doesnt "steve kerr" us
as long as we get back some nice assets from Chicago i dont give a damn lol


they can't get melo unless a sign and trade, phil is not even entertaining the idea, melo doesnt want chicago to gut its team to sign him

Phil never said that. He said he didnt want Boozer
fitzfarm
Posts: 25165
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/28/2010
Member: #3285
7/11/2014  3:57 PM
Nalod wrote:Mirotic is not a bull and would have to agree to sign with NY.

I think some of you are hoping for more in return from Melo.
Whats scarey is Rockets can take Melo. I know we read Bosh has been offered it, but things can happen. Not saying it will, saying it could.
Media portraying Melo as taking money if he goes with knicks has to be playing with his head.

They can trade the euros rights . I'm sure he'd love NYC and we are not asking to much for melo... Euro,mcd,boozer and 2 first ... The Knicks are in the drivers seat if melo chooses chitown
Page 5 of 8 « First‹ Previous 3  4  5  6  7 Next ›Last »
« Reply To Topic
What's this?? Carmelo Reconsidering Bulls As Option
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy